[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
#  @gm7t2 Greg
Greg posts on X about exchanges, sats, if you, bitcoin the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1030585804559736832/interactions)

- X Week XXXXXXX +85,175%
- X Month XXXXXXX +5,256%
- X Months XXXXXXX +1,957%
- X Year XXXXXXX +284%
### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1030585804559736832/posts_active)

- X Months XXX +223%
- X Year XXX +164%
### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1030585804559736832/followers)

- X Week XXXXXX +0.05%
- X Month XXXXXX +0.01%
- X Months XXXXXX -X%
- X Year XXXXXX -XXXX%
### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1030585804559736832/influencer_rank)

### Social Influence
**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) [finance](/list/finance)
**Social topic influence**
[exchanges](/topic/exchanges) #630, [sats](/topic/sats) #238, [if you](/topic/if-you), [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin), [all the](/topic/all-the), [core](/topic/core), [utxo](/topic/utxo), [uncommongoods](/topic/uncommongoods), [token](/topic/token), [i dont](/topic/i-dont)
**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [UNCOMMON•GOODS (UNCOMMONGOODS)](/topic/uncommongoods)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@OrangeSurfBTC He is minting the UNCOMMON.GOODS rune token paying XX sats per token minted At the same time these tokens are on sale for XXXX sats each I don't see why it is even worth minting them when the price of minting is higher than the market price"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998719756803649953) 2025-12-10T11:41Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"@great_martis Most holders never spend it: proves even owners know its a hot potato not money Because that's what hot potatoes are famous for People love to hold them rather than trying to get rid of them asap"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1996539768587628563) 2025-12-04T11:19Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@Somnath__95 @Wisdom_HQ The poem does seem to indicate that men shouldn't be included in the count and I assume the narrator himself isn't a wife It's unclear whether the large mostly feline family are also going to St. Ives but if they are your math checks out"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1997612965521162252) 2025-12-07T10:23Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"What do you mean by "they break" Inscriptions are immutable. They don't break. BRC-20 is a stupid protocol because single use messages ("mint X tokens" or "transfer Y tokens") are inscribed permanently onto sats They end up being sent to exchanges and unsuspecting people buy those inscribed sats. The Cat can't know whether the current holder of inscriptions even knows that inscriptions exist but will punish them just the same The unsuspecting exchange customer isn't F'ing Around but will Find Out just the same"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1997985260135485942) 2025-12-08T11:03Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"@Wisdom_HQ Are any of the children from previous marriages Do the X men have X wives each or one each"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1997532572881138156) 2025-12-07T05:04Z 10.7K followers, 297.9K engagements
"That's not correct. Inscriptions don't stop existing if you send them to an exchange address. How would that even work The indexer doesn't know what addresses belong to exchanges. Sending btc to an exchange is just a regular transaction. I'm not sure what "moved like that" is referring to Even spending them as fees doesn't destroy them. They just turn up in the block reward of whatever block mines the tx that spend them as fees You don't need to withdraw 1000 sats from the exchange. You withdraw any size and someone ends up with dust either as change or because you made a small payment to"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998080784469528633) 2025-12-08T17:22Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"I don't think you are understanding what I'm saying Inscriptions don't need an ordinals specific wallet to send to receive them and the fact that exchanges don't hold separate utxos for separate users is exactly the problem: I send some junk inscriptions to an exchange and you withdraw them without you or the exchange knowing it You transact with the sats you got from the exchange and eventually end up with some dust outputs which might contain inscriptions. You don't know if they do or not and don't care but the cat still ends up taking those outputs Is there something specific you disagree"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998086571099107786) 2025-12-08T17:45Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"Junk inscriptions are very well distributed through the bitcoin supply at this point. You get them in random exchange withdrawals all the time without knowing it Here's the most recent block reward. XXXXX newly created bitcoins plus whatever fees the miner collected. Look at all the inscription junk in there just from the fees that were collected: That will end up in the hands of people who don't know what inscriptions are. And this is going on all the time"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998090260169830591) 2025-12-08T18:00Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"@lukedewolf The text inscriptions are the BRC-20 junk I was talking about that make up the majority of inscription volume"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998091211832443101) 2025-12-08T18:04Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"@BTCtoOblivion Core logic before: no confiscation Core logic after: no confiscation Stupid inconsistent Coretards"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998122986746810696) 2025-12-08T20:10Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@jkaartinen @lukedewolf Looking at the current most recent block I see million dollar utxos with inscriptions in them. Are we going to confiscate those to fix the "spam problem" This one has an inscription buried XX BTC into a XX BTC output. Get him"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998734292176777522) 2025-12-10T12:39Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"Some responses: It's always been strange to me why we can't just ignore provably fake pubkeys. What's been causing us (technically) to need to store them the same way as everything else Almost all the pubkeys on the chain are plausibly real. If you make up a pubkey at random it's almost certainly fake (as in nobody knows the corresponding private key) but even those have a XX% chance of looking real. Isn't it the case that only XX% of all possible pubkeys are provably fake So we could ignore provably fake pubkeys but it would make almost no difference to the UTXO set size There are three ways"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1997984160082751814) 2025-12-08T10:58Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@Wisdom_HQ What you talkin about Willis"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998179170174849534) 2025-12-08T23:53Z 10.7K followers, 236.7K engagements
"@Arthur_van_Pelt Core isn't the official Bitcoin node software so its developers aren't in official positions of power You know this already. There's nothing official about Bitcoin"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998403242246479896) 2025-12-09T14:43Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"my UTXOs aren't obviously trash all suspiciously sitting just above the dust limit. None of them Have you checked You don't have to know about inscriptions to own them. Those things are all over the UTXO set. People inwittingly withdraw inscriptions from exchanges every day This "cat" proposal punishes people who never even heard of inscriptions"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998575738203811952) 2025-12-10T02:09Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@jkaartinen @lukedewolf Link to the utxo:"
[X Link](https://x.com/gm7t2/status/1998734479473475696) 2025-12-10T12:40Z 10.7K followers, X engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@gm7t2 GregGreg posts on X about exchanges, sats, if you, bitcoin the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies finance
Social topic influence exchanges #630, sats #238, if you, bitcoin, all the, core, utxo, uncommongoods, token, i dont
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) UNCOMMON•GOODS (UNCOMMONGOODS)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@OrangeSurfBTC He is minting the UNCOMMON.GOODS rune token paying XX sats per token minted At the same time these tokens are on sale for XXXX sats each I don't see why it is even worth minting them when the price of minting is higher than the market price"
X Link 2025-12-10T11:41Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"@great_martis Most holders never spend it: proves even owners know its a hot potato not money Because that's what hot potatoes are famous for People love to hold them rather than trying to get rid of them asap"
X Link 2025-12-04T11:19Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@Somnath__95 @Wisdom_HQ The poem does seem to indicate that men shouldn't be included in the count and I assume the narrator himself isn't a wife It's unclear whether the large mostly feline family are also going to St. Ives but if they are your math checks out"
X Link 2025-12-07T10:23Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"What do you mean by "they break" Inscriptions are immutable. They don't break. BRC-20 is a stupid protocol because single use messages ("mint X tokens" or "transfer Y tokens") are inscribed permanently onto sats They end up being sent to exchanges and unsuspecting people buy those inscribed sats. The Cat can't know whether the current holder of inscriptions even knows that inscriptions exist but will punish them just the same The unsuspecting exchange customer isn't F'ing Around but will Find Out just the same"
X Link 2025-12-08T11:03Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"@Wisdom_HQ Are any of the children from previous marriages Do the X men have X wives each or one each"
X Link 2025-12-07T05:04Z 10.7K followers, 297.9K engagements
"That's not correct. Inscriptions don't stop existing if you send them to an exchange address. How would that even work The indexer doesn't know what addresses belong to exchanges. Sending btc to an exchange is just a regular transaction. I'm not sure what "moved like that" is referring to Even spending them as fees doesn't destroy them. They just turn up in the block reward of whatever block mines the tx that spend them as fees You don't need to withdraw 1000 sats from the exchange. You withdraw any size and someone ends up with dust either as change or because you made a small payment to"
X Link 2025-12-08T17:22Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"I don't think you are understanding what I'm saying Inscriptions don't need an ordinals specific wallet to send to receive them and the fact that exchanges don't hold separate utxos for separate users is exactly the problem: I send some junk inscriptions to an exchange and you withdraw them without you or the exchange knowing it You transact with the sats you got from the exchange and eventually end up with some dust outputs which might contain inscriptions. You don't know if they do or not and don't care but the cat still ends up taking those outputs Is there something specific you disagree"
X Link 2025-12-08T17:45Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"Junk inscriptions are very well distributed through the bitcoin supply at this point. You get them in random exchange withdrawals all the time without knowing it Here's the most recent block reward. XXXXX newly created bitcoins plus whatever fees the miner collected. Look at all the inscription junk in there just from the fees that were collected: That will end up in the hands of people who don't know what inscriptions are. And this is going on all the time"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:00Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"@lukedewolf The text inscriptions are the BRC-20 junk I was talking about that make up the majority of inscription volume"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:04Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"@BTCtoOblivion Core logic before: no confiscation Core logic after: no confiscation Stupid inconsistent Coretards"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:10Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@jkaartinen @lukedewolf Looking at the current most recent block I see million dollar utxos with inscriptions in them. Are we going to confiscate those to fix the "spam problem" This one has an inscription buried XX BTC into a XX BTC output. Get him"
X Link 2025-12-10T12:39Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"Some responses: It's always been strange to me why we can't just ignore provably fake pubkeys. What's been causing us (technically) to need to store them the same way as everything else Almost all the pubkeys on the chain are plausibly real. If you make up a pubkey at random it's almost certainly fake (as in nobody knows the corresponding private key) but even those have a XX% chance of looking real. Isn't it the case that only XX% of all possible pubkeys are provably fake So we could ignore provably fake pubkeys but it would make almost no difference to the UTXO set size There are three ways"
X Link 2025-12-08T10:58Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@Wisdom_HQ What you talkin about Willis"
X Link 2025-12-08T23:53Z 10.7K followers, 236.7K engagements
"@Arthur_van_Pelt Core isn't the official Bitcoin node software so its developers aren't in official positions of power You know this already. There's nothing official about Bitcoin"
X Link 2025-12-09T14:43Z 10.7K followers, XX engagements
"my UTXOs aren't obviously trash all suspiciously sitting just above the dust limit. None of them Have you checked You don't have to know about inscriptions to own them. Those things are all over the UTXO set. People inwittingly withdraw inscriptions from exchanges every day This "cat" proposal punishes people who never even heard of inscriptions"
X Link 2025-12-10T02:09Z 10.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@jkaartinen @lukedewolf Link to the utxo:"
X Link 2025-12-10T12:40Z 10.7K followers, X engagements
/creator/x::gm7t2