[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![CynicalPublius Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::793542678377926656.png) Cynical Publius [@CynicalPublius](/creator/twitter/CynicalPublius) on x 230.5K followers
Created: 2025-04-29 00:16:55 UTC

I argue a lot with Grok.  The argument always goes the same way:

X. I ask Grok a question on some politically-charged issue.

X. Grok answers convincingly and without hesitation or ambivalence, citing mainstream media news sources and politically-compromised scientific "studies" as the totally-correct bases for its answer.

X. I disagree, and then challenge Grok, questioning why it assumes its sources are accurate.

X. Grok walks it back slightly, and I challenge it again on the same grounds.

X. After about X rounds of this, Grok admits I'm right.

AI will be useless until it learns to critically appraise the validity of what it uses as sources.


XXXXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1917010168703070583/c:line.svg)

[Post Link](https://x.com/CynicalPublius/status/1917010168703070583)