[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]  GOLF.com [@GOLF_com](/creator/twitter/GOLF_com) on x 557.2K followers Created: 2025-05-11 19:15:06 UTC Lucas Glover was asked: Is golf — men’s elite professional golf — better on courses that measure XXXXX yards or XXXXX yards? “Seventy-one hundred,” Glover said. “No question about it. “Look at this Cricket Club course,” Glover said. “You have a pitch-shot par-3 where the cover is a XXX yards, you have a 250-yard uphill par-3 where one side is death and you have two par-3s that are in between Four different clubs. Look at the second hole [the ninth for member play, a short, right-curving par-4]. I played it was a 5-wood and a sand wedge. Wyndham Clark, longer than I am, hit driver right up to the green. We both made 3s. The architect gives you so many choices. At Quail Hollow, we’ll all be hitting it to pretty much the same place.” Glover was describing his Saturday play with Clark, when the two U.S. Open winners went around in three hours as a twosome. On Sunday, they did it again. Needless to say, a 7,100-yard course plays faster than a 7,600-yard course. “Golf’s a walking sport,” Glover said. “When Tillinghast designed this course, the greens and the tees were close together. Land was not an issue back then [in the early 1920s]. But golf was meant for walking, so of course you had the greens and tees close together.”  XXXXXXX engagements  **Related Topics** [lucas glover](/topic/lucas-glover) [Post Link](https://x.com/GOLF_com/status/1921645257462108477)
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
GOLF.com @GOLF_com on x 557.2K followers
Created: 2025-05-11 19:15:06 UTC
Lucas Glover was asked: Is golf — men’s elite professional golf — better on courses that measure XXXXX yards or XXXXX yards?
“Seventy-one hundred,” Glover said. “No question about it.
“Look at this Cricket Club course,” Glover said. “You have a pitch-shot par-3 where the cover is a XXX yards, you have a 250-yard uphill par-3 where one side is death and you have two par-3s that are in between Four different clubs. Look at the second hole [the ninth for member play, a short, right-curving par-4]. I played it was a 5-wood and a sand wedge. Wyndham Clark, longer than I am, hit driver right up to the green. We both made 3s. The architect gives you so many choices. At Quail Hollow, we’ll all be hitting it to pretty much the same place.”
Glover was describing his Saturday play with Clark, when the two U.S. Open winners went around in three hours as a twosome. On Sunday, they did it again. Needless to say, a 7,100-yard course plays faster than a 7,600-yard course.
“Golf’s a walking sport,” Glover said. “When Tillinghast designed this course, the greens and the tees were close together. Land was not an issue back then [in the early 1920s]. But golf was meant for walking, so of course you had the greens and tees close together.”
XXXXXXX engagements
Related Topics lucas glover