[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @for_yield Mezz Mezz posts on X about legit, prop, money, $100mm the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::340454668/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXXX +1,441% - X Months XXXXXXXXX -XX% - X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::340454668/posts_active)  ### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::340454668/followers)  - X Week XXXXXX +0.17% - X Month XXXXXX +0.89% - X Months XXXXXX +5.40% - X Year XXXXXX +12% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::340454668/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::340454668/influence) --- **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) [mlb](/list/mlb) **Social topic influence** [legit](/topic/legit), [prop](/topic/prop), [money](/topic/money), [$100mm](/topic/$100mm), [$220mm](/topic/$220mm), [trader](/topic/trader), [$17bn](/topic/$17bn), [rays](/topic/rays), [tampa bay rays](/topic/tampa-bay-rays) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::340454668/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Older I get I am convinced these are the only ages: -baby -kid -high schooler -like XX -XX -XX -legit XX -XX -in their 40s -XX -XX -80"  [@for_yield](/creator/x/for_yield) on [X](/post/tweet/1943045368712978823) 2025-07-09 20:31:30 UTC 17.9K followers, 126.2K engagements "But this get into portfolio allocation theory it's not about total return on an isolated basis and also -- public REITs vs private funds have completely different approaches to asset class allocation leverage interest rate sensitivity etc not to mention public REITs are generally prop type specific and private funds are diversified"  [@for_yield](/creator/x/for_yield) on [X](/post/tweet/1945579693861699604) 2025-07-16 20:22:00 UTC 17.9K followers, XXX engagements "No. Same issue as Gallen when guys are losing 2-3+ mph on the fastball and were previously fastball heavy repertoire i.e. the fastball approach created the plane through which the secondary stuff worked it's a bad recipe. Obviously very different fastballs / arm angles between Gallen / Nola but it's the same concept. Get the velo back up a lot of their issues go away"  [@for_yield](/creator/x/for_yield) on [X](/post/tweet/1946767228818620713) 2025-07-20 03:00:51 UTC 17.9K followers, XXX engagements "Stu Sternberg selling the Tampa Bay Rays at $1.7bn a pretty incredible story. Guy was equity options trader went to Spear Leeds & Kellogg then partner at Goldman until 2002. Buys Rays for $220mm in 2004 XX% share so he's in at $100mm. Sells rays XX years later at $1.7bn"  [@for_yield](/creator/x/for_yield) on [X](/post/tweet/1945146533453946889) 2025-07-15 15:40:47 UTC 17.9K followers, 28.4K engagements "@mlb_advanced3 Also don't understand why Nola keeps going back to the curve and doesn't just pound the lower zone. The usage rate on the curve is ridiculous"  [@for_yield](/creator/x/for_yield) on [X](/post/tweet/1946767753207296312) 2025-07-20 03:02:56 UTC 17.9K followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@for_yield Mezz
Mezz posts on X about legit, prop, money, $100mm the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXXX +1,441%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX -XX%
Mentions: X #
Followers: XXXXXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +0.17%
- X Month XXXXXX +0.89%
- X Months XXXXXX +5.40%
- X Year XXXXXX +12%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence finance mlb
Social topic influence legit, prop, money, $100mm, $220mm, trader, $17bn, rays, tampa bay rays
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Older I get I am convinced these are the only ages: -baby -kid -high schooler -like XX -XX -XX -legit XX -XX -in their 40s -XX -XX -80"
@for_yield on X 2025-07-09 20:31:30 UTC 17.9K followers, 126.2K engagements
"But this get into portfolio allocation theory it's not about total return on an isolated basis and also -- public REITs vs private funds have completely different approaches to asset class allocation leverage interest rate sensitivity etc not to mention public REITs are generally prop type specific and private funds are diversified" @for_yield on X 2025-07-16 20:22:00 UTC 17.9K followers, XXX engagements
"No. Same issue as Gallen when guys are losing 2-3+ mph on the fastball and were previously fastball heavy repertoire i.e. the fastball approach created the plane through which the secondary stuff worked it's a bad recipe. Obviously very different fastballs / arm angles between Gallen / Nola but it's the same concept. Get the velo back up a lot of their issues go away" @for_yield on X 2025-07-20 03:00:51 UTC 17.9K followers, XXX engagements
"Stu Sternberg selling the Tampa Bay Rays at $1.7bn a pretty incredible story. Guy was equity options trader went to Spear Leeds & Kellogg then partner at Goldman until 2002. Buys Rays for $220mm in 2004 XX% share so he's in at $100mm. Sells rays XX years later at $1.7bn" @for_yield on X 2025-07-15 15:40:47 UTC 17.9K followers, 28.4K engagements
"@mlb_advanced3 Also don't understand why Nola keeps going back to the curve and doesn't just pound the lower zone. The usage rate on the curve is ridiculous" @for_yield on X 2025-07-20 03:02:56 UTC 17.9K followers, XXX engagements