Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@VladSaigau Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1496125256624484362.png) @VladSaigau Vlad Saigau

Vlad Saigau posts on X about spacex, $500b, $460540b, $780b the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1496125256624484362/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1496125256624484362/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXXX +93%
- X Month XXXXXXX +298%
- X Months XXXXXXX +864%
- X Year XXXXXXX +1,000%

### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1496125256624484362/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1496125256624484362/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX +44%
- X Month XX +18%
- X Months XX +98%
- X Year XXX +706%

### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1496125256624484362/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1496125256624484362/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXX +3.40%
- X Month XXXXX +30%
- X Months XXXXX +225%
- X Year XXXXX +584%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1496125256624484362/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1496125256624484362/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[stocks](/list/stocks)  XXXX% [finance](/list/finance)  XXXX% [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[spacex](/topic/spacex) #849, [$500b](/topic/$500b) #12, [$460540b](/topic/$460540b) 6.25%, [$780b](/topic/$780b) 6.25%, [$800b](/topic/$800b) 6.25%, [to the](/topic/to-the) 6.25%, [$w](/topic/$w) 6.25%, [$2000kg](/topic/$2000kg) 6.25%, [solar](/topic/solar) 6.25%, [sunlight](/topic/sunlight) XXXX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@defiantclient2](/creator/undefined) [@sawyermerritt](/creator/undefined) [@tmobile](/creator/undefined) [@optus](/creator/undefined) [@telstra](/creator/undefined) [@rogers](/creator/undefined) [@onenzofficial](/creator/undefined) [@kddipr](/creator/undefined) [@entel](/creator/undefined) [@entelperu](/creator/undefined) [@twiykyivstar](/creator/undefined) [@vmo2news](/creator/undefined) [@pettitfrontier](/creator/undefined) [@tmfassociates](/creator/undefined) [@nuke2astra](/creator/undefined) [@alexfrombabylon](/creator/undefined) [@rabbittleader](/creator/undefined) [@evnphillips](/creator/undefined) [@c1df9432](/creator/undefined) [@grok](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Wormhole (W)](/topic/$w)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"SpaceX Tender Preview: We Expect a $500B Print πŸš€ The analysis is structured around two questions: How large is a typical 6-month re-rating in SpaceX across tenders and secondaries Where does a new tender sit relative to the companys long-run exponential valuation path Using normalized tender bumps + a 10-yr log-trendline of Notices SpaceX share-price we estimate a $460-540B December valuation with $500B the most expected outcome. SpaceX share price had spent years below its exponential trajectory. Last years surge closed that gap almost exactly as we projected in our Q3'24 quarterly report."  
[X Link](https://x.com/VladSaigau/status/1996258453204189625)  2025-12-03T16:41Z 1586 followers, 59.6K engagements


"Our Q3 quarterly predicted a $780B true value for SpaceX by EOY 2025 πŸ‘€ Get Mach33 Premium research if youre an insitutional investor. Turns out we and our models know what were talking about"  
[X Link](https://x.com/VladSaigau/status/1997019644595499313)  2025-12-05T19:06Z 1587 followers, XXX engagements


"MNOs will lose customers for sure. Suppose Starlink has one MNO partner in each country. Starlink will steal customers from all MNOs not just that one and maybe the MNO partnered with Starlink will provide coverage for the Starlink package in dense urban mobile settings which Starlink will pay for of course. On net Starlink steals customers from everyone while the partner MNO could make more money by being the lynchpin between Starlink DTC and at-home Starlink dish. So the partner MNO could end up being better off on net by supporting Starlink. I hope this makes sense"  
[X Link](https://x.com/VladSaigau/status/1996880801728757820)  2025-12-05T09:54Z 1574 followers, XXX engagements


"@Defiantclient2 @SawyerMerritt @TMobile @Optus @Telstra @Rogers @onenzofficial @kddipr @entel @EntelPeru @TwiyKyivstar @VMO2News I will put together an analysis on this with illustrative numbers since its hard to explain clearly in words"  
[X Link](https://x.com/VladSaigau/status/1996881241870909879)  2025-12-05T09:56Z 1573 followers, XXX engagements


"@Defiantclient2 @SawyerMerritt @TMobile @Optus @Telstra @Rogers @onenzofficial @kddipr @entel @EntelPeru @TwiyKyivstar @VMO2News @grok explain what im trying to say here better than I did"  
[X Link](https://x.com/VladSaigau/status/1996884752461451509)  2025-12-05T10:09Z 1572 followers, XXX engagements


"RIP this analysis. $800B LFG πŸ€‘"  
[X Link](https://x.com/VladSaigau/status/1997017114574471473)  2025-12-05T18:55Z 1574 followers, 3915 engagements


"Orbital Power for Compute Is Closer to Terrestrial Parity Than Most Expect βš‘πŸ›°πŸ“‰ In Part X of our orbital compute series we projected the $/W of powering compute in high Earth orbit (HEO). At $2000/kg to HEO orbital power & cooling costs 18-26 $/W; about X the XX $/W terrestrial datacenter benchmark. Under a reusable Starship with orbital refuelling HEO delivery cost falls fast. We modelled three different satellite architectures and where they reach parity with terrestrial benchmarks in terms of launch costs. Starlink-satellite HEO parity: XXX $/kg to HEO Compute-Optimized Starlink (standard"  
[X Link](https://x.com/VladSaigau/status/1993723593398620392)  2025-11-26T16:48Z 1582 followers, 208.2K engagements


"Orbital Compute: Where Should Space Data Centers Live β˜€πŸ›° This week we benchmarked the solar radiation V and 'real-estate' physics of every major orbital regime from LEO to Earth-Sun L1. Key findings. β˜€ All orbits beat Earth by 6-9 in usable solar power. πŸŒ“ Dawn-Dusk Sun-Synchronous Orbit is the short-term sweet spot; continuous sunlight low radiation low latency low launch cost. πŸ“‰ But its capacity-limited: the terminator corridor is tiny X% of LEOs usable volume. ⚠MEO/High-Earth Orbit have optimal sunlight but sit inside the Van Allen belts resulting in punishing radiation requires heavy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/VladSaigau/status/1998803584750588054)  2025-12-10T17:14Z 1587 followers, 19.7K engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@VladSaigau Avatar @VladSaigau Vlad Saigau

Vlad Saigau posts on X about spacex, $500b, $460540b, $780b the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXX #

Engagements Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXXX +93%
  • X Month XXXXXXX +298%
  • X Months XXXXXXX +864%
  • X Year XXXXXXX +1,000%

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

  • X Week XX +44%
  • X Month XX +18%
  • X Months XX +98%
  • X Year XXX +706%

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXX +3.40%
  • X Month XXXXX +30%
  • X Months XXXXX +225%
  • X Year XXXXX +584%

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence stocks XXXX% finance XXXX% cryptocurrencies XXXX%

Social topic influence spacex #849, $500b #12, $460540b 6.25%, $780b 6.25%, $800b 6.25%, to the 6.25%, $w 6.25%, $2000kg 6.25%, solar 6.25%, sunlight XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @defiantclient2 @sawyermerritt @tmobile @optus @telstra @rogers @onenzofficial @kddipr @entel @entelperu @twiykyivstar @vmo2news @pettitfrontier @tmfassociates @nuke2astra @alexfrombabylon @rabbittleader @evnphillips @c1df9432 @grok

Top assets mentioned Wormhole (W)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"SpaceX Tender Preview: We Expect a $500B Print πŸš€ The analysis is structured around two questions: How large is a typical 6-month re-rating in SpaceX across tenders and secondaries Where does a new tender sit relative to the companys long-run exponential valuation path Using normalized tender bumps + a 10-yr log-trendline of Notices SpaceX share-price we estimate a $460-540B December valuation with $500B the most expected outcome. SpaceX share price had spent years below its exponential trajectory. Last years surge closed that gap almost exactly as we projected in our Q3'24 quarterly report."
X Link 2025-12-03T16:41Z 1586 followers, 59.6K engagements

"Our Q3 quarterly predicted a $780B true value for SpaceX by EOY 2025 πŸ‘€ Get Mach33 Premium research if youre an insitutional investor. Turns out we and our models know what were talking about"
X Link 2025-12-05T19:06Z 1587 followers, XXX engagements

"MNOs will lose customers for sure. Suppose Starlink has one MNO partner in each country. Starlink will steal customers from all MNOs not just that one and maybe the MNO partnered with Starlink will provide coverage for the Starlink package in dense urban mobile settings which Starlink will pay for of course. On net Starlink steals customers from everyone while the partner MNO could make more money by being the lynchpin between Starlink DTC and at-home Starlink dish. So the partner MNO could end up being better off on net by supporting Starlink. I hope this makes sense"
X Link 2025-12-05T09:54Z 1574 followers, XXX engagements

"@Defiantclient2 @SawyerMerritt @TMobile @Optus @Telstra @Rogers @onenzofficial @kddipr @entel @EntelPeru @TwiyKyivstar @VMO2News I will put together an analysis on this with illustrative numbers since its hard to explain clearly in words"
X Link 2025-12-05T09:56Z 1573 followers, XXX engagements

"@Defiantclient2 @SawyerMerritt @TMobile @Optus @Telstra @Rogers @onenzofficial @kddipr @entel @EntelPeru @TwiyKyivstar @VMO2News @grok explain what im trying to say here better than I did"
X Link 2025-12-05T10:09Z 1572 followers, XXX engagements

"RIP this analysis. $800B LFG πŸ€‘"
X Link 2025-12-05T18:55Z 1574 followers, 3915 engagements

"Orbital Power for Compute Is Closer to Terrestrial Parity Than Most Expect βš‘πŸ›°πŸ“‰ In Part X of our orbital compute series we projected the $/W of powering compute in high Earth orbit (HEO). At $2000/kg to HEO orbital power & cooling costs 18-26 $/W; about X the XX $/W terrestrial datacenter benchmark. Under a reusable Starship with orbital refuelling HEO delivery cost falls fast. We modelled three different satellite architectures and where they reach parity with terrestrial benchmarks in terms of launch costs. Starlink-satellite HEO parity: XXX $/kg to HEO Compute-Optimized Starlink (standard"
X Link 2025-11-26T16:48Z 1582 followers, 208.2K engagements

"Orbital Compute: Where Should Space Data Centers Live β˜€πŸ›° This week we benchmarked the solar radiation V and 'real-estate' physics of every major orbital regime from LEO to Earth-Sun L1. Key findings. β˜€ All orbits beat Earth by 6-9 in usable solar power. πŸŒ“ Dawn-Dusk Sun-Synchronous Orbit is the short-term sweet spot; continuous sunlight low radiation low latency low launch cost. πŸ“‰ But its capacity-limited: the terminator corridor is tiny X% of LEOs usable volume. ⚠MEO/High-Earth Orbit have optimal sunlight but sit inside the Van Allen belts resulting in punishing radiation requires heavy"
X Link 2025-12-10T17:14Z 1587 followers, 19.7K engagements

creator/x::VladSaigau
/creator/x::VladSaigau