[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/twitter/BitcoinErrorLog) "@SnassyIcp Again that means Bitcoin can't scale and you think the solution is banks. Most people think this so you arent abnormal but I find the idea to be extremely dissonant with what makes Bitcoin useful" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979813377498378254) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T07:34Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "@SnassyIcp What is "supposed" is off topic. There are things Bitcoin can do and things it cannot. It definitely cannot care about what anyone thinks it is supposed to do. It also cannot bring its properties to billions of people" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979818009238888869) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T07:52Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "Bitcoin L2s cannot scale the number of users while maintaining the promise of unilateral assured safety beyond the constraints of the L1's fixed rivalrous blockspace. This puts a hard cap on decentralized scaling. Proof: Claim #1: Any system that promises unilateral safety (you can force-settle/exit on L1 if others misbehave) is bounded by L1 exit capacity. Let L1 handle at most C tx per block (or per hour). If a fraction f of N users may need to exit within a safety window T (blocks/hours) then you must have this: f N C T N (C T) / f. As usage grows or fees spike (which collapses capacity" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979777017680724435) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T05:09Z 75.8K followers, 5512 engagements "You need to at least concede that of all the monies there would be one that is the most valuable. And then among all the blockchains there would be one that is the most secure. And then how difficult it would be to exceed Bitcoin in PoW. The rest is probably up for discussion" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979966655762460680) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T17:43Z 75.8K followers, 1068 engagements "@btc_kiel @TheBlueMatt @stevenroose3 Please be patient we will share a design soon. Mostly we just don't need Bitcoin layers" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979809693653766161) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T07:19Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "Something obvious but probably controversial: If Bitcoin scaled it would not be secure. Bitcoins scaling problem is its actual security model" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979817202808217900) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T07:49Z 75.8K followers, 3098 engagements "@coffeelover9457 WBTC is a bank. In the context of usage what is acceptable is up to the user. In the context of system design what is acceptable depends on the designer's requirements. If the requirement is trustless the user must use L1" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979819120855277660) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T07:57Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "Unable to afford a UTXO even the quintessential bitcoin maximalist is a Bitcoiner no longer" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979859815947178270) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T10:38Z 75.8K followers, 2658 engagements "In the link below you can find a recent effort to summarize the Synonym vision and updating the vision to the current state of our work. Bitkit was made to support this vision not to prove Lightning in any specific way. It just seems to be the most supported format for Bitcoin payments so far. My Lightning journey is more public than most if anyone really wants to reconstruct it it started at Bitrefill and was also always attached to an interest in digitizing credit (back then it was "gift tokens" on Lightning). I did talks on my Lightning Diary panels on why it sucks etc. Whether you are a" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979873489466065093) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T11:33Z 75.8K followers, 2513 engagements "@jack @grok How many times does "crypto" appear in the Bitcoin whitepaper" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979883697039114566) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T12:13Z 75.8K followers, 125K engagements "For XX years our only job was to fill the blocks but the only people that ever achieve it for us are the people we call shitcoiners and when they do we spend the bull market arguing about it and pretending we are saving Bitcoin then we spend the next X years in a bear market bragging about it" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979957005583540433) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T17:05Z 75.8K followers, 12.9K engagements "@HeSpeaksNStuff Which expresses as what Transactions. The reason we are all here especially the miners right" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979988887490437369) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T19:11Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "@oomahq Denying service from who the blocks are not full And when they are the goal will be to INCREASE the fee rate. The flavor of txns and how we feel about them will not change these dynamics. Bitcoin is exclusive by design" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979989582050361753) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T19:14Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "@A_HODL_21m If no one sells bitcoin for XX years it is because it is worthless. Your assumption of continually stacking requires someone else continually selling right" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979991477032767519) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T19:22Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "Where's a good place to find great rust devs great web devs or great mobile devs" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1975212370197979614) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-06T14:51Z 75.7K followers, 1657 engagements "It is worth noting that Tether is fulfilling the p2p cash dream better than Bitcoin so far and thinking about why. BoE isn't setting Bitcoin limits they are setting stablecoin limits here. 🤔" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1978724924509372720) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-16T07:29Z 75.7K followers, 1508 engagements "Psst hey @bitrefill stop mixing the bitcoin display methods and use BIP XXX please" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979068767222091816) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-17T06:15Z 75.8K followers, 1965 engagements "@Pledditor He's a salesman not a Bitcoiner" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979071976896393401) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-17T06:28Z 75.7K followers, 1088 engagements "@uxerik_ do people have that problem seems like they just use blockchains for anything contraband why risk using a honeypot/thief so you can buy a joint with illegal fiat instead darkweb markets all provide top-up account balances already no" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979167762137100572) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-17T12:49Z 75.7K followers, XXX engagements "@stevenroose3 @michaelbship @TheBlueMatt You are describing reputation an aspect of trust not technology. A complex car can explode or not for all i know. i TRUST it will not. That trust is derived from the people involved who are all *compromised* by the black box of complexity. Trust happens between people" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979406506412875827) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-18T04:37Z 75.7K followers, XXX engagements "@stevenroose3 @TheBlueMatt Because layers will never compete with trusted solutions that provide better UX cheaper faster reliable payments. The same way they havent for years and arent right now and no one has shown a realistic model for why they would or could" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979639648877260859) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-18T20:04Z 75.7K followers, XX engagements "@A_HODL_21m @HeSpeaksNStuff There is no tax in the bitcoin protocol. The protocol has no ability to increase adoption on its own (hence me noting our job in OP). Fee rate is relative to value moved there is a huge portion of economic spectrum bitcoin can represent" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979993859020009759) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T19:31Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "@stevenroose3 @TheBlueMatt Those arguments apply to hybrids too though right They are all trusted solutions with extra steps. But is format actually the most important aspect of trust Nah" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979391084267470916) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-18T03:36Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements ""Create a proof showing why Saylor's Microstrategy Bitcoin treasury scheme is market neutral not an increase in demand due to the share dilution and loan dynamics" 🤖beep🤖boop🤖bop. 🖨 👇" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979174913949774021) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-17T13:17Z 75.8K followers, 1363 engagements "Bitcoin does not scale. Blocksize limit + fee rate are exclusive factors. Any anchored construction loses security assurances as fees rises making any scale achieved also exclusive. The more people use it the less it works for everyone. Layers introduce significant complexity for narrow security terms and privacy use cases but again assurances are more likely to fail for more people when they need them most. Complexity compounds operational costs (complexity must live somewhere) which ultimately centralizes the layer the same way everything else does at scale. If your layer needs L1 for" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979525084608933902) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-18T12:28Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "isnt likely is doing heavy lifting there Safety can't depend on probability. 2000 operators isnt decentralization if it collapses whenever their incentives correlate. (Rolling providers during stress is like buying fire insurance while town is on fire no) Realistically you would never see 2000 Arks at any sort of scale due to regulatory availability anyway (can't build rep without identity can't scale without becoming a target). Coordination isnt bad it just isn't security. If coordination is voluntary and user-driven (reputation/heuristic-based) you can start managing things. but now we're" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979574397267558685) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-18T15:44Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "@TheBlueMatt @stevenroose3 There will never be 2000 reputable Arks. There will never be 2000 reputable LSPs either" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979588839598694674) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-18T16:42Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "@HeSpeaksNStuff Bitcoin is a literal protocol. A set of well-defined rules. My comments are objective" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979992727849738682) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T19:27Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "@stevenroose3 @btc_kiel @TheBlueMatt Remind me" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1980007127029543172) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T20:24Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "Bitcoin is dumping because there isn't enough data in the blocks" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979162599242506560) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-17T12:28Z 75.8K followers, 3194 engagements "@btc_kiel @TheBlueMatt @stevenroose3 This is custodial right Which means operators would be VASP money transmitters etc. Why bother with all the complexity if it doesnt provide scale and exposes operators to many legal risks" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979799489633456241) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T06:39Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "@SnassyIcp Bitcoin is not an investment. You are just speculating on demand trends and post-rationalizing your choice" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979826760054407297) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T08:27Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "@dorionmode @_julian256_ probably not tbh but better safe than sorry with personal btc. it costs almost nothing to not use it segwit most of the time. at least i know i will always have my coin on all relevant forks regardless of antics" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979906757175423180) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T13:45Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "There is no concept of "monetary use" in the bitcoin protocol. There are valid & invalid txns. The term "transaction" is a technical data term not an economic one. There are not economic "transactions" (two-party) in bitcoin there is no "money" and no "value" aside from a literal number of units. Those are projected use cases" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1979990822331318303) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T19:19Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements "Anyway the concern here is for the overall qty of users across all anchored systems; the individual design or topography of each layer is not relevant. They all are exclusive across fee rate and blockspace and they are all orbiting a black hole if their counterparties are not trustworthy" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1980017427758063686) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-19T21:05Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "@silentlink1 Tether started on Bitcoin. People stopped using it" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1980084837949075739) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-20T01:33Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements "@silentlink1 When people cant afford Bitcoin security they use something else" [X Link](https://x.com/BitcoinErrorLog/status/1980087586279289251) [@BitcoinErrorLog](/creator/x/BitcoinErrorLog) 2025-10-20T01:44Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@BitcoinErrorLog
"@SnassyIcp Again that means Bitcoin can't scale and you think the solution is banks. Most people think this so you arent abnormal but I find the idea to be extremely dissonant with what makes Bitcoin useful"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T07:34Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"@SnassyIcp What is "supposed" is off topic. There are things Bitcoin can do and things it cannot. It definitely cannot care about what anyone thinks it is supposed to do. It also cannot bring its properties to billions of people"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T07:52Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"Bitcoin L2s cannot scale the number of users while maintaining the promise of unilateral assured safety beyond the constraints of the L1's fixed rivalrous blockspace. This puts a hard cap on decentralized scaling. Proof: Claim #1: Any system that promises unilateral safety (you can force-settle/exit on L1 if others misbehave) is bounded by L1 exit capacity. Let L1 handle at most C tx per block (or per hour). If a fraction f of N users may need to exit within a safety window T (blocks/hours) then you must have this: f N C T N (C T) / f. As usage grows or fees spike (which collapses capacity"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T05:09Z 75.8K followers, 5512 engagements
"You need to at least concede that of all the monies there would be one that is the most valuable. And then among all the blockchains there would be one that is the most secure. And then how difficult it would be to exceed Bitcoin in PoW. The rest is probably up for discussion"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T17:43Z 75.8K followers, 1068 engagements
"@btc_kiel @TheBlueMatt @stevenroose3 Please be patient we will share a design soon. Mostly we just don't need Bitcoin layers"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T07:19Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"Something obvious but probably controversial: If Bitcoin scaled it would not be secure. Bitcoins scaling problem is its actual security model"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T07:49Z 75.8K followers, 3098 engagements
"@coffeelover9457 WBTC is a bank. In the context of usage what is acceptable is up to the user. In the context of system design what is acceptable depends on the designer's requirements. If the requirement is trustless the user must use L1"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T07:57Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"Unable to afford a UTXO even the quintessential bitcoin maximalist is a Bitcoiner no longer"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T10:38Z 75.8K followers, 2658 engagements
"In the link below you can find a recent effort to summarize the Synonym vision and updating the vision to the current state of our work. Bitkit was made to support this vision not to prove Lightning in any specific way. It just seems to be the most supported format for Bitcoin payments so far. My Lightning journey is more public than most if anyone really wants to reconstruct it it started at Bitrefill and was also always attached to an interest in digitizing credit (back then it was "gift tokens" on Lightning). I did talks on my Lightning Diary panels on why it sucks etc. Whether you are a"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T11:33Z 75.8K followers, 2513 engagements
"@jack @grok How many times does "crypto" appear in the Bitcoin whitepaper"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T12:13Z 75.8K followers, 125K engagements
"For XX years our only job was to fill the blocks but the only people that ever achieve it for us are the people we call shitcoiners and when they do we spend the bull market arguing about it and pretending we are saving Bitcoin then we spend the next X years in a bear market bragging about it"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T17:05Z 75.8K followers, 12.9K engagements
"@HeSpeaksNStuff Which expresses as what Transactions. The reason we are all here especially the miners right"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T19:11Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"@oomahq Denying service from who the blocks are not full And when they are the goal will be to INCREASE the fee rate. The flavor of txns and how we feel about them will not change these dynamics. Bitcoin is exclusive by design"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T19:14Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"@A_HODL_21m If no one sells bitcoin for XX years it is because it is worthless. Your assumption of continually stacking requires someone else continually selling right"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T19:22Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"Where's a good place to find great rust devs great web devs or great mobile devs"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-06T14:51Z 75.7K followers, 1657 engagements
"It is worth noting that Tether is fulfilling the p2p cash dream better than Bitcoin so far and thinking about why. BoE isn't setting Bitcoin limits they are setting stablecoin limits here. 🤔"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-16T07:29Z 75.7K followers, 1508 engagements
"Psst hey @bitrefill stop mixing the bitcoin display methods and use BIP XXX please"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-17T06:15Z 75.8K followers, 1965 engagements
"@Pledditor He's a salesman not a Bitcoiner"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-17T06:28Z 75.7K followers, 1088 engagements
"@uxerik_ do people have that problem seems like they just use blockchains for anything contraband why risk using a honeypot/thief so you can buy a joint with illegal fiat instead darkweb markets all provide top-up account balances already no"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-17T12:49Z 75.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@stevenroose3 @michaelbship @TheBlueMatt You are describing reputation an aspect of trust not technology. A complex car can explode or not for all i know. i TRUST it will not. That trust is derived from the people involved who are all compromised by the black box of complexity. Trust happens between people"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-18T04:37Z 75.7K followers, XXX engagements
"@stevenroose3 @TheBlueMatt Because layers will never compete with trusted solutions that provide better UX cheaper faster reliable payments. The same way they havent for years and arent right now and no one has shown a realistic model for why they would or could"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-18T20:04Z 75.7K followers, XX engagements
"@A_HODL_21m @HeSpeaksNStuff There is no tax in the bitcoin protocol. The protocol has no ability to increase adoption on its own (hence me noting our job in OP). Fee rate is relative to value moved there is a huge portion of economic spectrum bitcoin can represent"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T19:31Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"@stevenroose3 @TheBlueMatt Those arguments apply to hybrids too though right They are all trusted solutions with extra steps. But is format actually the most important aspect of trust Nah"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-18T03:36Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
""Create a proof showing why Saylor's Microstrategy Bitcoin treasury scheme is market neutral not an increase in demand due to the share dilution and loan dynamics" 🤖beep🤖boop🤖bop. 🖨 👇"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-17T13:17Z 75.8K followers, 1363 engagements
"Bitcoin does not scale. Blocksize limit + fee rate are exclusive factors. Any anchored construction loses security assurances as fees rises making any scale achieved also exclusive. The more people use it the less it works for everyone. Layers introduce significant complexity for narrow security terms and privacy use cases but again assurances are more likely to fail for more people when they need them most. Complexity compounds operational costs (complexity must live somewhere) which ultimately centralizes the layer the same way everything else does at scale. If your layer needs L1 for"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-18T12:28Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"isnt likely is doing heavy lifting there Safety can't depend on probability. 2000 operators isnt decentralization if it collapses whenever their incentives correlate. (Rolling providers during stress is like buying fire insurance while town is on fire no) Realistically you would never see 2000 Arks at any sort of scale due to regulatory availability anyway (can't build rep without identity can't scale without becoming a target). Coordination isnt bad it just isn't security. If coordination is voluntary and user-driven (reputation/heuristic-based) you can start managing things. but now we're"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-18T15:44Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"@TheBlueMatt @stevenroose3 There will never be 2000 reputable Arks. There will never be 2000 reputable LSPs either"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-18T16:42Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"@HeSpeaksNStuff Bitcoin is a literal protocol. A set of well-defined rules. My comments are objective"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T19:27Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"@stevenroose3 @btc_kiel @TheBlueMatt Remind me"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T20:24Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"Bitcoin is dumping because there isn't enough data in the blocks"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-17T12:28Z 75.8K followers, 3194 engagements
"@btc_kiel @TheBlueMatt @stevenroose3 This is custodial right Which means operators would be VASP money transmitters etc. Why bother with all the complexity if it doesnt provide scale and exposes operators to many legal risks"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T06:39Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"@SnassyIcp Bitcoin is not an investment. You are just speculating on demand trends and post-rationalizing your choice"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T08:27Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"@dorionmode @julian256 probably not tbh but better safe than sorry with personal btc. it costs almost nothing to not use it segwit most of the time. at least i know i will always have my coin on all relevant forks regardless of antics"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T13:45Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"There is no concept of "monetary use" in the bitcoin protocol. There are valid & invalid txns. The term "transaction" is a technical data term not an economic one. There are not economic "transactions" (two-party) in bitcoin there is no "money" and no "value" aside from a literal number of units. Those are projected use cases"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T19:19Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
"Anyway the concern here is for the overall qty of users across all anchored systems; the individual design or topography of each layer is not relevant. They all are exclusive across fee rate and blockspace and they are all orbiting a black hole if their counterparties are not trustworthy"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-19T21:05Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"@silentlink1 Tether started on Bitcoin. People stopped using it"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-20T01:33Z 75.8K followers, XXX engagements
"@silentlink1 When people cant afford Bitcoin security they use something else"
X Link @BitcoinErrorLog 2025-10-20T01:44Z 75.8K followers, XX engagements
/creator/twitter::2260407860/posts