[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

[@WesleyCorbett](/creator/twitter/WesleyCorbett)
"@StreetliTweets that is from attending to the way they are and thereby we forget Being itself. I am sorry but your interpretation makes Heidegger's thought look superficial whereas it is actually rich and complex"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979209156818010346) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-17T15:33Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux Listen up: The expert in writing acting computing finance economics climate change philosophy scientific medicine and a million other things is speaking"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979268449726833020) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-17T19:29Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux Don't start buying rational favours from me"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979635128378052942) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-18T19:46Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux The sensea aren't a matter of faith they simply are what they are justified by the reliable regularity they produce through evolutionary adaptation"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979924747874873345) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T14:56Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux The senses are objective products of natural selection not subjective whims but they aren't "rational" tools for unerring truth; they're pragmatic inferences tuned for survival not philosophical accuracy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979924805370462679) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T14:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux Why call the universe objective at all Objectivity is not a property of things but a human discipline a collective stance forged against bias and illusion. It is an epistemic posture not an ontological feature of the cosmos"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979957637312659695) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T17:07Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux Some people can't distinguish red-green because their retinal cone cells lack the photopigment to detect those wavelengths. How this not a difference in their senses"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979975479542087974) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T18:18Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux The senses and brain are integrated so there's no clean "hand-off" of raw data. Sensory neurons feed directly into brain regions (e.g. visual cortex) where processing begins immediately"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979975671976751432) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T18:19Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@StreetliTweets Heidegger is showing that the dominant way of revealing the world in scientific modernity has narrowed (we are regressing towards Cartesian ontology). Weve lost access to other more primordial ways of disclosing Being (like through art poetry or dwelling)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979209194176692706) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-17T15:33Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@DRichmond04 @jonathanbfine The following critique isn't supposed to be offensive but this argument appears so often that it deserves a name: The Sanctimonious Defence of Rothkos Daubs. Its like a toddler insisting their fridge scribble is the Sistine Chapel Ceiling because it "moves" in the right light"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979878769742753910) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T11:54Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@DRichmond04 @jonathanbfine Rothkos blocks arent portals to the soul; theyre Rorschach tests for the pretentious projecting profundity onto plain pigment because admitting its "just a fucking block of colour" would tank the resale value"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979879345658486994) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T11:56Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@DRichmond04 @jonathanbfine Rothkos Ruin shares the same visual grammar minus the hype and suddenly the emperor is naked. If movement or reflectance is the magic why not applaud a screensaver or a bus timetable No 100m aura thats why"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979879633102545345) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T11:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@MrQuestion777 @StefanMolyneux Calling brute facts arbitrary is akin to asking why the sky is arbitrarily blue. It mistakes explanatory closure for deficiency demanding a why where none is needed. Foundational facts do not lack justification; they define the boundary of what needs justifying"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1980205448155533407) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-20T09:32Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@MrQuestion777 @StefanMolyneux By definition a brute fact admits no deeper cause. Asking for one commits a category error like seeking what lies north of the North Pole. Your insistence on further grounding simply assumes rather than argues that an ultimate explanation must be personal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1980205501599334442) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-20T09:32Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@MrQuestion777 @StefanMolyneux If arbitrariness dooms brute facts it dooms God's aseity"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1980219250515354015) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-20T10:27Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@MrQuestion777 @StefanMolyneux Vicious circularity assumes the truth of a claim to prove it. This position is circular but not viciously so because it is rule circular. Rule circularity takes certain inferential norms as basic thereby defining what counts as inference at all. It is not self-defeating"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1980220234348089529) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-20T10:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@MrQuestion777 @StefanMolyneux Your argument begs the question because you assume God exists but I also beg the question because I take rule circularity to be basic. However at least my argument is known to rest on a rule that exists it has greater parsimony and isn't ontologically inflationary"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1980229180198633777) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-20T11:06Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@MrQuestion777 @StefanMolyneux On the matter of contingent and necessary beings I think this ends up at an impasse as seen in the debate between Russell and Coplestone"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1980229736581537947) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-20T11:08Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@NicholasKM2001 @xgabegottliebx I think this is what they are saying am I mistaken"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979613373303345253) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-18T18:19Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@xgabegottliebx @NicholasKM2001 A Hegelian ontology of sex and sexual relations"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979672276141576208) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-18T22:13Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux A sovereign currency issuer cannot run out of money. In the rare case of hyperinflation typically the state will install a new currency or borrow in another currency"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979924556874723805) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T14:56Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux The universe is not objective; it simply is unmoved by our categories. To speak of it conferring objectivity assumes a nave realism filtered through a veil of subjectivity a relic of Cartesian dualism"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979957688743141418) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T17:07Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@StefanMolyneux Descartes cogito rebuilds knowledge from within the isolated mind but as Wittgenstein shows meaning and knowing arise not privately but through shared forms of life and public language games"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1979957745995460970) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-19T17:08Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@MrQuestion777 @StefanMolyneux I see a misrepresentation stepping in. The validity of inference rests on rule circularity which is NOT a viciously circular argument"  
[X Link](https://x.com/WesleyCorbett/status/1980244716613464129) [@WesleyCorbett](/creator/x/WesleyCorbett) 2025-10-20T12:08Z XXX followers, XX engagements