[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @sneekycat9 sneekycat sneekycat posts on X about $pacs, status the most. They currently have XX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1968317472605601792/interactions)  - X Week XX -XX% - X Month XXX +86% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1968317472605601792/posts_active)  ### Followers: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1968317472605601792/followers)  - X Month XX +11% ### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::1968317472605601792/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social topic influence** [$pacs](/topic/$pacs) #60, [status](/topic/status) **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@digitalassetbuy](/creator/undefined) [@kingkarancrypto](/creator/undefined) [@cryptoinsightuk](/creator/undefined) [@clifhigh](/creator/undefined) [@hugophilion](/creator/undefined) [@xamanwallet](/creator/undefined) [@bifrostwallet](/creator/undefined) [@oxenflow](/creator/undefined) [@worldnewsx](/creator/undefined) [@maniaufo](/creator/undefined) [@bangkokpostnews](/creator/undefined) [@eyakoby](/creator/undefined) [@iwendtster](/creator/undefined) [@rpsagainsttrump](/creator/undefined) [@adamemedia](/creator/undefined) [@mtgreenee](/creator/undefined) [@repogles](/creator/undefined) [@polymarket](/creator/undefined) [@joeymannarinous](/creator/undefined) [@harrisonhsmith](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [PACS Group, Inc. (PACS)](/topic/$pacs) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@mearmalite10 politicians voting is what doesnt work if the legal general public (160M+) could vote on all bills and issues line item referendum style THAT would work. Would also negate the need for politicians" [X Link](https://x.com/sneekycat9/status/1998955304143495264) 2025-12-11T03:17Z XX followers, XX engagements "@C_3C_3 new system a few reps for giving pros and cons to new bills issues and review of old ones. then the legal general public votes yes/no on a line item basis cant bribe/corrupt/use PACs on 160M+ voters = far reduced corruption and theft a no more celebrity politicians or parties" [X Link](https://x.com/sneekycat9/status/1998952775133311186) 2025-12-11T03:07Z XX followers, X engagements "@OcrazioCornPop right. bet XX% of the general public wouldnt either. good reason to do way with politicians voting and go to a legal general public referendum line item style voting system. the public decides not the non-representing pols" [X Link](https://x.com/sneekycat9/status/1998959248248885460) 2025-12-11T03:33Z XX followers, XX engagements "@DMichaelTripi if the legal general voting public (160M+) could vote referendum style on every issue/bill line item only we would need politicians. remove their voting ability. also negates PACs bribes/kickbacks celebrity status as well as negating 'political parties'" [X Link](https://x.com/sneekycat9/status/1999052169727947151) 2025-12-11T09:42Z XX followers, X engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@sneekycat9 sneekycatsneekycat posts on X about $pacs, status the most. They currently have XX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social topic influence $pacs #60, status
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @digitalassetbuy @kingkarancrypto @cryptoinsightuk @clifhigh @hugophilion @xamanwallet @bifrostwallet @oxenflow @worldnewsx @maniaufo @bangkokpostnews @eyakoby @iwendtster @rpsagainsttrump @adamemedia @mtgreenee @repogles @polymarket @joeymannarinous @harrisonhsmith
Top assets mentioned PACS Group, Inc. (PACS)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@mearmalite10 politicians voting is what doesnt work if the legal general public (160M+) could vote on all bills and issues line item referendum style THAT would work. Would also negate the need for politicians"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:17Z XX followers, XX engagements
"@C_3C_3 new system a few reps for giving pros and cons to new bills issues and review of old ones. then the legal general public votes yes/no on a line item basis cant bribe/corrupt/use PACs on 160M+ voters = far reduced corruption and theft a no more celebrity politicians or parties"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:07Z XX followers, X engagements
"@OcrazioCornPop right. bet XX% of the general public wouldnt either. good reason to do way with politicians voting and go to a legal general public referendum line item style voting system. the public decides not the non-representing pols"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:33Z XX followers, XX engagements
"@DMichaelTripi if the legal general voting public (160M+) could vote referendum style on every issue/bill line item only we would need politicians. remove their voting ability. also negates PACs bribes/kickbacks celebrity status as well as negating 'political parties'"
X Link 2025-12-11T09:42Z XX followers, X engagements
/creator/x::sneekycat9