[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  fallingknife [@gofallingknife](/creator/twitter/gofallingknife) on x XXX followers Created: 2025-07-15 13:26:06 UTC $UNH holders that get to month end will have diamond hands. This week it’s Bill Ackman recycling 2011 news. Last week it was WSJ. Who knows, maybe next week it will be the Guardian again? When I first saw the post from Dr. Potter and Bill Ackman in February 2025, I instantly sided with them for courageously exposing a wrongdoing by the insurance company. I thought they created a public spotlight for the right reasons. I still do today. After reading the entire X page defamation letter provided by United Health’s (“UNH”) legal counsel, important evidence provided there remain unresolved and outstanding without proof. The letter is so detailed I believe UNH has a recording of the entire call. All their evidence and statements are clearly sourced and footnoted. UNH was prepared for the potential scenario this letter was shared to the public. UNH claims to of NEVER asked or expected Dr. Potter to leave mid surgery to take a call with their phone rep. Their rep asked to leave a message to call him back when convenient. (It’s juicy, I attached an image with green highlighted area) First, if Bill Ackman had simply provided proof to everyone, the discussion would be settled and their version of the story becomes cemented reality. But no proof was provided, only Ackman’s personal opinion of who is more truthful based on evidence not shared with the public. This doesn’t make sense, practically. Why would anyone ask a surgeon to leave mid surgery for a claims processing error phone call? The answer is probably it never happened and/or somebody at her office misunderstood the phone rep. Generally it’s a very human thing not to demand a call mid surgery with the surgeon. I don’t think anyone agrees some rep was crazy enough to demand this. An actual recording of the call probably exists at UNH since all claims calls are recorded as standard industry practice. I guess the recording will emerge if it ever goes to court. According to UNH their phone rep was actually transferred multiple times to different departments. He didn’t call the surgery room himself. We’ve all been on hold and then transferred endlessly into oblivion by a hospital before. Let’s be realistic here, he likely called the number on file. Dr. Potter to this day still hasn’t explained to the public her response to the evidence provided in the UNH defamation letter. Or attempted to deny its accuracy. Understandably, there may be legal reasons why she hasn’t addressed it. She was requesting an overnight stay to be approved for a patient in surgery. Which she attempted to charge an additional $110,000+ gross billings for the extra night stay. If insurance approves this they would negotiate this amount down some and pay it. According to Ackman if insurance denies coverage the cancer patient it could be “wiped out financially” and on the hook for the entire face value of the extra overnight stay of $XXXXXXX. What Ackman doesn’t mention is who would wipe them out? Yup—Dr. Potter’s one year old business would wipe out the cancer patient financially, not the insurance company. The same cancer patient she left mid surgery to “advocate” for coverage. Yes—they attempted to bill that patient an additional $110,000+ for an overnight stay (in addition to the original outpatient surgical revenue billing). I was surprised to see the financial health of Dr. Potter’s business not included in any narrative or analysis by Ackman. Which is not only relevant but should be considered for an unbiased and truth seeking assessment. This is material because it’s the psychology behind the circumstance of her actions leading to the post. This is also public information pieced together from Dr. Potter’s other posts on social: Her new business was struggling to keep up with expenses. As all entrepreneurs in this situation understand, cashflow is the lifeblood and the lack of it means death. (Continues in thread)  XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [doj](/topic/doj) [insurance](/topic/insurance) [wsj](/topic/wsj) [holders](/topic/holders) [$unh](/topic/$unh) [stocks healthcare](/topic/stocks-healthcare) [Post Link](https://x.com/gofallingknife/status/1945112641069867324)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
fallingknife @gofallingknife on x XXX followers
Created: 2025-07-15 13:26:06 UTC
$UNH holders that get to month end will have diamond hands. This week it’s Bill Ackman recycling 2011 news. Last week it was WSJ. Who knows, maybe next week it will be the Guardian again?
When I first saw the post from Dr. Potter and Bill Ackman in February 2025, I instantly sided with them for courageously exposing a wrongdoing by the insurance company. I thought they created a public spotlight for the right reasons. I still do today.
After reading the entire X page defamation letter provided by United Health’s (“UNH”) legal counsel, important evidence provided there remain unresolved and outstanding without proof. The letter is so detailed I believe UNH has a recording of the entire call. All their evidence and statements are clearly sourced and footnoted. UNH was prepared for the potential scenario this letter was shared to the public.
UNH claims to of NEVER asked or expected Dr. Potter to leave mid surgery to take a call with their phone rep. Their rep asked to leave a message to call him back when convenient.
(It’s juicy, I attached an image with green highlighted area)
First, if Bill Ackman had simply provided proof to everyone, the discussion would be settled and their version of the story becomes cemented reality. But no proof was provided, only Ackman’s personal opinion of who is more truthful based on evidence not shared with the public.
This doesn’t make sense, practically.
Why would anyone ask a surgeon to leave mid surgery for a claims processing error phone call? The answer is probably it never happened and/or somebody at her office misunderstood the phone rep.
Generally it’s a very human thing not to demand a call mid surgery with the surgeon. I don’t think anyone agrees some rep was crazy enough to demand this.
An actual recording of the call probably exists at UNH since all claims calls are recorded as standard industry practice. I guess the recording will emerge if it ever goes to court.
According to UNH their phone rep was actually transferred multiple times to different departments. He didn’t call the surgery room himself. We’ve all been on hold and then transferred endlessly into oblivion by a hospital before. Let’s be realistic here, he likely called the number on file.
Dr. Potter to this day still hasn’t explained to the public her response to the evidence provided in the UNH defamation letter. Or attempted to deny its accuracy. Understandably, there may be legal reasons why she hasn’t addressed it.
She was requesting an overnight stay to be approved for a patient in surgery. Which she attempted to charge an additional $110,000+ gross billings for the extra night stay. If insurance approves this they would negotiate this amount down some and pay it. According to Ackman if insurance denies coverage the cancer patient it could be “wiped out financially” and on the hook for the entire face value of the extra overnight stay of $XXXXXXX.
What Ackman doesn’t mention is who would wipe them out? Yup—Dr. Potter’s one year old business would wipe out the cancer patient financially, not the insurance company. The same cancer patient she left mid surgery to “advocate” for coverage. Yes—they attempted to bill that patient an additional $110,000+ for an overnight stay (in addition to the original outpatient surgical revenue billing).
I was surprised to see the financial health of Dr. Potter’s business not included in any narrative or analysis by Ackman. Which is not only relevant but should be considered for an unbiased and truth seeking assessment. This is material because it’s the psychology behind the circumstance of her actions leading to the post.
This is also public information pieced together from Dr. Potter’s other posts on social:
Her new business was struggling to keep up with expenses. As all entrepreneurs in this situation understand, cashflow is the lifeblood and the lack of it means death.
(Continues in thread)
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics doj insurance wsj holders $unh stocks healthcare