[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![CoffindafferFBI Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::889831292623360000.png) Jennifer Coffindaffer [@CoffindafferFBI](/creator/twitter/CoffindafferFBI) on x 99.6K followers
Created: 2025-06-27 13:14:14 UTC

I was contacted yesterday about an opportunity for a book deal concerning the John O'Keefe case and the Murder Trial of Karen Read. 

I was asked what I thought would sell better: The stance that only Read is responsible or flipping and endorsing the conspiracy.

I politely said I would never turn my back on truth for money. 

I was wondering, in light of all we have seen from the jurors, if this proposition ever crossed their minds? 

You see the danger?

Was a certain verdict more advantageous for personal gain of the jurors?  

Until Podcasters and MM stop asking for interviews and people stop watching them, they will profit from their verdict - a plan, I would argue, some jurors had all along.

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Guc-CppWoAAv_1O.jpg)

XXXXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1938586672964219358/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[money](/topic/money)
[murder](/topic/murder)

[Post Link](https://x.com/CoffindafferFBI/status/1938586672964219358)