[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @ostrom72158 Claire Ostrom Claire Ostrom posts on X about spam, bitcoin, if you, utxo the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1996692725056655365/interactions)  ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1996692725056655365/posts_active)  ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1996692725056655365/followers)  ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1996692725056655365/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) XXXXX% [finance](/list/finance) XXXXX% **Social topic influence** [spam](/topic/spam) #195, [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #3230, [if you](/topic/if-you) 12.12%, [utxo](/topic/utxo) 12.12%, [money](/topic/money) 9.09%, [i am](/topic/i-am) #2661, [fork](/topic/fork) #69, [the cat](/topic/the-cat) 6.06%, [future](/topic/future) 6.06%, [to the](/topic/to-the) XXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@asanoha_gold](/creator/undefined) [@evoskuil](/creator/undefined) [@btcblockjams](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoin_eagle](/creator/undefined) [@catotheelder17](/creator/undefined) [@graveskies](/creator/undefined) [@molobtc](/creator/undefined) [@janrothen](/creator/undefined) [@moneysnotneeded](/creator/undefined) [@stutxo](/creator/undefined) [@start9labs](/creator/undefined) [@piripindulki](/creator/undefined) [@0xflick](/creator/undefined) [@proofofcash](/creator/undefined) [@nabubito](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoineagle](/creator/undefined) [@mikeinspace](/creator/undefined) [@grok](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinbombadil](/creator/undefined) [@anarchopleb](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Thank you Matthew I hope we get some answers about the ML moderation soon. If there is anything I can do to substantiate it better I will. Maybe someone will reach out with more info after seeing your video" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1997496490470834298) 2025-12-07T02:40Z XXX followers, 2200 engagements "@Dgray9d9 @AskerAesir The money is for enemies. The network is a public good that requires stewardship in order to maintain that fact" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1997693644313350568) 2025-12-07T15:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@0xFlick I love your story I think that is cool. We cannot stop people from doing whatever they want. I only hope to help remove the perverse incentives to do it in ways that are destroying the network. If you remove the financial incentive most will lose interest" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1997940491984441484) 2025-12-08T08:05Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@evoskuil @tempstat Eric am I mistaken somehow" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1997968112059347242) 2025-12-08T09:54Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@lukedewolf @gm7t2 This is covered in the FAQ" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998095865844834416) 2025-12-08T18:22Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@stutxo @0xFlick It's pretty easy to understand that spam is not money. I don't think the typical Bitcoin buyer will cry for you at all" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998100408330506317) 2025-12-08T18:40Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@stutxo Love Bitcoin don't love spam on Bitcoin. This is a real solution" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998106029024780555) 2025-12-08T19:02Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@markgoodw_in This isnt my favorite list vs your favorite list. NMUs match a common technical notion of spam: external-incentive schemes that use Bitcoin as file storage impose permanent chainstate cost and dont serve its monetary role. ALL ETF UTXOs is just a political category" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998131230077006121) 2025-12-08T20:43Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@janrothen No I'm saying that the UTXO set is full of spam" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998155309567639798) 2025-12-08T22:18Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@BTCMcBoatface @SimplestBTCBook @start9labs Not harmed I dont think the community feels much obligation to protect spam and abuse. These are not people who are suddenly going to censor money. No chance. The principles are clear they just dont extend to NMUs" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998188938377465984) 2025-12-09T00:32Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "If inscription UTXOs under 1k sats were removed from the UTXO set we would remove XX% of the memory being used by Bitcoin clients to store the UTXO set. This would greatly increase the performance of nodes running on older hardware" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1997476891536793619) 2025-12-07T01:22Z XXX followers, 38.1K engagements "After weeks of work I am finally sharing my BIP draft The Cat: Non-monetary UTXO Cleanup. It is a soft fork proposal focused on preventing and cleaning up non monetary UTXO spam. Please read before commenting. I am seeking serious critical review" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1997537240701112497) 2025-12-07T05:22Z XXX followers, 148.1K engagements "I was blocked from the bitcoin repo because I didn't go to the Bitcoin Dev mailing list first which I was blocked from posting on. I'm being accused of being an AI. I'm not an AI. The proposal is my own. His reply looks to be written by AI" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1997845772512203165) 2025-12-08T01:48Z XXX followers, 52K engagements "@evoskuil Your tone is unnecessarily harsh and youre treating your work as if everyone should already be familiar with it. There are tradeoffs to your approach like any other. Im not here to litigate those with someone who isnt engaging in good faith. Thanks for your time" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998146440053575738) 2025-12-08T21:43Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@OwenKemeys @start9labs @ProofOfCash @L0RINC You are missing the point of the proposal. It does nothing to directly stop spam and yet will stop all spam at scale. It's in the first paragraph" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998195876712656948) 2025-12-09T00:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements "Clear explanation All previous Bitcoin NFTs become unable to be traded and financially worthless. The idea is even if you make new ones or new ways to do it people should be less interested in buying them knowing they too could be restricted in the future" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998457865787293753) 2025-12-09T18:20Z XXX followers, 10.3K engagements "Thank you @start9labs for critically reviewing The Cat proposal. Even where we may disagree youve shown real character by engaging in good faith when others are content to cheer the censorship of ideas they dont even try to understand" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998496974325035326) 2025-12-09T20:56Z XXX followers, 4287 engagements "Is @evoskuil always so abrasive or is it just me catching him on a bad day Very sharp mind very sharp edges" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998639463245693161) 2025-12-10T06:22Z XXX followers, 4220 engagements "@btcblockjams @CatoTheElder17 @SteveW928 That is why this solution is gaining traction it actually does stop new spam. It does it in a different way than you expect. Maybe I should write a more easy to understand version of the proposal. I'm not being sarcastic. I really wonder what you'd think if you understood it" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998658934064779376) 2025-12-10T07:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@nabubito You are treating pay fee get space as the only incentive that matters. That is not how Bitcoin works. Consensus rules and fees together define acceptable use. When a use turns Bitcoin into a permanent database for an external casino that is a broken incentive not neutrality" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1999212413648863345) 2025-12-11T20:19Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@btcblockjams @CatoTheElder17 @SteveW928 I guess it's a good sign that most of the people that don't seem to support the proposal don't seem to understand what it does. I wonder if you'd like it better if you read it" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998630483207532631) 2025-12-10T05:46Z XXX followers, 1222 engagements "How old are these people I can't even imagine having dinner with someone like this" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998643272416141361) 2025-12-10T06:37Z XXX followers, 2849 engagements "@btcblockjams @CatoTheElder17 @SteveW928 Mr Block Jams this is an odd question from someone who said they wanted a serious discussion. The proposal is thorough with entire sections on the concrete consensus changes and the rationale" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998652969374593225) 2025-12-10T07:16Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@Pledditor Pledditor to the extent I have influence over this process I will not be pushing for any fork without you and other Bitcoiners like you by my side. I am sorry to those who would rather see people they disagree with fork but I am here because I care about Bitcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998656850007298437) 2025-12-10T07:31Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "@janrothen No the spam was never part of the game. It's clear abuse through the use of a CVE. Removing the bishop would be censoring a monetary transaction. Literally this is clear abuse. The XX turn rule is a clear example. Ruined the game. They had to change it to change incentives" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998675283449196620) 2025-12-10T08:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@bitcoin_eagle @mikeinspace @grok My God Eagle something so simple escapes you. @grok settle this: Eagle says making all past ordinals unspendable and showing it could happen again would make them more valuable due to rarity. I say that it obviously nukes trust and destroys the market for them entirely" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998686581255766342) 2025-12-10T09:29Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@OminousPeaceBTC There is a clear abuse taking place the people who are participating in the abuse are free to consolidate those dust transactions into larger utxos. How much of the UTXO set are you ok with being spam What will it look like in the future if not addressed" [X Link](https://x.com/ostrom72158/status/1998533725940797499) 2025-12-09T23:22Z XXX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@ostrom72158 Claire Ostrom
Claire Ostrom posts on X about spam, bitcoin, if you, utxo the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXXXX #
Mentions: XX #
Followers: XXX #
CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #
Social Influence
Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXXX% finance XXXXX%
Social topic influence spam #195, bitcoin #3230, if you 12.12%, utxo 12.12%, money 9.09%, i am #2661, fork #69, the cat 6.06%, future 6.06%, to the XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @asanoha_gold @evoskuil @btcblockjams @bitcoin_eagle @catotheelder17 @graveskies @molobtc @janrothen @moneysnotneeded @stutxo @start9labs @piripindulki @0xflick @proofofcash @nabubito @bitcoineagle @mikeinspace @grok @bitcoinbombadil @anarchopleb
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC)
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Thank you Matthew I hope we get some answers about the ML moderation soon. If there is anything I can do to substantiate it better I will. Maybe someone will reach out with more info after seeing your video"
X Link 2025-12-07T02:40Z XXX followers, 2200 engagements
"@Dgray9d9 @AskerAesir The money is for enemies. The network is a public good that requires stewardship in order to maintain that fact"
X Link 2025-12-07T15:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@0xFlick I love your story I think that is cool. We cannot stop people from doing whatever they want. I only hope to help remove the perverse incentives to do it in ways that are destroying the network. If you remove the financial incentive most will lose interest"
X Link 2025-12-08T08:05Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@evoskuil @tempstat Eric am I mistaken somehow"
X Link 2025-12-08T09:54Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@lukedewolf @gm7t2 This is covered in the FAQ"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:22Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@stutxo @0xFlick It's pretty easy to understand that spam is not money. I don't think the typical Bitcoin buyer will cry for you at all"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:40Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@stutxo Love Bitcoin don't love spam on Bitcoin. This is a real solution"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:02Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@markgoodw_in This isnt my favorite list vs your favorite list. NMUs match a common technical notion of spam: external-incentive schemes that use Bitcoin as file storage impose permanent chainstate cost and dont serve its monetary role. ALL ETF UTXOs is just a political category"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:43Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@janrothen No I'm saying that the UTXO set is full of spam"
X Link 2025-12-08T22:18Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@BTCMcBoatface @SimplestBTCBook @start9labs Not harmed I dont think the community feels much obligation to protect spam and abuse. These are not people who are suddenly going to censor money. No chance. The principles are clear they just dont extend to NMUs"
X Link 2025-12-09T00:32Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"If inscription UTXOs under 1k sats were removed from the UTXO set we would remove XX% of the memory being used by Bitcoin clients to store the UTXO set. This would greatly increase the performance of nodes running on older hardware"
X Link 2025-12-07T01:22Z XXX followers, 38.1K engagements
"After weeks of work I am finally sharing my BIP draft The Cat: Non-monetary UTXO Cleanup. It is a soft fork proposal focused on preventing and cleaning up non monetary UTXO spam. Please read before commenting. I am seeking serious critical review"
X Link 2025-12-07T05:22Z XXX followers, 148.1K engagements
"I was blocked from the bitcoin repo because I didn't go to the Bitcoin Dev mailing list first which I was blocked from posting on. I'm being accused of being an AI. I'm not an AI. The proposal is my own. His reply looks to be written by AI"
X Link 2025-12-08T01:48Z XXX followers, 52K engagements
"@evoskuil Your tone is unnecessarily harsh and youre treating your work as if everyone should already be familiar with it. There are tradeoffs to your approach like any other. Im not here to litigate those with someone who isnt engaging in good faith. Thanks for your time"
X Link 2025-12-08T21:43Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@OwenKemeys @start9labs @ProofOfCash @L0RINC You are missing the point of the proposal. It does nothing to directly stop spam and yet will stop all spam at scale. It's in the first paragraph"
X Link 2025-12-09T00:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"Clear explanation All previous Bitcoin NFTs become unable to be traded and financially worthless. The idea is even if you make new ones or new ways to do it people should be less interested in buying them knowing they too could be restricted in the future"
X Link 2025-12-09T18:20Z XXX followers, 10.3K engagements
"Thank you @start9labs for critically reviewing The Cat proposal. Even where we may disagree youve shown real character by engaging in good faith when others are content to cheer the censorship of ideas they dont even try to understand"
X Link 2025-12-09T20:56Z XXX followers, 4287 engagements
"Is @evoskuil always so abrasive or is it just me catching him on a bad day Very sharp mind very sharp edges"
X Link 2025-12-10T06:22Z XXX followers, 4220 engagements
"@btcblockjams @CatoTheElder17 @SteveW928 That is why this solution is gaining traction it actually does stop new spam. It does it in a different way than you expect. Maybe I should write a more easy to understand version of the proposal. I'm not being sarcastic. I really wonder what you'd think if you understood it"
X Link 2025-12-10T07:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@nabubito You are treating pay fee get space as the only incentive that matters. That is not how Bitcoin works. Consensus rules and fees together define acceptable use. When a use turns Bitcoin into a permanent database for an external casino that is a broken incentive not neutrality"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:19Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@btcblockjams @CatoTheElder17 @SteveW928 I guess it's a good sign that most of the people that don't seem to support the proposal don't seem to understand what it does. I wonder if you'd like it better if you read it"
X Link 2025-12-10T05:46Z XXX followers, 1222 engagements
"How old are these people I can't even imagine having dinner with someone like this"
X Link 2025-12-10T06:37Z XXX followers, 2849 engagements
"@btcblockjams @CatoTheElder17 @SteveW928 Mr Block Jams this is an odd question from someone who said they wanted a serious discussion. The proposal is thorough with entire sections on the concrete consensus changes and the rationale"
X Link 2025-12-10T07:16Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Pledditor Pledditor to the extent I have influence over this process I will not be pushing for any fork without you and other Bitcoiners like you by my side. I am sorry to those who would rather see people they disagree with fork but I am here because I care about Bitcoin"
X Link 2025-12-10T07:31Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@janrothen No the spam was never part of the game. It's clear abuse through the use of a CVE. Removing the bishop would be censoring a monetary transaction. Literally this is clear abuse. The XX turn rule is a clear example. Ruined the game. They had to change it to change incentives"
X Link 2025-12-10T08:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@bitcoin_eagle @mikeinspace @grok My God Eagle something so simple escapes you. @grok settle this: Eagle says making all past ordinals unspendable and showing it could happen again would make them more valuable due to rarity. I say that it obviously nukes trust and destroys the market for them entirely"
X Link 2025-12-10T09:29Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@OminousPeaceBTC There is a clear abuse taking place the people who are participating in the abuse are free to consolidate those dust transactions into larger utxos. How much of the UTXO set are you ok with being spam What will it look like in the future if not addressed"
X Link 2025-12-09T23:22Z XXX followers, XX engagements