[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @snapolino Snapolino Snapolino posts on X about bitcoin, core, utxo, sats the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 1611 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1595169072299536384/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +306% - X Month XXXXXX -XX% - X Months XXXXXXX +751% - X Year XXXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1595169072299536384/posts_active)  - X Week X -XX% - X Month XX -XX% - X Months XXX +211% - X Year XXX -XX% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1595169072299536384/followers)  - X Week XXXXX +0.54% - X Month XXXXX +0.18% - X Months XXXXX +13% - X Year XXXXX +28% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1595169072299536384/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) [stocks](/list/stocks) **Social topic influence** [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #5701, [core](/topic/core), [utxo](/topic/utxo), [sats](/topic/sats) #316, [javascript](/topic/javascript), [good start](/topic/good-start), [transaction](/topic/transaction), [at least](/topic/at-least), [gamma](/topic/gamma), [xy](/topic/xy) **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@excellion](/creator/undefined) [@elonmusk](/creator/undefined) [@giacomozucco](/creator/undefined) [@adam3us](/creator/undefined) [@lukedashjr](/creator/undefined) [@cdarl2](/creator/undefined) [@parmanthe](/creator/undefined) [@asovrynvagabond](/creator/undefined) [@ghostofwhitman](/creator/undefined) [@ericbalchunas](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@soveconomy](/creator/undefined) [@fieldnas](/creator/undefined) [@noufsmith](/creator/undefined) [@1914ad](/creator/undefined) [@rtcom](/creator/undefined) [@saylor](/creator/undefined) [@bitpaine](/creator/undefined) [@cybercurious6](/creator/undefined) [@alibabaqwen](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@Zai_org Now i wonder if a 9B dense model nearly gets as good as the 108B quantized. how would a exactly 18B model do (exactly double the size) shouldnt it beat the 108B model in most tasks" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998018296692740277) 2025-12-08T13:14Z 1112 followers, XXX engagements "@innerhat @LukeDashjr @ostrom72158 XX% of web drive by infections happen via javascript" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998424724196745517) 2025-12-09T16:09Z 1112 followers, XX engagements "@azpetazmac good start is run uninstall bitcoin core then install bitcoin knots after that support the uasf 444(110 bip) and after that support the cat proposal to something like half yearly cleanups of the utxo set" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998664373854953956) 2025-12-10T08:01Z 1111 followers, XXX engagements "@BitcoinBombadil @bitcoincoreorg XXXXX% of BTC are responsible for XX% of the whole historical BTC UTXO set 🤯🤯🤯" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998743583596360117) 2025-12-10T13:16Z 1111 followers, XX engagements "@stackhodler How is your Bakkt shill going" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1995447477508387040) 2025-12-01T10:58Z 1112 followers, 1107 engagements "Bitcoin Core says this helps Bitcoin. Absolutely fucking retarded Bitcoin Core. uninstall Core run Knots and Activate BIP XXX (110) Rug the fucking spamers and bad actor pools. #UninstallCore #RunKnots" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998319084493058193) 2025-12-09T09:09Z 1112 followers, 11K engagements "@calibrated_lies @dr0ther this is why we have to do multiple things and as quickly as possible because it is an attack. Knots == appropriate defaults XXX (110) == removing vulnerabilitys setting limits miners cant expand (256 byte limits contentious) MOEW == removing UTXO bloat by at least 40%" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998834449602248924) 2025-12-10T19:17Z 1112 followers, XX engagements "@calibrated_lies @dr0ther The problem is when gamma and vega hit together and your "borrowed BTC" get into trouble and a buyback is not possible anymore. If its a small ammount its your problem if big its exchange problem " [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998838541208441038) 2025-12-10T19:33Z 1112 followers, XX engagements "@simulx4 @1440000bytes thanks for the information how would a lookup of a single adress lookup work in this case would it still not cause a disk read i have to think a little more on specific cases" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998502450182107204) 2025-12-09T21:18Z 1109 followers, XX engagements "Interesting IBIT/BTCUSD meassured in sats has exactly the feds funds rate spread every month . looks like XX% trust BTC more than IBIT every month. NASDAQ:IBIT/BITSTAMP:BTCUSD*100000000" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1993239769766412382) 2025-11-25T08:46Z 1111 followers, XXX engagements "@ichbinderachim Bullshitt. core fucked up XX bytes dosent have the same behaviour in v30 than in v29. They introduced a new bug" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998492497274957998) 2025-12-09T20:38Z 1111 followers, XXX engagements "@1440000bytes wouldnt that open ddos possibility of nodes create a fake tx that requires you to lookup x thousand adresses over and over" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998494011003384071) 2025-12-09T20:44Z 1111 followers, XXX engagements "@simulx4 @1440000bytes thats in the block which i agree but i was talking about mempool where a receiving node would have to verify it "somehow" against the data on the disk. because one can not assume that inscriptino XY was created by the same person (assumption) and every utxo is different entity" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998498304255307836) 2025-12-09T21:01Z 1111 followers, XX engagements "@calibrated_lies @kretchino @dr0ther if you dont remove those sats they will take those sats they get back and just do it again. So you make all new attacks free. Preventive meassures have to increase the cost for attackers else the preventive meassure fails. Therefore the dust hast to be locked down" [X Link](https://x.com/snapolino/status/1998839629756436690) 2025-12-10T19:37Z 1111 followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@snapolino Snapolino
Snapolino posts on X about bitcoin, core, utxo, sats the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 1611 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +306%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXX +751%
- X Year XXXXXXX -XX%
Mentions: XX #
- X Week X -XX%
- X Month XX -XX%
- X Months XXX +211%
- X Year XXX -XX%
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX +0.54%
- X Month XXXXX +0.18%
- X Months XXXXX +13%
- X Year XXXXX +28%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence
Social category influence cryptocurrencies stocks
Social topic influence bitcoin #5701, core, utxo, sats #316, javascript, good start, transaction, at least, gamma, xy
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @excellion @elonmusk @giacomozucco @adam3us @lukedashjr @cdarl2 @parmanthe @asovrynvagabond @ghostofwhitman @ericbalchunas @bitcoin @soveconomy @fieldnas @noufsmith @1914ad @rtcom @saylor @bitpaine @cybercurious6 @alibabaqwen
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC)
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@Zai_org Now i wonder if a 9B dense model nearly gets as good as the 108B quantized. how would a exactly 18B model do (exactly double the size) shouldnt it beat the 108B model in most tasks"
X Link 2025-12-08T13:14Z 1112 followers, XXX engagements
"@innerhat @LukeDashjr @ostrom72158 XX% of web drive by infections happen via javascript"
X Link 2025-12-09T16:09Z 1112 followers, XX engagements
"@azpetazmac good start is run uninstall bitcoin core then install bitcoin knots after that support the uasf 444(110 bip) and after that support the cat proposal to something like half yearly cleanups of the utxo set"
X Link 2025-12-10T08:01Z 1111 followers, XXX engagements
"@BitcoinBombadil @bitcoincoreorg XXXXX% of BTC are responsible for XX% of the whole historical BTC UTXO set 🤯🤯🤯"
X Link 2025-12-10T13:16Z 1111 followers, XX engagements
"@stackhodler How is your Bakkt shill going"
X Link 2025-12-01T10:58Z 1112 followers, 1107 engagements
"Bitcoin Core says this helps Bitcoin. Absolutely fucking retarded Bitcoin Core. uninstall Core run Knots and Activate BIP XXX (110) Rug the fucking spamers and bad actor pools. #UninstallCore #RunKnots"
X Link 2025-12-09T09:09Z 1112 followers, 11K engagements
"@calibrated_lies @dr0ther this is why we have to do multiple things and as quickly as possible because it is an attack. Knots == appropriate defaults XXX (110) == removing vulnerabilitys setting limits miners cant expand (256 byte limits contentious) MOEW == removing UTXO bloat by at least 40%"
X Link 2025-12-10T19:17Z 1112 followers, XX engagements
"@calibrated_lies @dr0ther The problem is when gamma and vega hit together and your "borrowed BTC" get into trouble and a buyback is not possible anymore. If its a small ammount its your problem if big its exchange problem "
X Link 2025-12-10T19:33Z 1112 followers, XX engagements
"@simulx4 @1440000bytes thanks for the information how would a lookup of a single adress lookup work in this case would it still not cause a disk read i have to think a little more on specific cases"
X Link 2025-12-09T21:18Z 1109 followers, XX engagements
"Interesting IBIT/BTCUSD meassured in sats has exactly the feds funds rate spread every month . looks like XX% trust BTC more than IBIT every month. NASDAQ:IBIT/BITSTAMP:BTCUSD*100000000"
X Link 2025-11-25T08:46Z 1111 followers, XXX engagements
"@ichbinderachim Bullshitt. core fucked up XX bytes dosent have the same behaviour in v30 than in v29. They introduced a new bug"
X Link 2025-12-09T20:38Z 1111 followers, XXX engagements
"@1440000bytes wouldnt that open ddos possibility of nodes create a fake tx that requires you to lookup x thousand adresses over and over"
X Link 2025-12-09T20:44Z 1111 followers, XXX engagements
"@simulx4 @1440000bytes thats in the block which i agree but i was talking about mempool where a receiving node would have to verify it "somehow" against the data on the disk. because one can not assume that inscriptino XY was created by the same person (assumption) and every utxo is different entity"
X Link 2025-12-09T21:01Z 1111 followers, XX engagements
"@calibrated_lies @kretchino @dr0ther if you dont remove those sats they will take those sats they get back and just do it again. So you make all new attacks free. Preventive meassures have to increase the cost for attackers else the preventive meassure fails. Therefore the dust hast to be locked down"
X Link 2025-12-10T19:37Z 1111 followers, XX engagements