[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  JunkSavvy [@JunkSavvy](/creator/twitter/JunkSavvy) on x 7794 followers Created: 2025-07-13 04:00:55 UTC BONUS: “Because that’s fictitious. You have the share count. If there is any naked short selling, the people should be charged. In the unlikely event that there was some minimal amount, it probably wouldn’t change your situation.” A) You know we are not asking for the issued shares of NBH. We are asking for an aggregated share count from all brokers holding long obligations in NBH. You look like the kind of ASS Gensler did when he tried the same thing in front of the Senate Banking Cmte. #TryHarder. B) If there are naked shorts??? i) if NBH’s ledger is imbalanced because of FINRA’s U3 halt, naked shorts are not the only issue. ii) We have presented plenty of evidence of open short positions including FINRA/SEC’s admission they exist, Anson Funds and other brokers approaches to NBH to buy shares to cover short positions, TradeStation’s admission that they cannot fulfill their obligations to deliver certificated shares of NBH to the transfer agent, and Hilltop Securities admitting to @PeteSessions that they have a “big problem”. iii) Got naked??? Well, I don’t know what you mean by “minimal”, but according to @JohnnyTabacco, locating shares for shorts is kinda his thing, 15.4M shares were borrowed and sold short on December 8, 2022. 9M shares were purchased long. Best case scenario, if shorts sold and then immediately acquired to cover, 6.4M shares ARE STILL NAKED!!! I bought shares as many others did on the 8th. So, my guess is “best” is not the case. We have other evidence that we do not share publicly, but that is in the hands of the right people…WE DON”T OWE YOU SH*T. #GFY $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH 🧵9/9 XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [stocks](/topic/stocks) [alternative investments](/topic/alternative-investments) [Post Link](https://x.com/JunkSavvy/status/1944245631687545087)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
JunkSavvy @JunkSavvy on x 7794 followers
Created: 2025-07-13 04:00:55 UTC
BONUS: “Because that’s fictitious. You have the share count. If there is any naked short selling, the people should be charged. In the unlikely event that there was some minimal amount, it probably wouldn’t change your situation.”
A) You know we are not asking for the issued shares of NBH. We are asking for an aggregated share count from all brokers holding long obligations in NBH. You look like the kind of ASS Gensler did when he tried the same thing in front of the Senate Banking Cmte. #TryHarder. B) If there are naked shorts??? i) if NBH’s ledger is imbalanced because of FINRA’s U3 halt, naked shorts are not the only issue. ii) We have presented plenty of evidence of open short positions including FINRA/SEC’s admission they exist, Anson Funds and other brokers approaches to NBH to buy shares to cover short positions, TradeStation’s admission that they cannot fulfill their obligations to deliver certificated shares of NBH to the transfer agent, and Hilltop Securities admitting to @PeteSessions that they have a “big problem”. iii) Got naked??? Well, I don’t know what you mean by “minimal”, but according to @JohnnyTabacco, locating shares for shorts is kinda his thing, 15.4M shares were borrowed and sold short on December 8, 2022. 9M shares were purchased long. Best case scenario, if shorts sold and then immediately acquired to cover, 6.4M shares ARE STILL NAKED!!! I bought shares as many others did on the 8th. So, my guess is “best” is not the case. We have other evidence that we do not share publicly, but that is in the hands of the right people…WE DON”T OWE YOU SH*T. #GFY $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH
🧵9/9
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics stocks alternative investments