[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @mihaieremia Mihai | XOXNO.com 🔥🛠️ Mihai | XOXNO.com 🔥🛠️ posts on X about $egld, shards, stablecoins, trust the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 1302 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::916671212612411394/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX +25% - X Month XXXXXX -XX% - X Months XXXXXXXXX +51% - X Year XXXXXXXXX -XXXX% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::916671212612411394/posts_active)  - X Week XX -XX% - X Month XX -XX% - X Months XXX +105% - X Year XXX +117% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::916671212612411394/followers)  - X Week XXXXX -XXXX% - X Month XXXXX -XXXX% - X Months XXXXX -XX% - X Year XXXXX +26% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::916671212612411394/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [finance](/list/finance) [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) **Social topic influence** [$egld](/topic/$egld) #33, [shards](/topic/shards), [stablecoins](/topic/stablecoins) #1171, [trust](/topic/trust), [$near](/topic/$near), [fud](/topic/fud), [dove](/topic/dove), [usdc](/topic/usdc), [debt](/topic/debt), [staking](/topic/staking) **Top assets mentioned** [MultiversX (EGLD)](/topic/$egld) [Near Protocol (NEAR)](/topic/$near) [USDC (USDC)](/topic/usdc) [xMoney (UTK)](/topic/xmoney) [Solana (SOL)](/topic/solana) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "@drCrutch69 @HatomProtocol @XoxnoNetwork @MultiversX Define how XOXNO is a scam before I can trust you :))" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1997413998611054874) 2025-12-06T21:13Z 5371 followers, XXX engagements "There is no need to fix anything. Both can stay exactly the same since nobody cares;that's not what's making any difference to the $EGLD or $NEAR price. It just shows again that you focus on unimportant things to FUD stablecoin news over something that wasn't even the highlight. You dove deep into a legal document covering many aspects and hand-picked the most absurd detail to "report." You could take a screenshot from CoinMarketCap and say the same thing any day of the year with the same viewpoint. It just shows what type of person you are :P" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998125754962608582) 2025-12-08T20:21Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements "We are aware that that some competitors forcefully redeemed people $EGLD. We are aware of that competitors are self updating their private pools minting USH with HTM then selling USH for USDC to repay long standing debt against HTM while dumping on their holders. We are aware that X% minting fees means you lose all your staking rewards that is around X% today. We are aware that there is no transparency in the platform of who did what pr better say activity per wallet (years later millions dumped and no activities) Karma is real you bunch of scammers @As_Hatom If you are a hard code believer" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1997216470775091670) 2025-12-06T08:08Z 5368 followers, 7258 engagements "Impressive enough to prove why sharding is the endgame. If my math is correct from the public Grafana dashboard with XX shards and a peak of 1037495 TPS thats 14821 TPS per shard. Using the average of 874184 TPS its 12488 TPS per shard. A few days ago I sent 1M transactions to a single shard on our MultiversX public devnet (it crashed likely because the 2-CPU servers died during my unannounced stress test; with proper servers it would have been fine). Recently on mainnet I also filled a block with 15k transactions once we drop to 1s block times thats directly 15k TPS per shard and with 70" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998082225783665139) 2025-12-08T17:28Z 5368 followers, 5935 engagements "@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com You're such a hater that you took the time to retweet that post even though the guy posted it on many L1s too. Where were your retweets for the others Oh wait you're not a hater of everything; just curiously interested in what's happening on MvX :P" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998119599905312915) 2025-12-08T19:56Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements "The price of MvX is irrelevant to me. I'll be fine at $X or $XXX :)) MvX has plenty of issues nobody's denying that. I even posted here that it's not activated with a screenshot clearly showing FALSE. I just proved you're a hater: you claim you're not interested yet you're obsessed with exposing "lies" while ignoring your own L1's identical "lies" ironically the same thing: dynamic/adaptive sharding. Probably both just rephrased it in 2018-2019 to avoid copying each other terms. Move on go dig for more "lies" in the whitepaper of a stablecoin and drop them here. Nobody will care about you" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998135759753416733) 2025-12-08T21:01Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements "Whenever @XoxnoNetwork takes over @xExchangeApp @LataretuClaudiu told me he will replace $MEX with $XOXNO and finally make the $MEX to $X a reality 🥹" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1985014208296358307) 2025-11-02T16:00Z 5372 followers, 2891 engagements "Not mad I couldn't care less about you as a person since you mean nothing to me :) But seeing you as a hypocrite makes me laugh and gives me the urge to mock you here in front of everyone proving how you claim to be uninterested while deeply following and replying to everything that carries a negative connotation for MvX :) We love haters just make it official not pretend something else" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998121802384781412) 2025-12-08T20:05Z 5369 followers, XXX engagements "Super cool to see that all our $EGLD suppliers on @XoxnoNetwork over the past XX days got XXXX% APY. You get a bit over half of the best on-chain APY of staked $EGLD while you can withdraw the deposited $EGLD at any time as well as borrow against it or swap it inside our protocol" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1986183687197892678) 2025-11-05T21:27Z 5370 followers, 2977 engagements "When Aster on MvX" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1996553535308337604) 2025-12-04T12:13Z 5369 followers, 1293 engagements "@proof_cm There are few cool dApps on Near too but still no insignificant user base neither just more liquidity as I mentioned since bigger fundraiser there Sadly MvX and NEAR had to be both equally way better but crime season was more powerful than fundamentals" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998091311677857939) 2025-12-08T18:04Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @proof_cm As dead as MVX :) With that market cap it's even more amplified. No idea where else to check dApps traffic since I could not find anything on the explorer" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998096957441757637) 2025-12-08T18:26Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements "Let's agree that NEAR Intents is a bridge/relayer interface not something people care about running on NEAR itself. Intent users are not sticky to the NEAR ecosystem (sadly for NEAR). It's like deploying a contract on MvX where every transaction attests a login on my Web2 platform with 100M daily users. In theory that creates 100M transactions on MvX but there aren't 100M people using the MvX ecosystemit's just me the developer leveraging MvX as infrastructure. The same happens with NEAR Intents: everyone uses NEAR smart contracts that prove transfers but anyone could replicate the same" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998100418426286467) 2025-12-08T18:40Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements "Nice I asked because I also tested @MultiversX and hit around the same TPS per shard but since I tested on the public network I couldnt create more than the current hardcoded shards :( Anyway congrats it proves that both NEAR and MvX (which I consider the only well-designed sharded networks with only small differences between them) could support such demands from stablecoins and AI agents in the future" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998103046358999116) 2025-12-08T18:51Z 5369 followers, XXX engagements "The only NEAR-native thing in your text is the v1.signer contract; everything else is off-chain services that any L1 could fork from NEAR's GitHub. Clone the v1.signer contract on any L1 and you can run the same flow (most probably easier on MvX than on EVM since they are very similar as contract flows and sharding/callbacks) :) Again nobody takes credit away from NEAR for building it (I didn't even mention it's not running on NEAR :P) but as my initial tweet said: people using that whole NEAR stack are not using NEAR as users (which I even mention is sad since would have been better overall" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998109801797357578) 2025-12-08T19:17Z 5370 followers, XX engagements "Only a hater would read all that WP and comment on this aspect without any positive remark about the only L1 with its own investment in the next wave of regulated stablecoins in the EU =))) In fact the network config always had a flag to enable adaptivity but guess what: theres no need for it since shards are empty with plenty of capacity. Supernova will bring even more and before that we can add shards via a small config upgrade as we did in the past (basically what NEAR has to do as well to enable more shards when needed such as last time it added shards :P). Get a life sir. the only" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998112508029411757) 2025-12-08T19:28Z 5369 followers, XXX engagements "You are so interested that you go as a little hater to each post to tell them how wrong it is :) Stop pretending you are not a hater check your account of replies and retweets and you will see yourself :P Let them "lie" if you don't care :P" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998118605360447534) 2025-12-08T19:52Z 5369 followers, XX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @proof_cm Dude I am smart (I think) for a reason. Take the L and go do something else with your life" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998121138057306501) 2025-12-08T20:02Z 5373 followers, XX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com Maybe then NEAR should also change its dynamic sharding since it's not live either and it requires a mainnet upgrade to add shards (same as MvX does today) :) - almost similar things Again nobody is mad just proving how hypocritical you are :P" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998124101253398954) 2025-12-08T20:14Z 5369 followers, XXX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com Then go complain to Solana about everything they lied about. :) I'll watch from the sidelines enjoying my drink :P" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998131203904512174) 2025-12-08T20:42Z 5369 followers, XX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com You need to learn to be multitasking since I replied to you I already finished drinking my matcha enjoy Burj light show arrived home and even started coding 😅😂 Stop wasting your time like that 🤪" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998137706749247813) 2025-12-08T21:08Z 5369 followers, XX engagements "@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com I stopped playing video games when I started coding. The only games I play now are real sports :) Crypto is enough of a game in itself" [X Link](https://x.com/mihaieremia/status/1998143309580288349) 2025-12-08T21:31Z 5370 followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@mihaieremia Mihai | XOXNO.com 🔥🛠️
Mihai | XOXNO.com 🔥🛠️ posts on X about $egld, shards, stablecoins, trust the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 1302 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXXX +25%
- X Month XXXXXX -XX%
- X Months XXXXXXXXX +51%
- X Year XXXXXXXXX -XXXX%
Mentions: XX #
- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XX -XX%
- X Months XXX +105%
- X Year XXX +117%
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX -XXXX%
- X Month XXXXX -XXXX%
- X Months XXXXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXX +26%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence
Social category influence finance cryptocurrencies
Social topic influence $egld #33, shards, stablecoins #1171, trust, $near, fud, dove, usdc, debt, staking
Top assets mentioned MultiversX (EGLD) Near Protocol (NEAR) USDC (USDC) xMoney (UTK) Solana (SOL)
Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@drCrutch69 @HatomProtocol @XoxnoNetwork @MultiversX Define how XOXNO is a scam before I can trust you :))"
X Link 2025-12-06T21:13Z 5371 followers, XXX engagements
"There is no need to fix anything. Both can stay exactly the same since nobody cares;that's not what's making any difference to the $EGLD or $NEAR price. It just shows again that you focus on unimportant things to FUD stablecoin news over something that wasn't even the highlight. You dove deep into a legal document covering many aspects and hand-picked the most absurd detail to "report." You could take a screenshot from CoinMarketCap and say the same thing any day of the year with the same viewpoint. It just shows what type of person you are :P"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:21Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements
"We are aware that that some competitors forcefully redeemed people $EGLD. We are aware of that competitors are self updating their private pools minting USH with HTM then selling USH for USDC to repay long standing debt against HTM while dumping on their holders. We are aware that X% minting fees means you lose all your staking rewards that is around X% today. We are aware that there is no transparency in the platform of who did what pr better say activity per wallet (years later millions dumped and no activities) Karma is real you bunch of scammers @As_Hatom If you are a hard code believer"
X Link 2025-12-06T08:08Z 5368 followers, 7258 engagements
"Impressive enough to prove why sharding is the endgame. If my math is correct from the public Grafana dashboard with XX shards and a peak of 1037495 TPS thats 14821 TPS per shard. Using the average of 874184 TPS its 12488 TPS per shard. A few days ago I sent 1M transactions to a single shard on our MultiversX public devnet (it crashed likely because the 2-CPU servers died during my unannounced stress test; with proper servers it would have been fine). Recently on mainnet I also filled a block with 15k transactions once we drop to 1s block times thats directly 15k TPS per shard and with 70"
X Link 2025-12-08T17:28Z 5368 followers, 5935 engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com You're such a hater that you took the time to retweet that post even though the guy posted it on many L1s too. Where were your retweets for the others Oh wait you're not a hater of everything; just curiously interested in what's happening on MvX :P"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:56Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements
"The price of MvX is irrelevant to me. I'll be fine at $X or $XXX :)) MvX has plenty of issues nobody's denying that. I even posted here that it's not activated with a screenshot clearly showing FALSE. I just proved you're a hater: you claim you're not interested yet you're obsessed with exposing "lies" while ignoring your own L1's identical "lies" ironically the same thing: dynamic/adaptive sharding. Probably both just rephrased it in 2018-2019 to avoid copying each other terms. Move on go dig for more "lies" in the whitepaper of a stablecoin and drop them here. Nobody will care about you"
X Link 2025-12-08T21:01Z 5368 followers, XXX engagements
"Whenever @XoxnoNetwork takes over @xExchangeApp @LataretuClaudiu told me he will replace $MEX with $XOXNO and finally make the $MEX to $X a reality 🥹"
X Link 2025-11-02T16:00Z 5372 followers, 2891 engagements
"Not mad I couldn't care less about you as a person since you mean nothing to me :) But seeing you as a hypocrite makes me laugh and gives me the urge to mock you here in front of everyone proving how you claim to be uninterested while deeply following and replying to everything that carries a negative connotation for MvX :) We love haters just make it official not pretend something else"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:05Z 5369 followers, XXX engagements
"Super cool to see that all our $EGLD suppliers on @XoxnoNetwork over the past XX days got XXXX% APY. You get a bit over half of the best on-chain APY of staked $EGLD while you can withdraw the deposited $EGLD at any time as well as borrow against it or swap it inside our protocol"
X Link 2025-11-05T21:27Z 5370 followers, 2977 engagements
"When Aster on MvX"
X Link 2025-12-04T12:13Z 5369 followers, 1293 engagements
"@proof_cm There are few cool dApps on Near too but still no insignificant user base neither just more liquidity as I mentioned since bigger fundraiser there Sadly MvX and NEAR had to be both equally way better but crime season was more powerful than fundamentals"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:04Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @proof_cm As dead as MVX :) With that market cap it's even more amplified. No idea where else to check dApps traffic since I could not find anything on the explorer"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:26Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements
"Let's agree that NEAR Intents is a bridge/relayer interface not something people care about running on NEAR itself. Intent users are not sticky to the NEAR ecosystem (sadly for NEAR). It's like deploying a contract on MvX where every transaction attests a login on my Web2 platform with 100M daily users. In theory that creates 100M transactions on MvX but there aren't 100M people using the MvX ecosystemit's just me the developer leveraging MvX as infrastructure. The same happens with NEAR Intents: everyone uses NEAR smart contracts that prove transfers but anyone could replicate the same"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:40Z 5370 followers, XXX engagements
"Nice I asked because I also tested @MultiversX and hit around the same TPS per shard but since I tested on the public network I couldnt create more than the current hardcoded shards :( Anyway congrats it proves that both NEAR and MvX (which I consider the only well-designed sharded networks with only small differences between them) could support such demands from stablecoins and AI agents in the future"
X Link 2025-12-08T18:51Z 5369 followers, XXX engagements
"The only NEAR-native thing in your text is the v1.signer contract; everything else is off-chain services that any L1 could fork from NEAR's GitHub. Clone the v1.signer contract on any L1 and you can run the same flow (most probably easier on MvX than on EVM since they are very similar as contract flows and sharding/callbacks) :) Again nobody takes credit away from NEAR for building it (I didn't even mention it's not running on NEAR :P) but as my initial tweet said: people using that whole NEAR stack are not using NEAR as users (which I even mention is sad since would have been better overall"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:17Z 5370 followers, XX engagements
"Only a hater would read all that WP and comment on this aspect without any positive remark about the only L1 with its own investment in the next wave of regulated stablecoins in the EU =))) In fact the network config always had a flag to enable adaptivity but guess what: theres no need for it since shards are empty with plenty of capacity. Supernova will bring even more and before that we can add shards via a small config upgrade as we did in the past (basically what NEAR has to do as well to enable more shards when needed such as last time it added shards :P). Get a life sir. the only"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:28Z 5369 followers, XXX engagements
"You are so interested that you go as a little hater to each post to tell them how wrong it is :) Stop pretending you are not a hater check your account of replies and retweets and you will see yourself :P Let them "lie" if you don't care :P"
X Link 2025-12-08T19:52Z 5369 followers, XX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @proof_cm Dude I am smart (I think) for a reason. Take the L and go do something else with your life"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:02Z 5373 followers, XX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com Maybe then NEAR should also change its dynamic sharding since it's not live either and it requires a mainnet upgrade to add shards (same as MvX does today) :) - almost similar things Again nobody is mad just proving how hypocritical you are :P"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:14Z 5369 followers, XXX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com Then go complain to Solana about everything they lied about. :) I'll watch from the sidelines enjoying my drink :P"
X Link 2025-12-08T20:42Z 5369 followers, XX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com You need to learn to be multitasking since I replied to you I already finished drinking my matcha enjoy Burj light show arrived home and even started coding 😅😂 Stop wasting your time like that 🤪"
X Link 2025-12-08T21:08Z 5369 followers, XX engagements
"@vinibarbosabr @xMoney_com I stopped playing video games when I started coding. The only games I play now are real sports :) Crypto is enough of a game in itself"
X Link 2025-12-08T21:31Z 5370 followers, XX engagements