[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  THE SKIN DOCTOR [@theskindoctor13](/creator/twitter/theskindoctor13) on x 857.4K followers Created: 2025-07-05 17:14:12 UTC Pune: A 22-year-old woman claimed a delivery man entered her flat, made her unconscious with a spray, raped her, took a selfie on her phone, and sent a threatening message that he'll come again. Public outrage followed. Police arrested a man, but she denied he was the one. Police insisted he was the only one who entered her flat that day, as per CCTV. Left with no option, she accepted she lied. The accused wasn’t a delivery man, but a highly qualified MNC techie and her long-time friend. She often called him home when her family was away. She told police she wasn’t ready for sex that particular day, but he allegedly forced himself on her. Angry, she filed a complaint. Now, she doesn’t want action against him. But then, why not name him directly and instead file complaint against an imaginary person? Maybe she just wanted to scare him without sending him to jail. The woman's friend told police she invited him over, saying she felt disturbed. They spent time together and took a selfie. After he left, she cropped the photo, typed a threat message on her phone, and called a relative claiming assault. Police say there was no forced entry, no chemical spray, the selfie was taken by her, and the threatening message was typed by her. So, they've released the accused and are now investigating whether sex actually occurred and, if it did, whether it was consensual or forced. This trivialises rape. Using such a serious charge to express anger or control someone harms real victims. It fuels distrust, weakens genuine cases, and turns justice into a joke. When someone doubts a woman’s real rape claim in the future, incidents like this will have played a role. XXXXXXX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/theskindoctor13/status/1941546163183755577)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
THE SKIN DOCTOR @theskindoctor13 on x 857.4K followers
Created: 2025-07-05 17:14:12 UTC
Pune: A 22-year-old woman claimed a delivery man entered her flat, made her unconscious with a spray, raped her, took a selfie on her phone, and sent a threatening message that he'll come again.
Public outrage followed. Police arrested a man, but she denied he was the one. Police insisted he was the only one who entered her flat that day, as per CCTV.
Left with no option, she accepted she lied. The accused wasn’t a delivery man, but a highly qualified MNC techie and her long-time friend. She often called him home when her family was away. She told police she wasn’t ready for sex that particular day, but he allegedly forced himself on her. Angry, she filed a complaint. Now, she doesn’t want action against him. But then, why not name him directly and instead file complaint against an imaginary person? Maybe she just wanted to scare him without sending him to jail.
The woman's friend told police she invited him over, saying she felt disturbed. They spent time together and took a selfie. After he left, she cropped the photo, typed a threat message on her phone, and called a relative claiming assault.
Police say there was no forced entry, no chemical spray, the selfie was taken by her, and the threatening message was typed by her. So, they've released the accused and are now investigating whether sex actually occurred and, if it did, whether it was consensual or forced.
This trivialises rape. Using such a serious charge to express anger or control someone harms real victims. It fuels distrust, weakens genuine cases, and turns justice into a joke. When someone doubts a woman’s real rape claim in the future, incidents like this will have played a role.
XXXXXXX engagements
