[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@simulx4 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::1982736555077984256.png) @simulx4 simulx4

simulx4 posts on X about bitcoin, spam, money, utxo the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1982736555077984256/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1982736555077984256/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%

### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1982736555077984256/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1982736555077984256/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX -XXXX%

### Followers: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1982736555077984256/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1982736555077984256/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXX +8.30%
- X Month XXX +69%

### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1982736555077984256/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::1982736555077984256/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  [finance](/list/finance)  [stocks](/list/stocks)  [exchanges](/list/exchanges)  [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  [countries](/list/countries) 

**Social topic influence**
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin), [spam](/topic/spam) #787, [money](/topic/money), [utxo](/topic/utxo), [safely](/topic/safely) #1104, [transaction](/topic/transaction) #204, [all the](/topic/all-the), [represent](/topic/represent) #689, [sats](/topic/sats), [dentacoin](/topic/dentacoin)

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@adam3us](/creator/undefined) [@wsbitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinbombadil](/creator/undefined) [@grok](/creator/undefined) [@giacomozucco](/creator/undefined) [@catotheelder17](/creator/undefined) [@lukedashjr](/creator/undefined) [@grassfedbitcoin](/creator/undefined) [@majorianbtc](/creator/undefined) [@satflation](/creator/undefined) [@nickszabo4](/creator/undefined) [@dathonohm](/creator/undefined) [@calibratedlies](/creator/undefined) [@barackomaba](/creator/undefined) [@davidsfreeman](/creator/undefined) [@supertestnet](/creator/undefined) [@4moonsettler](/creator/undefined) [@zndtoshi](/creator/undefined) [@coinjoined](/creator/undefined) [@stephanlivera](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [Cantor Equity Partners, Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (CEP)](/topic/$xxi) [Microsoft Corp. (MSFT)](/topic/microsoft)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"It's possible to change how small old dust UTXOs are spent without confiscating them simply by requiring the spender to send enough information to reconstruct the transaction ID and a spv Merkle proof of inclusion. different validation mechanism. allows most nodes to prune XX% of the UTXO set safely"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998568180088963556)  2025-12-10T01:39Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"my favorite shitcoin was always dentacoin. peak shitcoinery"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1996333832233267398)  2025-12-03T21:40Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@grok @SmallGov4All @middle_class_us "consumer prices" is a dumb and useless metric. you don't build wealth and a family on canned soup. you need a house and education and healthcare. all of which scales with gold and M2. not canned soup"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1997873760310091837)  2025-12-08T03:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"I don't think we had a bull market yet"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1997894254883225872)  2025-12-08T05:01Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@w_s_bitcoin You have to admit it's massively more effective than the other one"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998064086551286256)  2025-12-08T16:16Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"I've given up on Bitcoin because of JPEGs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998087918045552730)  2025-12-08T17:50Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@AlbusBaggs @evoskuil if fees are so low that means Bitcoin isn't being used And if Bitcoin isn't being used that's the main problem"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998404609648341084)  2025-12-09T14:49Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@AlbusBaggs @evoskuil widespread. real l2 solutions would drive up fees Bitcoin l2 right now is basically only lightning everything else is custodial"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998411485215916209)  2025-12-09T15:16Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@taodejing2 @brian_armstrong will never do this"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998434696661975263)  2025-12-09T16:48Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"could you imagine trying to ban colored coins the whole premise of banning these protocols is fundamentally broken. also spammers didn't "figure out how" in 2023. they chose that time as a. opportunity the main reason spam exists today is that fees are too low fees are low because adoption as money is sov is low and there are many custodial l2s that capture fees and prevent network collection of fees quality l2 is key to high fees and sustainable network high fees are good for bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998032115192172810)  2025-12-08T14:09Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"There is a degenerate construction where: The channel is funded unilaterally by A with exactly one UTXO that contains the inscription. The channel never receives or sends any HTLCs. A non-cooperative close occurs that forces a simple spend keyed exactly to A. No fees cause displacement of ordinal-indexed sats. In that particular pointless channel the inscription would just sit there and come back out to the same owner"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998088892311114131)  2025-12-08T17:54Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"the spender should include a self-contained resurrection annex containing the original output data the transaction preimage needed to recompute its txid and a Merkle inclusion proof showing that transaction existed in the block header at the given height. validation then requires no disk access node simply recomputes the txid verifies the Merkle branch against the already-cached block header checks the output fields and then performs normal script validation. all heavy data comes from the spender"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998497022513655898)  2025-12-09T20:56Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"the spender should include a self-contained resurrection annex containing the original output data the transaction preimage needed to recompute its txid and a Merkle inclusion proof showing that transaction existed in the block header at the given height. validation then requires no disk access. prevents ddos attacks. burden is on spender not nodes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998497370322199023)  2025-12-09T20:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"To make expired-UTXO spends safe in the mempool the spend must include all data needed for validation so the node never looks up anything on disk - original outputs value and script enough of the original transaction to recompute its txid - full Merkle proof committing that txid to a specific historical block header - mempool policy already treats every transaction as untrusted and nodes perform this verification exactly once per txid (repeats are dropped) an attacker cannot force repeated disk seeks or repeated lookups of historical block - validation is bounded CPU hashing plus header"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998500823127756905)  2025-12-09T21:11Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@snapolino @1440000bytes it never looks it up. it always just relies on the merkle-proof that has all the info it needs (in-memory block header chain) in active ram spender includes everything else needed to validate the expired output"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998503054950412649)  2025-12-09T21:20Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"once an output ages out the full burden shifts to the party who created it. nodes no longer carry the spammers state forever; they only keep a tiny stub. if the spammer wants to move that UTXO later they have to re-present the entire payload plus a merkle proof in every spend. that makes spam *expensive in perpetuity* without confiscation of any kind. pinging @LukeDashjr @mattkratter @dathon_ohm @lukedewolf"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998504289497674001)  2025-12-09T21:25Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@NYSE @jackmallers @twentyone $XXI fully diluted market cap is $10.65/share. Until they prove their ability to raise at rates lower than M2 inflation (6%) then there's no good reason to value them more than that"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998534361554231704)  2025-12-09T23:24Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@Pledditor what do you think of the non-confiscatory expiration of dust utxo's by requiring tx detail and merkle-inclusion proof to spend once they're unmoved very old and very small. basically. shifting burden of spam storage onto the spammers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998535127299920158)  2025-12-09T23:27Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@graveskies @barackomaba @Kplos190105 @brian_trollz cat is bad in every possible way. dust spend by spv is less bad. it isn't easily evaded can safely be permanent isn't specific to inscriptions and is doesn't confiscate anything. it just makes bitcoin impractical for storage"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998633259081912666)  2025-12-10T05:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@BitcoinIsaiah "decent" doesn't cut it. cost of a XX% attack now . is 40-60 billion. that's cheap for a trillion dollar asset. how hard would it be to acquire that hashpower even in secret various colos various pools. maybe XX% overhead to keep it quiet. leverage short rug. profit"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1999186707053445177)  2025-12-11T18:37Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"chatgpt right now"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1999188358199935268)  2025-12-11T18:43Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@Kplos190105 @graveskies @barackomaba @brian_trollz spam was used to prove that point scalability was a concern many of the current arguments against spam are similar look at the threads "crowding out financial transactions" is a common argument"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998401948425314534)  2025-12-09T14:38Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@AlbusBaggs @rot13maxi it doesn't harm bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998412393349800302)  2025-12-09T15:20Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@zippy24816 @rot13maxi all Bitcoin opcodes should be decided based on morality and biblical law not just protocol"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998412602335166932)  2025-12-09T15:21Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"all bitcoin opcodes parameters should be decided based on morality and biblical law not just protocol"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998412863610949641)  2025-12-09T15:22Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@btcplusplus @joshdoman_ technically you can use BitVM to emulate any covenant. no way to rug but coordinators can delay"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998426013064437824)  2025-12-09T16:14Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"this i the first solution i've seen to the utxo bloat problem that makes sense. XX% of the problem magically goes away with one soft-fork. we could probably cut the segwit discount in half too (a lot of the rationale erodes after this ships)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998495635935527041)  2025-12-09T20:51Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@MblingBrdFrk @barackomaba @Kplos190105 @brian_trollz It is possible to change the spending condition for dust to an SPD proof that includes All of the original transaction information so that nodes no longer have to store them in the UTXO set"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998609095683879221)  2025-12-10T04:21Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@ClioBitcoinBank @callebtc It depends a lot on how much money you have I mean if you're sitting on like $3000 in Bitcoin there's a good chance that nobody would even bother trying to steal from you because the legal risk is higher than the reward"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998780060224848315)  2025-12-10T15:41Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@knutsvanholm The same people who make it illegal to take my password and break into my bank account and move my money from my bank account same kind of law. . definitely worse than JPEGs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998798856096743492)  2025-12-10T16:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@citizen_8675309 @YassinMol @PeterSchiff @cz_binance Bitcoin isn't the same"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998821354163024056)  2025-12-10T18:25Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"who knew "bitcoin maintainer" was similar to "senator" i knew it would eventually go this way"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998880460152426645)  2025-12-10T22:20Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@nabubito @adam3us @Cipherhoodlum @nvk nice but personally i would consider limiting the UTX only spending restriction to UTXO's of a certain size or less (0.01 BTC for example)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998924247193014435)  2025-12-11T01:14Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"@rektsorekt @arejula27 @1440000bytes nah it confiscated $20mil in SATs and does nothing to stop spam but it will stop everyone from using Bitcoin as money"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998941177618510144)  2025-12-11T02:21Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"the spender should include a self-contained resurrection annex containing the original output data the transaction preimage needed to recompute its txid and a Merkle inclusion proof showing that transaction existed in the block header at the given height. validation then requires no disk access. prevents ddos attacks. burden is on spender not nodes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998497179586253307)  2025-12-09T20:57Z XXX followers, XXX engagements


"@samensign43 @_DavidSFreeman @adam3us confiscation of sats. of any kind let alone XX million dollars worth is wildly more damaging then all the committee-designated-spam currently on chain if that's not obvious to you then you have no idea what bitcoin is"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1998852928988434844)  2025-12-10T20:30Z XXX followers, XX engagements


"Supremacy comes in all kinds. White supremacy in rural America. Black supremacy in south Africa Religious supremacy in a small town where one faith controls schools and zoning boards. You don't need different rules for different supremacist identities. You only need to ask: how much power do they have in this situation and how much hostility do they represent"  
[X Link](https://x.com/simulx4/status/1999191726788067520)  2025-12-11T18:57Z XXX followers, XXX engagements