[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @kimkep4796 KKep KKep posts on X about $mmat, $mmtlp, $trch, $nbh the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1448954280258510856/interactions)  - X Week XXXXXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXXX +22% - X Months XXXXXXX +154% - X Year XXXXXXX +129% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1448954280258510856/posts_active)  - X Week XX -XX% - X Month XX -XXXX% - X Months XXX +154% - X Year XXX +105% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1448954280258510856/followers)  - X Week XXXXX +1% - X Month XXXXX +2.30% - X Months XXXXX +9.40% - X Year XXXXX +19% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1448954280258510856/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence **Social category influence** [technology brands](/list/technology-brands) XXXX% [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) XXXX% [stocks](/list/stocks) XXXX% [exchanges](/list/exchanges) XXXX% [finance](/list/finance) XXXX% [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations) XXXX% **Social topic influence** [$mmat](/topic/$mmat) #3, [$mmtlp](/topic/$mmtlp) #7, [$trch](/topic/$trch) #1, [$nbh](/topic/$nbh) #2, [lee](/topic/lee) #3324, [ultra](/topic/ultra) 9.52%, [meta](/topic/meta) 9.52%, [$gns](/topic/$gns) 7.14%, [nasdaq](/topic/nasdaq) 4.76%, [what is](/topic/what-is) XXXX% **Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by** [@kshaughnessy2](/creator/undefined) [@finrarobbedme](/creator/undefined) [@palikaras](/creator/undefined) [@hooferik10986](/creator/undefined) [@johnbrda](/creator/undefined) [@nasdaq](/creator/undefined) [@ctv](/creator/undefined) [@bnnbloomberg](/creator/undefined) [@zsaeed](/creator/undefined) [@daviddi49963202](/creator/undefined) [@geeprince2020](/creator/undefined) [@rd_squash](/creator/undefined) [@bradleyjbirnie](/creator/undefined) [@flyeaglesfly529](/creator/undefined) [@seamoore14](/creator/undefined) [@us247365_2](/creator/undefined) [@cdale_dog](/creator/undefined) [@mikeybbacon](/creator/undefined) [@bw793](/creator/undefined) **Top assets mentioned** [Gains Network (GNS)](/topic/$gns) ### Top Social Posts Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH β Update: Kelly v. FINRA Nevada (2:25-cv-01195) No new docket activity yet. Were now waiting on FINRAs response to William Kellys Second Amended Complaint followed by a ruling from the judge. Kellys core argument: FINRAs actions surrounding the MMTLP halt were ultra vires meaning FINRA exceeded its legal authority under the Exchange Act by implementing and enforcing actions not authorized by statute or rule violating limits set by 15A(b)(6) Reg SHO Rule 15c2-11 Rule 17a-4 and 10b-5. This case could define the boundaries of SRO immunity and accountability. More to come once" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1989385449862033556) 2025-11-14T17:30Z 2367 followers, 3662 engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH πΉ META MATERIALS BANKRUPTCY UPDATE As of Nov XX 2025 β U.S. Bankruptcy Case 24-50792 (Meta Materials Inc. Ch.7) filed Aug X 2024 currently before Judge Gary Spraker continues to escalate. On Mar X 2025 subpoenas hit: Anson Funds Virtu Citadel DTCC FINRA NASDAQ Ameritrade Schwab TradeStation. Motions to Quash were filed by: Citadel Virtu Anson heard recently in Nevada FINRA filed in D.C. NASDAQ filed in NYC Hearings recently held re: Traudt + Spears responses pending Additional Proof of Interest filings continue to appear on the docket . FINRA (D.C.) brief schedule" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1989460584207655020) 2025-11-14T22:29Z 2367 followers, 4962 engagements "βKelly v. FINRA: The Judge Decides Soon FINRA IMMUNITY ON THE LINE - What Should Victim Investors Prepare For" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1991472492888895668) 2025-11-20T11:43Z 2367 followers, 2359 engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH βKelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195 (D. Nevada) What is Kelly actually asking for In plain English he wants the court to force FINRA to: πΉ Admit they mishandled MMTLP including the corporate-action notices & the 12/9/22 halt. πΉ Declare that investors rights were violated. πΉ Release & preserve ALL MMTLP records trading data blue sheets internal messages corporate-action files. πΉ Stop altering corporate-action data without oversight & add safeguards before future halts. Bottom line: Kelly wants transparency accountability and a ruling that FINRAs MMTLP actions were" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1991599544102981953) 2025-11-20T20:08Z 2367 followers, 2623 engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1991873252885749867) 2025-11-21T14:16Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH βUPDATE as of 11/22/2025β β KELLY v FINRA (see π§΅ thread below) KELLY responds: Big Picture: Kelly is telling the judge: Im fine with you looking at some of FINRAs documents but you **cant treat disputed spin-off successfully completed language or vague unnamed FINRA rules as if theyre proven facts" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1992277176851284153) 2025-11-22T17:01Z 2367 followers, 6247 engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH @FINRA_Robbed_Me UPDATE: 11/23/2025 βKelly v. FINRA (D. Nev. 2:25-cv-01195) FINRA just filed a SUNDAY proposed order + extension after Kellys latest brief a sign his arguments hit enough pressure points that FINRAs scrambling to control timing and narrative. Judge is engaged case is alive and SRO immunity is officially on the hot seat. π₯βππ§© FINRA filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Time - Reply expected between 11/28/25 - 12/5/25" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1992704804582232417) 2025-11-23T21:20Z 2366 followers, 13.6K engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP $NBH TRAUDT (Nevada Bankruptcy Case) Affidavit in Support of Motion to Disqualify Wes Christian and similar to Motions filed by Danielle Spears. Filed 10/28/2025" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1985377884803153936) 2025-11-03T16:05Z 2366 followers, 14.2K engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP Citadel churn : 5+ senior exits since June (Sterner Kalra Neumann-Regan Finney Seegers). Meanwhile Citadel Securities is moving to quash the trustees subpoenas in the Meta Materials Ch.7 case. Investors deserve sunlight not dodgeball. #MMTLP #Citadel #FINRA #MMAT Sources: Business Insider on Sterner & Kalra; FN London & FNG on HRT hires/Seegers; NV Bankruptcy site + docket updates on Citadels motion to quash. @kshaughnessy2" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1988216136010224009) 2025-11-11T12:04Z 2367 followers, 2743 engagements "$GNS $MMAT $MMTLP Quick search regarding Citadel and Virtu $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$:" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1989473294312247780) 2025-11-14T23:19Z 2367 followers, 2626 engagements "$GNS $MMAT $MMTLP" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1989666623905829000) 2025-11-15T12:07Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements "$MMAT Part of a recent post from George Palikaras @palikaras: π₯π₯π₯How did the Directors & Officers destroy this amazing company after walking the founder out the door Stand by. I think were going to find out: π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1990403101249933769) 2025-11-17T12:54Z 2367 followers, 15K engagements "$MMAT Jack Harding - COB- Meta Materials" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1990408600171270490) 2025-11-17T13:16Z 2367 followers, 2604 engagements "$MMAT $GNS $MMTLP If youre paid to bash a stock heres the law in plain English: A criminal overt act is any step big or small that helps carry out a planned crime. Posting even one false or misleading message is an overt act in a market-manipulation scheme. And no you dont need to know every detail of the conspiracy. If you know youre joining any part of a deceptive effort and you act on it thats enough. Knowing participation + one overt act = criminal exposure. #MarketManipulation #SecuritiesFraud #FINRA #SEC #MMTLP #MMAT #InvestorProtection #RICO #WhiteCollarCrime" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1990899083813531961) 2025-11-18T21:45Z 2367 followers, 1466 engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP - Regarding Paid Bashers -" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1990900694023286979) 2025-11-18T21:51Z 2367 followers, 1335 engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP β William Lee Kelly v FINRA On 11/18/2025 as expected - FINRA filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. Dropbox links below. Summary in a separate post" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1990905090513699202) 2025-11-18T22:08Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP @FINRA_Robbed_Me β WILLIAM LEE KELLY v FINRA FINRA just filed a massive motion asking the court to throw out Kellys Second Amended Complaint in the MMTLP case. Heres the simple version: πΉ FINRA says Kelly still cant sue them the law doesnt allow private investors to bring claims against FINRA for how it performs its regulatory duties. πΉ FINRA claims absolute regulatory immunity. In plain English: If FINRA did it as part of its regulatory job (like halting trading) theyre legally untouchable. πΉ FINRA argues theyre not a government agency so constitutional claims (like due" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1990907160939933883) 2025-11-18T22:17Z 2367 followers, 11.9K engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT @FINRA_Robbed_Me β WILLIAM KELLY v FINRA (An AI Review - NLA - Part X of 2) X. Is Kellys Second Amended Complaint enough to plausibly allege that FINRA acted ultra vires Short answer: YES at the pleading stage it likely is enough. But enough to allege enough to win. Why Because the SAC does what the judge essentially told him to do: β Identifies specific actions FINRA allegedly had no statutory authority to perform Kelly alleges FINRA: Altered issuer-level corporate action data Imposed a U3 halt without SEC approval Deleted a security from the marketplace Obstructed SHO" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1991457709535744346) 2025-11-20T10:44Z 2368 followers, 17.7K engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH Kelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195 (11/22/2025) @FINRA_Robbed_Me π₯β¨ Will there be a positive outcome for victim investors Potential scenario below: Judge Gordon is likely to grant judicial notice of FINRAs documents only for their existence not as proof that the MMTLP spin-off successfully completed. That claim is disputed and directly contradicted by evidence so it cant be treated as fact. FINRAs vague request to notice various rules and filings will almost certainly be denied. π₯ Bottom line: FINRA probably wont get a full dismissal. The case is expected to survive in" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1992280648661209408) 2025-11-22T17:14Z 2367 followers, 2514 engagements "Keep an eye on this case too $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH Kelly v. FINRA (2:25-cv-01195 D. Nev.) A retail investor is challenging FINRAs claimed absolute immunity for the 12/2022 MMTLP trading halt. Kelly argues FINRA acted outside its authority violated due-process principles and triggered massive investor harm. The judge is now deciding whether FINRA can be sued a ruling that could reshape FINRAs power. βπ₯" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1993649347997704639) 2025-11-26T11:53Z 2367 followers, 6027 engagements "π¨ $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH Kelly v FINRA Update π¨ @FINRA_Robbed_Me Both sides just agreed to extend FINRAs deadline to Dec X 2025 the exact date FINRA fraud chief Sam Draddy told the SEC they were blue-sheeting MMTLP/MMAT on 12/5/2022. Three years apart. Same date. From secret blue sheets β federal court accountability. Heres why this moment is HUGEπ β Ultra vires = beyond their legal authority. If the judge finds FINRA exceeded the powers Congress gave it during the MMTLP halt then: FINRAs actions are not shielded Immunity falls apart The court can review and rule on what they did π₯ FINRA" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1994448470296375572) 2025-11-28T16:49Z 2367 followers, 27.5K engagements "@kshaughnessy2 @Nasdaq @CTV @BNNBloomberg $MMAT $MMTLP NASDAQ - Motion to Quash the subpoena in the Meta Materials Bankruptcy Case" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1994616782251057663) 2025-11-29T03:57Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements "$MMTLP $TRCH $NBH π¨ Whats a Rule XXX Petition Its a formal request asking the SEC to take agency action issue a rule fix a process or step in when current rules are failing investors. ANY citizen can file one and the SEC must review it. π¬ Today I sent the SEC (via email & overnight mail) a new Rule XXX Petition demanding emergency rulemaking to protect MMTLP-related FOIA records from being destroyed. Heres the issue The SEC keeps placing MMTLP FOIA requests on the Complex Track meaning they wont even look at them for X years. But the SECs own record-retention periods expire long before that" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1995631709400743938) 2025-12-01T23:10Z 2367 followers, 18.6K engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH What is the CFTC version of a XXX Petition Here is the XXXX Rule request made today to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission: πβ¨ Quick rundown: Under CFTC Rule XXXX anyone can ask the CFTC to create or change rules. In this case were asking them to preserve records and look into possible market manipulation around the $MMTLP halt. Basically we want them to keep all the data safe and shine a light on what happened ππ #MMTLP #MMAT #TRCH" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1995638289840193833) 2025-12-01T23:37Z 2367 followers, 1775 engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH π¬β¨ Quick fact for investors: SEC Rule XXX petitions are handled ONLY by SEC staff not contractors. Your XXX petition goes: X Office of the Secretary (SEC employees) X Routed to SEC divisions & attorneys X Reviewed internally X Decided by the Commissioners themselves π₯β‘ No FOIA contractors. No outsourced reviewers.π₯ Real SEC staff. Real accountability. π₯ $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH ππ" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1995658539940151505) 2025-12-02T00:57Z 2367 followers, 3695 engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1995669213349118079) 2025-12-02T01:39Z 2367 followers, 1114 engagements "$mmtlp $mmat $trch $nbh FYI - Scipio X is William Lee Kelly - Hes the Plaintiff in the federal lawsuit against FINRA. Kellys October posts on Rule XXX were incredibly helpful they sparked ideas and helped guide how I structured my own filings. If youre tracking $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH definitely give him a follow. To say the very least - hes sharp consistent dialed in and is fighting the good fight. ππβ¨β" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1995679330878251488) 2025-12-02T02:20Z 2366 followers, 1937 engagements "**$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH Case 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA Kelly v. FINRA (Laymans Terms)** Below is what Kelly just filed his Opposition to FINRAs Motion to Dismiss broken down for regular investors π (thread below)" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1996338112302375247) 2025-12-03T21:57Z 2367 followers, 4925 engagements "Prior thread in one post π₯π₯π₯ **$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH βCase 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA Kelly v. FINRA (Laymans Terms)** Below is what Kelly just filed his Opposition to FINRAs Motion to Dismiss broken down for regular investors π π₯ What This Filing Says (In Plain English) X FINRA Went Outside Its Legal Authority (Ultra Vires) π« FINRA changed the MMTLP corporate-action data on Dec X 2022 without legal authority π« FINRA then issued a nationwide U3 halt with no SEC order π« FINRA made it permanent by tying the halt to the deletion of the ticker β Courts say SRO immunity does not apply when an" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1996356405851267463) 2025-12-03T23:10Z 2366 followers, 3283 engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH How might the case proceed β Has Kelly Presented Enough for the Case to Proceed Short answer: Yes he has presented more than enough to survive a Motion to Dismiss. Heres why: X At the Motion-to-Dismiss stage the judge must assume Kellys facts are TRUE Under the law (Twombly Iqbal) the Court must: Accept all well-pled allegations as true Draw all reasonable inferences in Kellys favor Only dismiss if no legal claim is possible even assuming hes right Kellys Opposition: β Clearly identifies ultra vires (outside authority) actions β Cites multiple appellate cases limiting" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1996359517630525859) 2025-12-03T23:22Z 2367 followers, 7077 engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH βWilliam Lee Kelly (Scipio) below regarding his case against FINRA" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1996650348728275267) 2025-12-04T18:38Z 2366 followers, 3697 engagements "Wow π π¨ SEC Just Quietly Closed a Major Short-Selling Loophole IEX must now report every single time a market maker uses the bona fide market maker exception the loophole that lets them short without borrowing shares first. This info now goes straight into the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT). Translation: β‘ Regulators will finally see who is shorting β‘ When they use the no-locate exception β‘ And how often it happens. More sunlight. More accountability" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1996658785197478320) 2025-12-04T19:12Z 2366 followers, XXX engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH π₯Attorney Billing Summary and Detailed Summary Exhibits from the Trustees Counsel: approximately $XXX million paid to creditors with (sic) XX days of the petition and as much as $XXX million WHICH APPEARS TO HAVE BENEFITTED INSIDERS (emphasis added) during the one year period prior to the petition.the implication for voidable transfer analysis is apparent" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1991947575528747306) 2025-11-21T19:11Z 2368 followers, 7454 engagements "$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH WILLIAM LEE KELLY V FINRA 12/05/2025 What FINRA Just Told the Court πβπ₯ Laymans terms breakdown of FINRAs latest filing (Doc 57): π₯ What FINRA Is Doing FINRA just filed a reply telling the judge: Kellys objections dont matter accept ALL our documents as facts. π Key Points (Simple Terms) πΉ FINRA Point #1 The 1-for-1 NBH Distribution Is Not Up for Debate FINRA wants the court to judicially notice (officially recognize) a Next Bridge press release saying MMTLP holders got X NBH share for each MMTLP share on 12/14/24. Kelly argued the distribution is disputed. FINRA" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1998157808944972071) 2025-12-08T22:28Z 2368 followers, 3422 engagements "@palikaras @zsaeed π₯Palikaras 12/08/2025π₯ $MMAT #FAFO" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1998168429858373899) 2025-12-08T23:10Z 2368 followers, 2220 engagements "$MMAT $MMTLP βKelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA π FINRA Reply filed: Dec X 2025 π Kelly Sur-Reply + Motion for Leave filed: Dec X 2025 π₯ Kelly just responded to FINRA and he caught them adding NEW arguments & NEW documents at the last minute. π₯ FINRA tried to claim Kelly admitted a 1:1 distribution π₯ FINRA slipped in a NEW Rule 11(b)(3) accusation π₯ FINRA added NEW rules & filings NOT in their original request π₯ FINRA wants a press release treated as fact even though its disputed β Kellys message to the Court: FINRA changed the story in their Reply. I deserve a chance to" [X Link](https://x.com/kimkep4796/status/1998212912578502715) 2025-12-09T02:07Z 2368 followers, 4715 engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@kimkep4796 KKepKKep posts on X about $mmat, $mmtlp, $trch, $nbh the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence technology brands XXXX% cryptocurrencies XXXX% stocks XXXX% exchanges XXXX% finance XXXX% travel destinations XXXX%
Social topic influence $mmat #3, $mmtlp #7, $trch #1, $nbh #2, lee #3324, ultra 9.52%, meta 9.52%, $gns 7.14%, nasdaq 4.76%, what is XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @kshaughnessy2 @finrarobbedme @palikaras @hooferik10986 @johnbrda @nasdaq @ctv @bnnbloomberg @zsaeed @daviddi49963202 @geeprince2020 @rd_squash @bradleyjbirnie @flyeaglesfly529 @seamoore14 @us247365_2 @cdale_dog @mikeybbacon @bw793
Top assets mentioned Gains Network (GNS)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH β Update: Kelly v. FINRA Nevada (2:25-cv-01195) No new docket activity yet. Were now waiting on FINRAs response to William Kellys Second Amended Complaint followed by a ruling from the judge. Kellys core argument: FINRAs actions surrounding the MMTLP halt were ultra vires meaning FINRA exceeded its legal authority under the Exchange Act by implementing and enforcing actions not authorized by statute or rule violating limits set by 15A(b)(6) Reg SHO Rule 15c2-11 Rule 17a-4 and 10b-5. This case could define the boundaries of SRO immunity and accountability. More to come once"
X Link 2025-11-14T17:30Z 2367 followers, 3662 engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH πΉ META MATERIALS BANKRUPTCY UPDATE As of Nov XX 2025 β U.S. Bankruptcy Case 24-50792 (Meta Materials Inc. Ch.7) filed Aug X 2024 currently before Judge Gary Spraker continues to escalate. On Mar X 2025 subpoenas hit: Anson Funds Virtu Citadel DTCC FINRA NASDAQ Ameritrade Schwab TradeStation. Motions to Quash were filed by: Citadel Virtu Anson heard recently in Nevada FINRA filed in D.C. NASDAQ filed in NYC Hearings recently held re: Traudt + Spears responses pending Additional Proof of Interest filings continue to appear on the docket . FINRA (D.C.) brief schedule"
X Link 2025-11-14T22:29Z 2367 followers, 4962 engagements
"βKelly v. FINRA: The Judge Decides Soon FINRA IMMUNITY ON THE LINE - What Should Victim Investors Prepare For"
X Link 2025-11-20T11:43Z 2367 followers, 2359 engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH βKelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195 (D. Nevada) What is Kelly actually asking for In plain English he wants the court to force FINRA to: πΉ Admit they mishandled MMTLP including the corporate-action notices & the 12/9/22 halt. πΉ Declare that investors rights were violated. πΉ Release & preserve ALL MMTLP records trading data blue sheets internal messages corporate-action files. πΉ Stop altering corporate-action data without oversight & add safeguards before future halts. Bottom line: Kelly wants transparency accountability and a ruling that FINRAs MMTLP actions were"
X Link 2025-11-20T20:08Z 2367 followers, 2623 engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH"
X Link 2025-11-21T14:16Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH βUPDATE as of 11/22/2025β β KELLY v FINRA (see π§΅ thread below) KELLY responds: Big Picture: Kelly is telling the judge: Im fine with you looking at some of FINRAs documents but you **cant treat disputed spin-off successfully completed language or vague unnamed FINRA rules as if theyre proven facts"
X Link 2025-11-22T17:01Z 2367 followers, 6247 engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH @FINRA_Robbed_Me UPDATE: 11/23/2025 βKelly v. FINRA (D. Nev. 2:25-cv-01195) FINRA just filed a SUNDAY proposed order + extension after Kellys latest brief a sign his arguments hit enough pressure points that FINRAs scrambling to control timing and narrative. Judge is engaged case is alive and SRO immunity is officially on the hot seat. π₯βππ§© FINRA filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Time - Reply expected between 11/28/25 - 12/5/25"
X Link 2025-11-23T21:20Z 2366 followers, 13.6K engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP $NBH TRAUDT (Nevada Bankruptcy Case) Affidavit in Support of Motion to Disqualify Wes Christian and similar to Motions filed by Danielle Spears. Filed 10/28/2025"
X Link 2025-11-03T16:05Z 2366 followers, 14.2K engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP Citadel churn : 5+ senior exits since June (Sterner Kalra Neumann-Regan Finney Seegers). Meanwhile Citadel Securities is moving to quash the trustees subpoenas in the Meta Materials Ch.7 case. Investors deserve sunlight not dodgeball. #MMTLP #Citadel #FINRA #MMAT Sources: Business Insider on Sterner & Kalra; FN London & FNG on HRT hires/Seegers; NV Bankruptcy site + docket updates on Citadels motion to quash. @kshaughnessy2"
X Link 2025-11-11T12:04Z 2367 followers, 2743 engagements
"$GNS $MMAT $MMTLP Quick search regarding Citadel and Virtu $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$:"
X Link 2025-11-14T23:19Z 2367 followers, 2626 engagements
"$GNS $MMAT $MMTLP"
X Link 2025-11-15T12:07Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements
"$MMAT Part of a recent post from George Palikaras @palikaras: π₯π₯π₯How did the Directors & Officers destroy this amazing company after walking the founder out the door Stand by. I think were going to find out: π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯"
X Link 2025-11-17T12:54Z 2367 followers, 15K engagements
"$MMAT Jack Harding - COB- Meta Materials"
X Link 2025-11-17T13:16Z 2367 followers, 2604 engagements
"$MMAT $GNS $MMTLP If youre paid to bash a stock heres the law in plain English: A criminal overt act is any step big or small that helps carry out a planned crime. Posting even one false or misleading message is an overt act in a market-manipulation scheme. And no you dont need to know every detail of the conspiracy. If you know youre joining any part of a deceptive effort and you act on it thats enough. Knowing participation + one overt act = criminal exposure. #MarketManipulation #SecuritiesFraud #FINRA #SEC #MMTLP #MMAT #InvestorProtection #RICO #WhiteCollarCrime"
X Link 2025-11-18T21:45Z 2367 followers, 1466 engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP - Regarding Paid Bashers -"
X Link 2025-11-18T21:51Z 2367 followers, 1335 engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP β William Lee Kelly v FINRA On 11/18/2025 as expected - FINRA filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. Dropbox links below. Summary in a separate post"
X Link 2025-11-18T22:08Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP @FINRA_Robbed_Me β WILLIAM LEE KELLY v FINRA FINRA just filed a massive motion asking the court to throw out Kellys Second Amended Complaint in the MMTLP case. Heres the simple version: πΉ FINRA says Kelly still cant sue them the law doesnt allow private investors to bring claims against FINRA for how it performs its regulatory duties. πΉ FINRA claims absolute regulatory immunity. In plain English: If FINRA did it as part of its regulatory job (like halting trading) theyre legally untouchable. πΉ FINRA argues theyre not a government agency so constitutional claims (like due"
X Link 2025-11-18T22:17Z 2367 followers, 11.9K engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT @FINRA_Robbed_Me β WILLIAM KELLY v FINRA (An AI Review - NLA - Part X of 2) X. Is Kellys Second Amended Complaint enough to plausibly allege that FINRA acted ultra vires Short answer: YES at the pleading stage it likely is enough. But enough to allege enough to win. Why Because the SAC does what the judge essentially told him to do: β Identifies specific actions FINRA allegedly had no statutory authority to perform Kelly alleges FINRA: Altered issuer-level corporate action data Imposed a U3 halt without SEC approval Deleted a security from the marketplace Obstructed SHO"
X Link 2025-11-20T10:44Z 2368 followers, 17.7K engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH Kelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195 (11/22/2025) @FINRA_Robbed_Me π₯β¨ Will there be a positive outcome for victim investors Potential scenario below: Judge Gordon is likely to grant judicial notice of FINRAs documents only for their existence not as proof that the MMTLP spin-off successfully completed. That claim is disputed and directly contradicted by evidence so it cant be treated as fact. FINRAs vague request to notice various rules and filings will almost certainly be denied. π₯ Bottom line: FINRA probably wont get a full dismissal. The case is expected to survive in"
X Link 2025-11-22T17:14Z 2367 followers, 2514 engagements
"Keep an eye on this case too $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH Kelly v. FINRA (2:25-cv-01195 D. Nev.) A retail investor is challenging FINRAs claimed absolute immunity for the 12/2022 MMTLP trading halt. Kelly argues FINRA acted outside its authority violated due-process principles and triggered massive investor harm. The judge is now deciding whether FINRA can be sued a ruling that could reshape FINRAs power. βπ₯"
X Link 2025-11-26T11:53Z 2367 followers, 6027 engagements
"π¨ $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH Kelly v FINRA Update π¨ @FINRA_Robbed_Me Both sides just agreed to extend FINRAs deadline to Dec X 2025 the exact date FINRA fraud chief Sam Draddy told the SEC they were blue-sheeting MMTLP/MMAT on 12/5/2022. Three years apart. Same date. From secret blue sheets β federal court accountability. Heres why this moment is HUGEπ β Ultra vires = beyond their legal authority. If the judge finds FINRA exceeded the powers Congress gave it during the MMTLP halt then: FINRAs actions are not shielded Immunity falls apart The court can review and rule on what they did π₯ FINRA"
X Link 2025-11-28T16:49Z 2367 followers, 27.5K engagements
"@kshaughnessy2 @Nasdaq @CTV @BNNBloomberg $MMAT $MMTLP NASDAQ - Motion to Quash the subpoena in the Meta Materials Bankruptcy Case"
X Link 2025-11-29T03:57Z 2367 followers, XXX engagements
"$MMTLP $TRCH $NBH π¨ Whats a Rule XXX Petition Its a formal request asking the SEC to take agency action issue a rule fix a process or step in when current rules are failing investors. ANY citizen can file one and the SEC must review it. π¬ Today I sent the SEC (via email & overnight mail) a new Rule XXX Petition demanding emergency rulemaking to protect MMTLP-related FOIA records from being destroyed. Heres the issue The SEC keeps placing MMTLP FOIA requests on the Complex Track meaning they wont even look at them for X years. But the SECs own record-retention periods expire long before that"
X Link 2025-12-01T23:10Z 2367 followers, 18.6K engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH What is the CFTC version of a XXX Petition Here is the XXXX Rule request made today to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission: πβ¨ Quick rundown: Under CFTC Rule XXXX anyone can ask the CFTC to create or change rules. In this case were asking them to preserve records and look into possible market manipulation around the $MMTLP halt. Basically we want them to keep all the data safe and shine a light on what happened ππ #MMTLP #MMAT #TRCH"
X Link 2025-12-01T23:37Z 2367 followers, 1775 engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH π¬β¨ Quick fact for investors: SEC Rule XXX petitions are handled ONLY by SEC staff not contractors. Your XXX petition goes: X Office of the Secretary (SEC employees) X Routed to SEC divisions & attorneys X Reviewed internally X Decided by the Commissioners themselves π₯β‘ No FOIA contractors. No outsourced reviewers.π₯ Real SEC staff. Real accountability. π₯ $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH ππ"
X Link 2025-12-02T00:57Z 2367 followers, 3695 engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT"
X Link 2025-12-02T01:39Z 2367 followers, 1114 engagements
"$mmtlp $mmat $trch $nbh FYI - Scipio X is William Lee Kelly - Hes the Plaintiff in the federal lawsuit against FINRA. Kellys October posts on Rule XXX were incredibly helpful they sparked ideas and helped guide how I structured my own filings. If youre tracking $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH definitely give him a follow. To say the very least - hes sharp consistent dialed in and is fighting the good fight. ππβ¨β"
X Link 2025-12-02T02:20Z 2366 followers, 1937 engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH Case 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA Kelly v. FINRA (Laymans Terms) Below is what Kelly just filed his Opposition to FINRAs Motion to Dismiss broken down for regular investors π (thread below)"
X Link 2025-12-03T21:57Z 2367 followers, 4925 engagements
"Prior thread in one post π₯π₯π₯ $MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH βCase 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA Kelly v. FINRA (Laymans Terms) Below is what Kelly just filed his Opposition to FINRAs Motion to Dismiss broken down for regular investors π π₯ What This Filing Says (In Plain English) X FINRA Went Outside Its Legal Authority (Ultra Vires) π« FINRA changed the MMTLP corporate-action data on Dec X 2022 without legal authority π« FINRA then issued a nationwide U3 halt with no SEC order π« FINRA made it permanent by tying the halt to the deletion of the ticker β Courts say SRO immunity does not apply when an"
X Link 2025-12-03T23:10Z 2366 followers, 3283 engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH How might the case proceed β
Has Kelly Presented Enough for the Case to Proceed Short answer: Yes he has presented more than enough to survive a Motion to Dismiss. Heres why: X At the Motion-to-Dismiss stage the judge must assume Kellys facts are TRUE Under the law (Twombly Iqbal) the Court must: Accept all well-pled allegations as true Draw all reasonable inferences in Kellys favor Only dismiss if no legal claim is possible even assuming hes right Kellys Opposition: β Clearly identifies ultra vires (outside authority) actions β Cites multiple appellate cases limiting"
X Link 2025-12-03T23:22Z 2367 followers, 7077 engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH βWilliam Lee Kelly (Scipio) below regarding his case against FINRA"
X Link 2025-12-04T18:38Z 2366 followers, 3697 engagements
"Wow π π¨ SEC Just Quietly Closed a Major Short-Selling Loophole IEX must now report every single time a market maker uses the bona fide market maker exception the loophole that lets them short without borrowing shares first. This info now goes straight into the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT). Translation: β‘ Regulators will finally see who is shorting β‘ When they use the no-locate exception β‘ And how often it happens. More sunlight. More accountability"
X Link 2025-12-04T19:12Z 2366 followers, XXX engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP $TRCH π₯Attorney Billing Summary and Detailed Summary Exhibits from the Trustees Counsel: approximately $XXX million paid to creditors with (sic) XX days of the petition and as much as $XXX million WHICH APPEARS TO HAVE BENEFITTED INSIDERS (emphasis added) during the one year period prior to the petition.the implication for voidable transfer analysis is apparent"
X Link 2025-11-21T19:11Z 2368 followers, 7454 engagements
"$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH $NBH WILLIAM LEE KELLY V FINRA 12/05/2025 What FINRA Just Told the Court πβπ₯ Laymans terms breakdown of FINRAs latest filing (Doc 57): π₯ What FINRA Is Doing FINRA just filed a reply telling the judge: Kellys objections dont matter accept ALL our documents as facts. π Key Points (Simple Terms) πΉ FINRA Point #1 The 1-for-1 NBH Distribution Is Not Up for Debate FINRA wants the court to judicially notice (officially recognize) a Next Bridge press release saying MMTLP holders got X NBH share for each MMTLP share on 12/14/24. Kelly argued the distribution is disputed. FINRA"
X Link 2025-12-08T22:28Z 2368 followers, 3422 engagements
"@palikaras @zsaeed π₯Palikaras 12/08/2025π₯ $MMAT #FAFO"
X Link 2025-12-08T23:10Z 2368 followers, 2220 engagements
"$MMAT $MMTLP βKelly v. FINRA Case No. 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA π
FINRA Reply filed: Dec X 2025 π
Kelly Sur-Reply + Motion for Leave filed: Dec X 2025 π₯ Kelly just responded to FINRA and he caught them adding NEW arguments & NEW documents at the last minute. π₯ FINRA tried to claim Kelly admitted a 1:1 distribution π₯ FINRA slipped in a NEW Rule 11(b)(3) accusation π₯ FINRA added NEW rules & filings NOT in their original request π₯ FINRA wants a press release treated as fact even though its disputed β Kellys message to the Court: FINRA changed the story in their Reply. I deserve a chance to"
X Link 2025-12-09T02:07Z 2368 followers, 4715 engagements
/creator/twitter::kimkep4796