Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

![NUCLRGOLF Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:24/cr:twitter::1334726477611491329.png) NUCLR GOLF [@NUCLRGOLF](/creator/twitter/NUCLRGOLF) on x 251.9K followers
Created: 2024-06-08 15:14:43 UTC

šŸšØšŸ“šŸ’© #CHICKEN SH!T — At last weeks RBC Canadian Open, World #125 Nate Lashley called out PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan and is unhappy with signature events: ā€œOur No. X event is the Players and it’s a 144-man field. If that’s the best field all year, then why are these signature events that are supposed to be so good XX (man fields)? It makes no sense… Look at how good the Players was this year. When you have more competition, things stay tighter, more compact. When you’ve got fields with no cuts it spreads things out… But we have a commissioner who is a chicken shit and won’t stand up to a handful of guys, that’s what happens. You can’t tell me finishing top XX in a limited field is similar to a 144- or 156-man field. It’s not even close. There’s no comparison. This is way harder.ā€ (Via: @golfweek) 

Do you agree with Nate?

![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GPj3YQRWEAAgGjA.jpg)

XXXXXXX engagements

![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/p:tweet::1799460050970230947/c:line.svg)

**Related Topics**
[events](/topic/events)
[pga tour](/topic/pga-tour)
[nate lashley](/topic/nate-lashley)
[rbc](/topic/rbc)

[Post Link](https://x.com/NUCLRGOLF/status/1799460050970230947)

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

NUCLRGOLF Avatar NUCLR GOLF @NUCLRGOLF on x 251.9K followers Created: 2024-06-08 15:14:43 UTC

šŸšØšŸ“šŸ’© #CHICKEN SH!T — At last weeks RBC Canadian Open, World #125 Nate Lashley called out PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan and is unhappy with signature events: ā€œOur No. X event is the Players and it’s a 144-man field. If that’s the best field all year, then why are these signature events that are supposed to be so good XX (man fields)? It makes no sense… Look at how good the Players was this year. When you have more competition, things stay tighter, more compact. When you’ve got fields with no cuts it spreads things out… But we have a commissioner who is a chicken shit and won’t stand up to a handful of guys, that’s what happens. You can’t tell me finishing top XX in a limited field is similar to a 144- or 156-man field. It’s not even close. There’s no comparison. This is way harder.ā€ (Via: @golfweek)

Do you agree with Nate?

XXXXXXX engagements

Engagements Line Chart

Related Topics events pga tour nate lashley rbc

Post Link

post/tweet::1799460050970230947
/post/tweet::1799460050970230947