[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![BhavikaKapoor5 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1028963647836618752.png) Bhavika Kapoor [@BhavikaKapoor5](/creator/twitter/BhavikaKapoor5) on x 99.2K followers
Created: 2025-07-13 06:46:10 UTC

We attacked Pakistan without providing any evidence of its involvement in the Pahalgam terrorist incident.

As a result, we suffered a significant loss of diplomatic support on the international front.

Globally, India was seen as the aggressor, while Pakistan played the victim card and gained support from major countries such as the USA, the UK, Russia, China, Turkey, EU countries and others.

My questions remain unanswered — what exactly did we achieve by attacking Pakistan?

• Have we destroyed all XX identified terror camps? No.

• Are we certain Pakistan will now stop cross-border terrorism? No.

• Have we apprehended the terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack? No.

• Have we presented any concrete proof linking Pakistan to the Pahalgam attack? No.

Then why did we attack Pakistan?

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gvt-7DcXgAARyFY.jpg)

XXXXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1944287219880992904/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[turkey](/topic/turkey)
[china](/topic/china)
[russia](/topic/russia)
[united states](/topic/united-states)
[countries](/topic/countries)
[india](/topic/india)
[pahalgam](/topic/pahalgam)
[pakistan](/topic/pakistan)

[Post Link](https://x.com/BhavikaKapoor5/status/1944287219880992904)