[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  Apple Lamps [@lamps_apple](/creator/twitter/lamps_apple) on x 27.7K followers Created: 2025-06-09 22:24:39 UTC French authorities bypassed the EU’s DSA, ignored warrant rules, and built their case on that procedural sand. Under French Penal Code 121-7, complicity still needs concrete intent... “insufficient moderation” doesn’t cut it. Absolute sham. Submit a motion before the Chambre de l’Instruction to annul the indictment, based on the fundamental procedural defect that French authorities bypassed the DSA and relied on informal, non-binding requests rather than judicially authorized channels. Provide the court with full documentation of all such requests preceding September 2024 to demonstrate that the investigation was built on an invalid legal foundation. Simultaneously, formally request the court to refer key questions to the CJEU under Article XXX TFEU. These questions should address... Whether the DSA permits Member States to impose personal criminal liability on a CEO for platform moderation practices, Whether the use of “insufficient moderation” as a basis for complicity is compatible with EU safe harbor provisions and the principle of proportionality, and Whether France’s enforcement of encryption registration laws is consistent with EU digital market freedoms. The referral will suspend national proceedings and compel French authorities to defend their legal theory at the EU level. Concurrently, challenge the constitutionality of the LOPMI law before the Constitutional Council. Argue that its vague and unpredictable “platform-complicity” offense violates principles of legality, foreseeability, and proportionality under the French Constitution and the Declaration of the Rights of Man. A successful challenge could invalidate the core statutory basis for the prosecution. While these legal processes are underway, proactively publish Telegram’s compliance records with French and EU legal requests. This will directly counter claims of “non-cooperation” and reinforce your legal position both in court and in the public view. XXXXX engagements  [Post Link](https://x.com/lamps_apple/status/1932202207740588215)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
Apple Lamps @lamps_apple on x 27.7K followers
Created: 2025-06-09 22:24:39 UTC
French authorities bypassed the EU’s DSA, ignored warrant rules, and built their case on that procedural sand. Under French Penal Code 121-7, complicity still needs concrete intent... “insufficient moderation” doesn’t cut it. Absolute sham.
Submit a motion before the Chambre de l’Instruction to annul the indictment, based on the fundamental procedural defect that French authorities bypassed the DSA and relied on informal, non-binding requests rather than judicially authorized channels. Provide the court with full documentation of all such requests preceding September 2024 to demonstrate that the investigation was built on an invalid legal foundation.
Simultaneously, formally request the court to refer key questions to the CJEU under Article XXX TFEU. These questions should address...
Whether the DSA permits Member States to impose personal criminal liability on a CEO for platform moderation practices,
Whether the use of “insufficient moderation” as a basis for complicity is compatible with EU safe harbor provisions and the principle of proportionality, and
Whether France’s enforcement of encryption registration laws is consistent with EU digital market freedoms.
The referral will suspend national proceedings and compel French authorities to defend their legal theory at the EU level.
Concurrently, challenge the constitutionality of the LOPMI law before the Constitutional Council. Argue that its vague and unpredictable “platform-complicity” offense violates principles of legality, foreseeability, and proportionality under the French Constitution and the Declaration of the Rights of Man. A successful challenge could invalidate the core statutory basis for the prosecution.
While these legal processes are underway, proactively publish Telegram’s compliance records with French and EU legal requests. This will directly counter claims of “non-cooperation” and reinforce your legal position both in court and in the public view.
XXXXX engagements
