Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@BSF42069 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1661739003987759109.png) @BSF42069 BSF 🇬🇧🐀

BSF 🇬🇧🐀 posts on X about growth is, $30bn, ipo, china the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 2338 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1661739003987759109/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1661739003987759109/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +106%
- X Year XXXXXXX -XX%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1661739003987759109/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1661739003987759109/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week X -XX%
- X Month XX +17%
- X Months XXX +15%
- X Year XXX -XX%

### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1661739003987759109/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1661739003987759109/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXX -XXXX%
- X Month XXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXX +3.50%
- X Year XXXXX +19%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1661739003987759109/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1661739003987759109/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[finance](/list/finance)  [countries](/list/countries) 

**Social topic influence**
[growth is](/topic/growth-is), [$30bn](/topic/$30bn), [ipo](/topic/ipo), [china](/topic/china), [spaceflight](/topic/spaceflight), [target](/topic/target), [acquisition](/topic/acquisition), [guess](/topic/guess), [ai](/topic/ai), [finance](/topic/finance)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"This is the very same possibility that has led to China being excluded from western spaceflight programs btw"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1995864203366945017)  2025-12-02T14:34Z 1288 followers, XXX engagements


"@kmh @BanhmiBrieoche And CLPS is an even worse example. The entire aim of CLPS is and as explicitly stated is shot on target not goals. CLPS is resilient because it has so many providers that even if a mission fails even if a company fails there will still be more to come"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998502880366702786)  2025-12-09T21:19Z 1287 followers, XX engagements


"@xdNiBoR @Orbital_Perigee @KenKirtland17 @lrocket @SciGuySpace That was for acquisition. This needs to be sustainable"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1999141603424743676)  2025-12-11T15:37Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@HeySlattz Great they want to do more satellites. Guess Mars is out of the picture now sailed that ship huh. Its over guys. Absolutely certain. Yup. No if of buts. Fr fr. Ong"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1999152420975161512)  2025-12-11T16:20Z 1287 followers, XXX engagements


"@KenKirtland17 @Orbital_Perigee @lrocket @SciGuySpace The gamble here is for an ROI. Even excluding AI space based data centers have market appeal Its like Starlink itself really. Sure its eaten up resources but with the end goal being a better source of finance for even higher goals"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1999142048251703385)  2025-12-11T15:39Z 1288 followers, XXX engagements


"@BanhmiBrieoche Thats true but it makes sense. If people who have a negative perception are on there its going to be a part of it same if they have positive public perception"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1999183960035733765)  2025-12-11T18:26Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@BanhmiBrieoche Its more representative of wider society which can skew one way or another but being PoTY isnt necessarily one or the other"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1999183992667472215)  2025-12-11T18:26Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@Orbital_Perigee @fakecarlsagan @lrocket @BullAdamJonas The current suits are specific to risk disclosure. But these require intent not just issues in development"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998147335629799787)  2025-12-08T21:47Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@kmh @BanhmiBrieoche They were close to defaulting on payments which was the issue but now theyre cash flow positive and have paid of liabilities from funding rounds like the one in March"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998502419236585648)  2025-12-09T21:18Z 1287 followers, XX engagements


"@mcrs987 @xdNiBoR The article does actually state this isnt a pivot. And further markets for starship does inherently aid in development Falcon wouldnt have the cadence and flight history it does not without Starlink. Starship wont be able to gain the same without it either"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1999118727447453826)  2025-12-11T14:07Z 1287 followers, XX engagements


"@ITSNEWNAMEDUDE @KenKirtland17 @lrocket @SciGuySpace X year of revenue yes. But thats revenue not income less operating costs alone and its way lower. SpaceX also doesnt raise 30bn every funding round. Over the past X years the disclosed amount total is like 7bn"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1999215759382237499)  2025-12-11T20:32Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@Orbital_Perigee @fakecarlsagan @lrocket @BullAdamJonas Rocket Lab has disclosed that there are risks with Archimedes such as delays (it not performing as expected initially being explicitly stated too) technical issues and engineering challenges"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998147390964957652)  2025-12-08T21:47Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@deltaIV9250 Thats not a likely outcome though. Investors absolutely do not care about what Mars aims are atm The aim would also be to so after starship is out of heavy dev (late 2026 being when it should be entering or in commercial markets)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998528179464782287)  2025-12-09T23:00Z 1288 followers, XXX engagements


"@deltaIV9250 Growth is high investors will also know theyre capex heavy. Going public would be an insane boost to them being able to expand at the scale they want to make Mars colonisation possible"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998528525876473935)  2025-12-09T23:01Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@BanhmiBrieoche Expansion probably. $30bn from IPO is crazy too (literally the biggest ever) but its also probably $10bn annually coming in to sustain everything"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998550608719261698)  2025-12-10T00:29Z 1289 followers, XX engagements


"@Blaze_R935 @StarbaseBrewing Mars wont necessarily be a money pit (theres services that can be sold there) But investors will be more likely to care about the services they do provide. Starlink being an example of this They have to make Mars work out financially anyway so growth is a certainty"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998552368041111893)  2025-12-10T00:36Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@BanhmiBrieoche I think its based on when they expect it to happen. Really provided no big gremlins emerge its likely they will start flying at least Starlink by late next year imo especially with the design solidifying a bit"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1998558942159581447)  2025-12-10T01:02Z 1288 followers, XX engagements


"@ITSNEWNAMEDUDE @KenKirtland17 @lrocket @SciGuySpace And yes its X% of his net worth. But again thats net worth. Its not easy to liquidate and its unsustainable Also the IPO isnt a one of investment round. Thats just $30bn at IPO then about $10bn-15bn annually from then on"  
[X Link](https://x.com/BSF42069/status/1999215783541657613)  2025-12-11T20:32Z 1288 followers, X engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@BSF42069 Avatar @BSF42069 BSF 🇬🇧🐀

BSF 🇬🇧🐀 posts on X about growth is, $30bn, ipo, china the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 2338 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXX #

Engagements Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXX -XX%
  • X Month XXXXXX -XX%
  • X Months XXXXXXX +106%
  • X Year XXXXXXX -XX%

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

  • X Week X -XX%
  • X Month XX +17%
  • X Months XXX +15%
  • X Year XXX -XX%

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXX -XXXX%
  • X Month XXXXX -XXXX%
  • X Months XXXXX +3.50%
  • X Year XXXXX +19%

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence finance countries

Social topic influence growth is, $30bn, ipo, china, spaceflight, target, acquisition, guess, ai, finance

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"This is the very same possibility that has led to China being excluded from western spaceflight programs btw"
X Link 2025-12-02T14:34Z 1288 followers, XXX engagements

"@kmh @BanhmiBrieoche And CLPS is an even worse example. The entire aim of CLPS is and as explicitly stated is shot on target not goals. CLPS is resilient because it has so many providers that even if a mission fails even if a company fails there will still be more to come"
X Link 2025-12-09T21:19Z 1287 followers, XX engagements

"@xdNiBoR @Orbital_Perigee @KenKirtland17 @lrocket @SciGuySpace That was for acquisition. This needs to be sustainable"
X Link 2025-12-11T15:37Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@HeySlattz Great they want to do more satellites. Guess Mars is out of the picture now sailed that ship huh. Its over guys. Absolutely certain. Yup. No if of buts. Fr fr. Ong"
X Link 2025-12-11T16:20Z 1287 followers, XXX engagements

"@KenKirtland17 @Orbital_Perigee @lrocket @SciGuySpace The gamble here is for an ROI. Even excluding AI space based data centers have market appeal Its like Starlink itself really. Sure its eaten up resources but with the end goal being a better source of finance for even higher goals"
X Link 2025-12-11T15:39Z 1288 followers, XXX engagements

"@BanhmiBrieoche Thats true but it makes sense. If people who have a negative perception are on there its going to be a part of it same if they have positive public perception"
X Link 2025-12-11T18:26Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@BanhmiBrieoche Its more representative of wider society which can skew one way or another but being PoTY isnt necessarily one or the other"
X Link 2025-12-11T18:26Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@Orbital_Perigee @fakecarlsagan @lrocket @BullAdamJonas The current suits are specific to risk disclosure. But these require intent not just issues in development"
X Link 2025-12-08T21:47Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@kmh @BanhmiBrieoche They were close to defaulting on payments which was the issue but now theyre cash flow positive and have paid of liabilities from funding rounds like the one in March"
X Link 2025-12-09T21:18Z 1287 followers, XX engagements

"@mcrs987 @xdNiBoR The article does actually state this isnt a pivot. And further markets for starship does inherently aid in development Falcon wouldnt have the cadence and flight history it does not without Starlink. Starship wont be able to gain the same without it either"
X Link 2025-12-11T14:07Z 1287 followers, XX engagements

"@ITSNEWNAMEDUDE @KenKirtland17 @lrocket @SciGuySpace X year of revenue yes. But thats revenue not income less operating costs alone and its way lower. SpaceX also doesnt raise 30bn every funding round. Over the past X years the disclosed amount total is like 7bn"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:32Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@Orbital_Perigee @fakecarlsagan @lrocket @BullAdamJonas Rocket Lab has disclosed that there are risks with Archimedes such as delays (it not performing as expected initially being explicitly stated too) technical issues and engineering challenges"
X Link 2025-12-08T21:47Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@deltaIV9250 Thats not a likely outcome though. Investors absolutely do not care about what Mars aims are atm The aim would also be to so after starship is out of heavy dev (late 2026 being when it should be entering or in commercial markets)"
X Link 2025-12-09T23:00Z 1288 followers, XXX engagements

"@deltaIV9250 Growth is high investors will also know theyre capex heavy. Going public would be an insane boost to them being able to expand at the scale they want to make Mars colonisation possible"
X Link 2025-12-09T23:01Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@BanhmiBrieoche Expansion probably. $30bn from IPO is crazy too (literally the biggest ever) but its also probably $10bn annually coming in to sustain everything"
X Link 2025-12-10T00:29Z 1289 followers, XX engagements

"@Blaze_R935 @StarbaseBrewing Mars wont necessarily be a money pit (theres services that can be sold there) But investors will be more likely to care about the services they do provide. Starlink being an example of this They have to make Mars work out financially anyway so growth is a certainty"
X Link 2025-12-10T00:36Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@BanhmiBrieoche I think its based on when they expect it to happen. Really provided no big gremlins emerge its likely they will start flying at least Starlink by late next year imo especially with the design solidifying a bit"
X Link 2025-12-10T01:02Z 1288 followers, XX engagements

"@ITSNEWNAMEDUDE @KenKirtland17 @lrocket @SciGuySpace And yes its X% of his net worth. But again thats net worth. Its not easy to liquidate and its unsustainable Also the IPO isnt a one of investment round. Thats just $30bn at IPO then about $10bn-15bn annually from then on"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:32Z 1288 followers, X engagements

creator/x::BSF42069
/creator/x::BSF42069