[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  0xCB 🤖 [@cryptoboys27](/creator/twitter/cryptoboys27) on x 25.8K followers Created: 2025-06-27 06:37:41 UTC Gvirgen, enlighten me on a few things. I’m trying to make sense of all this 🤔🧠🤔 Currently, holding a single large-cap agent token (stable, popular, and highly valued) is far more rewarding than holding XXX agents, simply because points are calculated based on total USD value. 💬 Solution: A multiplier system based on the number of staked agents (not token), not just their value, is urgently needed. Why this matters: ✅ Prevents points from being concentrated in just 1–2 large tokens ✅ Encourages broader participation across the ecosystem ✅ Provides fairer opportunities for smaller, yet solid, agents However, several critical aspects still lack transparency 👇 🔹 (a) “Good product + strong fundamentals = more points” → What are the KPIs? Are they publicly defined? → If the Virtuals team serves as both executive and legislative, that’s undemocratic and creates a clear conflict of interest. 🔹 (b) Who exactly qualifies as a “dev”? → Is it the wallet that launched the agent? → Is it a person? The Founder? → If it’s the project founder, even if they bought tokens from the market using personal funds — not from an allocation? → Are treasury or company wallets considered “dev wallets”? 💬 Solution: Publicly tag all dev-related wallets (e.g., “Virtual Dev”) on-chain. This would eliminate ambiguity and potential bias. 🧠Transparency = Trust The current point distribution system remains one of the most urgent and unresolved concerns. Everyone sees the issue — yet no meaningful action has been taken. I provide criticism and solutions, From the bottom of my heart, i hope @virtuals_io will be better 🙂 XXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [united states dollar](/topic/united-states-dollar) [token](/topic/token) [Post Link](https://x.com/cryptoboys27/status/1938486875179913261)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
0xCB 🤖 @cryptoboys27 on x 25.8K followers
Created: 2025-06-27 06:37:41 UTC
Gvirgen, enlighten me on a few things. I’m trying to make sense of all this 🤔đź§
🤔 Currently, holding a single large-cap agent token (stable, popular, and highly valued) is far more rewarding than holding XXX agents, simply because points are calculated based on total USD value.
đź’¬ Solution: A multiplier system based on the number of staked agents (not token), not just their value, is urgently needed.
Why this matters:
✅ Prevents points from being concentrated in just 1–2 large tokens ✅ Encourages broader participation across the ecosystem ✅ Provides fairer opportunities for smaller, yet solid, agents
However, several critical aspects still lack transparency 👇
🔹 (a) “Good product + strong fundamentals = more points” → What are the KPIs? Are they publicly defined? → If the Virtuals team serves as both executive and legislative, that’s undemocratic and creates a clear conflict of interest.
🔹 (b) Who exactly qualifies as a “dev”? → Is it the wallet that launched the agent?
→ Is it a person? The Founder?
→ If it’s the project founder, even if they bought tokens from the market using personal funds — not from an allocation? → Are treasury or company wallets considered “dev wallets”?
💬 Solution: Publicly tag all dev-related wallets (e.g., “Virtual Dev”) on-chain. This would eliminate ambiguity and potential bias.
🧠Transparency = Trust
The current point distribution system remains one of the most urgent and unresolved concerns.
Everyone sees the issue — yet no meaningful action has been taken.
I provide criticism and solutions, From the bottom of my heart, i hope @virtuals_io will be better 🙂
XXXXX engagements
Related Topics united states dollar token