Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![_Hyper66 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1501732929239764996.png) XX [@_Hyper66](/creator/twitter/_Hyper66) on x 6009 followers
Created: 2025-07-06 09:09:21 UTC

Not like there’s a perfect model to keep the InFo-Fi meta, but here’s a suggestion i think kaito can Enable. 

This wouldn’t please everyone, i do not intend to, it’s just opinion that i wish would matter. 

X. No account should exist on more than X Leaderboard, that way there’s a threshold for number of projects account can yap about. This way there’s a fair competition, XX projects, X maximum, everyone picks what they can actively work on. 

X. Projects should max stay X months period before TGE, The aimless lengthy duration of campaign affect smaller audiences that are also here for incentives (almost everyone is here for incentives). 

X. Now down to cocky influencers, no account should exist on a Leaderboard if only they start tweeting 2/3 weeks before TGE, this way it preserves smaller audiences that have been yapping prior to launch. With this format, nobody can say “With one/two tweet days before TGE i’ll be on the leaderboard”

X. For the small accounts, here you’d have to work your way up. Kaito can implement a minimum of XXX Followers count before you’re eligible for this drop. Sounds uncomfortable yeah ? but my POV of this is, if you have XXX followers, the few days period you’d upscale to 500, would yield active XXX followers (prob 20/30 would interact with you more since they’re majorly going to be people within the same work structure as you). 

All of these are not perfect Models to sustain InFo-Fi, but this way it’s clearly put, everyone can attain what they want, there’s no fair system when people are in numbers, but compromise can lead to a better system. 

I’ll Love for people to drop their X cents on what they feel about this, please act sane while giving responses, we don’t have to hurl insults at one another, be civil.


XXXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1941786536304869676/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[yap](/topic/yap)
[leaderboard](/topic/leaderboard)
[meta](/topic/meta)

[Post Link](https://x.com/_Hyper66/status/1941786536304869676)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

_Hyper66 Avatar XX @_Hyper66 on x 6009 followers Created: 2025-07-06 09:09:21 UTC

Not like there’s a perfect model to keep the InFo-Fi meta, but here’s a suggestion i think kaito can Enable.

This wouldn’t please everyone, i do not intend to, it’s just opinion that i wish would matter.

X. No account should exist on more than X Leaderboard, that way there’s a threshold for number of projects account can yap about. This way there’s a fair competition, XX projects, X maximum, everyone picks what they can actively work on.

X. Projects should max stay X months period before TGE, The aimless lengthy duration of campaign affect smaller audiences that are also here for incentives (almost everyone is here for incentives).

X. Now down to cocky influencers, no account should exist on a Leaderboard if only they start tweeting 2/3 weeks before TGE, this way it preserves smaller audiences that have been yapping prior to launch. With this format, nobody can say “With one/two tweet days before TGE i’ll be on the leaderboard”

X. For the small accounts, here you’d have to work your way up. Kaito can implement a minimum of XXX Followers count before you’re eligible for this drop. Sounds uncomfortable yeah ? but my POV of this is, if you have XXX followers, the few days period you’d upscale to 500, would yield active XXX followers (prob 20/30 would interact with you more since they’re majorly going to be people within the same work structure as you).

All of these are not perfect Models to sustain InFo-Fi, but this way it’s clearly put, everyone can attain what they want, there’s no fair system when people are in numbers, but compromise can lead to a better system.

I’ll Love for people to drop their X cents on what they feel about this, please act sane while giving responses, we don’t have to hurl insults at one another, be civil.

XXXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics yap leaderboard meta

Post Link

post/tweet::1941786536304869676
/post/tweet::1941786536304869676