Dark | Light
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@sneekycat9 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1968317472605601792.png) @sneekycat9 sneekycat

sneekycat posts on X about $pacs, status the most. They currently have XX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1968317472605601792/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1968317472605601792/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX +86%

### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1968317472605601792/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1968317472605601792/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)


### Followers: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1968317472605601792/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1968317472605601792/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Month XX +11%

### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::1968317472605601792/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1968317472605601792/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social topic influence**
[$pacs](/topic/$pacs) #59, [status](/topic/status) XX%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@mearmalite10](/creator/undefined) [@c3c3](/creator/undefined) [@ocraziocornpop](/creator/undefined) [@dmichaeltripi](/creator/undefined) [@goodwillgamed](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[PACS Group, Inc. (PACS)](/topic/$pacs)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"@mearmalite10 politicians voting is what doesnt work if the legal general public (160M+) could vote on all bills and issues line item referendum style THAT would work. Would also negate the need for politicians"  
[X Link](https://x.com/sneekycat9/status/1998955304143495264)  2025-12-11T03:17Z XX followers, XX engagements


"@C_3C_3 new system a few reps for giving pros and cons to new bills issues and review of old ones. then the legal general public votes yes/no on a line item basis cant bribe/corrupt/use PACs on 160M+ voters = far reduced corruption and theft a no more celebrity politicians or parties"  
[X Link](https://x.com/sneekycat9/status/1998952775133311186)  2025-12-11T03:07Z XX followers, X engagements


"@OcrazioCornPop right. bet XX% of the general public wouldnt either. good reason to do way with politicians voting and go to a legal general public referendum line item style voting system. the public decides not the non-representing pols"  
[X Link](https://x.com/sneekycat9/status/1998959248248885460)  2025-12-11T03:33Z XX followers, XX engagements


"@DMichaelTripi if the legal general voting public (160M+) could vote referendum style on every issue/bill line item only we would need politicians. remove their voting ability. also negates PACs bribes/kickbacks celebrity status as well as negating 'political parties'"  
[X Link](https://x.com/sneekycat9/status/1999052169727947151)  2025-12-11T09:42Z XX followers, X engagements

[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@sneekycat9 Avatar @sneekycat9 sneekycat

sneekycat posts on X about $pacs, status the most. They currently have XX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXX #

Engagements Line Chart

  • X Week XX -XX%
  • X Month XXX +86%

Mentions: X #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XX #

Followers Line Chart

  • X Month XX +11%

CreatorRank: undefined #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social topic influence $pacs #59, status XX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @mearmalite10 @c3c3 @ocraziocornpop @dmichaeltripi @goodwillgamed

Top assets mentioned PACS Group, Inc. (PACS)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"@mearmalite10 politicians voting is what doesnt work if the legal general public (160M+) could vote on all bills and issues line item referendum style THAT would work. Would also negate the need for politicians"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:17Z XX followers, XX engagements

"@C_3C_3 new system a few reps for giving pros and cons to new bills issues and review of old ones. then the legal general public votes yes/no on a line item basis cant bribe/corrupt/use PACs on 160M+ voters = far reduced corruption and theft a no more celebrity politicians or parties"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:07Z XX followers, X engagements

"@OcrazioCornPop right. bet XX% of the general public wouldnt either. good reason to do way with politicians voting and go to a legal general public referendum line item style voting system. the public decides not the non-representing pols"
X Link 2025-12-11T03:33Z XX followers, XX engagements

"@DMichaelTripi if the legal general voting public (160M+) could vote referendum style on every issue/bill line item only we would need politicians. remove their voting ability. also negates PACs bribes/kickbacks celebrity status as well as negating 'political parties'"
X Link 2025-12-11T09:42Z XX followers, X engagements

@sneekycat9
/creator/twitter::sneekycat9