[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @graveskies thunderoushorse thunderoushorse posts on X about bitcoin, fiat, decentralized, $salt lend the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 1555 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1783287012860067840/interactions)  - X Week XXXXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXX +113% - X Months XXXXXX -XX% - X Year XXXXXXX +375% ### Mentions: XX [#](/creator/twitter::1783287012860067840/posts_active)  - X Week XX -XX% - X Month XXX +133% - X Months XXX -XX% - X Year XXXXX +107% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1783287012860067840/followers)  - X Week XXXXX +1.70% - X Month XXXXX +5.10% - X Months XXXXX +23% - X Year XXXXX +317% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1783287012860067840/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1783287012860067840/influence) --- **Social category influence** [cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies) [automotive brands](/list/automotive-brands) [finance](/list/finance) **Social topic influence** [bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin), [fiat](/topic/fiat) #420, [decentralized](/topic/decentralized), [$salt lend](/topic/$salt-lend) #10, [bruh](/topic/bruh), [bitcoin plus](/topic/bitcoin-plus), [financial freedom](/topic/financial-freedom), [order of](/topic/order-of), [money](/topic/money), [flock](/topic/flock) **Top assets mentioned** [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [SALT (SALT)](/topic/$salt-lend) [Bitcoin Plus (XBC)](/topic/bitcoin-plus) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1783287012860067840/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "Bruh. this is awesome. Forgive me I'm fan girling a little bit. It's good to know when you support people and they recognize that and support back. The mark of a good person" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1979908154138714391) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-19T13:51Z 1926 followers, XX engagements "@secsovereign @Billyndroid OK I'm interested Can you explain that to me like I'm an idiot. Because I'm an idiot" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980382554730688858) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-20T21:16Z 1930 followers, XX engagements "That's a fair assessment. But Core isn't just a company of devs. Sure a few of them could be captured but isn't there like hundreds of devs Minus Luke lol. And they aren't all on the same team so to speak. I was under the impression that they are a decentralized group that require concensus to make changes. Am I wrong here" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980387051360154095) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-20T21:34Z 1929 followers, XX engagements "A purest will reject anything they don't understand a maximalist wants to understand. Puritans will have to deal with bitcoin plus fiat. Maximalist will see the path to bitcoin only. If no one can build on bitcoin then you will never have a decentralized MoE that can replace fiat. Maximalist should understand this. Puritans would rather have a different MoE that you have to sell your bitcoin for as long as no one changes anything and bitcoin stops being programmable money. But SoV will be good" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980512016587424020) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-21T05:50Z 1930 followers, XX engagements "@adam3us @MajorianBTC @lopp Citrea only needed OP return increase up to 144b. So conflict of interest doesn't hold up" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980021508782035448) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-19T21:21Z 1930 followers, XX engagements "@BitcoinMonk21 @nakadai_mon Who has said this Name one account that has said they like being a free csam relay service provider. Just one. Literally no one wants that. If you don't agree with me then your a bigot racist homophobe transphobe fascist pedo. Sound familiar Fucking liberals. Sheesh" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980384807252377915) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-20T21:25Z 1930 followers, XXX engagements "You just contradicted yourself. You are saying you're not saying that he likes it but then rationalizing that he must like it. And that's my point. For you this is about csam. And it's not for him. So you are trying to rationalize that it must be so him because otherwise he would agree with you. It's an illogical ultimatum. No different than the liberal argument that they like all races so if you disagree then you must be racist. I'm trying to show you the harm in your bad logic friend" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980499350938644694) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-21T05:00Z 1931 followers, XX engagements "@asanoha_gold You don't understand what the 2nd is and how it will develop successfully" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980808169048928417) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T01:27Z 1931 followers, XX engagements "@roryhighside @csuwildcat @kyletorpey It won't kill Bitcoin. None of it will. You just need it to be your reality otherwise what would you fight" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980954751295434837) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T11:09Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "@asanoha_gold Well. it doesn't actually. Bitcoin is still Bitcoin in spite of shitcoins. Why don't you break that down. From where I'm sitting it's you who want to interfere with people's monetary rights" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980955849393865047) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T11:14Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "Freedom lesson for today. In a freemarket people are free to shitcoin. As long as they are infringing on another's right. Stupid as they are they aren't infringing on your rights. Bitcoin is a freemarket. No one is forcing you to do anything" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980965657349918733) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T11:53Z 1932 followers, XXX engagements "@BitcoinMonk21 Luke with 101k followers. A bitcoin core developer. Runs Knots. Created Knots. Helped create Segwit. Been in bitcoin longer than some of the core devs" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980379714381570098) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-20T21:04Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "The development side of bitcoin is just one peice of the whole. The state could try to utilize them to capture Bitcoin but the is a checks and balances system that protects each from the other. There is development mining nodes and users. All have their own power that can't really be usurped. The state can't capture bitcoin without changing the Nakamoto consensus. This requires that the majority of everyone agrees from all categories of influence. Devs are needed to write the change miners to agree to run the change and needs XX% consensus to accept the change nodes have to agree to enforce" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980397829232230766) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-20T22:16Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "@jiminica1 @michelleo_21mil Yeah it works as an MoE now because everyone isn't trying to use it. Most of the purists have proven that they don't want anything built on top of Bitcoin. Maybe you are an exception but until recently people like you were called maximalists" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980594366717866018) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-21T11:17Z 1931 followers, XX engagements "@ghostofmatias2 @BitcoinRothbard @asanoha_gold Knots is not libertarian. I don't give a shit who is liberal or conservative. Both reject the natural order of anarchy which is bitcoin. Anarchy and the freemarket will win" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980793480151535743) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T00:29Z 1931 followers, XX engagements "You don't understand anarchy and you can't see what's right in front of you until you can understand. Knots is not representative of anarchy. Your take is something that conservatives who don't understand anarcho-capitalism typically think. Study Bitcoin. We have so much more to learn" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980805054031360053) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T01:15Z 1931 followers, XX engagements "Nope I am not. I understand quite a bit more than you think. Both definitions of anarchy fall into that category but that doesn't means the how and why are the same. Everything I said still stands. Until bitcoin Type X anarchy was theoretical. Bitcoin is the first freemarket. Trade with no leader. No authority. No government. Only participants and their different interests" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980831561621602792) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T03:00Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "@adam3us @LaurentMT @MiraReserve @timoncc @chad_agn Bitcoin didn't die. Core v30 was never going to kill Bitcoin. Knots was never going to kill Bitcoin. The only thing that dies is a person's vision of what they hoped it would be. Their world view vs the freemarket. The freemarket wins" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980833409913049294) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T03:07Z 1931 followers, XX engagements "@XSTAC1 @SALTLending @Bitcoinmath_org" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980868796815393126) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T05:28Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "@roryhighside @csuwildcat @kyletorpey The worst possible outcome is Bitcoin dies. The government taking over a hard fork that eventually loses and trades to X is hardly the worst possible outcome. So again even under your own comment and definition reference you are still wrong. Learn a little humility" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1981000347469619408) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T14:11Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "@XSTAC1 @SALTLending @Bitcoinmath_org "You can trust me I'm in a suit." Had me dying looking like a moron at the fiat mine. Right on par with "We're from the government and we're here to help." That we all fear. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1981011583154475022) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T14:55Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "You need to think from a bitcoin standard. Not a fiat standard. That argument is fiat minded. Corporatism is an equivalent to cronyism. Neither exist in bitcoin because there isn't a company or ultimate system of governance. You should do more research into freemarkets. Start with the "Price of Tomorrow" by Jeff Booth" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1981061965314179201) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T18:15Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "So the main question is how do you know it's not being done with Bitcoin's moneyness at the forefront Just because shitcoiners will flock first doesn't mean that they won't be replaced by money use cases. For example a decentralized layer X may need to be able to time stamp compressed info to validate itself as a verification sweep" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1981118834670260620) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T22:01Z 1932 followers, XX engagements "@asanoha_gold Knots is not libertarian. At all. Core maybe liberal and maybe you could make a case for Knots being conservative but definitely not libertarian. Bitcoin is Anarchy and Knots and Core are both rejecting that" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1980792916202160159) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-22T00:26Z 1932 followers, XXX engagements "You are labeling everything as catastrophizing when it's not. The worse case scenario is bitcoin dies. Which is not what he said. I played out the scenario in which what he was saying as precedent by law. Which is ultimately that the government tries to take over bitcoin fails and everyone moves on. Including bitcoin. The first scenario is catastrophizing The second his argument is not. And your too illiterate to understand the definition of the word you used and sourced and apply it to the conversation correctly. But at this point it is not about what is right or wrong but the false bravado" [X Link](https://x.com/graveskies/status/1981150321696264678) [@graveskies](/creator/x/graveskies) 2025-10-23T00:06Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@graveskies thunderoushorse
thunderoushorse posts on X about bitcoin, fiat, decentralized, $salt lend the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and 1555 posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Engagements: XXX #
- X Week XXXXX -XX%
- X Month XXXXXX +113%
- X Months XXXXXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXXXX +375%
Mentions: XX #
- X Week XX -XX%
- X Month XXX +133%
- X Months XXX -XX%
- X Year XXXXX +107%
Followers: XXXXX #
- X Week XXXXX +1.70%
- X Month XXXXX +5.10%
- X Months XXXXX +23%
- X Year XXXXX +317%
CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #
Social Influence #
Social category influence cryptocurrencies automotive brands finance
Social topic influence bitcoin, fiat #420, decentralized, $salt lend #10, bruh, bitcoin plus, financial freedom, order of, money, flock
Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) SALT (SALT) Bitcoin Plus (XBC)
Top Social Posts #
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"Bruh. this is awesome. Forgive me I'm fan girling a little bit. It's good to know when you support people and they recognize that and support back. The mark of a good person"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-19T13:51Z 1926 followers, XX engagements
"@secsovereign @Billyndroid OK I'm interested Can you explain that to me like I'm an idiot. Because I'm an idiot"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-20T21:16Z 1930 followers, XX engagements
"That's a fair assessment. But Core isn't just a company of devs. Sure a few of them could be captured but isn't there like hundreds of devs Minus Luke lol. And they aren't all on the same team so to speak. I was under the impression that they are a decentralized group that require concensus to make changes. Am I wrong here"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-20T21:34Z 1929 followers, XX engagements
"A purest will reject anything they don't understand a maximalist wants to understand. Puritans will have to deal with bitcoin plus fiat. Maximalist will see the path to bitcoin only. If no one can build on bitcoin then you will never have a decentralized MoE that can replace fiat. Maximalist should understand this. Puritans would rather have a different MoE that you have to sell your bitcoin for as long as no one changes anything and bitcoin stops being programmable money. But SoV will be good"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-21T05:50Z 1930 followers, XX engagements
"@adam3us @MajorianBTC @lopp Citrea only needed OP return increase up to 144b. So conflict of interest doesn't hold up"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-19T21:21Z 1930 followers, XX engagements
"@BitcoinMonk21 @nakadai_mon Who has said this Name one account that has said they like being a free csam relay service provider. Just one. Literally no one wants that. If you don't agree with me then your a bigot racist homophobe transphobe fascist pedo. Sound familiar Fucking liberals. Sheesh"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-20T21:25Z 1930 followers, XXX engagements
"You just contradicted yourself. You are saying you're not saying that he likes it but then rationalizing that he must like it. And that's my point. For you this is about csam. And it's not for him. So you are trying to rationalize that it must be so him because otherwise he would agree with you. It's an illogical ultimatum. No different than the liberal argument that they like all races so if you disagree then you must be racist. I'm trying to show you the harm in your bad logic friend"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-21T05:00Z 1931 followers, XX engagements
"@asanoha_gold You don't understand what the 2nd is and how it will develop successfully"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T01:27Z 1931 followers, XX engagements
"@roryhighside @csuwildcat @kyletorpey It won't kill Bitcoin. None of it will. You just need it to be your reality otherwise what would you fight"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T11:09Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"@asanoha_gold Well. it doesn't actually. Bitcoin is still Bitcoin in spite of shitcoins. Why don't you break that down. From where I'm sitting it's you who want to interfere with people's monetary rights"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T11:14Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"Freedom lesson for today. In a freemarket people are free to shitcoin. As long as they are infringing on another's right. Stupid as they are they aren't infringing on your rights. Bitcoin is a freemarket. No one is forcing you to do anything"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T11:53Z 1932 followers, XXX engagements
"@BitcoinMonk21 Luke with 101k followers. A bitcoin core developer. Runs Knots. Created Knots. Helped create Segwit. Been in bitcoin longer than some of the core devs"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-20T21:04Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"The development side of bitcoin is just one peice of the whole. The state could try to utilize them to capture Bitcoin but the is a checks and balances system that protects each from the other. There is development mining nodes and users. All have their own power that can't really be usurped. The state can't capture bitcoin without changing the Nakamoto consensus. This requires that the majority of everyone agrees from all categories of influence. Devs are needed to write the change miners to agree to run the change and needs XX% consensus to accept the change nodes have to agree to enforce"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-20T22:16Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"@jiminica1 @michelleo_21mil Yeah it works as an MoE now because everyone isn't trying to use it. Most of the purists have proven that they don't want anything built on top of Bitcoin. Maybe you are an exception but until recently people like you were called maximalists"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-21T11:17Z 1931 followers, XX engagements
"@ghostofmatias2 @BitcoinRothbard @asanoha_gold Knots is not libertarian. I don't give a shit who is liberal or conservative. Both reject the natural order of anarchy which is bitcoin. Anarchy and the freemarket will win"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T00:29Z 1931 followers, XX engagements
"You don't understand anarchy and you can't see what's right in front of you until you can understand. Knots is not representative of anarchy. Your take is something that conservatives who don't understand anarcho-capitalism typically think. Study Bitcoin. We have so much more to learn"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T01:15Z 1931 followers, XX engagements
"Nope I am not. I understand quite a bit more than you think. Both definitions of anarchy fall into that category but that doesn't means the how and why are the same. Everything I said still stands. Until bitcoin Type X anarchy was theoretical. Bitcoin is the first freemarket. Trade with no leader. No authority. No government. Only participants and their different interests"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T03:00Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"@adam3us @LaurentMT @MiraReserve @timoncc @chad_agn Bitcoin didn't die. Core v30 was never going to kill Bitcoin. Knots was never going to kill Bitcoin. The only thing that dies is a person's vision of what they hoped it would be. Their world view vs the freemarket. The freemarket wins"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T03:07Z 1931 followers, XX engagements
"@XSTAC1 @SALTLending @Bitcoinmath_org"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T05:28Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"@roryhighside @csuwildcat @kyletorpey The worst possible outcome is Bitcoin dies. The government taking over a hard fork that eventually loses and trades to X is hardly the worst possible outcome. So again even under your own comment and definition reference you are still wrong. Learn a little humility"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T14:11Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"@XSTAC1 @SALTLending @Bitcoinmath_org "You can trust me I'm in a suit." Had me dying looking like a moron at the fiat mine. Right on par with "We're from the government and we're here to help." That we all fear. 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T14:55Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"You need to think from a bitcoin standard. Not a fiat standard. That argument is fiat minded. Corporatism is an equivalent to cronyism. Neither exist in bitcoin because there isn't a company or ultimate system of governance. You should do more research into freemarkets. Start with the "Price of Tomorrow" by Jeff Booth"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T18:15Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"So the main question is how do you know it's not being done with Bitcoin's moneyness at the forefront Just because shitcoiners will flock first doesn't mean that they won't be replaced by money use cases. For example a decentralized layer X may need to be able to time stamp compressed info to validate itself as a verification sweep"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T22:01Z 1932 followers, XX engagements
"@asanoha_gold Knots is not libertarian. At all. Core maybe liberal and maybe you could make a case for Knots being conservative but definitely not libertarian. Bitcoin is Anarchy and Knots and Core are both rejecting that"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-22T00:26Z 1932 followers, XXX engagements
"You are labeling everything as catastrophizing when it's not. The worse case scenario is bitcoin dies. Which is not what he said. I played out the scenario in which what he was saying as precedent by law. Which is ultimately that the government tries to take over bitcoin fails and everyone moves on. Including bitcoin. The first scenario is catastrophizing The second his argument is not. And your too illiterate to understand the definition of the word you used and sourced and apply it to the conversation correctly. But at this point it is not about what is right or wrong but the false bravado"
X Link @graveskies 2025-10-23T00:06Z 1932 followers, XX engagements