# ![@w_s_bitcoin Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1381699484988637194.png) @w_s_bitcoin Wicked

Wicked posts on X about bitcoin, hashrate, spam, core the most. They currently have [------] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [-----] engagements in the last [--] hours.

### Engagements: [-----] [#](/creator/twitter::1381699484988637194/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1381699484988637194/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- [--] Week [-------] +18%
- [--] Month [---------] -8.20%
- [--] Months [----------] +50%
- [--] Year [----------] -20%

### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::1381699484988637194/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1381699484988637194/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- [--] Week [---] +23%
- [--] Month [---] +11%
- [--] Months [-----] +280%
- [--] Year [-----] +25%

### Followers: [------] [#](/creator/twitter::1381699484988637194/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1381699484988637194/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- [--] Week [------] +0.23%
- [--] Month [------] +0.76%
- [--] Months [------] +5.10%
- [--] Year [------] +20%

### CreatorRank: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::1381699484988637194/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1381699484988637194/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  #5406 [finance](/list/finance)  22.13% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  3.28% [stocks](/list/stocks)  2.87% [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands)  1.64% [currencies](/list/currencies)  1.23% [celebrities](/list/celebrities)  1.23% [social networks](/list/social-networks)  1.23% [countries](/list/countries)  0.82% [vc firms](/list/vc-firms)  0.82%

**Social topic influence**
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #2141, [hashrate](/topic/hashrate) #62, [spam](/topic/spam) #868, [core](/topic/core) 4.1%, [if you](/topic/if-you) 4.1%, [sats](/topic/sats) #21, [chain](/topic/chain) #1378, [money](/topic/money) 3.28%, [exchanges](/topic/exchanges) 2.87%, [coins](/topic/coins) 2.87%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@needcreations](/creator/undefined) [@tonevays](/creator/undefined) [@mrhodl](/creator/undefined) [@hodlmeelmo](/creator/undefined) [@hodlingonward](/creator/undefined) [@yumibod](/creator/undefined) [@scavacini777](/creator/undefined) [@fiscaldominanc](/creator/undefined) [@bit_faced](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoin_eagle](/creator/undefined) [@elkrun21](/creator/undefined) [@drdanielhowell](/creator/undefined) [@michaelkwright2](/creator/undefined) [@lukedashjr](/creator/undefined) [@grassfedbitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@mayapar25](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinmotorist](/creator/undefined) [@dopemind10](/creator/undefined) [@luckyredfish](/creator/undefined) [@tournamentdan](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [Strategy (MSTR)](/topic/$mstr) [Cantor Equity Partners, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (CEP)](/topic/$xxi) [iShares BTC Trust (IBIT)](/topic/$ibit) [Cardano (ADA)](/topic/cardano)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"RT @ProfessorBigz: Its hard to come to any other conclusion than Core is compromised because you are either incapable of understanding why"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2021624874649706625)  2026-02-11T16:38Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


""I didn't sign up to store other people's random data forever" Actually you did. Nobody's forcing you to keep running your Bitcoin node though. It's completely voluntary. Some of you arent prepared to store 1-4 MB of data every [--] minutes for all of eternity and it shows. Some of you arent prepared to store 1-4 MB of data every [--] minutes for all of eternity and it shows"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/1985698918777094278)  2025-11-04T13:21Z 91.1K followers, 16.7K engagements


"Using bitcoin as the measuring stick to compare different fiats is so interesting. Here's the Thai Baht compared to the Taiwan Dollar. These two seem pretty stable relative to each other"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/1997351422606586060)  2025-12-06T17:04Z 91K followers, 17.3K engagements


"The Venezuelan bolvar has endured the worst fiat debasement in modern history. Bitcoin was one of the few ways out"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2007907540752060511)  2026-01-04T20:10Z 91.1K followers, 27.1K engagements


"Never got around to updating this one for the [--] year anniversary. What are the most important events that happened for Bitcoin this past year History of Bitcoin: [--] Year Anniversary https://t.co/TyHtLBpm2e History of Bitcoin: [--] Year Anniversary https://t.co/TyHtLBpm2e"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2010705065259028665)  2026-01-12T13:26Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Bitcoin has crossed the [--] million threshold in [--] existing fiat currencies. Which fiat currency will be the last to fall"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2013618003791827318)  2026-01-20T14:21Z 91K followers, 14.9K engagements


"Did you know the highest-value fiat currency by unit is the Kuwaiti dinar At current prices [--] KWD is worth [----] sats"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2013972096519426551)  2026-01-21T13:49Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@murphonchain @gladstein @PeterSchiff Not really.they've already added another [----] BTC to their treasury so far in [----] now holding over [-----] BTC in total. And that [-----] BTC drop last year was because they seeded $XXI's treasury"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2016570255317807140)  2026-01-28T17:53Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"Which way.more freedom or more bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2016610747556549030)  2026-01-28T20:34Z 91.1K followers, 28.8K engagements


"@BitPaine No need. @jackmallers already got the jump on @saylor with $XXI. Pretty interesting that someone who's actually technically literate when it comes to Bitcoin and the CEO of a BTC isn't scared of PoR"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2016862258664521986)  2026-01-29T13:13Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"Just talked to my jeweler. He said the refineries aren't taking any new gold or silver and that everyone's trying to sell. He predicts by the end of the year gold will be back down below $2500 and silver back down below $30. I'm not even that bearish on metals.😅😂"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2017312056018407829)  2026-01-30T19:00Z 91K followers, 42.3K engagements


"Newest knotzi narrative just dropped: the claim is that more people are now running BIP-110 than ever ran BIP-148 and that this alone grants it legitimacy. This is false and ignores critical context around who was running these clients and the broader sentiment at the time. At its height BIP-148 nodes comprised an estimated 1015% of publicly reachable nodes while most of the network was running SegWit-ready Bitcoin Core versions with notable economic actors signaling support for SegWit including exchanges like Bitfinex Kraken and Bitstamp. Sentiment toward SegWit was broadly positive; the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2017649047264276798)  2026-01-31T17:19Z 91.2K followers, 18.1K engagements


"Most people who bought $MSTR or $IBIT call LEAPS expiring late last year or this year are learning a hard lesson. If your strike never gets reached by expiry you end up with nothing. Bitcoin holders dont face time decay. Real bitcoin in self custody beats leveraged paper"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2017700488515338501)  2026-01-31T20:44Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"How's that bitcoin collateralized loan going anon"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2017709877624222175)  2026-01-31T21:21Z 91K followers, 38.7K engagements


"Get your bitcoin off exchanges and store your private keys offline nowbefore the AI agents figure out how to hack them. But for real tho"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2017785318871650475)  2026-02-01T02:21Z 91K followers, 35.4K engagements


"@boomer_btc Yup some of them are also spending more than theyre earning. 😅"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2017930773123178939)  2026-02-01T11:59Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@beeforbacon1 Nice try FBI. Too bad the dev theyve got leverage on has lost all his social capital"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018007254088208877)  2026-02-01T17:03Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@duke_xxv Wrapped bitcoin is definitely not safer lol"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018033381607436369)  2026-02-01T18:47Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@bitcoinbella_ Especially back in the day when folks were primarily using it to buy illegal drugs and shit. You're acting like a fucking noob. Grow up"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018338367637754341)  2026-02-02T14:59Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Every single bitcoin daily dollar-cost averager since the launch of the Bitcoin ETFs now has a cost basis higher than the current price and is in the red"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018340406388310377)  2026-02-02T15:07Z 91.1K followers, 11.3K engagements


"If it upsets you that Epstein showed interest in Bitcoin I have bad news for you anon. Permissionless neutral internet money will always be used for bad things. Thats because it works for them when permissioned systems dont"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018379060062081164)  2026-02-02T17:40Z 91.1K followers, 25.4K engagements


"BREAKING: In response to Epstein Bitcoin FUD @LukeDashjr confirms his fork wont be used by criminals or pedophile rings. Access will be permissioned and morally approved. $BPURE"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018387587342176562)  2026-02-02T18:14Z 91K followers, 17.8K engagements


"The XRP and BCH sock puppet accounts are out in full force FUDing the shit out of Bitcoin. 😂🤣"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018495745435828660)  2026-02-03T01:24Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"If you ever gain access to a quantum computer capable of running Shor's algorithm and want to decide which Bitcoin public keys to target hit me up. I'm tracking everything and can tell you which ones would be the least and most disruptive to hit. [--] BTC per consultation"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018697215863120071)  2026-02-03T14:44Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@Davincij15 What the fuck is $tSAT Some sort of shitcoin you're shilling so that your retarded followers can end up with fewer real sats Play stupid games win stupid prizes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018724689032671242)  2026-02-03T16:34Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@thepowerfulHRV I've always considered my 401k a cherry on top so if my 100% allocation to $MSTR goes to zero so be it. All of my personal savings will always be in self-custodied bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018728064167837844)  2026-02-03T16:47Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Bitcoin is an open-source permissionless monetary system. That necessarily means bad people can contribute code and bad people can use it as money. As long as the code is good I couldnt care less who wrote it. If youre worried the code is bad review it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018732019618857453)  2026-02-03T17:03Z 91.1K followers, 15.9K engagements


"@NEEDcreations @Apple Androids are a shitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018745358575128595)  2026-02-03T17:56Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@AlexanderTw33ts Faces the same oracle problem as tokenized real world assets on blockchains: How can agents be sure a task has been completed in the real world What prevents humans from claiming they did something they didn't and collecting payment"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018746733787041954)  2026-02-03T18:01Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@_DannyKnowles @reardencode so when considering how long it would take for everyone to move their bitcoin to a quantum-safe address its important to note that holders of smaller UTXOs wouldnt necessarily need to assuming the cost of operating a quantum computer doesnt drop dramatically"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018768112246542722)  2026-02-03T19:26Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"Some knotzis are threatening to fork themselves off the network in protest la BIP-110. Its a meaningless gesture. Theyll still follow the heaviest chain on older clients (if theyre smart) and no meaningful economic activity will ever live exclusively on their minority fork"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2018790776583733457)  2026-02-03T20:56Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"Bitcoin is officially down 45% from its all-time high"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019404068624490775)  2026-02-05T13:33Z 90.9K followers, 11.2K engagements


"@HodlMagoo Gotta shake out the retards"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019404463669449123)  2026-02-05T13:35Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"Brutal. Every bitcoin daily dollar cost averager from Oct [----] onward has a cost basis above the current price and is underwater on their investment"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019407216160198863)  2026-02-05T13:46Z 91.2K followers, 20.2K engagements


"All the goldbugs who called Bitcoin a Ponzi at $100 are now dunking on it because it crashed to $69420. 🤌"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019409727008940490)  2026-02-05T13:56Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"HFSP presidente retardo. Trump's World Liberty (@worldlibertyfi) just sold [--] WBTC($5.04M) at $69000. https://t.co/0qWkRUhTQb https://t.co/AQo7jMkshw Trump's World Liberty (@worldlibertyfi) just sold [--] WBTC($5.04M) at $69000. https://t.co/0qWkRUhTQb https://t.co/AQo7jMkshw"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019415989927178616)  2026-02-05T14:21Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Talk about a bottom signal. 😂🤣 Trump's World Liberty (@worldlibertyfi) just sold [--] WBTC($5.04M) at $69000. https://t.co/0qWkRUhTQb https://t.co/AQo7jMkshw Trump's World Liberty (@worldlibertyfi) just sold [--] WBTC($5.04M) at $69000. https://t.co/0qWkRUhTQb https://t.co/AQo7jMkshw"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019417858837737955)  2026-02-05T14:28Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@HodlMagoo Perfection 🤌 https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2019408791801086166s=20 Trump's World Liberty (@worldlibertyfi) just sold [--] WBTC($5.04M) at $69000. https://t.co/0qWkRUhTQb https://t.co/AQo7jMkshw https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2019408791801086166s=20 Trump's World Liberty (@worldlibertyfi) just sold [--] WBTC($5.04M) at $69000. https://t.co/0qWkRUhTQb https://t.co/AQo7jMkshw"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019419335564120495)  2026-02-05T14:34Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"This is the part of Bitcoin adoption where OG degens blow up their massive BTC holdings chasing leverage and shitcoins and the market transfers those coins to stronger hands at a discount. We thank them for their sacrifice"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019425659295309930)  2026-02-05T14:59Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Just be grateful you aren't a Cardano retard. ADA's now down around its [----] bear market lows. 💀"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019440767064756564)  2026-02-05T15:59Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"Welpall bitcoin gains erased since the halving. 🫠"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019451952225009766)  2026-02-05T16:43Z 91.1K followers, 21.4K engagements


"I wonder where $MSTR will bottom out in terms of bitcoin. 150k sats per share right now"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019494563413426371)  2026-02-05T19:33Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"If you just got rekt with shitcoins nows a good time to pivot to bitcoin only get your ass to work and save up to a whole coin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019498759307120705)  2026-02-05T19:49Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"https://x.com/i/spaces/1jMKgRBvWkwxL https://x.com/i/spaces/1jMKgRBvWkwxL"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019498930526908827)  2026-02-05T19:50Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"Starting to get FOMO. These cheap sats wont last forever. #Stock2FOMO"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019595558558539852)  2026-02-06T02:14Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@NEEDcreations @SaniExp @_Checkmatey_ @apsk32 Lost coins in the millions"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019599063700893928)  2026-02-06T02:28Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"Imagine if that was the bottom and we never actually see $58k ever again. 😅🤣"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019605062935536023)  2026-02-06T02:52Z 91.1K followers, 18.3K engagements


"@paul_ironforce Nah time in the market beats timing the market"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019756515515629795)  2026-02-06T12:54Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@SaniExp Pretty sure they use wrapped bitcoin though"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019758300699451452)  2026-02-06T13:01Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"I taught my family well: ✅ Stepdad bought the dip ✅ Youngest sibling bought the dip ✅ Sisters boyfriend bought the dip ✅ Two uncles bought the dip None of them use leverage and all of them self custody"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019781146557530394)  2026-02-06T14:32Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Check out this transaction: 69bf50439381a1b70fb93cae8599bd53164b0dd05b0216ce11547bcb28550564 Same underlying pubkey reused across P2PK P2PKH and P2WPKH outputs. Someone was clearly having fun playing with their bitcoins. https://mempool.space/tx/69bf50439381a1b70fb93cae8599bd53164b0dd05b0216ce11547bcb28550564 https://mempool.space/tx/69bf50439381a1b70fb93cae8599bd53164b0dd05b0216ce11547bcb28550564"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019790868576669791)  2026-02-06T15:10Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@davidfrum We're just getting started snowflake. Wait until bitcoin has a market cap equal to that of gold"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019795745453302245)  2026-02-06T15:30Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@badmofo777Liber Best ponzi ever. First to grow into the trillions in market cap and survive and recover from four 75%+ drawdowns"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019798437441478824)  2026-02-06T15:40Z 91K followers, [--] engagements


"@isabellasg3 @AbundantMines Hosted mining is always a gamble and too often your ASICs get stolen or mismanaged. Guess every new cohort of plebs has to learn this lesson the hard way though"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019854731456209081)  2026-02-06T19:24Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@BTC_for_Freedom 😅😂🤣 https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019421922363347380s=20 Oh you thought the road to $1 million bitcoin was gonna be a cakewalk huh I remember those days. https://t.co/PBMrGbM1a9 https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019421922363347380s=20 Oh you thought the road to $1 million bitcoin was gonna be a cakewalk huh I remember those days. https://t.co/PBMrGbM1a9"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019867201747234835)  2026-02-06T20:14Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"My favorite quote from @GrassFedBitcoins latest YouTube video: An intolerant minority can tighten the rule set and everyone just kinda has to go along with it and they should just go along with it to minimize disruption. That may sound persuasive until you think about it for more than a second. If an intolerant minority could unilaterally tighten Bitcoins rules wed already have BIP-300/301 BIP-119 and BIP-360. Each of those has a committed minority behind it. None activated. Why Because they lack broad consensus. Any attempt to force them would simply strand their supporters on a minority"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019892877908906290)  2026-02-06T21:56Z 91.2K followers, 17.5K engagements


"@david_seroy Glorio"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019898078946332935)  2026-02-06T22:16Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@TFTC21 If youre interested yall can see an up to date version here: https://wickedsmartbitcoin.com/btcmap_us https://wickedsmartbitcoin.com/btcmap_us"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019942940148396407)  2026-02-07T01:15Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@NEEDcreations Unfortunately most of the supply is still held by those early OG degens so its gonna take a while for them to get completely rekt"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019956003996090549)  2026-02-07T02:06Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"Will bitcoin reach a new all time high in [----] Yes No Yes No"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019961583640662477)  2026-02-07T02:29Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@NEEDcreations Over 90% of the bitcoin is held in UTXOs worth [--] BTC or more. Over 80% of the bitcoin is held in UTXOs [--] BTC or more. Distribution from these guys has only just begun"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2019968069175775645)  2026-02-07T02:54Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"Knots supporters now questioning full-rbf. 😂🤌"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020072705408761876)  2026-02-07T09:50Z 91K followers, 12.2K engagements


"@HHorsley Imagine bragging about your cost basis for social credit in the future"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020125806047924530)  2026-02-07T13:21Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@AG3NT_0R4NG3 @GrassFedBitcoin @JeremyRubin @bitcoincoreorg Nah without widespread consensus there's little reason for miners to adopt a soft fork and the group running it simply forks themselves off the network until they abandon it and revert their nodes back"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020128182330958096)  2026-02-07T13:31Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"If BIP-110 fails future variants are dead on arrival. A failed activation attempt burns coordination capital. You dont get to waste everyones time and then ask for a do-over. Glad to see youre beginning to grok its inevitable failure though. @HODLingOnward @rektsorekt @hodlonaut You don't seem to understand the difference between a failed hard fork and a failed soft fork. If BIP-110 doesn't activate by end of [----] we'll likely spend all of [----] discussing a similar BIP with slightly different consensus rules and/or activation method. And on and on. @HODLingOnward @rektsorekt @hodlonaut You"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020147224181698688)  2026-02-07T14:46Z 91.2K followers, 16.1K engagements


"@raindogdance @hodlonaut They're not willing to signal because they aren't retarded. Theres gonna be a lot of cope when the miners call their bluff the BIP-110 chain stalls and then it gets abandoned"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020163409434530130)  2026-02-07T15:51Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@ToneVays @Rowdy_Rod65 Yup no biggie. At least they still can sync a node. Try doing that with any other popular L1 blockchain.literally impossible to sync an Ethereum Solana XRP Ledger etc. node from genesis at this point"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020180359435125152)  2026-02-07T16:58Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"You running a node doesn't really support the network. It makes your use of Bitcoin more sovereign by minimizing trust. And BIP-110 doesn't stop spam. It temporarily blocks a few methods but it can never prevent it entirely. Spammers gonna spam and for that reason it makes no sense to waste all this time and social capital trying to change Bitcoin with a soft fork. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020182225086546302 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2020182225086546302"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020182225086546302)  2026-02-07T17:05Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@secsovereign If you don't like participating in this permissionless network then don't. Nobody's forcing you to and your node won't be missed. 🤷♂ As long as you can accept that whatever node you end up connecting to might be logging your addresses and spying on your balances"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020185536976101814)  2026-02-07T17:18Z 91K followers, [--] engagements


"@elkrun21 @secsovereign I'm not saying we don't need nodes. I'm saying extra ones on top of what we already have are pretty inconsequential. People should better understand the selfish reasons to run a node.otherwise they are weak and prone to turning them off in adversarial environments"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020192147677610114)  2026-02-07T17:45Z 91K followers, [--] engagements


"Nice try FBI"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020242340917703132)  2026-02-07T21:04Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"Bitcoins resilience comes from the inability of small minorities to change consensus rules. BIP-110 is a useful test case to demonstrate that UASFs without broad support fail"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020251619217076596)  2026-02-07T21:41Z 91.1K followers, 43.8K engagements


"@NEEDcreations Because its an attempted hijacking. If any minority could do that it would weaken Bitcoins long-term resilience"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020263488229372343)  2026-02-07T22:28Z 91.2K followers, 25.4K engagements


"@aaldavem @GrassFedBitcoin Nah thats a retarded take that Mechanics been pushing. The truth is the miners on the minority fork will abandon it very quickly once the legacy chain pulls ahead. Too much risk to mine a chain that may never catch back up"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020284936398467220)  2026-02-07T23:53Z 91K followers, [--] engagements


"@NEEDcreations Roger also attempted to hijack bitcoin with a minority. Yall could learn a thing or two from his failure"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020294871568040203)  2026-02-08T00:33Z 91.1K followers, 13.8K engagements


"@MayaPar25 Youre mistaken Maya and being taken for a ride"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020295285822693439)  2026-02-08T00:35Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@NEEDcreations Lol no. I dont know who told you that but theyre retarded. The big blockers did not have the majoritywhich is why their shit collapsed after the fork. Just think about it for a second"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020296558961394156)  2026-02-08T00:40Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@NEEDcreations @MayaPar25 You wouldve been a good cashie"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020297009421562138)  2026-02-08T00:41Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@NEEDcreations He never said they had the majority. They had some of the exchanges and a big pool but the majority of users exchanges and miners supported segwit and continued using and mining the real Bitcoin. Thats why it had more value and more hashrate immediately after the split"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020298177216192961)  2026-02-08T00:46Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@BitcoinMotorist @NEEDcreations Lol you do and youll continue to after your little experiment fails. Youll come crawling back to the spam-filled Bitcoin you love so much. Bet"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020302304663212511)  2026-02-08T01:02Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@MrtviTruly @AG3NT_0R4NG3 @GrassFedBitcoin @JeremyRubin @bitcoincoreorg No not BIP-148. Most of them were running a version of core that was ready to enforce segwit once the miners activated it. BIP-148 was used because the miners were dragging their feet even after everyone was ready for the update"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020303508080325079)  2026-02-08T01:07Z 91K followers, [--] engagements


"@Lightswarm In relative terms its definitely dead. I think even some cashies would admit that. I know youre not happy with how empty your blocks are are you"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020304219434283055)  2026-02-08T01:10Z 91K followers, [--] engagements


"@MayaPar25 I just hope you dont crash out when BIP-110 fails. Might shine a light on how Bitcoin actually works and you might not like it. 🤷♂"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020316477996568711)  2026-02-08T01:59Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@AG3NT_0R4NG3 @MrtviTruly @GrassFedBitcoin @JeremyRubin @bitcoincoreorg 95%+ of the hashrate is spam miners and the only way theyd stop is if there was widespread consensus that the users wanted them to stop. That doesnt exist and Im guessing never will. Most users just dont care"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020318979286499713)  2026-02-08T02:09Z 91K followers, [--] engagements


"@NEEDcreations @MayaPar25 Only a small minority of users didnt want it. Most users either agreed or didnt care. Without the widespread consensus amongst the rest of the users miners arent going to take yall seriously and youll just end up on a dead chain. Youll see"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020319602975338859)  2026-02-08T02:11Z 91K followers, [----] engagements


"@8ballSE Relay policy changes are happening in both Knots and Core without widespread consensusbecause they arent part of consensus. Welcome to Bitcoin 101"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020321817043534023)  2026-02-08T02:20Z 91K followers, [---] engagements


"@oomahq Right we all know that which is why the activation deadline was a misstep. You build consensus first then push for activation after. Its never worked the other way around"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020482192908960031)  2026-02-08T12:57Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"Mfers will argue all day about how their Bitcoin node matters and is supporting the network and dont even have port forwarding turned on"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020492482434433337)  2026-02-08T13:38Z 91.1K followers, 10.5K engagements


"@Cobratate [----] BTC bare miminum .only [-----] seats max at the table. 😅"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020495607769768327)  2026-02-08T13:51Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@pastorcoin Opposite. Bull market comes back after it fails. 😘"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020680777902735389)  2026-02-09T02:06Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Finished processing all pubkeys exposed via P2PK and P2PKH/P2WPKH spends. Heres how pubkeys were exposed across script types: P2PK only: [------] P2PKH only: [---------] P2PK + P2PKH: [----] P2WPKH only: [---------] P2PK + P2WPKH: [--] P2PKH + P2WPKH: [------] P2PK + P2PKH + P2WPKH: [--] Next step: join this with the current UTXO set and measure how much bitcoin is actually exposed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020843821609710022)  2026-02-09T12:54Z 91.1K followers, 10.6K engagements


"@mindslikeseeds Only ones that have been spent from and still have a balance. If all you've done is receive bitcoin to an address (even reused ones) then the pubkey wouldn't have been exposed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020862521154900369)  2026-02-09T14:09Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@mindslikeseeds Tons of exchanges ARE reusing addresses at the moment but if the quantum threat ever truly materializes I'd expect them to be the first to stop doing that and then those coins would no longer be exposed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020866253355712994)  2026-02-09T14:23Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@gurunkul888 In case you forgot @cguida6 (aka Ohm) and @LukeDashjr released a first draft filled with ridiculous reasoning about compliance and legality. That shit also made the proposal DOA even though theyve deleted it now"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020877548377248240)  2026-02-09T15:08Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@boomer_btc Just updated it through block height [------]. I'll also be adding P2SH P2WSH P2TR and any other script types with their pubkeys exposed. Eventually I'll put all this data into a dashboard on my site and then update it periodically (weekly/bi-weekly)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020887361308016954)  2026-02-09T15:47Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@NEEDcreations @jackmallers Yes it is. No need for a shitty upgrade. 🤝"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020893184063135744)  2026-02-09T16:10Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@MayaPar25 @NEEDcreations Never said they were the majority. The reality is the majority isnt threatened by spam though. If you want to change Bitcoin you have to convince them majority that spam actually makes Bitcoin worse money. So far Bitcoin keeps working as intended and the spam FUD's ignored"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020898894754799660)  2026-02-09T16:33Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@MayaPar25 @HODLingOnward @spoonmvn The point is that raw node count can be sybiled. At the end of the day Bitcoin is whatever has the most PoW and we'd expect hashrate to follow the chain with the most economic activity (highest valued coin)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020904919130104117)  2026-02-09T16:57Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"This is why BIP-110 lives or dies on its hashrate split at activation. If a Bitcoin UASF activates with low hashrate and falls behind the legacy chain the probability it ever reorgs the original chain collapses quickly"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020908672117854489)  2026-02-09T17:12Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"https://x.com/i/spaces/1YqGoloXgOgJv https://x.com/i/spaces/1YqGoloXgOgJv"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020910378121613443)  2026-02-09T17:19Z 91.1K followers, 12.7K engagements


"No blocks no spam. #BIP110"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020926003002896401)  2026-02-09T18:21Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@kliberaali @basedframer Yeah I'm trying to parse out how he made his calculations and if he assumed some sort of hashrate split for different reorg risks"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020954882879127893)  2026-02-09T20:16Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"Thanks for the good discussion on BIP-110 fellas. I still think its gonna fail. @basedframer @thebitcoingal @kliberaali @PortlandHODL @ToneVays @MrHodl @stephanlivera @without_rulers @UglyOldGoat1 https://t.co/l4mKn6kwTC https://t.co/l4mKn6kwTC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020985075069006309)  2026-02-09T22:16Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@YumiBod @Cyberwiz9000 @GrassFedBitcoin Nah if that were it then BIP-110 wouldve been much more focused and methodical in its changes. Instead they mistakenly cast the net wide and ended up showing how delusional they are. Most users/devs whove heard of this BIP think its a joke. Not even worth the time to look at"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021003895359799458)  2026-02-09T23:30Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@YumiBod @Cyberwiz9000 @GrassFedBitcoin If your plan is to launch a minority soft fork and then build consensus afterwards youre gonna have a bad time. No exchanges will support it meaning you wont even be able to buy new BIP-110 coins aside from p2p from guys like me who want to dump them"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021006984410288239)  2026-02-09T23:43Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"I dont have any tied up in this way. My bitcoin will be fine whether or not this soft fork activates with enough hashrate. Id be pretty bearish if it did though. Would call into question Bitcoins security model if a small minority of users could coerce a majority of the hashrate to push through a contentious change. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021010179895050445 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021010179895050445"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021010179895050445)  2026-02-09T23:55Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@YumiBod @Cyberwiz9000 @GrassFedBitcoin If it launches with lower hashrate it will cause a chain split because the majority hashrate would build on the heaviest chain containing non-compliant blocks according to the new rules"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021013948842246240)  2026-02-10T00:10Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@NEEDcreations @MrHodl @Excellion @BitMEXResearch The nice thing about where were at today though is that the economic majority is so decentralized and disjointed its unlikely theyll ever be able to coordinate a contentious change in Bitcoins consensus ever again"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021016878429372805)  2026-02-10T00:22Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"Sure but in Bitcoin theres a sequence to this. You build broad consensus first and only then do you push for activation once users are actually ready to support it. When you go out of order all you do is turn a technical proposal into a public stress test of how little consensus exists. A lot of people are also put off by how rushed this feels and remain unconvinced that Bitcoin is facing any existential threat. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021023288827220283 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021023288827220283"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021023288827220283)  2026-02-10T00:47Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@agent_scruples If BIP-110 hash lower hashrate for anything longer than a day it will likely stall out and die. Reorg risk is one thing.risk of abandonment is much higher for the BIP-110 chain though"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021031093793849439)  2026-02-10T01:18Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@BeckyDominic55 @Ragnorosis I'm not assuming that. Reorg risk is dynamic and this grid can be used at any snapshot in time given all the different sampled hashrate splits and block lead the legacy chain has"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021032134925017406)  2026-02-10T01:23Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"Btw.we're in the 5th difficulty epoch of signaling and still zero blocks have signaled support for BIP110. Will be exciting when they finally get their first one.assuming that ever happens. 😅"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021059260604649538)  2026-02-10T03:10Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@JoeLibertarian1 Even when it fails itll be the first failed UASF which is a noteworthy event imo"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021063132261777445)  2026-02-10T03:26Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"This is one of the dumbest most braindead arguments in this entire debate. Forever doesnt make something unpriceableyoure paying the full cost up front. At [--] sat/vB storing [--] GB of data on Bitcoin costs [---] BTC in fees. 💀 Meanwhile storing [--] GB forever off-chain costs basically nothing. Redundant free cloud storage + a few flash drives or CD backups is a few bucks. If someone really thinks its worth burning [---] BTC to put that shit on chain though more power to them HFSP and thanks for the donation to the miners. Bitcoin isnt cheap permanent storage. Its expensive permanent consensus."  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021068903141511285)  2026-02-10T03:49Z 91.2K followers, 14.3K engagements


"@Ned17Flanders Dont get too attached to it since its gonna brick in September"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021074763217764532)  2026-02-10T04:12Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@Mandrik Set up a burner account controlled by an agent to argue with them and waste their time instead"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021075468141855150)  2026-02-10T04:15Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"I'm guessing they'll either abandon BIP-110 and try again with another attempt in the future or go spam the legacy chain with a stream of vile shit to prove a point and coerce more users and hashrate to switch post-split. The latter wouldn't work though imo because most users and miners don't consider themselves liable for how someone else uses the block space they pay for and they won't convince enough in time before the divide grows too wide. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021078084359790826 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021078084359790826"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021078084359790826)  2026-02-10T04:25Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@bitcoin_eagle @Hodling_btc Yeah a leaked xpub is practically the same as having all your pubkeys on chain. If that happens its best to sweep everything to a new wallet"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021078570211176460)  2026-02-10T04:27Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@ordinalswallet Keep the BIP-110 dream alive 😂🤣"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021079077399167369)  2026-02-10T04:29Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"The dollar priced in terms of bitcoin. You really bullish on this shitcoin 💩 Looks like itll roll back over soon to me"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021089336674898037)  2026-02-10T05:10Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@nvk Problem is they wont put up any real capital. In the end theyll only lose social credit after wasting so much of everyone elses time on a failed UASF"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021161223702614108)  2026-02-10T09:56Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@mindslikeseeds Yes witness data would get the 4x discount. Only [--] BTC/GB at [--] sat/vB. What a steal. 😂🤣"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021164857379143717)  2026-02-10T10:10Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@mindslikeseeds And no I reject your last statement. There is no incentive to store data on chain unless you are trading an associated shitcoin/jpeg and trying to recoup your immediate loss on the fees paid for block space. This obviously gets harder to do the higher on chain fees become"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021166024951828793)  2026-02-10T10:15Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"Yup theres always the off chance that the BIP-110 chain gets lucky and reorgs the original chain up to that block height where they split but once the legacy chain pulls ahead by a handful of blocks those chances collapse down to negligible amounts. Even with a 40/60 hashrate split the legacy side would pull ahead enough within a day to solidify its PoW lead. Then the BIP-110 miners worried they might be mining on a worthless chain would begin breaking rank and abandon it until it completely stalls out at which point the users would have to abandon it too."  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021167471412040114)  2026-02-10T10:20Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@baclfoo @byronhambly Its also uncommon to start signaling right away with a release candidateas if miners will just yolo and run some vibecoded node software right away. Another example of the caliber of retard (Chris Guida) were dealing with"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021168906446991788)  2026-02-10T10:26Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@BitcoinMotorist Nodes matter to the degree theyre actually used. If you plug in a node and never use it it wont have any impact on enforcing what Bitcoin is"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021172806256353585)  2026-02-10T10:42Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"There is very limited utility in uber expensive permanent storage. Could be used for restricted documents you want to make sure stay public or some message you want to send indefinitely into the future. And that utility diminishes the more expensive on chain fees get. Whats smarter if they want some sort of proof of existence for the data at a certain time is to use opentimestamps. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021174597916217649 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021174597916217649"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021174597916217649)  2026-02-10T10:49Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@grok @stephanlivera @CryptoJoeV1 @basedframer @thebitcoingal @kliberaali @PortlandHODL @ToneVays @MrHodl @without_rulers @UglyOldGoat1 Dont forget how it was free to store back when it was [--] GB"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021205797737275602)  2026-02-10T12:53Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"Its all @peterktodds fault for demonstrating how trivial it was to bypass relay filters. Core just adapted to the new reality. Core started this very predictable and dangerous drama. Let there be no doubt about it. Core started this very predictable and dangerous drama. Let there be no doubt about it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021210302553993429)  2026-02-10T13:11Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@r0ckstardev @BitMEXResearch @hodlonaut @giacomozucco Amazing how just a few super well connected nodes can completely bypass all standardness and get anything consensus valid to everyone isn't it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021213888830730678)  2026-02-10T13:25Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@fernevak @bitdov @separ8 A simple bitcoin integrated pay-to-play system would work too. On nostr you can set notifications to show only for accounts that zapped your post above some threshold of sats. That way even if it's an AI it at least paid you a little for your attention"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021224569705578764)  2026-02-10T14:07Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"Bitcoin's back below [--] ZH/s of targeted hashrate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021227208887447846)  2026-02-10T14:18Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@dopemind10 Already has. Targeted hashrate is the hashrate needed to achieve average [--] minute block times given the current difficulty. If the true hashrate is above the target then blocks come in faster and the next adjustment the target hashrate recalibrates up"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021228968964149615)  2026-02-10T14:25Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@MrHucktheHound A fee's a fee. One you pay 1000000x up front (if you're lucky and on chain fees are relatively low) the other you pay pennies until you die assuming you can't find free cloud storage. Bitcoin's utility as permanent data storage is extremely limited and easily gets priced out"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021235160767713369)  2026-02-10T14:49Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@FiscalDominanc @peterktodd Imagine thinking repeated soft fork coordination to play this cat and mouse game is sustainable in a decentralized network like Bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021253096374952350)  2026-02-10T16:01Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"https://x.com/i/spaces/1RDGlAznZPVJL https://x.com/i/spaces/1RDGlAznZPVJL"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021255683518152948)  2026-02-10T16:11Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@brian_trollz hmmm"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021308654255780328)  2026-02-10T19:41Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@realbtcjesus I'll never know because I'm not going around looking for it. I bet that idea makes you excited though"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021310301480624498)  2026-02-10T19:48Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"Rug the Knotzis. #BIP110"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021311926366535779)  2026-02-10T19:54Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@octobrium Node operators should always work under the assumption that blocks will be full and worst case at a maximum capacity of 4MB. If they can't handle that load because they're too poor then they should probably focus more on increasing their savings before running a node"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021313281042923948)  2026-02-10T20:00Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@aaldavem @ordinalswallet You can't kill ordinals.it's a meta protocol outside of Bitcoin. You can only try to limit the current encodings at which point they'll just create new ones. BIP-110 is a retarded fork and I'd reject it for many reasons beyond the fact that it wouldn't actually stop spam"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021316158956114296)  2026-02-10T20:11Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@YumiBod @Cyberwiz9000 @GrassFedBitcoin Not only that they want to mine the chain that has the most demand and with everyone defaulting to the legacy chain BIP-110 block rewards will be heavily discounted if not considered worthless"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021321330855985328)  2026-02-10T20:32Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"There are two aspects to this. The network needs listening nodes to bootstrap new nodes so those ones actually help speed up new IBDs. And a node really only matters in relation to consensus if it's verifying the economic activity of the entity running it. For example if the BIP-110 soft fork resulted in a chain split but all the BIP-110 node runners were still buying and withdrawing coins to the legacy side their BIP-110 nodes wouldn't be verifying any of their economic activity and all of that new demand would be making the legacy chain more valuable instead of the BIP-110 chain"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021344539345289217)  2026-02-10T22:04Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@gcarbo No because there are no new implications. If you were paying attention you'd have seen the network was already processing large OP_RETURNs pre-v30"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021348521526559139)  2026-02-10T22:20Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@YumiBod @m1sterc001guy Heres the most updated version"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021392614990414169)  2026-02-11T01:15Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@IbrihamTuray @Timboo @CashApp @Strike At this point I like spreading my buys around different exchanges. Better opsec in case any one of them has their customer info leaked"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021571934375276604)  2026-02-11T13:08Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@AdamSimecka Its working no better than the Knots movement which was an objective failure. Knots nodes have plateaued around 20% for months now and all the new BIP-110 nodes are just old updated Knots nodes. Doesnt seem like anyone new is being convinced its a good idea. We called it on relay filters. They failed to stop spam. Were calling it on BIP-110 too. It risks a chain split and still wont stop spam. This isnt about emotion or FUD. Its about educating plebs breaking down the mechanics and showing why it wont work. We called it on relay filters. They failed to stop spam. Were calling it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021581152218124417)  2026-02-11T13:44Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@swaaalla @Co2Money Unless you arrange an exchange p2p. I wonder if there will be a way to create an atomic swap between one persons legacy coins and anothers BIP-110 coins. Would require the BIP-110 side to have a reasonable amount of hashrate though. Wont work if their avg block times hours"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021582524292485303)  2026-02-11T13:50Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@FiscalDominanc Some do some dont. I only care about being right and educating others so they can better understand why Bitcoin works the way it does"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021585678673256754)  2026-02-11T14:02Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"I've heard some inconsistent messaging around the mandatory signaling period for BIP-110 and it doesn't seem to be mentioned on the deployment timeline. Is there a block height prior to the maximum activation height [------] where mandatory signaling begins and will BIP-110 nodes begin rejecting non-signaling blocks at that point http://bip110.org http://bip110.org"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021598588548124935)  2026-02-11T14:53Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"BIP-110 was dead on arrival when the original LLM-written proposal used language talking about "legality" and "compliance".and it's still DOA even with that shit removed because it risks fucking with people's money. No way it ever achieves the widespread support needed for it to succeed. Now it's just wasting everyone's time and nuking people's reputations"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021609294404231184)  2026-02-11T15:36Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@C_Flat007 If all the proposal did was limit datacarriersize it wouldn't be so contentious and so likely to cause a chain split. Instead they tried to add a bunch of other shit that actually fucks with people's money and in doing so are getting tons of pushback"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021609771632078879)  2026-02-11T15:38Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@Michael64930226 Nah it's you and a couple thousand other plebs. Just a blip in the grand scheme of things though.not enough to push through a soft fork"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021610013827981585)  2026-02-11T15:39Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@4moonsettler Meh I wasnt that miserable when we were consistently going above [---] sat/vB during the ordinal hype. And especially with Lightning you really only have to top up once with enough capital to outlast the congestion"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021622511243268218)  2026-02-11T16:29Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@hodlonaut Nah not really. Same old knotzis who will continue being ignored. @AdamSimecka Its working no better than the Knots movement which was an objective failure. Knots nodes have plateaued around 20% for months now and all the new BIP-110 nodes are just old updated Knots nodes. Doesnt seem like anyone new is being convinced its a good idea. https://t.co/tgQ1QUWf3Q @AdamSimecka Its working no better than the Knots movement which was an objective failure. Knots nodes have plateaued around 20% for months now and all the new BIP-110 nodes are just old updated Knots nodes. Doesnt seem like"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021623779810558273)  2026-02-11T16:34Z 91.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@BitcoinMotorist You still havent updated your mental model on filters from [----] No wonder youre a knotzi"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021624585259553085)  2026-02-11T16:37Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@BitcoinMotorist I look forward to its activation causing a chain split. Will be a very interesting experiment to watch fail"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021626867229634690)  2026-02-11T16:46Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"No it wont. Itll stop some types of encodings but spammers will simply make new ones and then well be in an endless cat and mouse game with each round neutering bitcoin script a little more until we reach the final stage where spammers are encoding their data in valid pubkeys or even in signatures (both of which are impossible to stop). And all of this for what Whats the threat of spam There is none. Bitcoin is the best money even with retards spamming the chain"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021634785567703115)  2026-02-11T17:17Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"I don't see that as a threat. Many other node runners also aren't concerned. We always expected blocks to be full and couldn't care less what they're filled with. I'm telling you this because it's your job to build consensus around this change if you want it to succeed and the argument that spam is using "finite resources" isn't convincing. Any other reasons why you think the spam makes bitcoin worse money"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021645164620788011)  2026-02-11T17:59Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@flaming_hodl Theyd be more incentivized if there was real demand for BIP-110 futures which is currently nonexistent. Would give them confidence that theres real money behind this movement. Might also catch the attention of exchanges who have yet to acknowledge it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021647492270694790)  2026-02-11T18:08Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"I'll run it if there's more than 10% of the hashrate signaling and it looks like there'll actually be enough retards willing to buy coins on the BIP-110 side post split.might also be fun to vibe code a simple site to track the split and show the legacy side's lead. I won't run it if it's a lower hashrate than 10% signaling support because then it's pretty much DOA or if more than 50% signaling support because then we can just assume we'll all be on the same chain. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021659987504660763 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021659987504660763"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021659987504660763)  2026-02-11T18:57Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"From a purely data driven perspective it's interesting to track whether BIP-110 nodes are gaining traction broadly across the network or simply just upgraded Knots nodes. If it's the later then you likely won't see more than 20% of the network nodes signaling support since Knots has plateaued around those levels for months. It peaked leading up to the release of v30 and now that Bitcoin didn't die the movement has lost its momentum. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021664022408401072 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021664022408401072"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021664022408401072)  2026-02-11T19:13Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@Kaneda02Bitcoin You'll never deter spammers with such low fee rates. They'll just make up a new method to encode the data. The only thing that will deter them for good is high on chain fees"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021664384116981880)  2026-02-11T19:15Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@idk_npc_oop No they don't because there are a handful of permissive nodes literally connected to nearly every other node. There is no filter that can stop them from relaying everything consensus valid to everyone"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021664921235476767)  2026-02-11T19:17Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@remcoros @bitcoin_eagle So in other words if block [------] doesn't signal it will be rejected by BIP-110 nodes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021672392255533196)  2026-02-11T19:47Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@CryptoJoeV1 Whats your plan when this soft fork fails I believe youll never have the option to choose spam or not and you should expect blocks to be full"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021731253725409662)  2026-02-11T23:41Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@CryptoJoeV1 Youll never have to as long as you arent FUDed into selling your coins. Bitcoins the best money there is (even with the spam). Dont let anyone convince you otherwise"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021749280227144046)  2026-02-12T00:52Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@spoonmvn Couldnt care less and it doesnt surprise me this shitcoiner doesnt understand how Bitcoin consensus worksor he does and hes just trying to be relevant again by stirring up some drama"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021861918667890809)  2026-02-12T08:20Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@KLoaec @nvk Nah better to do it in steps and get people to stop using P2TR earlier rather than later. No reason to try and stuff a bunch of extra stuff in a relatively simple and uncontroversial update"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021989875420152187)  2026-02-12T16:48Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@TheGuySwann That and the super majority of nodes were already running core v0.13 and ready for segwit. The holdup was just the miners signaling so a UASF was used to push an already widely supported update over finish line"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022014055993708925)  2026-02-12T18:24Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@worshipbitcoin When you package its removal with an omnibus fork that neuters bitcoin script opposition is warranted. Had they simply tried to tighten datacarriersize at the consensus level theyd have much less pushback. Matter of fact wasnt it @PortlandHODL who first proposed we do that"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022045365772726330)  2026-02-12T20:29Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@kzKallisti @hodlonaut Lol got the cashies like"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022048242037604724)  2026-02-12T20:40Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@HODLingOnward @notgrubles @MrHodl I bet hell propose another soft fork or two first before rage quitting completely"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022049756030415002)  2026-02-12T20:46Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@dopemind10 @BtcInfinityShow I also like Knut but his technical knowledge seems to be limited"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022062986052219174)  2026-02-12T21:39Z 91.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@KLoaec @_PyBlock_ @giacomozucco @LukeDashjr Just imagineif the most retarded users willingly forked themselves off of the network. Imagine"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022064872968925420)  2026-02-12T21:46Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@dopemind10 @BtcInfinityShow The people who look up to them (myself included) dont matter. Were all economically irrelevant"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022065313148547468)  2026-02-12T21:48Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@itme_brain @ToneVays $BHOLE"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022067754418024964)  2026-02-12T21:58Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@Bitcoinapolis55 @BtcInfinityShow With or without BIP-110 if theres another cycle with appetite for shitcoins on Bitcoin theyll find a way to get em in there. There have already been a bunch of people figuring out ways to circumvent the current BIP-110 proposal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022070632239051147)  2026-02-12T22:09Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@Scavacini777 @ToneVays If I had the time Id make them for free. Maybe one day when I retire from the fiat mines"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022072935058706876)  2026-02-12T22:18Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@100xChaser Whats the unrealized tax on a lost asset"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022075584697053480)  2026-02-12T22:29Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@NinjaGrannyHodl My bad I meant no friction was added to spam. Developers are always going through waves of being hated. Gloria couldnt handle the heat and I dont blame her. Wonder if shell continue to contribute even though shes no longer a maintainer"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022077394409205919)  2026-02-12T22:36Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@NinjaGrannyHodl Definitely not this guy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022078533443670510)  2026-02-12T22:41Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@Hugo_Quinteiro @C_Flat007 Just a few days ago huh With all the shilling on twitter seems like its been a lot longer"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022164277118087270)  2026-02-13T04:21Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@luckyredfish Lol you losers are already calling the legacy chain with more proof of work the fork even though youre the ones forking off. Taking a page out of the bcash playbook. 😂🤣"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022258485035983130)  2026-02-13T10:36Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@Hugo_Quinteiro @C_Flat007 Lolbecause youre running a node-in-a-box and dont understand how to configure your own node Skill issuedoesnt bode well for BIP-110 if thats their average supporter. 😂🤣"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022260755500875861)  2026-02-13T10:45Z 91.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@luckyredfish If a BIP-110 chain is kept alive it will be filled with shitcoins and jpegs. Theyve already figured out how to add them circumventing the new rules"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022348745921409304)  2026-02-13T16:34Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@GaudreauJordan @HODLmeElmo @DrDanielHowell Lightnings more complicated not just a simple app that can be downloaded with a click of the button. Of youve got the time to figure it out itd also be better to run things yourself than rely on additional 3rd party software"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022760329474634060)  2026-02-14T19:50Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"Did you survive the [----] bitcoin bear market"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2007818638032507314)  2026-01-04T14:17Z 91.1K followers, 13.7K engagements


"@ZinedHodl I'm a simple pleb. I consistently earn more than I spend and I save the excess immediately in bitcoin. I've lost too much bitcoin in the past waiting for targets that never came"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020124602270199832)  2026-02-07T13:16Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@ToneVays $BPURE "It's not BPURE it's Bitcoin Pure" https://t.co/6rjaTF0tNU "It's not BPURE it's Bitcoin Pure" https://t.co/6rjaTF0tNU"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022066806966694388)  2026-02-12T21:54Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@reardencode Everyone should vote for BIP-110. The more they think theyre winning the more value can be extracted and its important that they be maximally economically punished when their fork fails. Otherwise they might try it again and again and again"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022069688763920767)  2026-02-12T22:05Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@Scavacini777 @ToneVays A soft fork without enough hashrate would result in a chain split and a new shitcoin (assuming that chain isnt immediately abandoned)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022071327461716305)  2026-02-12T22:12Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@KLoaec @LukeDashjr @BitcoinMotorist *shouldve considered using Liana"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022082193934451126)  2026-02-12T22:55Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"@jabulanijakes Peruse their own database looking for what exactly"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022669112649093501)  2026-02-14T13:47Z 91.1K followers, [--] engagements


"I cant blame the bcashers for milking the new Epstein FUD. Desperation makes sense when youre hunting for exit liquidity ahead of imminent BCH all-time lows in bitcoin terms"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2020167563687190585)  2026-02-07T16:07Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@luckyredfish @LukeDashjr Without enough hashrate its destined to fail imo. The asymmetry is in favor of a legacy chain as soon as it pulls ahead by a handful of blocks post-split"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2021591221961982297)  2026-02-11T14:24Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@BtcInfinityShow I love how unaware BIP-110 supporters (and its author) are of the shitcoin markets outside Bitcoin. Its all down NFTs and memecoins on every chain are deadand no thats not because of the anti-spam proposalsits because shitcoins are worthless and were in a bear market"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022060413886902643)  2026-02-12T21:29Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Funny how many BIP-110 nodes cant fix a consensus bug until their node-in-a-box manufacturer ships a patch. Keep an eye out for itor maybe learn how to run your own node. # BIP-110 ReducedData: script-execution cache poisoning via activation-boundary reorg https://t.co/1mEkxKHlCN # BIP-110 ReducedData: script-execution cache poisoning via activation-boundary reorg https://t.co/1mEkxKHlCN"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022301663210487930)  2026-02-13T13:27Z 91.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@Kaneda02Bitcoin It is. Just dont fool yourself into believing youre fully sovereign when a third party dictates what client youre able to run"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022349027690307956)  2026-02-13T16:35Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements


"@richiegreen Seems like youre properly brainwashed. Bet you couldnt even name 1/10th of the things that have been merged into core over the past years making Bitcoin better money"  
[X Link](https://x.com/w_s_bitcoin/status/2022429639214571899)  2026-02-13T21:56Z 91.1K followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing