Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@tonygig Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::197110333.png) @tonygig Tony Giglio

Tony Giglio posts on X about $120mish, $40myear, $27myear, $67m the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XX [#](/creator/twitter::197110333/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::197110333/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX +148%
- X Months XXXXXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXXXX +108%

### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::197110333/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::197110333/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week X -XX%
- X Month XX +1,133%
- X Months XX +140%
- X Year XXX +7.80%

### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::197110333/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::197110333/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXX no change
- X Month XXXXX +0.17%
- X Months XXXXX +4.20%
- X Year XXXXX +3.30%

### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::197110333/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::197110333/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[finance](/list/finance)  XXXX%

**Social topic influence**
[$120mish](/topic/$120mish) 9.09%, [$40myear](/topic/$40myear) 9.09%, [$27myear](/topic/$27myear) 9.09%, [$67m](/topic/$67m) 9.09%, [maze](/topic/maze) 9.09%, [the first](/topic/the-first) 9.09%, [imo](/topic/imo) 9.09%, [target](/topic/target) XXXX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@savagesports](/creator/undefined) [@thecinesthetic](/creator/undefined) [@michaelbays](/creator/undefined) [@thr](/creator/undefined) [@timbhealey](/creator/undefined) [@romanforever](/creator/undefined) [@yangs1k](/creator/undefined) [@iamjamesstewart](/creator/undefined) [@mcheek88](/creator/undefined) [@brayaj38](/creator/undefined) [@eyesmyriad](/creator/undefined) [@esmereldag25](/creator/undefined) [@smmujtaba1999](/creator/undefined) [@roblancaster72](/creator/undefined) [@shadesofrani](/creator/undefined)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"If they wanted to try to get fewer years they would have had to OVERPAY the yearly comp the O's were offering. X years @ $120M-ish. And I'm not sure why $40M/year would be out of their budget They had agreed last year to pay Bregman $40M/year. Plus they're not paying Devers $27M/year. Henry gets out of Devers and Bregman (combined $67M this year) and will replace them with Campbell and Casas"  
[X Link](https://x.com/tonygig/status/1999212554045079564)  2025-12-11T20:19Z 1203 followers, 1031 engagements


"King is XXX% wrong. I recently re-read the shining. First time since high school. It is easily the most faithful adaptation of a King novel. There are even huge chunks of dialogue from the novel in the film. Kubrick left out some exposition didnt blow up the hotel changed hedge animals to maze. A few other minor things. If King thinks the movie is cold and disappointing then he thinks his book is too"  
[X Link](https://x.com/tonygig/status/1999305988659130559)  2025-12-12T02:31Z 1203 followers, 6311 engagements


"You don't think it's a faithful if not one of the most faithful adaptations It's the same story same scenes huge chunks of dialogue lifted directly from the novel. The first printing of THE SHINING was almost XXX pages long. It can't include everything. Kubrick made the choice to exclude much of the exposition. And the "changes" Kubrick made IMO were necessary. I think it was important for the audience to actually SEE Jack Torrance kill someone. Not only does this shock the audience but make them believe Jack can kill it elevates Wendy's role as 'hero' in helping rescue her son rather than"  
[X Link](https://x.com/tonygig/status/1999491564981146075)  2025-12-12T14:48Z 1202 followers, XXX engagements


"Reports said Boston was worry about length of deal and Alonzo's age. You're suggesting the same length for a player older than Alonzo. Unless they make X other significant moves. there's no reason to sign Bregman. If they can swing the trades for Marte and Peralta. then adding Bregman makes sense. IMO Gray simply replaces Giolito. Bregman would replace himself. So if they don't make another move what's the point of returning the same team that got eliminated in round X Henry wants a lockout more than a championship. He wants that Salary Cap. He's not signing anyone longer than 1-2 years."  
[X Link](https://x.com/tonygig/status/1999904241469554975)  2025-12-13T18:08Z 1205 followers, XXX engagements


"Stop it. Maye and New Englands offense was utterly embarrassing in the 2nd half. One broken play TD. Maye in the 2nd half couldnt scramble. He was off target. Threw Balls to no one. Out of sync with receivers. He played confused and scared. Even his completions were off target. Lights were too bright. Buffalo was missing X of their best defenders and Maye couldnt put together a single 2nd half drive"  
[X Link](https://x.com/tonygig/status/2000313606777233517)  2025-12-14T21:15Z 1204 followers, XXX engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@tonygig Avatar @tonygig Tony Giglio

Tony Giglio posts on X about $120mish, $40myear, $27myear, $67m the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XX #

Engagements Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXX -XX%
  • X Month XXXXXX +148%
  • X Months XXXXXX -XX%
  • X Year XXXXXXX +108%

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

  • X Week X -XX%
  • X Month XX +1,133%
  • X Months XX +140%
  • X Year XXX +7.80%

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

  • X Week XXXXX no change
  • X Month XXXXX +0.17%
  • X Months XXXXX +4.20%
  • X Year XXXXX +3.30%

CreatorRank: undefined #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence finance XXXX%

Social topic influence $120mish 9.09%, $40myear 9.09%, $27myear 9.09%, $67m 9.09%, maze 9.09%, the first 9.09%, imo 9.09%, target XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @savagesports @thecinesthetic @michaelbays @thr @timbhealey @romanforever @yangs1k @iamjamesstewart @mcheek88 @brayaj38 @eyesmyriad @esmereldag25 @smmujtaba1999 @roblancaster72 @shadesofrani

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"If they wanted to try to get fewer years they would have had to OVERPAY the yearly comp the O's were offering. X years @ $120M-ish. And I'm not sure why $40M/year would be out of their budget They had agreed last year to pay Bregman $40M/year. Plus they're not paying Devers $27M/year. Henry gets out of Devers and Bregman (combined $67M this year) and will replace them with Campbell and Casas"
X Link 2025-12-11T20:19Z 1203 followers, 1031 engagements

"King is XXX% wrong. I recently re-read the shining. First time since high school. It is easily the most faithful adaptation of a King novel. There are even huge chunks of dialogue from the novel in the film. Kubrick left out some exposition didnt blow up the hotel changed hedge animals to maze. A few other minor things. If King thinks the movie is cold and disappointing then he thinks his book is too"
X Link 2025-12-12T02:31Z 1203 followers, 6311 engagements

"You don't think it's a faithful if not one of the most faithful adaptations It's the same story same scenes huge chunks of dialogue lifted directly from the novel. The first printing of THE SHINING was almost XXX pages long. It can't include everything. Kubrick made the choice to exclude much of the exposition. And the "changes" Kubrick made IMO were necessary. I think it was important for the audience to actually SEE Jack Torrance kill someone. Not only does this shock the audience but make them believe Jack can kill it elevates Wendy's role as 'hero' in helping rescue her son rather than"
X Link 2025-12-12T14:48Z 1202 followers, XXX engagements

"Reports said Boston was worry about length of deal and Alonzo's age. You're suggesting the same length for a player older than Alonzo. Unless they make X other significant moves. there's no reason to sign Bregman. If they can swing the trades for Marte and Peralta. then adding Bregman makes sense. IMO Gray simply replaces Giolito. Bregman would replace himself. So if they don't make another move what's the point of returning the same team that got eliminated in round X Henry wants a lockout more than a championship. He wants that Salary Cap. He's not signing anyone longer than 1-2 years."
X Link 2025-12-13T18:08Z 1205 followers, XXX engagements

"Stop it. Maye and New Englands offense was utterly embarrassing in the 2nd half. One broken play TD. Maye in the 2nd half couldnt scramble. He was off target. Threw Balls to no one. Out of sync with receivers. He played confused and scared. Even his completions were off target. Lights were too bright. Buffalo was missing X of their best defenders and Maye couldnt put together a single 2nd half drive"
X Link 2025-12-14T21:15Z 1204 followers, XXX engagements

@tonygig
/creator/twitter::tonygig