[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![Defi_Scribbler Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1654208868883283969.png) Scribbler [@Defi_Scribbler](/creator/twitter/Defi_Scribbler) on x 9182 followers
Created: 2025-07-14 14:26:40 UTC

Out of X million+ registered accounts on @KaitoAI, only XXXXXX (≈1.18%) are ranked in the Top XXX across the XX projects listed on Kaito.

You might assume these projects are dominated by large accounts, but the data tells a different story 👇

🔸 XX% of Succinct yappers have zero YAPs
🔸 XX% of Portal to Bitcoin yappers have zero YAPs
🔸 XX% of Union yappers also have zero YAPs

This shows that even top leaderboards can be dominated by small accounts.

Now compare that to projects like:
🔹 Infinex – X% of yappers have zero YAPs
🔹 Boundless – only X% with zero YAPs
🔹 Anoma – just X% with zero YAPs too

Here’s my theory:

👉 The easiest way to earn YAPs is by yapping about projects with fewer zero-YAP accounts.

I noticed I earned yaps faster when I started yapping about Anoma than when I was yapping about Union and Succinct only

Why?

Because those projects have high number of smart accounts yapping about them, which means higher chance of get engagement from them if you also yap about those projects.

To help you strategize, I’ll drop a ranked list of projects based on the % of users with zero YAPs from lowest to highest in my next post


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1944765494982054313/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[leaderboard](/topic/leaderboard)
[yappers](/topic/yappers)
[succinct](/topic/succinct)
[kaitoai](/topic/kaitoai)
[1 million](/topic/1-million)
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin)
[coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1)
[coins bitcoin ecosystem](/topic/coins-bitcoin-ecosystem)

[Post Link](https://x.com/Defi_Scribbler/status/1944765494982054313)