Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

[@fakecarlsagan](/creator/twitter/fakecarlsagan)
"Falcon X performs the vast majority of US launches even excluding Starlink"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1979418040426205515) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-18T05:23Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@Aussie_Mofo @MichaelCal3302 @Scholtz1971 @KenKirtland17 There's still be a decent amount with Cygnus and Atlas V. But we'd be completely dependent on Russia to keep the ISS operational. And even then with XX% less crew in the US segment"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1979453633478693142) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-18T07:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Phil is making shit up again. SpaceX was going to attempt recovering the Falcon X booster. At no point was it even *suggested* that the upper stage would be reusable or that any of it would be rapidly reusable"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1979496455527174165) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-18T10:35Z XXX followers, 11.6K engagements


"@bwmcgee @Alex_Skandalis @SciGuySpace Artemis isn't a rehash of Apollo. It is much more ambitious and that means we need much more capable vehicles. Starship and Blue Moon match that ambition the Apollo LEM does not"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1978931452587762089) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-16T21:09Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@nintendobenzo @DJR69422 @SciGuySpace How would Blue Origin possibly be landing people on the Moon in X or X years"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1978998672873381895) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-17T01:37Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@Truthful_ast Cryogenic propellant transfer It'll never work"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1979527597236077033) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-18T12:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@Truthful_ast Plot twist"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1979527836970201376) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-18T12:39Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@AstroEvaduh @Truthful_ast Nah. Early 2030s"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1979528119204872368) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-18T12:40Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@appletimtri @cosmotaria @Truthful_ast Starship's panels need to be retractable"  
[X Link](https://x.com/fakecarlsagan/status/1979528701974073377) [@fakecarlsagan](/creator/x/fakecarlsagan) 2025-10-18T12:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@fakecarlsagan "Falcon X performs the vast majority of US launches even excluding Starlink"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-18T05:23Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@Aussie_Mofo @MichaelCal3302 @Scholtz1971 @KenKirtland17 There's still be a decent amount with Cygnus and Atlas V. But we'd be completely dependent on Russia to keep the ISS operational. And even then with XX% less crew in the US segment"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-18T07:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"Phil is making shit up again. SpaceX was going to attempt recovering the Falcon X booster. At no point was it even suggested that the upper stage would be reusable or that any of it would be rapidly reusable"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-18T10:35Z XXX followers, 11.6K engagements

"@bwmcgee @Alex_Skandalis @SciGuySpace Artemis isn't a rehash of Apollo. It is much more ambitious and that means we need much more capable vehicles. Starship and Blue Moon match that ambition the Apollo LEM does not"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-16T21:09Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@nintendobenzo @DJR69422 @SciGuySpace How would Blue Origin possibly be landing people on the Moon in X or X years"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-17T01:37Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@Truthful_ast Cryogenic propellant transfer It'll never work"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-18T12:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@Truthful_ast Plot twist"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-18T12:39Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@AstroEvaduh @Truthful_ast Nah. Early 2030s"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-18T12:40Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@appletimtri @cosmotaria @Truthful_ast Starship's panels need to be retractable"
X Link @fakecarlsagan 2025-10-18T12:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements

creator/twitter::34300660/posts
/creator/twitter::34300660/posts