[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
#  @start9labs Start9
Start9 posts on X about spam, bitcoin, ai, ordinals the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1212874962719010816/interactions)
- X Week XXXXXX +182,203%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +462%
- X Year XXXXXXX +211%
### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1212874962719010816/posts_active)
- X Week XX +2,000%
- X Month XX -XX%
- X Months XXX +319%
- X Year XXX +240%
### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1212874962719010816/followers)
- X Week XXXXXX +0.20%
- X Month XXXXXX +0.75%
- X Months XXXXXX +11%
- X Year XXXXXX +25%
### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1212874962719010816/influencer_rank)
### Social Influence
**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) XXXXX%
**Social topic influence**
[spam](/topic/spam) 13.64%, [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) 9.09%, [ai](/topic/ai) 9.09%, [ordinals](/topic/ordinals) 9.09%, [utxo](/topic/utxo) 9.09%, [future](/topic/future) 9.09%, [the cat](/topic/the-cat) 9.09%, [list](/topic/list) 4.55%, [blocked](/topic/blocked) 4.55%, [$117k](/topic/$117k) XXXX%
**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@asanoha_gold](/creator/undefined) [@graveskies](/creator/undefined) [@molobtc](/creator/undefined) [@aeonbtc](/creator/undefined) [@ostrom72158](/creator/undefined) [@melvincarvalho](/creator/undefined) [@mandrik](/creator/undefined) [@_colourorange](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinscoresby](/creator/undefined) [@proofofcash](/creator/undefined) [@relentless_btc](/creator/undefined) [@arthur_van_pelt](/creator/undefined) [@kelo6102](/creator/undefined) [@anarchopleb](/creator/undefined) [@cfidget70375](/creator/undefined) [@wsbitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@libertymugs](/creator/undefined) [@dragonnakamoto](/creator/undefined) [@hawkmcflipster](/creator/undefined) [@stutxo](/creator/undefined)
**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Not sure what to make of this proposal yet but attempting to silence it is ridiculous. Allegedly @ostrom72158 submitted the proposal to the mailing list but it was censored. So she submitted it to Github where it has now been rejected for skipping the mailing list"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998045371235549532) 2025-12-08T15:01Z 25.5K followers, 41K engagements
"@aeonBTC @_DavidSFreeman Don't be a deuche it was clearly a typo. $117k Not going to rehash the filters debate lol"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998136931444764899) 2025-12-08T21:05Z 25.5K followers, XX engagements
"Best not to over simplify things. This proposal is deceptively clever both technically and politically. You don't have to like something to find it interesting and want to examine it. Since when did thinking become so taboo And you cant deny it would be devastating to spammers. That said we will not be supporting using the Cat to freeze Stamp and Ordinal UTXOs"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998419426971148675) 2025-12-09T15:48Z 25.5K followers, 23.2K engagements
"Yeah that sucks wasn't aware of that. It certainly makes moderating more difficult. After a single pass through the proposal seems thorough and coherent. Not AI not spam. The proposal seems to eliminate the economic incentive to create spam. Love it or hate it it's quite brilliant in its simplicity and it would probably be more effective at mitigating spam on Bitcoin than anything we've ever seen. It seems well thought through in terms of using precise criteria for targeting self-identified spam and low value utxos ("NMUs") as well as an opportunity for people to salvage targeted NMUs. Now if"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998110305839411289) 2025-12-08T19:19Z 25.5K followers, 9397 engagements
"We didn't. Again check the receipts. You and others seem to be imposing your own opinions and presumptions onto us. We sold BTC at $177k to buy a year of operating expenses and inventory. Great timing on our part. We also said this spam war would be a headwind for price until it is resolved"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998133682083950965) 2025-12-08T20:52Z 25.5K followers, XX engagements
"If someone observes a fact it does not mean they endorse it. The Cat is possible. Users can freeze UTXOs if they want to and according to any criteria. I'm sorry this fact upsets you but it remains a fact. In our opinion it is best to acknowledge reality so that you can properly deal with it. We for one will not support the use of the Cat to freeze Stamps and Ordinals"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998417512355230033) 2025-12-09T15:40Z 25.5K followers, XX engagements
"Not necessarily. We are against using the Cat in this case for Ordinal UTXO cleanup. It doesn't seem fair given that most people seem ignorant to the fact that nodes can freeze UTXO if they want. We were shocked to learn that people were shocked to learn this was possible. However now that people are aware the Cat exists they cannot claim ignorance if it comes for them in the future. If spam becomes an existential threat to Bitcoin continued existence as sound money we would likely advocate for releasing the Cat"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998518559086096571) 2025-12-09T22:22Z 25.5K followers, XX engagements
"@stutxo @kelo6102 @L0RINC @ostrom72158 Holy shit you didn't know that was a fact Or holy shit you can't believe someone had the audacity to point out that fact"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998176436579176652) 2025-12-08T23:42Z 25.5K followers, XXX engagements
"Thank you for thinking creatively about ways to mitigate spam and for taking the time to put together such a thorough proposal. We believe that releasing the Cat on existing Ordinals while a win for UTXO cleanup is not worth the social cost. However now that the Cat is out of the bag so to speak future abuses cannot claim ignorance and should be prepared for what might happen"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1998517782749786339) 2025-12-09T22:19Z 25.5K followers, XXX engagements
"@aeonBTC Ugh we'll talk to the developers. People can run whatever they want nothing we can do to prevent it but we don't want to be facilitating the installation of anything that isn't production ready. Looks like this was just an RC"
[X Link](https://x.com/start9labs/status/1999288237928644687) 2025-12-12T01:20Z 25.5K followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@start9labs Start9
Start9 posts on X about spam, bitcoin, ai, ordinals the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +182,203%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +462%
- X Year XXXXXXX +211%
Mentions: X #
- X Week XX +2,000%
- X Month XX -XX%
- X Months XXX +319%
- X Year XXX +240%
Followers: XXXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +0.20%
- X Month XXXXXX +0.75%
- X Months XXXXXX +11%
- X Year XXXXXX +25%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence
Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXXX%
Social topic influence spam 13.64%, bitcoin 9.09%, ai 9.09%, ordinals 9.09%, utxo 9.09%, future 9.09%, the cat 9.09%, list 4.55%, blocked 4.55%, $117k XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @asanoha_gold @graveskies @molobtc @aeonbtc @ostrom72158 @melvincarvalho @mandrik @_colourorange @bitcoinscoresby @proofofcash @relentless_btc @arthur_van_pelt @kelo6102 @anarchopleb @cfidget70375 @wsbitcoin @libertymugs @dragonnakamoto @hawkmcflipster @stutxo
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC)
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Not sure what to make of this proposal yet but attempting to silence it is ridiculous. Allegedly @ostrom72158 submitted the proposal to the mailing list but it was censored. So she submitted it to Github where it has now been rejected for skipping the mailing list"
X Link 2025-12-08T15:01Z 25.5K followers, 41K engagements
"@aeonBTC @_DavidSFreeman Don't be a deuche it was clearly a typo. $117k Not going to rehash the filters debate lol"
X Link 2025-12-08T21:05Z 25.5K followers, XX engagements
"Best not to over simplify things. This proposal is deceptively clever both technically and politically. You don't have to like something to find it interesting and want to examine it. Since when did thinking become so taboo And you cant deny it would be devastating to spammers. That said we will not be supporting using the Cat to freeze Stamp and Ordinal UTXOs"
X Link 2025-12-09T15:48Z 25.5K followers, 23.2K engagements
"Yeah that sucks wasn't aware of that. It certainly makes moderating more difficult. After a single pass through the proposal seems thorough and coherent. Not AI not spam. The proposal seems to eliminate the economic incentive to create spam. Love it or hate it it's quite brilliant in its simplicity and it would probably be more effective at mitigating spam on Bitcoin than anything we've ever seen. It seems well thought through in terms of using precise criteria for targeting self-identified spam and low value utxos ("NMUs") as well as an opportunity for people to salvage targeted NMUs. Now if"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:19Z 25.5K followers, 9397 engagements
"We didn't. Again check the receipts. You and others seem to be imposing your own opinions and presumptions onto us. We sold BTC at $177k to buy a year of operating expenses and inventory. Great timing on our part. We also said this spam war would be a headwind for price until it is resolved"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:52Z 25.5K followers, XX engagements
"If someone observes a fact it does not mean they endorse it. The Cat is possible. Users can freeze UTXOs if they want to and according to any criteria. I'm sorry this fact upsets you but it remains a fact. In our opinion it is best to acknowledge reality so that you can properly deal with it. We for one will not support the use of the Cat to freeze Stamps and Ordinals"
X Link 2025-12-09T15:40Z 25.5K followers, XX engagements
"Not necessarily. We are against using the Cat in this case for Ordinal UTXO cleanup. It doesn't seem fair given that most people seem ignorant to the fact that nodes can freeze UTXO if they want. We were shocked to learn that people were shocked to learn this was possible. However now that people are aware the Cat exists they cannot claim ignorance if it comes for them in the future. If spam becomes an existential threat to Bitcoin continued existence as sound money we would likely advocate for releasing the Cat"
X Link 2025-12-09T22:22Z 25.5K followers, XX engagements
"@stutxo @kelo6102 @L0RINC @ostrom72158 Holy shit you didn't know that was a fact Or holy shit you can't believe someone had the audacity to point out that fact"
X Link 2025-12-08T23:42Z 25.5K followers, XXX engagements
"Thank you for thinking creatively about ways to mitigate spam and for taking the time to put together such a thorough proposal. We believe that releasing the Cat on existing Ordinals while a win for UTXO cleanup is not worth the social cost. However now that the Cat is out of the bag so to speak future abuses cannot claim ignorance and should be prepared for what might happen"
X Link 2025-12-09T22:19Z 25.5K followers, XXX engagements
"@aeonBTC Ugh we'll talk to the developers. People can run whatever they want nothing we can do to prevent it but we don't want to be facilitating the installation of anything that isn't production ready. Looks like this was just an RC"
X Link 2025-12-12T01:20Z 25.5K followers, XXX engagements