Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![AlynOnBitcoin Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1686143409579339782.png) THE BITCOIN KING| $PEPE [@AlynOnBitcoin](/creator/twitter/AlynOnBitcoin) on x 5374 followers
Created: 2025-07-16 08:35:08 UTC

🚨Why Is This Conversation Avoided ⁉️

Binance’s Silence on DOG  What Aren’t We Seeing?

@binance went ahead and listed $ORDI and $SATS without hesitation.
But when it comes to Rune tokens like $DOG… nothing. Not a word.

Could it be they’re seeing things we don’t?
Are there warning signs the public is ignoring?
Or is Binance simply steering clear of something that doesn’t quite add up?

Some even wonder if Binance already made their choice on Bitcoin protocols 
👉 Maybe $ORDI and BRC‑20 have already proven themselves as the “clear winner” in their eyes…

👉 Maybe they see BRC‑20 as the stronger, safer path on Bitcoin compared to Runes.

Meanwhile, parts of the DOG community pushed by @LeonidasNFT  have gone as far as accusing @binance of only listing tokens they can  manipulate!
That’s not a small claim.

⚠️ Did @binance ever think about listing $DOG… and then back away after watching the tone and hostility from the community itself?

The silence isn’t just awkward,  it feels deliberate.

For holders, it’s frustrating.
For scepticss, it’s confirmation.
For everyone else, it’s a big unanswered question that nobody seems willing to dig into.

💬 What do YOU think?
Share your honest opinion in the comments 
Is Binance protecting itself from something shady…
or have they already placed their bet on BRC‑20 as the future?

#BINANCE #DOG #BRC20

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gv90oaoXUAA5p5t.jpg)

XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1945401803799191615/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[sats](/topic/sats)
[$dog](/topic/$dog)
[binance](/topic/binance)
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin)
[coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1)
[coins bitcoin ecosystem](/topic/coins-bitcoin-ecosystem)
[coins pow](/topic/coins-pow)
[$pepe](/topic/$pepe)

[Post Link](https://x.com/AlynOnBitcoin/status/1945401803799191615)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

AlynOnBitcoin Avatar THE BITCOIN KING| $PEPE @AlynOnBitcoin on x 5374 followers Created: 2025-07-16 08:35:08 UTC

🚨Why Is This Conversation Avoided ⁉️

Binance’s Silence on DOG What Aren’t We Seeing?

@binance went ahead and listed $ORDI and $SATS without hesitation. But when it comes to Rune tokens like $DOG… nothing. Not a word.

Could it be they’re seeing things we don’t? Are there warning signs the public is ignoring? Or is Binance simply steering clear of something that doesn’t quite add up?

Some even wonder if Binance already made their choice on Bitcoin protocols 👉 Maybe $ORDI and BRC‑20 have already proven themselves as the “clear winner” in their eyes…

👉 Maybe they see BRC‑20 as the stronger, safer path on Bitcoin compared to Runes.

Meanwhile, parts of the DOG community pushed by @LeonidasNFT have gone as far as accusing @binance of only listing tokens they can manipulate! That’s not a small claim.

⚠️ Did @binance ever think about listing $DOG… and then back away after watching the tone and hostility from the community itself?

The silence isn’t just awkward, it feels deliberate.

For holders, it’s frustrating. For scepticss, it’s confirmation. For everyone else, it’s a big unanswered question that nobody seems willing to dig into.

💬 What do YOU think? Share your honest opinion in the comments Is Binance protecting itself from something shady… or have they already placed their bet on BRC‑20 as the future?

#BINANCE #DOG #BRC20

XXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics sats $dog binance bitcoin coins layer 1 coins bitcoin ecosystem coins pow $pepe

Post Link

post/tweet::1945401803799191615
/post/tweet::1945401803799191615