[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 [@DrJackKruse](/creator/twitter/DrJackKruse) on x 119K followers Created: 2025-07-10 21:53:05 UTC Are collagen supplements completely useless? This is what this meta-analysis study seems to conclude. Food gurus lose again. I love winning. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘆 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝗮 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗯𝗮𝗱 𝗱𝗮𝘆. A new meta-analysis of XX studies on collagen supplements for skin aging just landed, and its results aren't good news for the longevity gurus pushing bone broth. When researchers looked at ALL studies, collagen improved skin hydration, elasticity, and wrinkles. However, when they separated the studies by funding source, a pattern emerged. Industry-funded studies showed "significant benefits," while independent studies showed no effect. The same thing happened when they looked at study quality. High-quality studies found no benefits, while low-quality studies did. The authors' conclusion: "𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗼 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴." Guess what improves it? Red light from the sun. And it's free. My blog today is all about collagen and how the wrong light can destroy it in your eyes. Every time we demand rigorous proof instead of accepting weak evidence because we want it to be true, we push the entire field forward. "It remains unclear how it is possible that the human body directs amino acids and peptides from the ingested collagen hydrolysate specifically toward the dermis." The study aligns with my point about demanding rigorous proof. It highlights how bias can skew results, reinforcing the need for high-quality, independent research.  XXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [supplements](/topic/supplements) [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) [coins layer 1](/topic/coins-layer-1) [coins bitcoin ecosystem](/topic/coins-bitcoin-ecosystem) [coins pow](/topic/coins-pow) [Post Link](https://x.com/DrJackKruse/status/1943428288086503534)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 @DrJackKruse on x 119K followers
Created: 2025-07-10 21:53:05 UTC
Are collagen supplements completely useless? This is what this meta-analysis study seems to conclude. Food gurus lose again. I love winning.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘆 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝗮 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗯𝗮𝗱 𝗱𝗮𝘆.
A new meta-analysis of XX studies on collagen supplements for skin aging just landed, and its results aren't good news for the longevity gurus pushing bone broth.
When researchers looked at ALL studies, collagen improved skin hydration, elasticity, and wrinkles.
However, when they separated the studies by funding source, a pattern emerged. Industry-funded studies showed "significant benefits," while independent studies showed no effect.
The same thing happened when they looked at study quality. High-quality studies found no benefits, while low-quality studies did.
The authors' conclusion: "𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗻𝗼 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴."
Guess what improves it? Red light from the sun. And it's free. My blog today is all about collagen and how the wrong light can destroy it in your eyes.
Every time we demand rigorous proof instead of accepting weak evidence because we want it to be true, we push the entire field forward.
"It remains unclear how it is possible that the human body directs amino acids and peptides from the ingested collagen hydrolysate specifically toward the dermis."
The study aligns with my point about demanding rigorous proof. It highlights how bias can skew results, reinforcing the need for high-quality, independent research.
XXXXXX engagements
Related Topics supplements bitcoin coins layer 1 coins bitcoin ecosystem coins pow