[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @murchandamus Murch Murch posts on X about bitcoin, core, native, future the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::819942536919785474/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +74% - X Month XXXXXXX +38% - X Months XXXXXXX +6,595% - X Year XXXXXXX +114% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::819942536919785474/posts_active)  - X Week XX +30% - X Month XXX +79% - X Months XXX +5,986% - X Year XXX +154% ### Followers: XXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::819942536919785474/followers)  - X Week XXXXXX +0.23% - X Month XXXXXX +0.70% - X Months XXXXXX +4% - X Year XXXXXX +3.90% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::819942536919785474/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) #3393 [finance](/list/finance) XXXX% [vc firms](/list/vc-firms) XXXX% [social networks](/list/social-networks) XXXX% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) XXXX% **Social topic influence** [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) #1254, [core](/topic/core) #1430, [native](/topic/native) #267, [future](/topic/future) #2701, [hashrate](/topic/hashrate) 3.45%, [sober](/topic/sober) 1.72%, [social capital](/topic/social-capital) 1.72%, [money](/topic/money) 1.72%, [twitter](/topic/twitter) 1.72%, [sentiment](/topic/sentiment) XXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@adam3us](/creator/undefined) [@dathon_ohm](/creator/undefined) [@lukedewolf](/creator/undefined) [@bitcoinbombadil](/creator/undefined) [@arthur_van_pelt](/creator/undefined) [@malachirevolts](/creator/undefined) [@peetxbt](/creator/undefined) [@coincontroversy](/creator/undefined) [@giacomozucco](/creator/undefined) [@dathonohm](/creator/undefined) [@lukedashjr](/creator/undefined) [@thebluematt](/creator/undefined) [@cbspears](/creator/undefined) [@catotheelder17](/creator/undefined) [@bitmexresearch](/creator/undefined) [@lightcoin](/creator/undefined) [@aaldavem](/creator/undefined) [@arthurvanpelt](/creator/undefined) [@dannystutzman](/creator/undefined) [@orionwl](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@lukedewolf @adam3us @felipecreate Some upgrade hooks such as native segwit outputs with higher versions are standard and unencumbered. I.e. you can write anything you want into native segwit outputs with higher versions and it will be relayed and mined" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1994063245141827658) 2025-11-27T15:18Z 21.2K followers, 11.7K engagements "@lukedewolf @adam3us @aaldavem @TheBlueMatt @cbspears That said Id rather explain this sober truth than peddle ineffective and detrimental miracle cures designed to divide Bitcoiners" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1997068417153880536) 2025-12-05T22:19Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements "@lukedewolf @adam3us @aaldavem @TheBlueMatt @cbspears But I do still hold that I believe increasing the limit was a mistake From a social capital perspective absolutely. What a flaming waste of time. From a technical perspective still convinced its correct" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1997068796859908271) 2025-12-05T22:21Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements "According to Dathon one of these choices would get zero honest votes. X. Bitcoin is money not data storage X. I support activation of BIP-110: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork due to the authors stated motivation" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1996982097547084252) 2025-12-05T16:36Z 21.2K followers, 26.4K engagements "@ostrom72158 The UTXO set is not stored in memory. Its stored on disk. Some of it is cached from blocks we processed recently" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1998615639351861404) 2025-12-10T04:47Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements "I was very wrong recently. I thought that Bitcoin Core would accept unencumbered native segwit outputs of any length in standard txs. Researching witness programs I realized that Bitcoin Core only accepts up to XX B for future version witness programs as standard. My apologies" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1998772641411510714) 2025-12-10T15:11Z 21.2K followers, 5030 engagements "@lukedewolf @adam3us @felipecreate Note that I was wrong here: Bitcoin Core will only accept witness programs of up to XX B in standard transactions" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1998779632812769490) 2025-12-10T15:39Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements "@MalachiRevolts @RoninMiner @WendellMoone @CoinControversy @adam3us @LukeDashjr @lukedewolf @dathon_ohm @giacomozucco @Arthur_van_Pelt @PeetXBT @danny_stutzman @BitMEXResearch @orionwl_ I still dont think that polls like this one are particularly useful. a) Twitter is not representative of Bitcoin b) polls get very uneven distribution c) sentiment doesnt supersede technical arguments" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1998789074774335923) 2025-12-10T16:17Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements "There is a more concise term for activating a soft fork with minority of hashrate and network support. Its usually referred to as forking off or creating an altcoin" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1996642955323674664) 2025-12-04T18:09Z 21.2K followers, 15.5K engagements "@dathon_ohm @phzix @A86664949 If the softfork fails to getting meaningful adoption and Bitcoin continues on just fine will you commit to finally learning how Bitcoin works and to stop relying on circular reasoning like here" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1997011139864174952) 2025-12-05T18:32Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements "@lukedewolf @adam3us @aaldavem @TheBlueMatt @cbspears I hope Core works to engage more with the users of Bitcoin who have chosen to run Knots. Im of two minds here. Were still gonna build the software that we think is best for Bitcoin including monetary maximalists" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1997069310007955906) 2025-12-05T22:23Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements "@lukedewolf @adam3us @aaldavem @TheBlueMatt @cbspears Were right here where they left us. But tbh Im increasing warming up to Satoshis approach to Larimer regarding the Ill never run Core again Coretard Knots fans" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1997092669785559354) 2025-12-05T23:56Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements "@PakoVM If that had been added it would have won overall. ;)" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1997313047896240620) 2025-12-06T14:31Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements "@lukedewolf @giacomozucco @LukeDashjr @Arthur_van_Pelt @PeetXBT @CoinControversy @danny_stutzman @adam3us @BitMEXResearch @orionwl_ Historically there have been instances of miners fake signaling readiness for activation. Were the same to happen here it would be quite possible that the proposal activates by signal while only a minority of the hashrate is enforcing at such a small margin" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1997349183054107078) 2025-12-06T16:55Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements "@BitcoinBombadil @PeetXBT @BitcoinMania___ @giacomozucco @Dig_A_Hash_Kid @adam3us @LukeDashjr @Arthur_van_Pelt @CoinControversy @danny_stutzman @BitMEXResearch @orionwl_ Hi @BitcoinBombadil I incorrectly stated somewhere in this conversation that Bitcoin Core would accept future-version native segwit outputs of any length. I was wrong. Bitcoin Core will only accept witness programs of up to XX B in standard transactions" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1998779272345841975) 2025-12-10T15:38Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements "Two new BIP numbers were assigned. BIP 89: Chain Code Delegation for Private Collaborative Custody BIP 110: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1996343310894645754) 2025-12-03T22:18Z 21.2K followers, 19.7K engagements "@ostrom72158" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1998242394450567675) 2025-12-09T04:04Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements "@lukedewolf Thanks for the grace. Im rather embarrassed about being confidently wrong about that" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1998774234487935346) 2025-12-10T15:18Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements "@adam3us @lukedewolf Yes my point is that longer output scripts wouldnt be relayed by Bitcoin Core even if they would be consensus valid" [X Link](https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1998796666988802240) 2025-12-10T16:47Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@murchandamus MurchMurch posts on X about bitcoin, core, native, future the most. They currently have XXXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies #3393 finance XXXX% vc firms XXXX% social networks XXXX% technology brands XXXX%
Social topic influence bitcoin #1254, core #1430, native #267, future #2701, hashrate 3.45%, sober 1.72%, social capital 1.72%, money 1.72%, twitter 1.72%, sentiment XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @adam3us @dathon_ohm @lukedewolf @bitcoinbombadil @arthur_van_pelt @malachirevolts @peetxbt @coincontroversy @giacomozucco @dathonohm @lukedashjr @thebluematt @cbspears @catotheelder17 @bitmexresearch @lightcoin @aaldavem @arthurvanpelt @dannystutzman @orionwl
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@lukedewolf @adam3us @felipecreate Some upgrade hooks such as native segwit outputs with higher versions are standard and unencumbered. I.e. you can write anything you want into native segwit outputs with higher versions and it will be relayed and mined"
X Link 2025-11-27T15:18Z 21.2K followers, 11.7K engagements
"@lukedewolf @adam3us @aaldavem @TheBlueMatt @cbspears That said Id rather explain this sober truth than peddle ineffective and detrimental miracle cures designed to divide Bitcoiners"
X Link 2025-12-05T22:19Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
"@lukedewolf @adam3us @aaldavem @TheBlueMatt @cbspears But I do still hold that I believe increasing the limit was a mistake From a social capital perspective absolutely. What a flaming waste of time. From a technical perspective still convinced its correct"
X Link 2025-12-05T22:21Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
"According to Dathon one of these choices would get zero honest votes. X. Bitcoin is money not data storage X. I support activation of BIP-110: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork due to the authors stated motivation"
X Link 2025-12-05T16:36Z 21.2K followers, 26.4K engagements
"@ostrom72158 The UTXO set is not stored in memory. Its stored on disk. Some of it is cached from blocks we processed recently"
X Link 2025-12-10T04:47Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
"I was very wrong recently. I thought that Bitcoin Core would accept unencumbered native segwit outputs of any length in standard txs. Researching witness programs I realized that Bitcoin Core only accepts up to XX B for future version witness programs as standard. My apologies"
X Link 2025-12-10T15:11Z 21.2K followers, 5030 engagements
"@lukedewolf @adam3us @felipecreate Note that I was wrong here: Bitcoin Core will only accept witness programs of up to XX B in standard transactions"
X Link 2025-12-10T15:39Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
"@MalachiRevolts @RoninMiner @WendellMoone @CoinControversy @adam3us @LukeDashjr @lukedewolf @dathon_ohm @giacomozucco @Arthur_van_Pelt @PeetXBT @danny_stutzman @BitMEXResearch @orionwl_ I still dont think that polls like this one are particularly useful. a) Twitter is not representative of Bitcoin b) polls get very uneven distribution c) sentiment doesnt supersede technical arguments"
X Link 2025-12-10T16:17Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements
"There is a more concise term for activating a soft fork with minority of hashrate and network support. Its usually referred to as forking off or creating an altcoin"
X Link 2025-12-04T18:09Z 21.2K followers, 15.5K engagements
"@dathon_ohm @phzix @A86664949 If the softfork fails to getting meaningful adoption and Bitcoin continues on just fine will you commit to finally learning how Bitcoin works and to stop relying on circular reasoning like here"
X Link 2025-12-05T18:32Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements
"@lukedewolf @adam3us @aaldavem @TheBlueMatt @cbspears I hope Core works to engage more with the users of Bitcoin who have chosen to run Knots. Im of two minds here. Were still gonna build the software that we think is best for Bitcoin including monetary maximalists"
X Link 2025-12-05T22:23Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
"@lukedewolf @adam3us @aaldavem @TheBlueMatt @cbspears Were right here where they left us. But tbh Im increasing warming up to Satoshis approach to Larimer regarding the Ill never run Core again Coretard Knots fans"
X Link 2025-12-05T23:56Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements
"@PakoVM If that had been added it would have won overall. ;)"
X Link 2025-12-06T14:31Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
"@lukedewolf @giacomozucco @LukeDashjr @Arthur_van_Pelt @PeetXBT @CoinControversy @danny_stutzman @adam3us @BitMEXResearch @orionwl_ Historically there have been instances of miners fake signaling readiness for activation. Were the same to happen here it would be quite possible that the proposal activates by signal while only a minority of the hashrate is enforcing at such a small margin"
X Link 2025-12-06T16:55Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements
"@BitcoinBombadil @PeetXBT @BitcoinMania___ @giacomozucco @Dig_A_Hash_Kid @adam3us @LukeDashjr @Arthur_van_Pelt @CoinControversy @danny_stutzman @BitMEXResearch @orionwl_ Hi @BitcoinBombadil I incorrectly stated somewhere in this conversation that Bitcoin Core would accept future-version native segwit outputs of any length. I was wrong. Bitcoin Core will only accept witness programs of up to XX B in standard transactions"
X Link 2025-12-10T15:38Z 21.2K followers, XX engagements
"Two new BIP numbers were assigned. BIP 89: Chain Code Delegation for Private Collaborative Custody BIP 110: Reduced Data Temporary Softfork"
X Link 2025-12-03T22:18Z 21.2K followers, 19.7K engagements
"@ostrom72158"
X Link 2025-12-09T04:04Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
"@lukedewolf Thanks for the grace. Im rather embarrassed about being confidently wrong about that"
X Link 2025-12-10T15:18Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
"@adam3us @lukedewolf Yes my point is that longer output scripts wouldnt be relayed by Bitcoin Core even if they would be consensus valid"
X Link 2025-12-10T16:47Z 21.2K followers, XXX engagements
/creator/twitter::murchandamus