[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

# ![@petereharrell Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::143154448.png) @petereharrell Peter Harrell

Peter Harrell posts on X about costco, tariffs, unpack, shell the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.

### Engagements: XX [#](/creator/twitter::143154448/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::143154448/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- X Week XXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX +38%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX +384%

### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::143154448/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::143154448/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- X Week X no change
- X Month XX -XX%
- X Months XX +58%
- X Year XXX +93%

### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::143154448/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::143154448/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- X Week XXXXX +0.26%
- X Month XXXXX +0.75%
- X Months XXXXX +38%
- X Year XXXXX +241%

### CreatorRank: undefined [#](/creator/twitter::143154448/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::143154448/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[stocks](/list/stocks)  [finance](/list/finance) 

**Social topic influence**
[costco](/topic/costco) #1024, [tariffs](/topic/tariffs) #1340, [unpack](/topic/unpack) #107, [shell](/topic/shell), [number of](/topic/number-of), [what is](/topic/what-is), [the latest](/topic/the-latest)

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@bradsetser](/creator/undefined) [@commercegov](/creator/undefined) [@carnegieendow](/creator/undefined) [@bisgov](/creator/undefined) [@melovelymax](/creator/undefined) [@piie](/creator/undefined) [@jasonfurman](/creator/undefined) [@lawfare](/creator/undefined) [@thestalwart](/creator/undefined) [@tracyalloway](/creator/undefined) [@thierrybreton](/creator/undefined) [@gabewildau](/creator/undefined) [@cletewillems](/creator/undefined) [@zephyrteachout](/creator/undefined) [@statedept](/creator/undefined) [@mcfaul](/creator/undefined) [@adamtooze](/creator/undefined) [@michaelstumo](/creator/undefined) [@gideonrachman](/creator/undefined) [@fletcherrussia](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)](/topic/costco)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Unlike private lawsuits where parties usually pay their own attorneys fees federal law provides that plaintiffs suing the government can often win attorneys fees unless the government can show that its actions were "substantially justified.""  
[X Link](https://x.com/petereharrell/status/1995859553322471502)  2025-12-02T14:16Z 6466 followers, XXX engagements


"The plaintiffs suing over IEEPA tariffs--including the growing number of companies like Costco and EssilorLuxottica that recently sued for refunds--generally seek attorneys fees as well as refunds. The more lawsuits we see the more taxpayers may have to shell out"  
[X Link](https://x.com/petereharrell/status/1995860957583802717)  2025-12-02T14:21Z 6466 followers, XXX engagements


"Costco yesterday became the latest company to sue the government for an IEEPA tariff refund if SCOTUS rules that IEEPA tariffs are illegal. Let's unpack what is happening: X. Costco joins Revlon EssilorLuxottica (Ray Ban etc.) Kawasaki Bumble Bee Yokohama Tire and others suing in the Court of International Trade (CIT) demanding refunds and injunctions against the government collecting IEEPA tariffs from the plaintiffs. X. In principle a company forced to pay unlawful tariffs SHOULD be able to get its money back just as you should get a refund if e.g. the IRS illegally seized XX% of your"  
[X Link](https://x.com/petereharrell/status/1995855302386696382)  2025-12-02T13:59Z 6464 followers, 6661 engagements


"Today in @lawfare Jennifer Hillman and I unpack several arguments from last month's SCOTUS hearing on IEEPA tariffs. In particular we explain: X. Why the fact that IEEPA clearly authorizes embargoes doesn't mean IEEPA should be read to authorize a tariff as a sort of lesser included measure. (Congress has long delegated embargo powers without authorizing changes to tariff rates). X. What IEEPA "licenses" do and why they don't authorize fees. X. Why calling a tariff a "regulatory" tariff as opposed to a "revenue tariff" doesn't make it legal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/petereharrell/status/1998413621961818316)  2025-12-09T15:25Z 6464 followers, 4759 engagements