[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @BellikOzan Ozan Bellik Ozan Bellik posts on X about money, leo, $2413t, nasa the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 3119 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1240075098133909506/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +328% - X Month XXXXXX -XXXX% - X Months XXXXXXX -XX% - X Year XXXXXXXXXX +598% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1240075098133909506/posts_active)  - X Week XX +264% - X Month XX +20% - X Months XXX -XX% - X Year XXXXX -XXXX% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1240075098133909506/followers)  - X Week XXXXX +0.48% - X Month XXXXX +1% - X Months XXXXX +3.40% - X Year XXXXX +47% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1240075098133909506/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1240075098133909506/influence) --- **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) [stocks](/list/stocks) [celebrities](/list/celebrities) [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands) [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) **Social topic influence** [money](/topic/money), [leo](/topic/leo), [$2413t](/topic/$2413t) #578, [nasa](/topic/nasa), [kamala harris](/topic/kamala-harris), [tesla](/topic/tesla), [harris](/topic/harris), [$500kg](/topic/$500kg), [$50byr](/topic/$50byr), [half of](/topic/half-of) **Top assets mentioned** [Tesla, Inc. (TSLA)](/topic/tesla) [Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL)](/topic/$googl) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1240075098133909506/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Awareness is a beautiful thing" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979209876405653933) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T15:36Z 6496 followers, 5261 engagements "I'm happy for Stoke that they have a crazy high valuation and access to loads of money but I must admit I admired them more when it looked like they were going to try to be unprecedentedly scrappy" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1976101526277075120) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-09T01:44Z 6499 followers, 4700 engagements "@Biteme640672194 On the order of 20t with current tech but who knows what the future will bring" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978955685736993123) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T22:46Z 6495 followers, XX engagements "Don't need to make it larger there's a lot of volume in the CM you don't need for a X person LEO taxi. You could add solar panels (much smaller ones than on ESM) or just add batteries. Say X days at 2kW - 144kWh - 600kg (about a quarter of a m3). Already has a XX x 160lbf thruster RCS system that provides 6DOF That have the requisite endurance with potentially upsized tanks. Not much new piping is needed. You'd need a new adapter for mating to the LV but that shouldn't be too hard. As for rebalancing adding batteries and tankage gives you a lot of flexibility in keeping the spacecraft's CM" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979194792853803304) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T14:36Z 6499 followers, 2027 engagements "I think most spaceflight fans even very knowledgeable ones don't know how close the Orion CM is to being a self-sufficient LEO crew vehicle independent of the ESM. (And yeah I haven't discussed the necessary life support mods here though I mentioned them up thread but they're also relatively minor.)" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979221468606271862) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T16:22Z 6499 followers, 1851 engagements "By all means add it up. A thousand launches a year (less than one a day per site currently under construction) at 100t/launch would be 100kt/yr. At $500/kg that'd be $50B/yr. If half of that was headcount at $250k/yr/person that'd mean they'd need 100k employees on launch alone to hit that cadence. Right now they're launching F9 at over XX% of that rate with roughly XX% of that number of *total* employees. Those employees are also recovering first stages at sea refurbishing said stages which were not designed for turnarounds as fast building entirely new second stages building and operating" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978814226434277520) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T13:24Z 6500 followers, XX engagements "These days I only use Gemini (when I can't be bothered to open Grok/Twitter) and Grok (when I need better quality than Gemini -- it's sad how far Google has fallen). Been meaning to give Claude a try" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979310264832135226) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T22:15Z 6499 followers, 1826 engagements "@spacepotat0Z @Phrankensteyn They're planning to reuse it. It's still going to be pricey. But wouldn't be ludicrous if they do" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979313234198041038) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T22:27Z 6500 followers, XX engagements "@nuclear___love The first one is not a premise just a conclusion. No circularity. I didn't say McMurdo on the Moon wouldn't happen (fully expect it will) just that that's not what NASA is aiming for let alone seriously trying for within the scope of Artemis" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979331771746652591) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T23:40Z 6498 followers, XX engagements "The radiator problem is vastly overrated. That 200k cluster in Memphis drawing 250MW resides in a 785000 sqft factory. Arrange it in a square and extend each side by XX% (expand by roughly the length of the ISS in each direction) and you've got enough radiator area to dissipate those 250MW in orbit at 50C. (Even if that is continuous power rather than peak.)" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978824990394069185) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T14:06Z 6498 followers, 5143 engagements "Heh maybe wouldn't be so bad. It would give SpaceX a reason to prioritize HLS dev and show us all once again how terrible of an idea cost plus is. By all means give us a side by side. Not that I'd be happy about the waste of money but at least it'd be entertaining" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978913846778827079) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T20:00Z 6498 followers, 5701 engagements "I'm using 50C surface temp. And double-sided radiators. Works out to 1236.6 x emissivity (0.85 for white 0.95+ for black coatings) minus absorbed sunlight and IR from the Earth. How close your coolant (if any) and chip temperatures come to radiator surface temperatures is quite variable and a design optimization problem" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978942074025295931) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T21:52Z 6498 followers, XXX engagements "With unlimited money I'm XX% sure I could deliver a crewed lander in X years. But not with traditional contractors. And not with the NASA review process" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978943833225511290) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T21:59Z 6499 followers, 1268 engagements "@DaveEnright6 @KenKirtland17 @eager_space BTUs are units of energy. kW are units of power. 44000BTU/ft2 works out to 500MJ/m2" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978956812817682447) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T22:50Z 6498 followers, XXX engagements "If all that heat is getting dumped into the helium and you're letting it rise to 2000K it'd be 50kg/m2 but the presence of that much helium might reduce the heat load so you might be able to get away with substantially less. You might also have a radiative component helping out" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978958606793084980) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T22:57Z 6498 followers, XX engagements "I have a simpler solution" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1978964274543288642) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-16T23:20Z 6497 followers, 1170 engagements "@codingfodder @Exogynous True but it can get you a baby in X months " [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979027635062571245) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T03:32Z 6498 followers, XX engagements "@nuclear___love You misunderstand the purpose of Artemis" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979305000741613585) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T21:54Z 6498 followers, XX engagements "@nuclear___love How quickly people have forgotten they had already built up the production rate for close to XX stacks' worth of engines a year and were close to that on build rate of prototypes" [X Link](https://x.com/BellikOzan/status/1979318178900775424) [@BellikOzan](/creator/x/BellikOzan) 2025-10-17T22:46Z 6496 followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@BellikOzan Ozan Bellik
Ozan Bellik posts on X about money, leo, $2413t, nasa the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 3119 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +328%
- X Month XXXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXXXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXXXXXXX +598%
Mentions: X #
- X Week XX +264%
- X Month XX +20%
- X Months XXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXX -XXXX%
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX +0.48%
- X Month XXXXX +1%
- X Months XXXXX +3.40%
- X Year XXXXX +47%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence finance stocks celebrities automotive brands technology brands
Social topic influence money, leo, $2413t #578, nasa, kamala harris, tesla, harris, $500kg, $50byr, half of
Top assets mentioned Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL)
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Awareness is a beautiful thing"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T15:36Z 6496 followers, 5261 engagements
"I'm happy for Stoke that they have a crazy high valuation and access to loads of money but I must admit I admired them more when it looked like they were going to try to be unprecedentedly scrappy"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-09T01:44Z 6499 followers, 4700 engagements
"@Biteme640672194 On the order of 20t with current tech but who knows what the future will bring"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T22:46Z 6495 followers, XX engagements
"Don't need to make it larger there's a lot of volume in the CM you don't need for a X person LEO taxi. You could add solar panels (much smaller ones than on ESM) or just add batteries. Say X days at 2kW - 144kWh - 600kg (about a quarter of a m3). Already has a XX x 160lbf thruster RCS system that provides 6DOF That have the requisite endurance with potentially upsized tanks. Not much new piping is needed. You'd need a new adapter for mating to the LV but that shouldn't be too hard. As for rebalancing adding batteries and tankage gives you a lot of flexibility in keeping the spacecraft's CM"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T14:36Z 6499 followers, 2027 engagements
"I think most spaceflight fans even very knowledgeable ones don't know how close the Orion CM is to being a self-sufficient LEO crew vehicle independent of the ESM. (And yeah I haven't discussed the necessary life support mods here though I mentioned them up thread but they're also relatively minor.)"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T16:22Z 6499 followers, 1851 engagements
"By all means add it up. A thousand launches a year (less than one a day per site currently under construction) at 100t/launch would be 100kt/yr. At $500/kg that'd be $50B/yr. If half of that was headcount at $250k/yr/person that'd mean they'd need 100k employees on launch alone to hit that cadence. Right now they're launching F9 at over XX% of that rate with roughly XX% of that number of total employees. Those employees are also recovering first stages at sea refurbishing said stages which were not designed for turnarounds as fast building entirely new second stages building and operating"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T13:24Z 6500 followers, XX engagements
"These days I only use Gemini (when I can't be bothered to open Grok/Twitter) and Grok (when I need better quality than Gemini -- it's sad how far Google has fallen). Been meaning to give Claude a try"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T22:15Z 6499 followers, 1826 engagements
"@spacepotat0Z @Phrankensteyn They're planning to reuse it. It's still going to be pricey. But wouldn't be ludicrous if they do"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T22:27Z 6500 followers, XX engagements
"@nuclear___love The first one is not a premise just a conclusion. No circularity. I didn't say McMurdo on the Moon wouldn't happen (fully expect it will) just that that's not what NASA is aiming for let alone seriously trying for within the scope of Artemis"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T23:40Z 6498 followers, XX engagements
"The radiator problem is vastly overrated. That 200k cluster in Memphis drawing 250MW resides in a 785000 sqft factory. Arrange it in a square and extend each side by XX% (expand by roughly the length of the ISS in each direction) and you've got enough radiator area to dissipate those 250MW in orbit at 50C. (Even if that is continuous power rather than peak.)"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T14:06Z 6498 followers, 5143 engagements
"Heh maybe wouldn't be so bad. It would give SpaceX a reason to prioritize HLS dev and show us all once again how terrible of an idea cost plus is. By all means give us a side by side. Not that I'd be happy about the waste of money but at least it'd be entertaining"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T20:00Z 6498 followers, 5701 engagements
"I'm using 50C surface temp. And double-sided radiators. Works out to 1236.6 x emissivity (0.85 for white 0.95+ for black coatings) minus absorbed sunlight and IR from the Earth. How close your coolant (if any) and chip temperatures come to radiator surface temperatures is quite variable and a design optimization problem"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T21:52Z 6498 followers, XXX engagements
"With unlimited money I'm XX% sure I could deliver a crewed lander in X years. But not with traditional contractors. And not with the NASA review process"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T21:59Z 6499 followers, 1268 engagements
"@DaveEnright6 @KenKirtland17 @eager_space BTUs are units of energy. kW are units of power. 44000BTU/ft2 works out to 500MJ/m2"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T22:50Z 6498 followers, XXX engagements
"If all that heat is getting dumped into the helium and you're letting it rise to 2000K it'd be 50kg/m2 but the presence of that much helium might reduce the heat load so you might be able to get away with substantially less. You might also have a radiative component helping out"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T22:57Z 6498 followers, XX engagements
"I have a simpler solution"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-16T23:20Z 6497 followers, 1170 engagements
"@codingfodder @Exogynous True but it can get you a baby in X months "
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T03:32Z 6498 followers, XX engagements
"@nuclear___love You misunderstand the purpose of Artemis"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T21:54Z 6498 followers, XX engagements
"@nuclear___love How quickly people have forgotten they had already built up the production rate for close to XX stacks' worth of engines a year and were close to that on build rate of prototypes"
X Link @BellikOzan 2025-10-17T22:46Z 6496 followers, XX engagements