Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

[@Gov_Milledge](/creator/twitter/Gov_Milledge)
"Andrele misses the mark. Key pt of his order re existing CDP not authorizing is non-continuous pipeline status - same problem SB XXX has -this isnt defined anywhere in CA. PHMSA has only two definitions of a pipeline status - active and abandoned 1/"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978258441421410761) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T00:35Z XXX followers, 5102 engagements


"Quick reading of consent decree suggests it would be XX days from start of dispute resolution process before anything became public absent an SEC filing by $SOC. Pipeline will still progress in background but dual track of offshore will start soon"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978265919852789899) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T01:05Z XXX followers, 3127 engagements


"Key point re consent decree is that it is also binding on any other entities or persons otherwise bound by law to comply with the Decree. Andrele expressly held that the safety valve installation fell outside of existing CDP tho mandated by OSFM + consent decree 2/ $SOC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978265903016923354) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T01:05Z XXX followers, 2312 engagements


"My suspicion is we see Fed support on offshore scenario soon as well as starting of dispute resolution process under consent once OSFM acts on $SOC submission. Pipeline odds may be narrower but attacking via breach of consent decree is still on table /5"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978265915494920216) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T01:05Z XXX followers, 1524 engagements


"@ESGhound Anderle held safety valve work violated CDP and therefore could be subject to further CCC enforcement activity. Thats the hook. Replacing segments per CD is still subject to local/state/federal - safety valve portion of CD isnt though. EFRD compliance is crucial part of CD $SOC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978273802497806349) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T01:36Z XXX followers, 3220 engagements


"$SOC response brief to the courts tentative ruling has been filed around 12pm today"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978514971609682156) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, 2847 engagements


"One problem for CCC is the 1986 CDP states the county level official shall resolve any question of intent or interpretation of any condition of the CDP. This was resolved in SB 2/12 letter to $SOC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978514982816841850) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"$SOC argument carries over to a conclusion - delegated authority from CCC sets min standards and does not mandate the action to be taken by a local government in implementing"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978514988026269957) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, 1175 engagements


"A few highlights - $SOC seizes on argument of CCC being unable to end run Santa Barbara in applying delegated authority. Argument is statute only allows CCC to seek a writ of mandate with XX days of final decision (SB 2/12/25 letter) or go to legislature to review local authority"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978514977108431106) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"The TLDR here by $SOC is that the CCC is intervening and attempting to second guess delegated local authority to SB - authority where SB under the 1986 CDP is given authority to determine whether it falls there under. CCC cant do what it is trying to do and end run SB"  
[X Link](https://x.com/Gov_Milledge/status/1978514990970667101) [@Gov_Milledge](/creator/x/Gov_Milledge) 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, 1113 engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@Gov_Milledge "Andrele misses the mark. Key pt of his order re existing CDP not authorizing is non-continuous pipeline status - same problem SB XXX has -this isnt defined anywhere in CA. PHMSA has only two definitions of a pipeline status - active and abandoned 1/"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T00:35Z XXX followers, 5102 engagements

"Quick reading of consent decree suggests it would be XX days from start of dispute resolution process before anything became public absent an SEC filing by $SOC. Pipeline will still progress in background but dual track of offshore will start soon"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T01:05Z XXX followers, 3127 engagements

"Key point re consent decree is that it is also binding on any other entities or persons otherwise bound by law to comply with the Decree. Andrele expressly held that the safety valve installation fell outside of existing CDP tho mandated by OSFM + consent decree 2/ $SOC"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T01:05Z XXX followers, 2312 engagements

"My suspicion is we see Fed support on offshore scenario soon as well as starting of dispute resolution process under consent once OSFM acts on $SOC submission. Pipeline odds may be narrower but attacking via breach of consent decree is still on table /5"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T01:05Z XXX followers, 1524 engagements

"@ESGhound Anderle held safety valve work violated CDP and therefore could be subject to further CCC enforcement activity. Thats the hook. Replacing segments per CD is still subject to local/state/federal - safety valve portion of CD isnt though. EFRD compliance is crucial part of CD $SOC"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T01:36Z XXX followers, 3220 engagements

"$SOC response brief to the courts tentative ruling has been filed around 12pm today"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, 2847 engagements

"One problem for CCC is the 1986 CDP states the county level official shall resolve any question of intent or interpretation of any condition of the CDP. This was resolved in SB 2/12 letter to $SOC"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"$SOC argument carries over to a conclusion - delegated authority from CCC sets min standards and does not mandate the action to be taken by a local government in implementing"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, 1175 engagements

"A few highlights - $SOC seizes on argument of CCC being unable to end run Santa Barbara in applying delegated authority. Argument is statute only allows CCC to seek a writ of mandate with XX days of final decision (SB 2/12/25 letter) or go to legislature to review local authority"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"The TLDR here by $SOC is that the CCC is intervening and attempting to second guess delegated local authority to SB - authority where SB under the 1986 CDP is given authority to determine whether it falls there under. CCC cant do what it is trying to do and end run SB"
X Link @Gov_Milledge 2025-10-15T17:35Z XXX followers, 1113 engagements

creator/twitter::556333236/posts
/creator/twitter::556333236/posts