[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] [@chainsoup](/creator/twitter/chainsoup) "@stedson41008 @suipiens @ikadotxyz They've already done a VC round at $600m. I think they launch above that"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947992836814639378) 2025-07-23 12:10:58 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "BREAKING: If you're not full porting $SUI $WAL $DEEP $NS and $IKA you're NGMI"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947351070964883719) 2025-07-21 17:40:50 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements "@Umar_jaz @MostDefinitely6 @d3h3d_ @SuiTransparency @WalrusProtocol @FoxOnSui @Stoicsui @Hansxbt @ikadotxyz I took a risk and went heavy on the leveling. I'll have just over 1.2m IKA"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947083618368606530) 2025-07-20 23:58:04 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@wgwelku @d3h3d_ @0xJohannes_ @SuiTransparency @WalrusProtocol @FoxOnSui @Stoicsui @Hansxbt @ikadotxyz It's a hoop to jump through and it's far better than traditional KYC. Do I love having to do it No but I'm kind of assuming that they were kind of backed into a corner by legal and @0xHolonym was the compromise. With the numbers they came through with I'm okay with it"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947281286944469047) 2025-07-21 13:03:32 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@Iam_nelsonblac @SuiTransparency @WalrusProtocol @FoxOnSui @Stoicsui @Hansxbt @ikadotxyz I got literally X from the Walrus drop. I took a risk and played along with the NFTs and leveling on Ika and I'm in the top XXX% with a generous allocation. That's a win"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947070380604092576) 2025-07-20 23:05:28 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@not0nlin3 @JennyENicholson In no sense has that ever been true about anything. The only time that's even a little true is if someone is forced to make a compromise and make do with something less specialized. Even people have become more and more specialized over time"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947495175745355985) 2025-07-22 03:13:27 UTC XXX followers, 1516 engagements "@bharathdotsui @0xairtx @SuiNSdapp @SuiNetwork @AftermathFi Fun fact: since accepting $NS payments about X months ago they've collected over 3M $NS. XX% would have burned under the new mechanism. That's over XXX% of supply. Fees not collected in $NS would have also bought back and burned $NS but I'm not sure what those numbers were"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1948081517629948027) 2025-07-23 18:03:22 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "On the site below the total $NS shown is just what was collected in protocol fees since starting to accept it as payment (a little under X months ago). Under the upcoming burn mechanism 2.5M of these tokens (over XXX% of the supply) would have been burned. Extra $NS would have been bought back and burned using fees collected in other tokens. 👀"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1946712773175456151) 2025-07-19 23:24:27 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements "Last VC round valuation was $600M which would be $XXXX per token. I think they have to launch above that but IMO launching too far above that might risk making the chart look a little dumpy. We have premarkets ranging between $XXXX and $XXXX which is north of the last valuation but might make for a fairly safe range to launch into and still gives the token room for some initial upside before all of the apps start to come online. I'm thinking maybe $0.15-$0.20 might be a good initial target while they build momentum"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947073975546163453) 2025-07-20 23:19:45 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@WatcherGuru Most normal people aren't paying capital gains taxes on selling their homes. If it's your primary residence and you've lived it in for X years then you already get a $250k exemption on capital gains. This would only really benefit the rich"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947733702642933880) 2025-07-22 19:01:16 UTC XXX followers, 1001 engagements "@williamm168 @SuiNSdapp Let's vote on using some of that $SUI to buy $NS back"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1946193591119810867) 2025-07-18 13:01:25 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements "Total initial supply was defined but we don't know what will be circulating. For example it says that over XX% is part of the community allocation and we know that over XX% of it won't initially be circulating. "The IKA token initial launch supply is 10000000000 tokens and as a community driven protocol well over XX% of that is part of the community allocation. X% (600000000) will be distributed at mainnet launch with the first Ika community drop and the full distribution and mechanics of the IKA token including the rest of community allocations and insider allocations is planned to be"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947071128507146276) 2025-07-20 23:08:26 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@Stoicsui @williamm168 @SuiNSdapp Fair but it's not an either/or proposition IMO. $NS is liquid why should the holdings be nearly 50/50 If you're putting money into growth and the DAO is confident that what they're doing is going to create value then why not hold a heavier allocation of your own token"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1946198888064397551) 2025-07-18 13:22:28 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements "@kantianum @saksidasaksi $NS is so undervalued right now. Obviously $WAL will always be valued higher but from these levels $NS could 10x without breaking a sweat. Especially with staking burning and the upcoming communication features"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1945835023996776850) 2025-07-17 13:16:36 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements "@akhiakhilesh021 @d3h3d_ @SuiTransparency @WalrusProtocol @FoxOnSui @Stoicsui @Hansxbt @ikadotxyz It was pretty clear when they launched the droplets stuff that the IKA should be allocated to the droplets. Also Galxe sucks"  [@chainsoup](/creator/x/chainsoup) on [X](/post/tweet/1947069145649975743) 2025-07-20 23:00:33 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@chainsoup
"@stedson41008 @suipiens @ikadotxyz They've already done a VC round at $600m. I think they launch above that"
@chainsoup on X 2025-07-23 12:10:58 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"BREAKING: If you're not full porting $SUI $WAL $DEEP $NS and $IKA you're NGMI" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-21 17:40:50 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@Umar_jaz @MostDefinitely6 @d3h3d_ @SuiTransparency @WalrusProtocol @FoxOnSui @Stoicsui @Hansxbt @ikadotxyz I took a risk and went heavy on the leveling. I'll have just over 1.2m IKA" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-20 23:58:04 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@wgwelku @d3h3d_ @0xJohannes_ @SuiTransparency @WalrusProtocol @FoxOnSui @Stoicsui @Hansxbt @ikadotxyz It's a hoop to jump through and it's far better than traditional KYC. Do I love having to do it No but I'm kind of assuming that they were kind of backed into a corner by legal and @0xHolonym was the compromise. With the numbers they came through with I'm okay with it" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-21 13:03:32 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Iam_nelsonblac @SuiTransparency @WalrusProtocol @FoxOnSui @Stoicsui @Hansxbt @ikadotxyz I got literally X from the Walrus drop. I took a risk and played along with the NFTs and leveling on Ika and I'm in the top XXX% with a generous allocation. That's a win" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-20 23:05:28 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@not0nlin3 @JennyENicholson In no sense has that ever been true about anything. The only time that's even a little true is if someone is forced to make a compromise and make do with something less specialized. Even people have become more and more specialized over time" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-22 03:13:27 UTC XXX followers, 1516 engagements
"@bharathdotsui @0xairtx @SuiNSdapp @SuiNetwork @AftermathFi Fun fact: since accepting $NS payments about X months ago they've collected over 3M $NS. XX% would have burned under the new mechanism. That's over XXX% of supply. Fees not collected in $NS would have also bought back and burned $NS but I'm not sure what those numbers were" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-23 18:03:22 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"On the site below the total $NS shown is just what was collected in protocol fees since starting to accept it as payment (a little under X months ago). Under the upcoming burn mechanism 2.5M of these tokens (over XXX% of the supply) would have been burned. Extra $NS would have been bought back and burned using fees collected in other tokens. 👀" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-19 23:24:27 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"Last VC round valuation was $600M which would be $XXXX per token. I think they have to launch above that but IMO launching too far above that might risk making the chart look a little dumpy. We have premarkets ranging between $XXXX and $XXXX which is north of the last valuation but might make for a fairly safe range to launch into and still gives the token room for some initial upside before all of the apps start to come online. I'm thinking maybe $0.15-$0.20 might be a good initial target while they build momentum" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-20 23:19:45 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@WatcherGuru Most normal people aren't paying capital gains taxes on selling their homes. If it's your primary residence and you've lived it in for X years then you already get a $250k exemption on capital gains. This would only really benefit the rich" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-22 19:01:16 UTC XXX followers, 1001 engagements
"@williamm168 @SuiNSdapp Let's vote on using some of that $SUI to buy $NS back" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-18 13:01:25 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"Total initial supply was defined but we don't know what will be circulating. For example it says that over XX% is part of the community allocation and we know that over XX% of it won't initially be circulating. "The IKA token initial launch supply is 10000000000 tokens and as a community driven protocol well over XX% of that is part of the community allocation. X% (600000000) will be distributed at mainnet launch with the first Ika community drop and the full distribution and mechanics of the IKA token including the rest of community allocations and insider allocations is planned to be" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-20 23:08:26 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@Stoicsui @williamm168 @SuiNSdapp Fair but it's not an either/or proposition IMO. $NS is liquid why should the holdings be nearly 50/50 If you're putting money into growth and the DAO is confident that what they're doing is going to create value then why not hold a heavier allocation of your own token" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-18 13:22:28 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements
"@kantianum @saksidasaksi $NS is so undervalued right now. Obviously $WAL will always be valued higher but from these levels $NS could 10x without breaking a sweat. Especially with staking burning and the upcoming communication features" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-17 13:16:36 UTC XXX followers, XXX engagements
"@akhiakhilesh021 @d3h3d_ @SuiTransparency @WalrusProtocol @FoxOnSui @Stoicsui @Hansxbt @ikadotxyz It was pretty clear when they launched the droplets stuff that the IKA should be allocated to the droplets. Also Galxe sucks" @chainsoup on X 2025-07-20 23:00:33 UTC XXX followers, XX engagements