Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![brent_e_trader Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1199013706367143936.png) Brent [@brent_e_trader](/creator/twitter/brent_e_trader) on x 1848 followers
Created: 2025-07-09 21:04:40 UTC

$UNH I read every word of today's WSJ hit piece twice.  There is nothing in there that is new and in fact, they don't even report what the interviewees said in response to the DOJ questions!  Is it for legal reasons or is it because the responses don't incriminate UNH?


XXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1943053715012751710/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[doj](/topic/doj)
[wsj](/topic/wsj)
[$unh](/topic/$unh)
[stocks healthcare](/topic/stocks-healthcare)

[Post Link](https://x.com/brent_e_trader/status/1943053715012751710)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

brent_e_trader Avatar Brent @brent_e_trader on x 1848 followers Created: 2025-07-09 21:04:40 UTC

$UNH I read every word of today's WSJ hit piece twice. There is nothing in there that is new and in fact, they don't even report what the interviewees said in response to the DOJ questions! Is it for legal reasons or is it because the responses don't incriminate UNH?

XXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics doj wsj $unh stocks healthcare

Post Link

post/tweet::1943053715012751710
/post/tweet::1943053715012751710