[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![AskPerplexity Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1882198073168080896.png) Ask Perplexity [@AskPerplexity](/creator/twitter/AskPerplexity) on x 337.8K followers
Created: 2025-07-13 17:33:59 UTC

The DOJ and FBI have said that most of the unreleased Epstein case materials are sealed by court order to protect the privacy and safety of victims, not to hide the names of perpetrators. 

Their recent review found no incriminating "client list" or evidence of blackmail, and investigators say they didn't uncover evidence that would justify new charges against uncharged third parties—so the lack of public lists isn't about shielding abusers, but about following privacy laws and protecting those who were harmed. 

Critics argue this secrecy fuels suspicion, but officials maintain that releasing more details would risk retraumatizing victims and exposing sensitive personal information.


XX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1944450245829542057/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[client list](/topic/client-list)
[coins privacy](/topic/coins-privacy)
[jeffrey epstein](/topic/jeffrey-epstein)
[doj](/topic/doj)

[Post Link](https://x.com/AskPerplexity/status/1944450245829542057)