[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  ThatDeFiRaph [@_jasmine_9ja](/creator/twitter/_jasmine_9ja) on x 5453 followers Created: 2025-07-13 08:58:51 UTC I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about what scalable, aligned infrastructure looks like onchain. Most projects build tools. Union is building leverage. Not just financial leverage, but protocol leverage, the kind that lets other apps scale faster, coordinate better, and stay trustless at the core. When I first explored @union_build , what stood out wasn’t just the technical vision but the clarity behind the coordination layer. Union isn’t reinventing the wheel. It’s making it easier for protocols to roll forward with purpose. With the rise of restaked systems and modular architectures, coordination becomes a bottleneck. Union solves that by giving builders access to reusable identity, role-based gating, and shared logic — all natively onchain. What makes this special is how deeply Union understands its users. I’ve seen firsthand how fragmented it can feel to integrate complex permissions or delegate power without compromising decentralization. Union turns that pain point into programmable composability. Want to build a multisig that responds to zkp-based voting logic? Want to build a vault where access depends on proof-of-Y participation? Union makes that possible without you needing a security audit team or a backend rewrite. This feels personal to me because I’ve tried to build in those fragmented conditions. When coordination is fragile, everything else slows down. Union gives that missing connective tissue to teams that want to move fast without breaking trust. Union also aligns with something I care about deeply — shared upside. The protocol doesn’t just enable functionality, it encourages contribution. Whether you’re integrating, extending, or even building community tools around it, you’re part of the same mission. That’s rare. For builders navigating the zk landscape or building appchains, I believe Union offers the kind of flexibility and rigor we all need. It’s not loud or flashy. It’s infrastructure that speaks through what it enables. I’m watching closely how zkgm evolves and how Union unlocks its next wave of use cases. Because the more tools that can plug into Union, the more we move from isolated silos to interoperable, powerful onchain systems. This is the kind of foundation I want to build with. zkgm  XXX engagements  **Related Topics** [faster](/topic/faster) [protocol](/topic/protocol) [financial leverage](/topic/financial-leverage) [onchain](/topic/onchain) [Post Link](https://x.com/_jasmine_9ja/status/1944320608973565976)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
ThatDeFiRaph @_jasmine_9ja on x 5453 followers
Created: 2025-07-13 08:58:51 UTC
I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about what scalable, aligned infrastructure looks like onchain. Most projects build tools. Union is building leverage. Not just financial leverage, but protocol leverage, the kind that lets other apps scale faster, coordinate better, and stay trustless at the core.
When I first explored @union_build , what stood out wasn’t just the technical vision but the clarity behind the coordination layer. Union isn’t reinventing the wheel. It’s making it easier for protocols to roll forward with purpose. With the rise of restaked systems and modular architectures, coordination becomes a bottleneck. Union solves that by giving builders access to reusable identity, role-based gating, and shared logic — all natively onchain.
What makes this special is how deeply Union understands its users. I’ve seen firsthand how fragmented it can feel to integrate complex permissions or delegate power without compromising decentralization. Union turns that pain point into programmable composability. Want to build a multisig that responds to zkp-based voting logic? Want to build a vault where access depends on proof-of-Y participation? Union makes that possible without you needing a security audit team or a backend rewrite.
This feels personal to me because I’ve tried to build in those fragmented conditions. When coordination is fragile, everything else slows down. Union gives that missing connective tissue to teams that want to move fast without breaking trust.
Union also aligns with something I care about deeply — shared upside. The protocol doesn’t just enable functionality, it encourages contribution. Whether you’re integrating, extending, or even building community tools around it, you’re part of the same mission. That’s rare.
For builders navigating the zk landscape or building appchains, I believe Union offers the kind of flexibility and rigor we all need. It’s not loud or flashy. It’s infrastructure that speaks through what it enables.
I’m watching closely how zkgm evolves and how Union unlocks its next wave of use cases. Because the more tools that can plug into Union, the more we move from isolated silos to interoperable, powerful onchain systems.
This is the kind of foundation I want to build with. zkgm
XXX engagements
Related Topics faster protocol financial leverage onchain