[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @Tcessooh Tncess Tncess posts on X about not in the most. They currently have XXX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1887699954728128512/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXXX +5,700% - X Month XXXXXXX +18,020% - X Months XXXXXXX +6,272% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1887699954728128512/posts_active)  ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1887699954728128512/followers)  - X Week XXX +15% - X Month XXX +40% - X Months XXX +792% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1887699954728128512/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1887699954728128512/influence) --- **Social topic influence** [not in](/topic/not-in) XXXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@ctrlcentered](/creator/undefined) [@p83748w828473](/creator/undefined) [@chameleondks](/creator/undefined) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1887699954728128512/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Update: the Law Times article that was written on the CBX vs SM case seems to have been edited a lot. These are some of the changes I spotted. (This is a rolling list) The official statement from SM is not in the article anymore" [X Link](https://x.com/Tcessooh/status/1983365847801532672) [@Tcessooh](/creator/x/Tcessooh) 2025-10-29T02:50Z XXX followers, 161K engagements "That contradicts there statement yesterday when they said:" [X Link](https://x.com/Tcessooh/status/1983521962594021615) [@Tcessooh](/creator/x/Tcessooh) 2025-10-29T13:11Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "Yesterday they said it is because CBX continue to deny the validity of exclusive contract and follow up agreements that the company believes it is no longer possible to continue EXO activities with them" [X Link](https://x.com/Tcessooh/status/1983521966179959134) [@Tcessooh](/creator/x/Tcessooh) 2025-10-29T13:11Z XXX followers, XXX engagements "SM Entertainment has expressed regret over CBX (Chen Baekhyun and Xiumin)s public statement that they are willing to agree unconditionally in order to participate in EXOs full-group activities. (Not this line clocking SMs ridiculousness😭)" [X Link](https://x.com/Tcessooh/status/1983722977566061032) [@Tcessooh](/creator/x/Tcessooh) 2025-10-30T02:29Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@Tcessooh TncessTncess posts on X about not in the most. They currently have XXX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social topic influence not in XXXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @ctrlcentered @p83748w828473 @chameleondks
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Update: the Law Times article that was written on the CBX vs SM case seems to have been edited a lot. These are some of the changes I spotted. (This is a rolling list) The official statement from SM is not in the article anymore"
X Link @Tcessooh 2025-10-29T02:50Z XXX followers, 161K engagements
"That contradicts there statement yesterday when they said:"
X Link @Tcessooh 2025-10-29T13:11Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"Yesterday they said it is because CBX continue to deny the validity of exclusive contract and follow up agreements that the company believes it is no longer possible to continue EXO activities with them"
X Link @Tcessooh 2025-10-29T13:11Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"SM Entertainment has expressed regret over CBX (Chen Baekhyun and Xiumin)s public statement that they are willing to agree unconditionally in order to participate in EXOs full-group activities. (Not this line clocking SMs ridiculousness😭)"
X Link @Tcessooh 2025-10-30T02:29Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
/creator/x::Tcessooh