Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![qualitybargain Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::4544713933.png) LTValue [@qualitybargain](/creator/twitter/qualitybargain) on x 2280 followers
Created: 2025-05-25 05:38:43 UTC

ULS Solutions $ULS looks like a great business but with recent move post Q1 result to ~$72/sh and trading at ~40x NTM PE, valuation doesn't seem to make sense.

Brokers just saying "this business should be worth 38x".

Feels a bit like $VRSK (which now trades at 42x...), in the sense that both are high quality businesses (high ROIC, capital efficient etc.) with good earnings resilience/visibility (based on recurring revenue and pricing power, which is highly valued in this market given how uncertain anything with cyclical exposure is), and both are growing EPS ~10-12%.

With VRSK I don't think there's a story of subscription growth inflecting higher to justify the multiple.

Same thing with ULS (they may benefit from more testing associated with supply chain re-configuration, but offset to this is product innovation cycles/plans getting pushed out, so hard to take a view).

So it just ends up looking super crowded and expensive. 

Problem is that if a stock like this has any wobble or miss vs. the street, then this thing could get whacked and be down -15-20% in a day...


XXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1926513236943225312/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[$vrsk](/topic/$vrsk)
[$72sh](/topic/$72sh)
[$uls](/topic/$uls)
[verisk analytics inc](/topic/verisk-analytics-inc)
[stocks industrials](/topic/stocks-industrials)

[Post Link](https://x.com/qualitybargain/status/1926513236943225312)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

qualitybargain Avatar LTValue @qualitybargain on x 2280 followers Created: 2025-05-25 05:38:43 UTC

ULS Solutions $ULS looks like a great business but with recent move post Q1 result to ~$72/sh and trading at ~40x NTM PE, valuation doesn't seem to make sense.

Brokers just saying "this business should be worth 38x".

Feels a bit like $VRSK (which now trades at 42x...), in the sense that both are high quality businesses (high ROIC, capital efficient etc.) with good earnings resilience/visibility (based on recurring revenue and pricing power, which is highly valued in this market given how uncertain anything with cyclical exposure is), and both are growing EPS ~10-12%.

With VRSK I don't think there's a story of subscription growth inflecting higher to justify the multiple.

Same thing with ULS (they may benefit from more testing associated with supply chain re-configuration, but offset to this is product innovation cycles/plans getting pushed out, so hard to take a view).

So it just ends up looking super crowded and expensive.

Problem is that if a stock like this has any wobble or miss vs. the street, then this thing could get whacked and be down -15-20% in a day...

XXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics $vrsk $72sh $uls verisk analytics inc stocks industrials

Post Link

post/tweet::1926513236943225312
/post/tweet::1926513236943225312