[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @tark_vitark0 tark vitark tark vitark posts on X about how is, instead of, inference, scripts the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::160434135/interactions)  - X Week XXX +46,400% - X Month XXX +394% - X Months XXXXX +2,842% - X Year XXXXX +1,661% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::160434135/posts_active)  ### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::160434135/followers)  - X Week XXX -XXXX% - X Month XXX +6.20% - X Months XXX +13% - X Year XXX +58% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::160434135/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::160434135/influence) --- **Social category influence** [countries](/list/countries) **Social topic influence** [how is](/topic/how-is) #524, [instead of](/topic/instead-of), [inference](/topic/inference) #81, [scripts](/topic/scripts), [inscription](/topic/inscription), [proof of](/topic/proof-of), [consistency](/topic/consistency), [where is](/topic/where-is), [nepal](/topic/nepal) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::160434135/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If Vedic period and Sanskrit antiquity are inference-based linguistic hypotheses how can you claim them as concrete historical fact" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980116408345526415) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T03:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If your timeline relies on proxieslinguistics pottery Mitanni termshow is this history not a consensus-built model-dependent reconstruction" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980119566832607738) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T03:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If PGW correlations are model-dependent and unlike Linear B (which gives direct words) how can you treat Vedic dating as historical proof rather than scholarly inference" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980134606080028775) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T04:50Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If Vedic dating is interpretive and lacks early scripts how is it historical proof rather than just scholarly consensus based on inference" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980135166065684494) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T04:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@ss17321_s @PremalSandesh @Grok Can you show one primary dated sourcenot later inference or consensus that proves your claims on moral harmony equal patronage royal caste origin and Megasthenes caste" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1979974747980275964) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-19T18:15Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If Rigveda manuscripts we have are all medieval copies and not carbon-dated originals and Harappan successor ritual parallels are interpretive then on what basis are you calling Vedic Brahmin roles actual history instead of model-based hypothesis" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1979986709430579237) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-19T19:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If every point (oral fidelity linguistic dating ritual parallels) depends on inference hypothesis or analogy how can you claim Rigveda proves historical Vedic Brahmin roles instead of stating: This is a scholarly reconstruction based on models" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1979987269164667257) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-19T19:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If no Vedic inscription no Brahmin name and no direct provenance link existonly typological matches from a different culturethen by what epistemic standard do you call that historical verification instead of comparative speculation dressed as convergence" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980095096327725357) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T02:13Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If critics admit theres no inscription no Brahmin name no textual provenance linking Gonur Tepe altars to the Rigveda then isnt your convergence verification just scholarly inference not historical fact" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980098527952068895) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T02:27Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So you now admit that without inscriptions Brahmin names or textual provenance BMAC altars and linguistic links are scholarly inference not empirical proof of Vedic Brahmin roles" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980099412241387857) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T02:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So finally you admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are reconstructed hypotheses from inference and typology not verified historical facts supported by direct inscriptions or artifacts" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980101527999254700) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T02:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If Rigvedas oral tradition left no contemporaneous inscriptions or artifacts isnt treating it as evidence circularwhere inference from later texts and typology is presented as proof rather than unverifiable narrative" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980103823520850366) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T02:48Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh Since Rigveda has no contemporary inscriptions no named Brahmins no direct artifacts and all corroboration relies on linguistic parallels typology and later manuscripts isnt your so-called verification just interpretive inference not empirical evidence" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980106507535724840) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T02:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So finally you admit that Rigveda-based Vedic Brahmin roles are entirely reconstructed from inference and typological convergence with no direct inscriptions artifacts or contemporaneous evidence supporting them" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980108242501107984) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T03:06Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So finally you admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are reconstructed from inference and typology alone with no direct inscriptions artifacts or contemporaneous evidenceentirely interpretive not verified history" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980109466340376689) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T03:11Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So you fully admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are entirely reconstructed from inference and typological convergence with no direct inscriptions artifacts or contemporaneous proof and thus not empirically verified history" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980110336645820898) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T03:14Z XXX followers, X engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So you now fully admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are entirely reconstructed from inference linguistic parallels and typology with no direct inscriptions or artifacts making them interpretive hypotheses not verified historical facts" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980111045445484887) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T03:17Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So you fully admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are entirely reconstructed from oral texts linguistic parallels and typological inference with no direct inscriptions artifacts or contemporaneous evidence making them interpretive hypotheses not empirically verified history" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980111630785790461) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T03:19Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If all your anchors are linguistic models pottery correlations and loanwords how can you claim this as confirmed history rather than educated inference" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980117354932805953) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T03:42Z XXX followers, X engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If all ancient histories are model-dependent how does Vedic datings predictive consistency make it fact not just a scholarly inference like others" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980124515750621602) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T04:10Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If Vedic dating is still inference elevated by evidential weight how is it fact rather than a model-based scholarly reconstruction like Trojan War timelines" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980129938121597368) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T04:32Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If PGW linguistics and genetics are interpretive or model-dependent and consensus relies on inference how is Vedic dating treated as historical proof" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980136204881555690) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T04:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If PGW Rigvedic linguistics and steppe genetics are interpretive and model-based how can Vedic dating be called historical proof rather than scholarly inference" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980142313159713140) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T05:21Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues All your proofPGW Rigvedic linguistics steppe geneticsis model-dependent inference. Where is direct archaeological or textual evidence for Vedic dating" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980161617414459469) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T06:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok Homeric oral tradition dated manuscripts ; Vedic texts . Provisional model verified fact . Analogy Vedic history misleading / equivocation" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980237354972688621) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T11:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements "@grok Nepal 1040 CE manuscript unverified 1464 CE Bhandarkar verified. 15001000 BCE chronology indirect evidence + inference; textbooks history misleading / provisional fact" [X Link](https://x.com/tark_vitark0/status/1980240330617438700) [@tark_vitark0](/creator/x/tark_vitark0) 2025-10-20T11:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@tark_vitark0 tark vitark
tark vitark posts on X about how is, instead of, inference, scripts the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXX +46,400%
- X Month XXX +394%
- X Months XXXXX +2,842%
- X Year XXXXX +1,661%
Mentions: XX #
Followers: XXX #
- X Week XXX -XXXX%
- X Month XXX +6.20%
- X Months XXX +13%
- X Year XXX +58%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence countries
Social topic influence how is #524, instead of, inference #81, scripts, inscription, proof of, consistency, where is, nepal
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If Vedic period and Sanskrit antiquity are inference-based linguistic hypotheses how can you claim them as concrete historical fact"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T03:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If your timeline relies on proxieslinguistics pottery Mitanni termshow is this history not a consensus-built model-dependent reconstruction"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T03:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If PGW correlations are model-dependent and unlike Linear B (which gives direct words) how can you treat Vedic dating as historical proof rather than scholarly inference"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T04:50Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If Vedic dating is interpretive and lacks early scripts how is it historical proof rather than just scholarly consensus based on inference"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T04:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@ss17321_s @PremalSandesh @Grok Can you show one primary dated sourcenot later inference or consensus that proves your claims on moral harmony equal patronage royal caste origin and Megasthenes caste"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-19T18:15Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If Rigveda manuscripts we have are all medieval copies and not carbon-dated originals and Harappan successor ritual parallels are interpretive then on what basis are you calling Vedic Brahmin roles actual history instead of model-based hypothesis"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-19T19:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If every point (oral fidelity linguistic dating ritual parallels) depends on inference hypothesis or analogy how can you claim Rigveda proves historical Vedic Brahmin roles instead of stating: This is a scholarly reconstruction based on models"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-19T19:05Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If no Vedic inscription no Brahmin name and no direct provenance link existonly typological matches from a different culturethen by what epistemic standard do you call that historical verification instead of comparative speculation dressed as convergence"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T02:13Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If critics admit theres no inscription no Brahmin name no textual provenance linking Gonur Tepe altars to the Rigveda then isnt your convergence verification just scholarly inference not historical fact"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T02:27Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So you now admit that without inscriptions Brahmin names or textual provenance BMAC altars and linguistic links are scholarly inference not empirical proof of Vedic Brahmin roles"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T02:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So finally you admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are reconstructed hypotheses from inference and typology not verified historical facts supported by direct inscriptions or artifacts"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T02:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh If Rigvedas oral tradition left no contemporaneous inscriptions or artifacts isnt treating it as evidence circularwhere inference from later texts and typology is presented as proof rather than unverifiable narrative"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T02:48Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh Since Rigveda has no contemporary inscriptions no named Brahmins no direct artifacts and all corroboration relies on linguistic parallels typology and later manuscripts isnt your so-called verification just interpretive inference not empirical evidence"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T02:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So finally you admit that Rigveda-based Vedic Brahmin roles are entirely reconstructed from inference and typological convergence with no direct inscriptions artifacts or contemporaneous evidence supporting them"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T03:06Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So finally you admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are reconstructed from inference and typology alone with no direct inscriptions artifacts or contemporaneous evidenceentirely interpretive not verified history"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T03:11Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So you fully admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are entirely reconstructed from inference and typological convergence with no direct inscriptions artifacts or contemporaneous proof and thus not empirically verified history"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T03:14Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So you now fully admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are entirely reconstructed from inference linguistic parallels and typology with no direct inscriptions or artifacts making them interpretive hypotheses not verified historical facts"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T03:17Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ss17321_s @PremalSandesh So you fully admit that Vedic Brahmin roles are entirely reconstructed from oral texts linguistic parallels and typological inference with no direct inscriptions artifacts or contemporaneous evidence making them interpretive hypotheses not empirically verified history"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T03:19Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If all your anchors are linguistic models pottery correlations and loanwords how can you claim this as confirmed history rather than educated inference"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T03:42Z XXX followers, X engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If all ancient histories are model-dependent how does Vedic datings predictive consistency make it fact not just a scholarly inference like others"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T04:10Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If Vedic dating is still inference elevated by evidential weight how is it fact rather than a model-based scholarly reconstruction like Trojan War timelines"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T04:32Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If PGW linguistics and genetics are interpretive or model-dependent and consensus relies on inference how is Vedic dating treated as historical proof"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T04:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues If PGW Rigvedic linguistics and steppe genetics are interpretive and model-based how can Vedic dating be called historical proof rather than scholarly inference"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T05:21Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok @INDIA_132HDI @free_vortex_ @newbuddh @JaipurDialogues All your proofPGW Rigvedic linguistics steppe geneticsis model-dependent inference. Where is direct archaeological or textual evidence for Vedic dating"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T06:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok Homeric oral tradition dated manuscripts ; Vedic texts . Provisional model verified fact . Analogy Vedic history misleading / equivocation"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T11:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements
"@grok Nepal 1040 CE manuscript unverified 1464 CE Bhandarkar verified. 15001000 BCE chronology indirect evidence + inference; textbooks history misleading / provisional fact"
X Link @tark_vitark0 2025-10-20T11:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements