[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @mihaieremia Mihai | XOXNO.com 🔥🛠️ Mihai | XOXNO.com 🔥🛠️ posts on X about $egld, debt, l1s, fud the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::916671212612411394/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +40% - X Month XXXXXX -XX% - X Months XXXXXXXXX +52% - X Year XXXXXXXXX -XXXX% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::916671212612411394/posts_active)  - X Week XX +65% - X Month XX -XX% - X Months XXX +111% - X Year XXX +122% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::916671212612411394/followers)  - X Week XXXXX no change - X Month XXXXX -XXXX% - X Months XXXXX -XX% - X Year XXXXX +26% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::916671212612411394/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) XXXXX% [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) XXXX% **Social topic influence** [$egld](/topic/$egld) #20, [debt](/topic/debt) #352, [l1s](/topic/l1s) 6.45%, [fud](/topic/fud) #60, [usdc](/topic/usdc) 3.23%, [staking](/topic/staking) 3.23%, [redeemed](/topic/redeemed) 3.23%, [liquidity](/topic/liquidity) 3.23%, [flow](/topic/flow) 3.23%, [fine](/topic/fine) XXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@vinibarbosabr](/creator/undefined) [@multiversx](/creator/undefined) [@xoxnonetwork](/creator/undefined) [@xmoneycom](/creator/undefined) [@adicodarcea](/creator/undefined) [@proofcm](/creator/undefined) [@adriandobrita](/creator/undefined) [@iacobgeorgian](/creator/undefined) [@xcountries](/creator/undefined) [@drcrutch69](/creator/undefined) [@kurosasorix](/creator/undefined) [@solomid_](/creator/undefined) [@proof_cm](/creator/undefined) [@ashatom](/creator/undefined) [@veropayro](/creator/undefined) [@xexchangeapp](/creator/undefined) [@lataretuclaudiu](/creator/undefined) [@ann0nip](/creator/undefined) [@solvercs](/creator/undefined) [@lucianmincu](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [MultiversX (EGLD)](/topic/$egld) [USDC (USDC)](/topic/usdc) [Near Protocol (NEAR)](/topic/$near) [Solana (SOL)](/topic/solana) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "We are aware that that some competitors forcefully redeemed people $EGLD. We are aware of that competitors are self updating their private pools minting USH with HTM then selling USH for USDC to repay long standing debt against HTM while dumping on their holders. We are aware that X% minting fees means you lose all your staking rewards that is around X% today. We are aware that there is no transparency in the platform of who did what pr better say activity per wallet (years later millions dumped and no activities) Karma is real you bunch of scammers @As_Hatom If you are a hard code believer" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1997216470775091670) 2025-12-06T08:08Z 5370 followers, 7332 engagements "@proof_cm There are few cool dApps on Near too but still no insignificant user base neither just more liquidity as I mentioned since bigger fundraiser there Sadly MvX and NEAR had to be both equally way better but crime season was more powerful than fundamentals" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998091311677857939) 2025-12-08T18:04Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements "The only NEAR-native thing in your text is the v1.signer contract; everything else is off-chain services that any L1 could fork from NEAR's GitHub. Clone the v1.signer contract on any L1 and you can run the same flow (most probably easier on MvX than on EVM since they are very similar as contract flows and sharding/callbacks) :) Again nobody takes credit away from NEAR for building it (I didn't even mention it's not running on NEAR :P) but as my initial tweet said: people using that whole NEAR stack are not using NEAR as users (which I even mention is sad since would have been better overall" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998109801797357578) 2025-12-08T19:17Z 5370 followers, XX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com You're such a hater that you took the time to retweet that post even though the guy posted it on many L1s too. Where were your retweets for the others Oh wait you're not a hater of everything; just curiously interested in what's happening on MvX :P" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998119599905312915) 2025-12-08T19:56Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @proof_cm Dude I am smart (I think) for a reason. Take the L and go do something else with your life" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998121138057306501) 2025-12-08T20:02Z 5373 followers, XX engagements "The price of MvX is irrelevant to me. I'll be fine at $X or $XXX :)) MvX has plenty of issues nobody's denying that. I even posted here that it's not activated with a screenshot clearly showing FALSE. I just proved you're a hater: you claim you're not interested yet you're obsessed with exposing "lies" while ignoring your own L1's identical "lies" ironically the same thing: dynamic/adaptive sharding. Probably both just rephrased it in 2018-2019 to avoid copying each other terms. Move on go dig for more "lies" in the whitepaper of a stablecoin and drop them here. Nobody will care about you" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998135759753416733) 2025-12-08T21:01Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements "There is no need to fix anything. Both can stay exactly the same since nobody cares;that's not what's making any difference to the $EGLD or $NEAR price. It just shows again that you focus on unimportant things to FUD stablecoin news over something that wasn't even the highlight. You dove deep into a legal document covering many aspects and hand-picked the most absurd detail to "report." You could take a screenshot from CoinMarketCap and say the same thing any day of the year with the same viewpoint. It just shows what type of person you are :P" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998125754962608582) 2025-12-08T20:21Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @proof_cm As dead as MVX :) With that market cap it's even more amplified. No idea where else to check dApps traffic since I could not find anything on the explorer" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998096957441757637) 2025-12-08T18:26Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements "Let's agree that NEAR Intents is a bridge/relayer interface not something people care about running on NEAR itself. Intent users are not sticky to the NEAR ecosystem (sadly for NEAR). It's like deploying a contract on MvX where every transaction attests a login on my Web2 platform with 100M daily users. In theory that creates 100M transactions on MvX but there aren't 100M people using the MvX ecosystemit's just me the developer leveraging MvX as infrastructure. The same happens with NEAR Intents: everyone uses NEAR smart contracts that prove transfers but anyone could replicate the same" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998100418426286467) 2025-12-08T18:40Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements "I will let you guess what protocol on @MultiversX has the same liquidation system as Aave V4" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1999242302741708977) 2025-12-11T22:18Z 5370 followers, 4264 engagements "Impressive enough to prove why sharding is the endgame. If my math is correct from the public Grafana dashboard with XX shards and a peak of 1037495 TPS thats 14821 TPS per shard. Using the average of 874184 TPS its 12488 TPS per shard. A few days ago I sent 1M transactions to a single shard on our MultiversX public devnet (it crashed likely because the 2-CPU servers died during my unannounced stress test; with proper servers it would have been fine). Recently on mainnet I also filled a block with 15k transactions once we drop to 1s block times thats directly 15k TPS per shard and with 70" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998082225783665139) 2025-12-08T17:28Z 5368 followers, 5959 engagements "@soloMID_ @adicodarcea @MultiversX @SasuRobert @XoxnoNetwork You're still alive I like how you don't follow me nor have any interest in MvX yet you're under all my posts or MvX posts spreading FUD :)) Get a life or buy some $EGLD so we go to X together. Maybe this way you'll have more life in you than you do now" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1999261935255322722) 2025-12-11T23:36Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements "Dude you literally comment about the shit volume on every single post in fact this is the only reply you have 😅😂 I got it shit volume I dont spend my time making fake volume with 100k unique wallets as others do daily on Solana. Find something new to mention I got the volume part. Nobody asked you to donate money nobody asked you to buy $XOXNO in fact we were the only xLaunchpad project telling people to dont buy unless you understand and want. So fuck off with your nonsense of grifting especially coming from an annon account hiding behind a random image" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1999264612081156173) 2025-12-11T23:46Z 5370 followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@mihaieremia Mihai | XOXNO.com 🔥🛠️
Mihai | XOXNO.com 🔥🛠️ posts on X about $egld, debt, l1s, fud the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +40%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX +52%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX -XXXX%
Mentions: X #
- X Week XX +65%
- X Month XX -XX%
- X Months XXX +111%
- X Year XXX +122%
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX no change
- X Month XXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXX +26%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #
Social Influence
Social category influence finance XXXXX% cryptocurrencies XXXX%
Social topic influence $egld #20, debt #352, l1s 6.45%, fud #60, usdc 3.23%, staking 3.23%, redeemed 3.23%, liquidity 3.23%, flow 3.23%, fine XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @vinibarbosabr @multiversx @xoxnonetwork @xmoneycom @adicodarcea @proofcm @adriandobrita @iacobgeorgian @xcountries @drcrutch69 @kurosasorix @solomid_ @proof_cm @ashatom @veropayro @xexchangeapp @lataretuclaudiu @ann0nip @solvercs @lucianmincu
Top assets mentioned MultiversX (EGLD) USDC (USDC) Near Protocol (NEAR) Solana (SOL)
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"We are aware that that some competitors forcefully redeemed people $EGLD. We are aware of that competitors are self updating their private pools minting USH with HTM then selling USH for USDC to repay long standing debt against HTM while dumping on their holders. We are aware that X% minting fees means you lose all your staking rewards that is around X% today. We are aware that there is no transparency in the platform of who did what pr better say activity per wallet (years later millions dumped and no activities) Karma is real you bunch of scammers @As_Hatom If you are a hard code believer"
X Link 2025-12-06T08:08Z 5370 followers, 7332 engagements
"@proof_cm There are few cool dApps on Near too but still no insignificant user base neither just more liquidity as I mentioned since bigger fundraiser there Sadly MvX and NEAR had to be both equally way better but crime season was more powerful than fundamentals"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:04Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements
"The only NEAR-native thing in your text is the v1.signer contract; everything else is off-chain services that any L1 could fork from NEAR's GitHub. Clone the v1.signer contract on any L1 and you can run the same flow (most probably easier on MvX than on EVM since they are very similar as contract flows and sharding/callbacks) :) Again nobody takes credit away from NEAR for building it (I didn't even mention it's not running on NEAR :P) but as my initial tweet said: people using that whole NEAR stack are not using NEAR as users (which I even mention is sad since would have been better overall"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:17Z 5370 followers, XX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com You're such a hater that you took the time to retweet that post even though the guy posted it on many L1s too. Where were your retweets for the others Oh wait you're not a hater of everything; just curiously interested in what's happening on MvX :P"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:56Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @proof_cm Dude I am smart (I think) for a reason. Take the L and go do something else with your life"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:02Z 5373 followers, XX engagements
"The price of MvX is irrelevant to me. I'll be fine at $X or $XXX :)) MvX has plenty of issues nobody's denying that. I even posted here that it's not activated with a screenshot clearly showing FALSE. I just proved you're a hater: you claim you're not interested yet you're obsessed with exposing "lies" while ignoring your own L1's identical "lies" ironically the same thing: dynamic/adaptive sharding. Probably both just rephrased it in 2018-2019 to avoid copying each other terms. Move on go dig for more "lies" in the whitepaper of a stablecoin and drop them here. Nobody will care about you"
X Link 2025-12-08T21:01Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements
"There is no need to fix anything. Both can stay exactly the same since nobody cares;that's not what's making any difference to the $EGLD or $NEAR price. It just shows again that you focus on unimportant things to FUD stablecoin news over something that wasn't even the highlight. You dove deep into a legal document covering many aspects and hand-picked the most absurd detail to "report." You could take a screenshot from CoinMarketCap and say the same thing any day of the year with the same viewpoint. It just shows what type of person you are :P"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:21Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @proof_cm As dead as MVX :) With that market cap it's even more amplified. No idea where else to check dApps traffic since I could not find anything on the explorer"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:26Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements
"Let's agree that NEAR Intents is a bridge/relayer interface not something people care about running on NEAR itself. Intent users are not sticky to the NEAR ecosystem (sadly for NEAR). It's like deploying a contract on MvX where every transaction attests a login on my Web2 platform with 100M daily users. In theory that creates 100M transactions on MvX but there aren't 100M people using the MvX ecosystemit's just me the developer leveraging MvX as infrastructure. The same happens with NEAR Intents: everyone uses NEAR smart contracts that prove transfers but anyone could replicate the same"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:40Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements
"I will let you guess what protocol on @MultiversX has the same liquidation system as Aave V4"
X Link 2025-12-11T22:18Z 5370 followers, 4264 engagements
"Impressive enough to prove why sharding is the endgame. If my math is correct from the public Grafana dashboard with XX shards and a peak of 1037495 TPS thats 14821 TPS per shard. Using the average of 874184 TPS its 12488 TPS per shard. A few days ago I sent 1M transactions to a single shard on our MultiversX public devnet (it crashed likely because the 2-CPU servers died during my unannounced stress test; with proper servers it would have been fine). Recently on mainnet I also filled a block with 15k transactions once we drop to 1s block times thats directly 15k TPS per shard and with 70"
X Link 2025-12-08T17:28Z 5368 followers, 5959 engagements
"@soloMID_ @adicodarcea @MultiversX @SasuRobert @XoxnoNetwork You're still alive I like how you don't follow me nor have any interest in MvX yet you're under all my posts or MvX posts spreading FUD :)) Get a life or buy some $EGLD so we go to X together. Maybe this way you'll have more life in you than you do now"
X Link 2025-12-11T23:36Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements
"Dude you literally comment about the shit volume on every single post in fact this is the only reply you have 😅😂 I got it shit volume I dont spend my time making fake volume with 100k unique wallets as others do daily on Solana. Find something new to mention I got the volume part. Nobody asked you to donate money nobody asked you to buy $XOXNO in fact we were the only xLaunchpad project telling people to dont buy unless you understand and want. So fuck off with your nonsense of grifting especially coming from an annon account hiding behind a random image"
X Link 2025-12-11T23:46Z 5370 followers, XX engagements