# ![@BitMEXResearch Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::906870773066772480.png) @BitMEXResearch BitMEX Research

BitMEX Research posts on X about bitcoin, flow, bitcoin etf, core the most. They currently have [-------] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [-------] engagements in the last [--] hours.

### Engagements: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::906870773066772480/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::906870773066772480/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- [--] Week [-------] +967%
- [--] Month [---------] +173%
- [--] Months [---------] +88%
- [--] Year [---------] -67%

### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::906870773066772480/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::906870773066772480/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- [--] Week [--] +39%
- [--] Month [---] +17%
- [--] Months [---] +191%
- [--] Year [-----] +58%

### Followers: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::906870773066772480/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::906870773066772480/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- [--] Week [-------] -0.02%
- [--] Month [-------] +0%
- [--] Months [-------] -0.16%
- [--] Year [-------] -0.42%

### CreatorRank: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::906870773066772480/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::906870773066772480/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[exchanges](/list/exchanges)  #317 [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  #1538 [finance](/list/finance)  24.71% [stocks](/list/stocks)  8.82% [financial services](/list/financial-services)  5.29% [celebrities](/list/celebrities)  2.94% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  2.35% [currencies](/list/currencies)  1.76% [countries](/list/countries)  1.76% [events](/list/events)  0.59%

**Social topic influence**
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #687, [flow](/topic/flow) 18.82%, [bitcoin etf](/topic/bitcoin-etf) 17.65%, [core](/topic/core) #2342, [data](/topic/data) 7.65%, [strong](/topic/strong) 7.65%, [relay](/topic/relay) #142, [spam](/topic/spam) #104, [bitmex](/topic/bitmex) #2, [in the](/topic/in-the) 4.12%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@hodlonaut](/creator/undefined) [@tonevays](/creator/undefined) [@mrhodl](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinerrorlog](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinmotorist](/creator/undefined) [@stephanlivera](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinbombadil](/creator/undefined) [@ndeet](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinmonk21](/creator/undefined) [@theonevortex](/creator/undefined) [@giacomozucco](/creator/undefined) [@adam3us](/creator/undefined) [@briantrollz](/creator/undefined) [@reardencode](/creator/undefined) [@cguida6](/creator/undefined) [@peterktodd](/creator/undefined) [@cunyrenaud](/creator/undefined) [@hodlingonward](/creator/undefined) [@bitmexresearch](/creator/undefined) [@twelvetytwenty](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [BlackRock Inc (BLK)](/topic/blackrock) [Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN)](/topic/coinbase) [Bitcoin Cash (BCH)](/topic/bitcoin-cash)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"Bitcoin NFT Market Update - [--] Nov [----] * Since our previous post on [--] Aug [----] the median price of the top [--] NFTs on Bitcoin is down 36.7%. The median price is down 96.9% since the peak * In the period the Bitcoin price is down 14% in USD such that the USD decline in NFT prices is even greater * Turns out investing in onchain JPGs is not always entirely consistent with a Benjamin Graham "Intelligent Investor" type philosophy * Seems the JPS enjoyers are being defeated by basic market economics rather than filters or doomsday softfork threats like BIP-444 Bitcoin NFT Market Update - [--] Aug"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1989349741277180157)  2025-11-14T15:08Z 119.3K followers, 45.3K engagements


"Taproot Quantum Spend Paths Taproot is potentially an extremely helpful tool for quantum safety. We would advocate a model where wallets have the ability to spend the same Bitcoin outputs both with a quantum safe tapleaf & a quantum vulnerable leaf https://www.bitmex.com/blog/Taproot%20Quantum%20Spend%20Paths https://www.bitmex.com/blog/Taproot%20Quantum%20Spend%20Paths"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2015482450592297132)  2026-01-25T17:50Z 119.4K followers, 47.3K engagements


"You must think freedom sucks Wrong. He is saying one SHOULDN'T run a BIP-110 node he is not saying one CANNOT run a BIP-110 node You are playing the same tricks as the large blockers in the Blocksize War. I spent thousands of hours explaining why one SHOULDN'T run BU/XT etc and I was constantly told I was being "anti freedom" and that I was saying one CANNOT run BU It is not anti freedom to explain why BIP-110 is dangerous and stupid and that those pushing it are being highly irresponsible https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017012414886113739 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2017012414886113739"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2017012414886113739)  2026-01-29T23:10Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@izakaminska Did you know Denmark sold Epstein island to the US"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2017462690659045450)  2026-01-31T04:59Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@BitcoinErrorLog @Vladcostea @hodlonaut Also technically wrong the OP_Return relay limit was c32MB in [----] and then was reduced to 1MB in [----]. Then OP_Return because non standard until 2013"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018135686591705555)  2026-02-02T01:33Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@BitcoinErrorLog http://Sec.gov http://Sec.gov"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018322940111036908)  2026-02-02T13:57Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@BitcoinErrorLog It's a joke"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018349982672134248)  2026-02-02T15:45Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@theonevortex @jabulanijakes Yoou can read about our coverage of these Bitfinex tokens at the time here: https://www.bitmex.com/blog/chain-split-tokens https://www.bitmex.com/blog/chain-split-tokens"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018387160592748942)  2026-02-02T18:12Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"Great find by @kyletorpey @brian_armstrong describing the "small blockers" as "early idealists" is an interesting framing We wrote about the "entrepreneur Vs idealist" framing in a recent essay here: This essay is good context for this Epstein email https://www.bitmex.com/blog/amir-taaki-idealists-vs-entrepreneurs Interesting email from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong to investors found in the Epstein files. It's from February [----] during Bitcoin's block size debate. Armstrong talks about how Coinbase is working in the background to ensure the network is not held back by "the early"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018403121181900992)  2026-02-02T19:16Z 119.3K followers, 16K engagements


"Worth also noting that @brian_armstrong mentioning "early idealists" is somewhat contradictory of @rogerkver 's narrative that the small blockers were newbies that hijacked Bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018403495968117152)  2026-02-02T19:17Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@kyletorpey @brian_armstrong @Jason I don't know if @Jason is trying to be negative about Amir and Gavin in that email"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018407060585562527)  2026-02-02T19:31Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"You have got to hand it to Epstein he was clearly good at networking and he did actually find the top crypto experts Take @JeremyRubin for example probably quite an informed person to have as an advisor much better than one would have thought"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018727678929510635)  2026-02-03T16:45Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"these same objections were raised in [----] when taproot was being added (as it is not quantum resistant) and dismissed then Yeah it's annoying that there was no option to disable the key path spend when Taproot was introduced However you gotta admit the potential for quantum resistance in a tapleaf is quite good providing optionality as we mentioned in a recent blog post This is something that you can't do with P2SH https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018746436725125210 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018746436725125210"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018746436725125210)  2026-02-03T18:00Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@giacomozucco @JeremyRubin Right But we are talking about Epstein I would have guessed Epstein would find someone much more embedded in shitcoin scams than Rubin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018805811376714032)  2026-02-03T21:56Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@nic_carter @DiomedesRaa Why don't you write up a proposed plan on how to make Bitcoin more quantum resistant"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018823658144485437)  2026-02-03T23:07Z 119.4K followers, [----] engagements


"@nic_carter Don't write a BIP then Just write a proposal on making Bitcoin quantum safe in your own format"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018922238993383853)  2026-02-04T05:39Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@BitcoinBombadil @felipecreate @cguida6 @hodlonaut As far as policy filters go do you think we should get rid of all the other policy filters also Nope but a tiny minority of noderunners can remove incentive incompatible policy filters. If that happens I won't put my head in the sand I will accept that reality"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019032156530696422)  2026-02-04T12:55Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@CaminaDrummer4 Rejecting a block as invalid is fundamentally different from not relaying something"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019033293602394234)  2026-02-04T13:00Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@lopp @VinnyLingham @ranalli_don @gavinandresen Here is the source for the image https://archive.is/AaGIf https://archive.is/AaGIf"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019126815630233702)  2026-02-04T19:12Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"And then imagine denying that is a philosophical pivot. The "pivot" happened in [----] when small blockers won the Blocksize War and embraced a reasonable blocksize limit and a fee market The large blockers pathetic and weak philosophy that we can relay on filters and miners bening "good actors" to stop spam was defeated"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019403071713923533)  2026-02-05T13:29Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@ToneVays @hodlonaut "Lets fight spam by hoping miners dont try to maximise short term profits""  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019418547194315040)  2026-02-05T14:31Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@An__OG @peterktodd @ToneVays @hodlonaut Big blockers answer is "no not if bitcoin actually becomes a currency". No. That is not coherent and that logic requires an economically relevant Blocksize limit to hold"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019439399092593074)  2026-02-05T15:54Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"Bitcoin is trading at c$65000 down 48% from an all time record high of c$125000 Sentiment in the space is bleak Some Bitcoin miners are experiencing a lot of pain with profit margins being squeezed. Some miners could switch off their machines or pivot their data centres to AI Despite this believe it or not there are still people out there who believe we should design Bitcoin without assuming miners will aim for short term profit maximisation when they select transactions for their blocks https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019487875822448643 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019487875822448643"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019487875822448643)  2026-02-05T19:06Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@DonalDevine @BitcoinBombadil @felipecreate @cguida6 @hodlonaut Spam does not make it harder to run a node. https://x.com/i/status/2019423670322835760 @MrHodl @hodlonaut Greg Maxwell was right Roger Ver was wrong https://t.co/cKKvE4uZjE https://x.com/i/status/2019423670322835760 @MrHodl @hodlonaut Greg Maxwell was right Roger Ver was wrong https://t.co/cKKvE4uZjE"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019505996599595164)  2026-02-05T20:18Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"It's the Omega candle We did it fam"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019515662230860177)  2026-02-05T20:57Z 119.3K followers, 16.5K engagements


"https://www.tradingview.com/news/beincrypto:d5fe2ae99094b:0-accidental-2-000-btc-airdrop-crashes-bitcoin-price-10-on-bithumb/ https://www.tradingview.com/news/beincrypto:d5fe2ae99094b:0-accidental-2-000-btc-airdrop-crashes-bitcoin-price-10-on-bithumb/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019811785050894480)  2026-02-06T16:33Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"Fork Monitor is now running three versions of the BIP-110 softfork client This client contains consensus rule changes and may therefore result in a chain split and two competing coins http://forkmonitor.info/nodes/btc http://forkmonitor.info/nodes/btc"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2020447642996658395)  2026-02-08T10:40Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"You can track any miner signalling for the proposed softfork here: https://www.bitnod.es/ https://www.bitnod.es/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2020447895531462720)  2026-02-08T10:41Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"The common areas can only handle 4m3 of stuff per day anyway. That is the size of the common area room in the building. So the trash won't increase the amount of stuff in common areas. Every day the common area gets filled and then emptied Remember unlike most buildings we deeply value the anonymity of the tenants when they put stuff in the comman areas and there are thousands of tenants. Any enforcement is therefore unfeasible. We decided this years ago when after a huge war we increased the size of the common area from 1m3 to 4m3. The only effective way to reduce the amount of trash is to"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2020839959091961975)  2026-02-09T12:39Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@ndeet Bitcoin Core lifting the OP_RETURN limit was reckless and against the community Large OP_Returns were already reliably relayed and mined BEFORE Bitcoin Core increased the default relay limit Bitcoin Core already lost the ability to impose this filter on "the community""  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021038206343430157)  2026-02-10T01:47Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@giacomozucco @zndtoshi You raise a reasonable point here about a pre-emptive anti-BIP110 softfork On the other hand if the BIP-110 does actually launch then I think we may be able to quickly rally behind an emergency wipeout protection softfork for the Bitcoin chain"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021190013598261548)  2026-02-10T11:50Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"Transaction Relay Filters & Bitcoin Core Defaults There appears to be considerable confusion about transaction relay filters on the Bitcoin network and in particular the sequencing of events. For instance whether the relay filters broke down BEFORE or AFTER Bitcoin Core changed the defaults With respect to the sub [--] sat per vbyte filter @OrangeSurfBTC produced this clear image showing the number of sub [--] sat per vbyte transactions. The sequencing is clear Bitcoin Core merged the relevant PR on [--] Aug [----] and the client was released on [--] Sept [----]. By this time the volume of sub [--] sat per"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022069199036690815)  2026-02-12T22:03Z 119.3K followers, 10.6K engagements


"In Novemeber [----] Craig Wright tried to make a version of the Bitcoin whitepaper in Latex. The below animation shows Craig graudually editing the file to try to make the formatting match that of the real Bitcoin whitepaper which was made with Open Office"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1761038309554332034)  2024-02-23T14:40Z 119.3K followers, 138.4K engagements


"Judge: I will prepare a fairly long judgement I have reached the conclusions the evidence is overwhelming CSW is not the author of the whitepaper CSW is not satsohi CSW is not the creator of Bitcoin CSW did not author the Bitcoin software"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1768263295666938277)  2024-03-14T13:09Z 119.3K followers, 938.7K engagements


"According to Forbes HBO will say that @peterktodd is Satoshi. The Forbes article states that "a [----] BitcoinTalk post replying to Satoshi Nakamoto that Cullen Hoback believes was accidentally posted using Todd's profile" This is clearly ridiculous It is just an example of @peterktodd replying to Satoshi with a snarky pedantic and accurate comment. Yes an output value will need to be reduced to generate a txn fee. This is the kind of comment Peter could make today. There is zero reason to believe this was Satoshi"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1843788557925921052)  2024-10-08T23:00Z 119.3K followers, 425.6K engagements


"Please see below the relevent chapter from "The Blocksize War" as well as a chart of the BU futures market price on Bitfinex (data recently extracted from the Bitfinex API) The Blocksize War - Chapter [--] - Exchanges In the year or so that the war had been raging the industrial landscape of the cryptocurrency ecosystem had changed considerably. The most significant change was the emergence and growth of several cryptocurrency exchange businesses whose success was driven by considerable demand from the retail market in the Asia Pacific region. Companies such as Poloniex BitMEX and perhaps most"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2018386202710200520)  2026-02-02T18:09Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"Chancellor on the brink of leaking bailout details to Epstein Lord Mandelson gave Jeffrey Epstein advance notice of a 500bn bailout to save the Euro He messaged Epstein about the bailout on the evening of May [--] [----] It was formally announced the following morning https://t.co/btejzVTvxV Lord Mandelson gave Jeffrey Epstein advance notice of a 500bn bailout to save the Euro He messaged Epstein about the bailout on the evening of May [--] [----] It was formally announced the following morning https://t.co/btejzVTvxV"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2020101858073641395)  2026-02-07T11:46Z 119.3K followers, 12.4K engagements


"@spinebitcoin @theonevortex @ordinalswallet If you like relay filters remember to be nice For example I single handedly almost have the power to relax incentive incompatible relay filters I have Bitcoin nodes with [----] peers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2020558190581031087)  2026-02-08T17:59Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@MaxH1987 @Mandrik @jakeshieldsajj The book is just a re-hash of the arguments the large blockers made in [----]. Arguments which were comprehensively defeated"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2020558809446469964)  2026-02-08T18:02Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@w_s_bitcoin Exactly right Part of the reason SegWit2x failed is because Bitcoin Classic failed before it Part of the reason Classic failed is because XT failed before it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2020598158196392290)  2026-02-08T20:38Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"Some form of quantum secure recovery method is potentially avaiable for almost every Bitcoin output type Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost every frozen coin is potentially recoverable https://t.co/mKauGpKK41 https://t.co/MIgj1RjIAx Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021013213584998427)  2026-02-10T00:07Z 119.3K followers, 17.8K engagements


"@itme_brain @hodlonaut @adam3us The consensus limit is 1MB"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021020937156689969)  2026-02-10T00:38Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@separ8 @hodlonaut It's harder when Core v30 remove the option You can always: [--]. Run an older version of Core [--]. Patch the code yourself and compile [--]. Run an alternative client like Libre Relay or Knots And anyway Core never removed the option"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021201139178537143)  2026-02-10T12:34Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@Strike_Attack without satisfying the original locking script All the methods described above do satisfy the original locking script in addition to a new quantum secure system"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021239335224254588)  2026-02-10T15:06Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@cryptoquick We support public mempools"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021240439550935100)  2026-02-10T15:10Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@hodlonaut Does this now mean you finally accept that Bitcoin Core does not have the power to impose incentive incompatible relay filters on the network"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021615203289297189)  2026-02-11T15:59Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@Arthur_van_Pelt @bobomc2 @hodlonaut Nah its the BIP110 chain that will ironically have the most spam just like it was the BCash chain that ironically had the fewest transactions"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021686514753700248)  2026-02-11T20:43Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost every frozen coin is potentially recoverable https://www.bitmex.com/blog/Mitigating-The-Impact-Of-The-Quantum-Freeze https://www.bitmex.com/blog/Mitigating-The-Impact-Of-The-Quantum-Freeze"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2020997563759882283)  2026-02-09T23:05Z 119.3K followers, 105.9K engagements


"@adam3us @theonevortex @MrHodl @BitcoinMotorist @ToneVays @stephanlivera @BitcoinErrorLog @brian_trollz @LukeDashjr @EligiusPool There was also spam Luke produced about "juicy hambergers" Is Bitcoin money or is it a hamburger spam system Bitcoin is money Source: https://mempool.space/tx/ff82a8ea1febad747370f08afb1ade5e30abf4c95373e347fd40351806ef498amode=details https://mempool.space/tx/ff82a8ea1febad747370f08afb1ade5e30abf4c95373e347fd40351806ef498amode=details"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022414757513617542)  2026-02-13T20:57Z 119.3K followers, 31.6K engagements


"@BitcoinMotorist @ToneVays So everything in the coinbase including large JPG OP_Returns isn't spam"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022576307931070760)  2026-02-14T07:39Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"The first debate about arbitrary data in the blockchain happened in December [----] and Satoshi was involved On 8th December [----] Satoshi released Bitcoin version 0.3.18 which included a standardness check to only include known transaction types 🧵"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1972718255887335548)  2025-09-29T17:40Z 119.3K followers, 310.1K engagements


"Fighting talk from Gregory Maxwell on the Core v Knots spam debate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1978545931600511157)  2025-10-15T19:38Z 119.4K followers, 623.6K engagements


"Bitcoin & Quantum Risk Debating the potential risks quantum computers could pose to Bitcoin and how Bitcoin could mitigate that risk is nothing new In [----] several leading cryptographers including Daniel Bernstein published "Post-Quantum Cryptography" 🧵 1/13 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003587862034297079 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2003587862034297079"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2003587862034297079)  2025-12-23T22:05Z 119.3K followers, 193.6K engagements


"Do you support BIP [---] Yes (I am a high priest) No (I am a high priest) No (Not a high priest) Yes (Not a high priest) Yes (I am a high priest) No (I am a high priest) No (Not a high priest) Yes (Not a high priest)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019057334098579728)  2026-02-04T14:35Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"Do you agree Spam increases the propensity to overpay to run a Bitcoin full node No in general spam like images makes running a full node slightly easier Why do you side with attackers I am not sideing with anyone I just believe profit maximisation should be expected. I believe we should try to build Bitcoin in an incentive compatible way such that each individual actor acts selfishly in their own self interest and yet despite that Bitcoin still works as money"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019401912517353639)  2026-02-05T13:25Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@BitcoinBombadil @giacomozucco @GrassFedBitcoin @BTCtoOblivion So you are saying Roger Ver was correct Didn't Roger lose this argument in [----] https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019423670322835760s=20 @MrHodl @hodlonaut Greg Maxwell was right Roger Ver was wrong https://t.co/cKKvE4uZjE https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019423670322835760s=20 @MrHodl @hodlonaut Greg Maxwell was right Roger Ver was wrong https://t.co/cKKvE4uZjE"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2019848038165205351)  2026-02-06T18:57Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@nic_carter Does @jemimajoanna not know we spend all our time arguing about various issues and parameters in Bitcoin and we make life so difficult by ourselves by always asking if it will work in 100+ years time"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2020502281989579168)  2026-02-08T14:17Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"arrogantly pushed through a very controversial merge I get that that is your position I am not pretending not to understand it I am asking about your view on other related issues such as: [--]. Whether incentive incompatible relay filters are economically sustainable in the long run [--]. Whether you think Bitcoin Core has the power to impose incentive incompatible relay filters or if a tiny minority can completely undermine them by spending a pathetically tiny amount of money on a handful of relay nodes [--]. Whether you are aware that in [----] exactly that happened. Bitcoin Core Bitcoin Knots and"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021625152828567940)  2026-02-11T16:39Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@TicTocTick The cost of electricity wasted to create one is $96k Why would anyone waste $30k per Bitcoin like that (Also not all miners have the same cost structure)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021657116717851015)  2026-02-11T18:46Z 119.3K followers, 11.8K engagements


"@AutismCapital Didn't realise the DOW Jones index is in US$ Thought it was just points You would think an account called Autism Capital would notice that"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021658970075856921)  2026-02-11T18:53Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@CunyRenaud @hodlonaut How do we know these were reliably relayed and not directly submitted I tested it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022048639703720349)  2026-02-12T20:42Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@ndeet @coinjoined @hodlonaut @adam3us @PortlandHODL But by manipulate fees it just means paying a few per unit block weight which is fundamentally the same as other demand for block weight"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022399544819093936)  2026-02-13T19:56Z 119.4K followers, [--] engagements


"that I am pro the best solution that makes a firm stand against the uncapping of op_return If one has a few old laptops lying around it costs around $200 a year for one person to run the infrastructure to effectively uncap the OP_Return relay limit. Having an objective to stop that from happening is almost lunacy. You would have to be really really nice to a lot of people and get down on your knees and beg them not to relay things. I really hope you don't try to do this. Your efforts will be wasted. I don't think it's a cyberpunk approach either. Cyberpunks don't go around begging people."  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022435551752716564)  2026-02-13T22:19Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"the haste What haste You have got this thing all wrong Bitcoin Core developers have been debating and discussing these filters at meetings and conferences for years. Perhaps up to [--] years. They were often high and mighty about how important the defaults they set were. There were years and years of sluggish inaction Then in [----] people started relaxing the filters themselves ignoring Core defaults. Turns out the Core developers were not as important as they thought and people can set what filters they like. FullRBF happened the min relay fee was relaxed and large OP_Returns started being"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021185535314743676)  2026-02-10T11:32Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"Ok. The point still stands Core developers have been debating and discussing these filters for up to [--] years without relaxing them or making many changes Then in [----] users ignored Core developers and relaxed the filters on their own. This undermines Core Gloria whom you dislike lost her apparent power and influence over network relay filters The truth is of course whether you like it or not Gloria never really had such power and influence. It was an illusion that some people fell for. People like you run the nodes and you set the relay filters not developers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2021187971420962850)  2026-02-10T11:42Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"Your questions are irrelevant I appreciate you think they are irrelevant but do you have a view as they are downstream of Cores conduct How are they downstream The sequencing of events is as follows: [--]. FullRBF transactions were reliably relayed on the open network and mined BEFORE Core relayed then as standard [--]. Transactions with a feerate below [--] sat per vbyte were reliably relayed and mined on the open network BEFORE Core relayed then as standard [--]. Large OP_Reurn output transactions reliably relayed and mined on the open network BEFORE Core relayed them as standard Do you understand that"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021627864047632529)  2026-02-11T16:50Z 119.3K followers, 14.9K engagements


"@MrHodl @BitcoinMotorist @ToneVays @stephanlivera @BitcoinErrorLog @brian_trollz Also a coinbase transaction can and typically does have OP_Return outputs I wonder if that is ok"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022291594053820518)  2026-02-13T12:47Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"@MrHodl @BitcoinMotorist @ToneVays @stephanlivera @BitcoinErrorLog @brian_trollz Here is an example of some of Luke's spam What the hell is the "Yandere game". Bitcoin is supposed to be for money https://mempool.space/tx/8e1e44a48b5e79636675d1476f8e4add075bbeb7f49e00ec743eed56f17feaaamode=details https://mempool.space/tx/8e1e44a48b5e79636675d1476f8e4add075bbeb7f49e00ec743eed56f17feaaamode=details"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022297786910232698)  2026-02-13T13:12Z 119.3K followers, 24.2K engagements


"@coinjoined @ndeet @hodlonaut @adam3us @PortlandHODL This attack vector already existed since [----]. The fee economics haven't changed Completely agree. Excellently put It's important to note that I had to make this point again and again to the large blockers in the [----] period: https://www.bitmex.com/blog/the-segwit-transaction-capacity-increase-part-1 https://www.bitmex.com/blog/the-segwit-transaction-capacity-increase-part-1"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022355004594508167)  2026-02-13T16:59Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@ajtowns @HODLingOnward False flag attack"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022358558730523128)  2026-02-13T17:13Z 119.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@MrHodl Indeed he was And people were very pissed at Luke Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.phptopic=38007.msg486156#msg486156 https://bitcointalk.org/index.phptopic=38007.msg486156#msg486156"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022364027142250972)  2026-02-13T17:35Z 119.3K followers, 10.6K engagements


"@BitcoinMonk21 @MrHodl @BitcoinMotorist @ToneVays @stephanlivera @BitcoinErrorLog @brian_trollz i don't know for sure but there is probably a reasonable size limit The coinbase can have OP_Return outputs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022417213509206475)  2026-02-13T21:06Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@BitcoinMonk21 @MrHodl @BitcoinMotorist @ToneVays @stephanlivera @BitcoinErrorLog @brian_trollz you have to do the proof of work to make that transaction Which is the same Taproot Wizard's [----] The 4MB image which was inscribed by a miner that had to do proof of work https://mempool.space/tx/0301e0480b374b32851a9462db29dc19fe830a7f7d7a88b81612b9d42099c0aemode=details https://mempool.space/tx/0301e0480b374b32851a9462db29dc19fe830a7f7d7a88b81612b9d42099c0aemode=details"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022429300537131444)  2026-02-13T21:54Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@BitcoinBombadil Honest Bitcoin users must fight on every front to Mitigate Spam Fighting on every front is extremely poor strategy Instead fight smart"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2022631915375951972)  2026-02-14T11:20Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow All data out for 13th Feb. Very strong day with $631m positive net flow over all providers. Huge day for Blackrock at +$493m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1757682975892811977)  2024-02-14T08:27Z 119.3K followers, 241.9K engagements


"Bitcoin Spot ETF Flow - 14th Feb [----] All data in. Another strong day with +$340m net flow for all the Bitcoin ETFs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1758015192045097361)  2024-02-15T06:27Z 119.3K followers, 74.1K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - 15th Feb All data out. Very strong day. +$477m of net ETF flow https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1758396135822016850/photo/1 https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1758396135822016850/photo/1"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1758396135822016850)  2024-02-16T07:41Z 119.3K followers, 369.9K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - 16th Feb [----] All data in. Another strong day with +$331.7m net flow. For the week its +$2273.4m net flow Total net flow since 11th Jan is +$4926.9m https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1758775499604574677/photo/1 https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1758775499604574677/photo/1"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1758775499604574677)  2024-02-17T08:48Z 119.3K followers, 764K engagements


"1/3 Bitcoin ETF Flow - Up to [--] Feb [----] All data in. +$251.4m net flow on 22nd Feb. A strong day"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1760936963043999792)  2024-02-23T07:57Z 119.3K followers, 83.9K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] Feb [----] All data now in except perhaps for the Galaxy/Invesco product Friday was a strong day with +$232.3m of net inflow. Also the outflow for GBTC was just $44m lowest level since 11th Jan"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1761307758173851758)  2024-02-24T08:31Z 119.3K followers, 195.5K engagements


"1/3 Bitcoin ETF Flow - 26th Feb [----] All data in. Strong day with $520m net inflow Total net inflow since 11th Jan is $6030m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1762389668186710091)  2024-02-27T08:10Z 119.3K followers, 165.5K engagements


"COPA Vs CSW Trial - New evidence published CSW submitted to the court a document called Maths.doc. It is dated December [----]. This was one of Wright's primary reliance documents supporting his claim to be Satosh. An extract of the document is shown below which contains a reference to Bitcoin Cash (BCH). Bitcoin Cash was not created until 2017"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1762570223083827577)  2024-02-27T20:07Z 119.3K followers, 259.7K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] Feb [----] All data now in. $576.8m net inflow on 27th Feb very strong day. Blackrock alone had $520m inflow Total net inflow since 11th Jan [----] now $6726.1m for the ETFs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1762736559495811433)  2024-02-28T07:08Z 119.3K followers, 154.2K engagements


"1/5 Bitcoin ETF Flow - 28th Feb [----] All data in. Today was a record inflow day with $673.4m of net inflow. This was driven by Blackrock which also had a record day with $612.1m of inflow"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1763100118151045595)  2024-02-29T07:13Z 119.3K followers, 64K engagements


"Sayonara Mr Fake Nakamoto"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1763583145129992663)  2024-03-01T15:12Z 119.3K followers, 53.8K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. Very strong day with +$562m net flow. Fidelity very strong with a record day Not the best day for diversity with smaller players BTCO HODL & BTCW all having outflows"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1764914385737138376)  2024-03-05T07:22Z 119.3K followers, 121.1K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. $648m total net inflow for the day. Largest inflows since day [--]. Blackrock with a record +$788.3 million day"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1765267365686567065)  2024-03-06T06:45Z 119.3K followers, 457.2K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. $332m net inflow on 6th March"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1765630010826559717)  2024-03-07T06:46Z 119.3K followers, 52.5K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. Net total inflow of $472.6m. Another strong day with Fidelity performing well with +$473.4m of flow Over $10 billion withdrawn from GBTC since 11th Jan 2024"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1765991166044938347)  2024-03-08T06:41Z 119.3K followers, 51.2K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. A strong day with $505.5m net inflow. Blackrock again leading with $562.9m of inflow"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1767451778054807797)  2024-03-12T07:25Z 119.3K followers, 62.5K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. Record day with over $1 billion of net inflow. Blackrock with a record $849 million of inflow"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1767807895645634867)  2024-03-13T07:00Z 119.3K followers, 602.9K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. Another strong day with $684m of net inflow"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1768195174201537017)  2024-03-14T08:39Z 119.3K followers, 82.5K engagements


"COPA vs CSW - The trial is now over COPA won and CSW lost. The final words from Judge Mellor below: "Having considered all the evidence and submissions presented to me in this trial I've reached the conclusion that the evidence is overwhelming. Therefore for the reasons which will be explained in that written judgment in due course I will make certain declarations which I am satisfied are useful and are necessary to do justice between the parties. First that Dr Wright is NOT the author of the Bitcoin White Paper. Second Dr Wright is NOT the person who adopted or operated under the pseudonym"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1768273414156922934)  2024-03-14T13:50Z 119.3K followers, 304.1K engagements


"WELCOME TO LAW Amen. We won. Amen. We won"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1768279434887385556)  2024-03-14T14:14Z 119.3K followers, 55.5K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] GBTC Outflow $257m (Craig is NOT Satoshi)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1768408753148211220)  2024-03-14T22:47Z 119.3K followers, 51.9K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow Update"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1768601207004672049)  2024-03-15T11:32Z 119.3K followers, 102.4K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] GBTC Outflow $643m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1769867409333067883)  2024-03-18T23:24Z 119.3K followers, 634.1K engagements


"1/4 Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. $154m net outflow. First outflow day since 1st March. Biggest disappointment was Fidelity inflow appears to be declining just $5.9m on the day a record low"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1770004721371062491)  2024-03-19T08:29Z 119.3K followers, 62.2K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. Record net outflow of $326m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1770365847925612714)  2024-03-20T08:24Z 119.3K followers, 309.4K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] GBTC Outflow $359m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1770946960956051678)  2024-03-21T22:53Z 119.3K followers, 580.7K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] GBTC Outflow $212m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1772755461642551549)  2024-03-26T22:40Z 119.3K followers, 72.3K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] March [----] All data in. Strong day with $418m net inflow"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1772932061449392187)  2024-03-27T10:21Z 119.3K followers, 53K engagements


"0.09765625 Bitcoin in rewards per block when SBF is released"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1773380072608563542)  2024-03-28T16:02Z 119.3K followers, 75.9K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] April [----] GBTC Outflow $0m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1774918564085952853)  2024-04-01T21:55Z 119.3K followers, 289.5K engagements


"APRIL FOOLS It's $303m of outflow Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] April [----] GBTC Outflow $0m Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] April [----] GBTC Outflow $0m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1774918733464572120)  2024-04-01T21:56Z 119.3K followers, 134K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] April [----] GBTC Outflow: $82m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1775280485742391496)  2024-04-02T21:53Z 119.3K followers, 136.3K engagements


"For the first time since the ETFs launched on 11th Jan [----] GBTC is NOT the product with the largest daily outflow Today's ARKB outflow of $88m is larger than GBTC at $82m Congratulations to @BarrySilbert Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] April [----] GBTC Outflow: $82m Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] April [----] GBTC Outflow: $82m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1775281156239573164)  2024-04-02T21:56Z 119.3K followers, 226.1K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] April [----] GBTC Outflow $155m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1777810177741205949)  2024-04-09T21:25Z 119.3K followers, 81.8K engagements


"Bitcoin ETF Flow - [--] April [----] GBTC Outflow $18m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1778178439456936314)  2024-04-10T21:49Z 119.3K followers, 405.4K engagements


"Bitcoin is now at block height [------] The halving has occurred The block subsidy is now [-----] BTC 🌗🌗🌗🌗 Blockhash = 0000000000000000000320283a032748cef8227873ff4872689bf23f1cda83a5"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1781475294022406652)  2024-04-20T00:09Z 119.3K followers, 111.2K engagements


"GBTC INFLOW OF US$63m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1786516460438688010)  2024-05-03T22:01Z 119.3K followers, 231.7K engagements


"$GBTC was just about to lose its crown as the largest Bitcoin ETF to $IBIT and then out of nowhere it has its first inflow day GBTC INFLOW OF US$63m GBTC INFLOW OF US$63m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1786519408296280179)  2024-05-03T22:13Z 119.3K followers, 48.6K engagements


"Finally a ZERO"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1788326132401443281)  2024-05-08T21:52Z 119.3K followers, 58.6K engagements


"GBTC Flow - [--] May [----] Zero Finally a ZERO Finally a ZERO"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1788326372546347303)  2024-05-08T21:53Z 119.3K followers, 51.4K engagements


"GBTC positive flow: $27m"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1790859639887737206)  2024-05-15T21:39Z 119.3K followers, 38.4K engagements


"https://craigwright.net/ https://craigwright.net/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1813252148236353903)  2024-07-16T16:39Z 119.3K followers, 29.8K engagements


"Trump Bitcoin Speech - Summary: * Bitcoin is great * Bitcoin will go to the moon * You are all smart * I am smart and my family is smart * If we don't lead in crypto China will * You are all great * The Dems are against crypto * @SenWarren is very nasty * I will fire @GaryGensler on day 1🔥🔥 * Vote for me"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1817295791020474649)  2024-07-27T20:27Z 119.3K followers, 130.8K engagements


"* HBO will shortly claim someone as Satoshi * HBO's prediction will be better than just finding someone in the phone book called Satoshi (Leah McGrath Goodman) & it wont be an obvious fraudster (CSW) * HBO will pick someone who said smart stuff about electronic cash years ago statements when considered without context could support a claim to be Satoshi but with context just puts then in a group with many other people * HBO will not have any new compelling evidence * HBO will be wrong happy satoshi (probably not) reveal day lab leak theory let's go happy satoshi (probably not) reveal day lab"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1843695536144073203)  2024-10-08T16:50Z 119.3K followers, 108.6K engagements


"Apparently HBO will say Peter Todd is Satoshi And HBO would be wrong LEAKED VIDEO FROM HBO DOCUMENTARY SUGGESTS THAT HBO BELIEVES PETER TODD IS SATOSHI https://t.co/vAsj4Bnejg LEAKED VIDEO FROM HBO DOCUMENTARY SUGGESTS THAT HBO BELIEVES PETER TODD IS SATOSHI https://t.co/vAsj4Bnejg"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1843735801345257721)  2024-10-08T19:30Z 119.3K followers, 99.1K engagements


"HBO Satoshi Documentary - Coverage We are watching live so you do not have to. We are starting [--] minutes into the almost 2h show to report on any evidence Peter Todd is Satoshi as early as possible 🧵"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1843820481964863802)  2024-10-09T01:07Z 119.3K followers, 260K engagements


"MicroStrategys Premium We did the Ponzi Maths $MSTR has a market capitalisation of over $100 billion and trades at a giant premium to the value of its Bitcoin holdings around 256% on a fully diluted basis. This premium is insane perhaps in part driven by some financial regulators banning people from buying Bitcoin ETFs. These people are so desperate for Bitcoin exposure they buy MSTR instead despite the premium. There is some "justification" for the premium to NAV however even if the Bitcoin price remains unchanged. MSTR has this yield strategy. Since MSTR trades at a premium the company can"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1859559585301909660)  2024-11-21T11:28Z 119.3K followers, 278.5K engagements


"COPA Vs CSW Breaking news The court of appeal has rejected CSWs application to appeal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1862462355348607027)  2024-11-29T11:43Z 119.3K followers, 129K engagements


"Congratulations to Arthur Ben Sam and Greg https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/28/trump-pardon-bitmex-crypto-exchange-money-laundering.html https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/28/trump-pardon-bitmex-crypto-exchange-money-laundering.html"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1905696896410349887)  2025-03-28T19:02Z 119.3K followers, 91.1K engagements


"On the other hand maybe it's a $2 trillion ecosystem precisely because the protocol rules are so hard to change Bitcoin a $2T ecosystem based on software can't reach consensus on [--] lines of code needed to allow more and better scale (op_CAT). And it can't agree for past [--] years on any other minor change/update. Pretty insane. Bitcoin a $2T ecosystem based on software can't reach consensus on [--] lines of code needed to allow more and better scale (op_CAT). And it can't agree for past [--] years on any other minor change/update. Pretty insane"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1929258106132787671)  2025-06-01T19:25Z 119.3K followers, 56K engagements


"Monero Re-org & Qubic It seems like there may have been a delibrate [--] block re-org on Monero $XMR from Qubic mining. The target time is [--] minutes therefore the re-org length is quite small. However it is not clear if there was a double spend attack or if this was just selfish mining i.e. trying to earn more of the block rewards. It seems for now that there is no evidence this was a double spend attack. Qubic did seem to have around 20% of the Monero hashrate for a while and they may have sold some coins for USD to rent hashrate to temporally push the hashrate up to over 30%. Qubic has"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1955254320305217726)  2025-08-12T13:05Z 119.3K followers, 167.2K engagements


"64 Byte Transactions A [--] byte Bitcoin transaction has the potential to be confused with an intermediate hashing step in Bitcoins Merkle tree because this is also [--] bytes. We explore how this vulnerability can be exploited & look at a proposed fix https://www.bitmex.com/blog/64-Byte-Transactions https://www.bitmex.com/blog/64-Byte-Transactions"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1998383507693850765)  2025-12-09T13:25Z 119.3K followers, 26.9K engagements


"@n1ckler Deciding when & how to add quantum safe crypto to Bitcoin is a challenging trade-off between signature size other characteristics how battle tested they are & the level of quantum risk Research appears to be progressing at a fast pace & there is no emergency 13/13"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BitMEXResearch/status/2003592874781454452)  2025-12-23T22:25Z 119.3K followers, 25.7K engagements


"A Complete History of Bitcoins Consensus Forks We list [--] Bitcoin consensus rule changes which represents what we believe to be almost every significant such event in Bitcoins history. At least three of these incidents resulted in a chain split https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoins-consensus-forks/ https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoins-consensus-forks/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/946263906418286595)  2017-12-28T06:17Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"The Lightning Network We explain the motivation behind the creation of LN and why its scaling characteristics are superior potentially resulting in a transformational improvement. We look at LNs limitations including the downside of inferior security https://blog.bitmex.com/the-lightning-network/ https://blog.bitmex.com/the-lightning-network/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/956349511365881857)  2018-01-25T02:14Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"The Ripple story We look over the history of Ripple and examine various disputes between the founders. We then explore the technology behind Ripple & conclude that by default server has full control over the ledger https://blog.bitmex.com/the-ripple-story/ http://Ripple.com https://blog.bitmex.com/the-ripple-story/ http://Ripple.com"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/960686999433703424)  2018-02-06T01:30Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"Tether We do not think Tether is a Ponzi scheme. We identify a possible candidate primary reserve bank for Tether based on financial data from Puerto Rico. We list other pseudonymous USD based online payment systems that were shut down by regulators https://blog.bitmex.com/tether/ https://blog.bitmex.com/tether/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/965135084914290694)  2018-02-18T08:05Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"Diagram of a Bitcoin block We present an illustration of a Bitcoin block including the Merkle trees. We explain why the 2nd Merkle tree in the block is necessary. We then take a closer look at some of the negatives of both overt & covert AsicBoost https://blog.bitmex.com/graphical-illustration-of-a-bitcoin-block/ https://blog.bitmex.com/graphical-illustration-of-a-bitcoin-block/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/969140926382620672)  2018-03-01T09:22Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"SegWit transaction capacity increase compared to Bitcoin Cash Since the launch of Bitcoin Cash in August [----] around [---] million SegWit transactions have taken place 20.1% more than the cumulative number of Bitcoin Cash transactions in the period. https://blog.bitmex.com/the-segwit-transaction-capacity-increase-update/ https://blog.bitmex.com/the-segwit-transaction-capacity-increase-update/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/976625772113743872)  2018-03-22T01:05Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"List of [--] Bitcoin fork tokens Although in [----] Bitcoin may have somewhat moved on beyond this issue in this sixth piece on consensus forks and chainsplits we provide a list of [--] tokens which seem to have forked away from Bitcoin https://blog.bitmex.com/42-bitcoin-fork-coins/ https://blog.bitmex.com/42-bitcoin-fork-coins/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/998452908529143808)  2018-05-21T06:38Z 119.3K followers, [---] engagements


"Bitcoin technology is a meritocracy not an Idiocracy. Sorry"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022729041107648883)  2026-02-14T17:45Z 771.6K followers, 18.4K engagements


"RT @bitschmidty: Kudos to @L0RINC for finding this BIP110 Knots PR consensus bug and reporting it right away"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022357397860196644)  2026-02-13T17:09Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"Kudos to @L0RINC for finding this BIP110 Knots PR consensus bug and reporting it right away # BIP-110 ReducedData: script-execution cache poisoning via activation-boundary reorg https://t.co/1mEkxKHlCN # BIP-110 ReducedData: script-execution cache poisoning via activation-boundary reorg https://t.co/1mEkxKHlCN"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022271605984944290)  2026-02-13T11:28Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"# BIP-110 ReducedData: script-execution cache poisoning via activation-boundary reorg Found a serious consensus bug in Bitcoin Knots' BIP-110 implementation: a shallow reorg across the activation boundary can poison the script validation cache causing a node to accept a block containing BIP-110 invalid transactions. Full disclosure with reproducers can be found on the pending PR: https://github.com/bitcoinknots/bitcoin/pull/238#issuecomment-3896624715 https://github.com/bitcoinknots/bitcoin/pull/238#issuecomment-3896624715"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022268491403763855)  2026-02-13T11:15Z [----] followers, 70.7K engagements


"Respect for changing your mind. I was initially supporting of filtering too. I admit I was wrong. [--]. Time has proven JPEGs to just be a passing fad and for the problem has largely resolved itself. Even if JPEGs were an enduring trend the blocksize limit mitigates any long term-damage they could theoretically do to IBD times/scaling. [--]. The movement Luke/Mechanic/Kratter whipped up isn't even about mitigating spam anymore it's about the lost cause of sanitizing bitcoin free from having sin immorality and criminality. Their goals are fundamentally opposed to bitcoin's usecase of freedom money"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022315662551519512)  2026-02-13T14:23Z 31K followers, 13K engagements


"RT @stephanlivera: @brian_trollz @BitMEXResearch @MrHodl @BitcoinErrorLog @AaronvanW @hodlonaut Looks like hodlonaut is now dropping his su"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022329686937002218)  2026-02-13T15:19Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@brian_trollz @BitMEXResearch @MrHodl @BitcoinErrorLog @AaronvanW @hodlonaut Looks like hodlonaut is now dropping his support for [---]. Good call https://x.com/i/status/2022284973835768136 I had a long talk with wise @giacomozucco today. And I am withdrawing my support for BIP-110. I stand by A and B of this post. And partly C. Something is seriously off with Bitcoin Core. And they are imo fully responsible for the current social fracture. Arrogance woke https://x.com/i/status/2022284973835768136 I had a long talk with wise @giacomozucco today. And I am withdrawing my support for BIP-110. I"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022304962076987853)  2026-02-13T13:40Z 191.2K followers, [----] engagements


"I had a long talk with wise @giacomozucco today. And I am withdrawing my support for BIP-110. I stand by A and B of this post. And partly C. Something is seriously off with Bitcoin Core. And they are imo fully responsible for the current social fracture. Arrogance woke politics disturbing physical centralization very poor ability to be responsible stewards of the reference implentation of Bitcoin. But I can no longer justify supporting BIP-110. I know the people pushing for it has the best intentions a strong principled base and a huge heart for Bitcoin. I respect that a lot. But I don't"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022284973835768136)  2026-02-13T12:21Z 154.7K followers, 103.1K engagements


"RT @hodlonaut: I had a long talk with wise @giacomozucco today. And I am withdrawing my support for BIP-110. I stand by A and B of this p"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022296059347603776)  2026-02-13T13:05Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"A) I think v30 the rationale the haste the circumstances the philosophical implications the arrogance the handwaving the disdain for broad community outrage and more shows beyond doubt that something is very wrong with Bitcoin Core and/or how it works right now. B) That means I am taking a stand against it C) This DOES NOT necessarily mean that I know for a fact BIP-110 is the best countermove but it DOES MEAN that I think some form of strong action has to be mustered against it if Core shows no willingness to accept they have acted recklessly and unwise and start working to remedy the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021177997718335802)  2026-02-10T11:02Z 154.7K followers, 72.1K engagements


"Transaction Relay Filters & Bitcoin Core Defaults There appears to be considerable confusion about transaction relay filters on the Bitcoin network and in particular the sequencing of events. For instance whether the relay filters broke down BEFORE or AFTER Bitcoin Core changed the defaults With respect to the sub [--] sat per vbyte filter @OrangeSurfBTC produced this clear image showing the number of sub [--] sat per vbyte transactions. The sequencing is clear Bitcoin Core merged the relevant PR on [--] Aug [----] and the client was released on [--] Sept [----]. By this time the volume of sub [--] sat per"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022069199036690815)  2026-02-12T22:03Z 119.3K followers, 10.6K engagements


"Your questions are irrelevant I appreciate you think they are irrelevant but do you have a view as they are downstream of Cores conduct How are they downstream The sequencing of events is as follows: [--]. FullRBF transactions were reliably relayed on the open network and mined BEFORE Core relayed then as standard [--]. Transactions with a feerate below [--] sat per vbyte were reliably relayed and mined on the open network BEFORE Core relayed then as standard [--]. Large OP_Reurn output transactions reliably relayed and mined on the open network BEFORE Core relayed them as standard Do you understand that"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021627864047632529)  2026-02-11T16:50Z 119.3K followers, 14.9K engagements


"RT @peterktodd: @hodlonaut really needs to reply to this"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022024083014398118)  2026-02-12T19:04Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@hodlonaut really needs to reply to this. @hodlonaut Your questions are irrelevant I appreciate you think they are irrelevant but do you have a view as they are downstream of Cores conduct How are they downstream The sequencing of events is as follows: [--]. FullRBF transactions were reliably relayed on the open network @hodlonaut Your questions are irrelevant I appreciate you think they are irrelevant but do you have a view as they are downstream of Cores conduct How are they downstream The sequencing of events is as follows: [--]. FullRBF transactions were reliably relayed on the open network"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021933743045587329)  2026-02-12T13:05Z 205.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@_PyBlock_ @LukeDashjr FYI Liana is built for people who actually need to use bitcoin as money in large amount and/or with inheritance built in. Same with others building on Miniscript which more and more companies are doing. None of this is about spam only virtue signaling"  
[X Link](https://x.com/KLoaec/status/2021618398078357941)  2026-02-11T16:12Z [----] followers, 12.8K engagements


"RT @mononautical: this taproot OP_IF example is much more worrying for the RDTS proposal than I first realized. it's actually a miniscript"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021661725867880957)  2026-02-11T19:04Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"this taproot OP_IF example is much more worrying for the RDTS proposal than I first realized. it's actually a miniscript wallet policy: thresh(3pk(A)pk(B)pk(C)pk(D)older(T1)older(T2)) meaning "a 3-of-4 multisig decaying to 2-of-4 after time T1 and 1-of-4 after time T2" For example there are a couple of spends using this "decaying multisig" script template whih uses multiple OP_IFs https://t.co/dVwtSylBUX For example there are a couple of spends using this "decaying multisig" script template whih uses multiple OP_IFs https://t.co/dVwtSylBUX"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1988953736774053920)  2025-11-13T12:54Z 21K followers, 76K engagements


"For example there are a couple of spends using this "decaying multisig" script template whih uses multiple OP_IFs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1988449211596370152)  2025-11-12T03:30Z 21K followers, 21.7K engagements


"AI agents can write code send emails and make phone calls. But they still can't transact. Today we're fixing that. Releasing a new set of tools that give agents native access to the Lightning Network: lnget for automatic L402 payments MCP for node operations remote signing for key isolation and scoped credentials for spending control. The machine-payable web starts now. And bitcoin makes it possible. ⚡🦞 https://lightning.engineering/posts/2026-02-11-ln-agent-tools/ https://lightning.engineering/posts/2026-02-11-ln-agent-tools/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021622443278766285)  2026-02-11T16:28Z 161.2K followers, 265K engagements


"the haste What haste You have got this thing all wrong Bitcoin Core developers have been debating and discussing these filters at meetings and conferences for years. Perhaps up to [--] years. They were often high and mighty about how important the defaults they set were. There were years and years of sluggish inaction Then in [----] people started relaxing the filters themselves ignoring Core defaults. Turns out the Core developers were not as important as they thought and people can set what filters they like. FullRBF happened the min relay fee was relaxed and large OP_Returns started being"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021185535314743676)  2026-02-10T11:32Z 119.3K followers, [----] engagements


"For context for the [---] fork people: Miniscript uses things called fragments. Some of these fragments use op_if that your fork disables for some reason. A user defines what their wallet should be for example "a 2-of-5 multisig". Miniscript will output a Bitcoin Script (a wallet basically) that is the best and safest way currently known to do this policy in Bitcoin. Disabling an opcode that is very much a building brick for safe Bitcoin wallets is dumb but also has a big engineering cost on: - the engineers who build the Miniscript engine - the devs that implemented it in Core and in multiple"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021528510385254600)  2026-02-11T10:15Z [----] followers, 30.3K engagements


"RT @OrangeSurfBTC:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021282600132718957)  2026-02-10T17:58Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@BitMEXResearch @hodlonaut Then in [----] users ignored Core developers and relaxed the filters on their own. This undermines Core Is there any evidence of that Can you share the data @BitMEXResearch @hodlonaut Then in [----] users ignored Core developers and relaxed the filters on their own. This undermines Core Is there any evidence of that Can you share the data"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021274490991219090)  2026-02-10T17:26Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@BitMEXResearch @hodlonaut Then in [----] users ignored Core developers and relaxed the filters on their own. This undermines Core Is there any evidence of that Can you share the data"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021269375848718432)  2026-02-10T17:05Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"RT @WillemSchroe: Good read"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021238608724627935)  2026-02-10T15:03Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"Good read. Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost every frozen coin is potentially recoverable https://t.co/mKauGpKK41 https://t.co/MIgj1RjIAx Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost every frozen coin is potentially recoverable https://t.co/mKauGpKK41 https://t.co/MIgj1RjIAx"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021237731880587365)  2026-02-10T15:00Z 15.4K followers, [----] engagements


"Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost every frozen coin is potentially recoverable https://www.bitmex.com/blog/Mitigating-The-Impact-Of-The-Quantum-Freeze https://www.bitmex.com/blog/Mitigating-The-Impact-Of-The-Quantum-Freeze"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2020997563759882283)  2026-02-09T23:05Z 119.3K followers, 105.9K engagements


"RT @BTCMcBoatface: Doubling down on softforks forevermore"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021161398043029901)  2026-02-10T09:56Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"Doubling down on softforks forevermore. @ndeet @GrassFedBitcoin @veenaveen1995 If Bitcoiners are willing to softfork to prevent data storage from becoming an officially supported use case today why would they not do the same exact thing tomorrow @ndeet @GrassFedBitcoin @veenaveen1995 If Bitcoiners are willing to softfork to prevent data storage from becoming an officially supported use case today why would they not do the same exact thing tomorrow"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021013449711681573)  2026-02-10T00:08Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@ndeet @GrassFedBitcoin @veenaveen1995 If Bitcoiners are willing to softfork to prevent data storage from becoming an officially supported use case today why would they not do the same exact thing tomorrow"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2020997564150034793)  2026-02-09T23:05Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"RT @nvk: Stop listening to the FUD"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021035787668889810)  2026-02-10T01:37Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"Stop listening to the FUD. Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost every frozen coin is potentially recoverable https://t.co/mKauGpKK41 https://t.co/MIgj1RjIAx Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost every frozen coin is potentially recoverable https://t.co/mKauGpKK41"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021032694638051348)  2026-02-10T01:25Z 156K followers, [----] engagements


"RT @cmsholdings: Johnny Bier writes really good research this is worth reading instead of articles that just say QUANTUM be scared"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021035734149586984)  2026-02-10T01:37Z 119.3K followers, [--] engagements


"Johnny Bier writes really good research this is worth reading instead of articles that just say QUANTUM be scared Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such that almost every frozen coin is potentially recoverable https://t.co/mKauGpKK41 https://t.co/MIgj1RjIAx Mitigating The Impact Of The Quantum Freeze We examine ways of mitigating the impact of a quantum freeze by allowing the frozen coins to potentially be recovered in a quantum safe way such"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021032430723805529)  2026-02-10T01:24Z 172.8K followers, 11.3K engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing