[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Sir Dickson [@Wizarab10](/creator/twitter/Wizarab10) on x 610.3K followers Created: 2025-06-14 09:33:56 UTC A lady sent me this video. She was angry with what she heard. I checked the responses on IG, and women were not pleased. No wonder Ife didn't post this on X. I like to know what you think about the video. . . . I'll summarise their displeasure below. X. Ethics. Just because you have money and audacity, does not make it ethical. Surrogacy exists as a means to help women going through fertility issues. It is not a way for rich women to shop for babies. There actually have to be a medical reason you are using surrogacy, to prevent abuse. To do otherwise could easily lead to exploitation and baby farming. X. Economics of supply and demand. If surrogacy becomes something that only the rich can afford, the price would shoot up, and it would no longer be accessible to women who need it. Surrogacy is not a luxury item that the rich should buy just because... X. She is XX She intentionally skipped the part that she is XX and geriatric. She is hiding the danger of her carrying pregnancy to term under "you dont owe anybody explanation. If you can afford it, do it. People hate that a woman can choose. They hate the audacity." This is a consolatory lie. Honesty is not that hard. The pregnancy is high risk, but she is desperately painting it as her choice. X. Exploitation Women's womb should not be rented just because. It is a moral and ethical issue. The carrier need to feel she is helping out a family who cannot have kid of their own. It is a humanitarian issue, not business. If we agree that pregnancy itself can be life threatening if complications arise, then the least that should happen is that, it arose through empathy doing good for another woman, not something ticked off the market list of the bourgeoisie. . . . I'm just here to compare note. Do you agree it should be strictly business or regulated by ethics?  XXXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [money](/topic/money) [women](/topic/women) [Post Link](https://x.com/Wizarab10/status/1933820189973381594)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Sir Dickson @Wizarab10 on x 610.3K followers
Created: 2025-06-14 09:33:56 UTC
A lady sent me this video. She was angry with what she heard. I checked the responses on IG, and women were not pleased. No wonder Ife didn't post this on X. I like to know what you think about the video. . . . I'll summarise their displeasure below.
X. Ethics. Just because you have money and audacity, does not make it ethical. Surrogacy exists as a means to help women going through fertility issues. It is not a way for rich women to shop for babies. There actually have to be a medical reason you are using surrogacy, to prevent abuse. To do otherwise could easily lead to exploitation and baby farming.
X. Economics of supply and demand. If surrogacy becomes something that only the rich can afford, the price would shoot up, and it would no longer be accessible to women who need it. Surrogacy is not a luxury item that the rich should buy just because...
X. She is XX She intentionally skipped the part that she is XX and geriatric. She is hiding the danger of her carrying pregnancy to term under "you dont owe anybody explanation. If you can afford it, do it. People hate that a woman can choose. They hate the audacity." This is a consolatory lie. Honesty is not that hard. The pregnancy is high risk, but she is desperately painting it as her choice.
X. Exploitation Women's womb should not be rented just because. It is a moral and ethical issue. The carrier need to feel she is helping out a family who cannot have kid of their own. It is a humanitarian issue, not business. If we agree that pregnancy itself can be life threatening if complications arise, then the least that should happen is that, it arose through empathy doing good for another woman, not something ticked off the market list of the bourgeoisie. . . . I'm just here to compare note. Do you agree it should be strictly business or regulated by ethics?
XXXXXXX engagements
