# ![@gluk64 Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::167801813.png) @gluk64 ALEX ZK ∎

ALEX ZK ∎ posts on X about zksync, ethereum, zk, blockchain the most. They currently have [---------] followers and [----] posts still getting attention that total [-----] engagements in the last [--] hours.

### Engagements: [-----] [#](/creator/twitter::167801813/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::167801813/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- [--] Week [------] -9.10%
- [--] Month [-------] -25%
- [--] Months [---------] +52%
- [--] Year [---------] -91%

### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::167801813/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::167801813/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- [--] Week [--] +59%
- [--] Month [--] no change
- [--] Months [---] +54%
- [--] Year [---] -18%

### Followers: [---------] [#](/creator/twitter::167801813/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::167801813/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- [--] Week [------] +0.01%
- [--] Month [------] +0.05%
- [--] Months [------] +4.60%
- [--] Year [------] +4.90%

### CreatorRank: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::167801813/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::167801813/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  #4130 [finance](/list/finance)  [stocks](/list/stocks)  [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  [countries](/list/countries)  [exchanges](/list/exchanges)  [social networks](/list/social-networks)  [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations)  [nfts](/list/nfts)  [events](/list/events) 

**Social topic influence**
[zksync](/topic/zksync) #5, [ethereum](/topic/ethereum) #4407, [zk](/topic/zk), [blockchain](/topic/blockchain), [crypto](/topic/crypto), [onchain](/topic/onchain), [solana](/topic/solana), [in the](/topic/in-the), [token](/topic/token), [decentralized](/topic/decentralized)

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@zksync](/creator/undefined) [@zksyncs](/creator/undefined) [@thematterlabs](/creator/undefined) [@gluk64](/creator/undefined) [@0xmert](/creator/undefined) [@ethereum](/creator/undefined) [@lensprotocol](/creator/undefined) [@vitalikbuterin](/creator/undefined) [@abstractchain](/creator/undefined) [@sophon](/creator/undefined) [@lefterisjp](/creator/undefined) [@micahzoltu](/creator/undefined) [@thezknation](/creator/undefined) [@fedeintern](/creator/undefined) [@stanikulechov](/creator/undefined) [@0xpolygon](/creator/undefined) [@pumatheuma](/creator/undefined) [@bkiepuszewski](/creator/undefined) [@aeyakovenko](/creator/undefined) [@grvtio](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[zkSync (ZK)](/topic/zksync) [Ethereum (ETH)](/topic/ethereum) [Solana (SOL)](/topic/solana) [StarkNet (STRK)](/topic/starknet) [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [Polyhedra Network (ZKJ)](/topic/$zk) [Cronos (CRO)](/topic/cronos) [Mastercard, Inc. (MA)](/topic/$ma) [Linea (LINEA)](/topic/linea) [USDC (USDC)](/topic/usdc) [Sophon (SOPH)](/topic/sophon) [Zcash (ZEC)](/topic/zcash) [Optimism (OP)](/topic/optimism) [Validity (VAL)](/topic/validity) [Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN)](/topic/coinbase) [WalletConnect Token (WCT)](/topic/wallet) [BlackRock Inc (BLK)](/topic/blackrock)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"@VitalikButerin @StarkWareLtd @loopringorg It's safer to do: account_key = sha256(ecdsa_sign(private_key "Sign this message to login to service xyz")) This is how @zksync handles private keys"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1258399302801555458)  2020-05-07T14:12Z 49.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@gabrielhaines @safetyth1rd @synthetix_io @CurveFinance @zksync @reddit @StarkWareLabs Reddit havent announced any results yet and I doubt they will go with two different solutions"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1314839411998294017)  2020-10-10T08:05Z 49.2K followers, [--] engagements


"8/ "Even if ZKrollups progressed at a breakneck pace all variations currently require rewriting contracts in a new language." This used to be the case. But I'm excited to announce this statement is no longer true 😎"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1318847708673748992)  2020-10-21T09:32Z 49.2K followers, [--] engagements


"9/ It will very soon be possible to take any existing contract written in Solidity/Vyper and deploy it to @zksync with a minimum (if any) modifications. on our testnet had a hint at how this will work. Please stay tuned for a few more weeks http://zksync.curve.fi http://zksync.curve.fi"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1318847709894365184)  2020-10-21T09:32Z 49.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@micksabox @joshuahjohnson @JamesSpediacci In rollup mode both solutions can do 3k TPS max. In Validium/zkPorter mode there is practically no limit for both. @zksync will publish a post about zkPorter soon it's interesting. Other diffs are non-technical see below (though some aspects might change for StarkNet)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1380503024062242816)  2021-04-09T12:49Z 49.4K followers, [--] engagements


"1/ Congrats to @hermez_network and @0xPolygon on their deal Some thoughts on what this means for @zksync and the ecosystem in general: 🧵"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1426518397433655307)  2021-08-14T12:17Z 49.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@starkwhale @zksync Is this why it costs 10x more to verify STARKs on L1 than to verify SNARKs (5M vs 0.5M gas) 😉"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1470391880802258946)  2021-12-13T13:55Z 49.2K followers, [--] engagements


"@dimahledba Not all zkEVMs are equal frens ;) Looking forward to comparing Cairo vs @zksync benchmarks Try to beat LLVM's performance 😈"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1575873900000514050)  2022-09-30T15:43Z 49.3K followers, [--] engagements


"@onchainjeff @sobylife @0xPolygon @zksync @zksync zkEVM testnet has been live since Feb '22. Polygon's zkEVM testnet since Oct '22. Historically despite efforts and claims to ship faster it took [--] year from testnet till full mainnet for all ZK rollups (zkSync v1 Hermez Starknet). Make your own conclusions"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1617825413979590656)  2023-01-24T10:03Z 49.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@dlubarov @onchainjeff @sobylife @0xPolygon @zksync You'll know very soon 🙂 Hopefully Polygon will then follow our example and make all of their code true open source for anyone to use"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1617826370301886465)  2023-01-24T10:07Z 49.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@sobylife @0xPolygon @zksync https://x.com/gluk64/status/1617825413979590656 @onchainjeff @sobylife @0xPolygon @zksync @zksync zkEVM testnet has been live since Feb '22. Polygon's zkEVM testnet since Oct '22. Historically despite efforts and claims to ship faster it took [--] year from testnet till full mainnet for all ZK rollups (zkSync v1 Hermez Starknet). Make your own conclusions. https://x.com/gluk64/status/1617825413979590656 @onchainjeff @sobylife @0xPolygon @zksync @zksync zkEVM testnet has been live since Feb '22. Polygon's zkEVM testnet since Oct '22. Historically despite efforts and"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1617826809168670720)  2023-01-24T10:09Z 49.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@GemholicECO wagmi @0xedenau Not stuck forever. We are working with the team to help them solve the problem and will publish a detailed update in a bit. Tune in. @0xedenau Not stuck forever. We are working with the team to help them solve the problem and will publish a detailed update in a bit. Tune in"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1644090810273595393)  2023-04-06T21:32Z 50.8K followers, 40.7K engagements


"@Justin_Bons @TripleWChampion Are you aware that Near's sharding is async Making its UX and composability in no way different to multi-ZK-chain protocols settling on Ethereum with low latency (such as zkSync's Hyperchains)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1660386336170209280)  2023-05-21T20:45Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@_bfarmer @zksync The docs just dropped and it's a well thought through nice modular design. Congrats So let's unpack: 🍿🧵👇 "Once ZK proofs are accepted by the Aggregator the recipient chains can start optimistically accepting inbound messages (knowing that the eventual and global"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1674560798125875200)  2023-06-29T23:59Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@LineaBuild @EthCC Congrats on the progress"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1678750007824904195)  2023-07-11T13:53Z 30.4K followers, [----] engagements


"@pumatheuma @_prestwich As @_prestwich points out it's not about standards but about "political control". Do you want to depend on others for a critical aspect of your protocol (including MEV potentially its most profitable part) Are you willing to forgo staking a custom token for sequencing"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1679163776669450240)  2023-07-12T16:28Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@kobigurk @zksync Both Plonky2 and Boojum are implementations of RedShift (Plonk + FRI). We borrowed some dope ideas from Plonky2 but did many things differently (see README). At the end Boojum is more than an order of magnitude faster (see @CelerNetwork's benchmarks). https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1400.pdf https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1400.pdf"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1680878564072103936)  2023-07-17T09:54Z 49.2K followers, 98.7K engagements


"@kobigurk @zksync @CelerNetwork Oh I see it's missing in the public repo. Bringing back hang on"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1680889194292322310)  2023-07-17T10:36Z 50.7K followers, [----] engagements


"@kobigurk @zksync @CelerNetwork Here you go: https://github.com/matter-labs/era-boojum https://github.com/matter-labs/era-boojum"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1680903382112903169)  2023-07-17T11:32Z 49.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@__geometry__ @kobigurk Cool So what's the overall gas costs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1685598928811474944)  2023-07-30T11:26Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@0xPolygonZero @zksync Disappointed by these untrue accusations :( Will share a detailed reply shortly"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1687172632372822016)  2023-08-03T19:49Z 30.5K followers, 19.2K engagements


"@MayagTrades @0xPolygonZero @zksync Literally the first line of the module:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1687183593875869696)  2023-08-03T19:49Z 30.5K followers, 23.1K engagements


"@fede_intern Great choice of topics you gonna rock it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1689179213193003010)  2023-08-09T07:38Z 30.4K followers, [----] engagements


"@andrewmilson Emailed you. Dm me if you're interested to discuss cooperating with @zksync"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1689930998660620288)  2023-08-11T09:25Z 30.4K followers, [----] engagements


"An average transaction (a token swap) costs [---] bytes calldata. Let's say [---] bytes with data compression. [--] MB per block thus means realistically [---] TPS. Across ALL ROLLUPS combined. I thought we are getting significantly more scale with EIP4844. Am I missing something"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1693716324042621241)  2023-08-21T20:06Z 30.5K followers, 67.9K engagements


"@n56frnjwcGbj95 That's even less: [--] TPS for all rollups or [--] TPS for each of the top [--] rollups. Ngmi 🤨 Unless I'm missing something big we urgently need zkPorter/volition"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1693721403206291870)  2023-08-21T20:27Z 31.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@n56frnjwcGbj95 The mean throughput will be based on [--] blobs then yielding [-----] Mb/block (30 kB/s) or [--] TPS no"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1693725085671006423)  2023-08-21T20:41Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@MacTar8822 If the quorum of zkPorter guardians is compromised - rollup accounts remain unaffected porter accounts can only be frozen. If the quorum of Arbitrum's anytrust validators is compromised - all accounts can be exploited (i.e. all assets can be stolen)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1693726435737772045)  2023-08-21T20:47Z 30.4K followers, [----] engagements


"@adompeldorius In theory yes. This is how a specialized rollup like zkSync Lite would work. In practice we got our sacred EVM equivalence. Here is a random Uniswap exchange tx [----] bytes calldata not counting signature:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1693727850187125049)  2023-08-21T20:52Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@adompeldorius Even with perfect data compression (eliminate all zeros map all addresses to [--] bytes) we'll end up with a few hundreds bytes for this tx. It doesn't really help given the order of magnitude of the problem"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1693733145818857547)  2023-08-21T21:13Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@adompeldorius 1) Agreed but I think Arbitrum and Optimism were at about 50%-60% compression rate. Looking at the tx data my gut feeling is: hard to exceed 80%. 2) Signatures can't be compressed. You could BLS them together but not with Account Abstraction. We need 4000x not 4x boost"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1693742443194134644)  2023-08-21T21:50Z [--] followers, [---] engagements


"@protolambda That's the right thing to do There's a lot at stake. I was just surprised after calculating actual TPS of non-trivial transactions. Is this calculation correct What's the compressed size of a typical swap"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1693889423858143330)  2023-08-22T07:34Z 30.6K followers, [----] engagements


"This is a huge milestone for the ZK world. While the cost-performance is yet far from the native zkEVMs the fact that you can run native Rust code of something as complex as an Ethereum client is mind-blowing. The hybrid EVM+native ZK future is coming. Congrats @RiscZero"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1694311260467114417)  2023-08-23T11:30Z 30.4K followers, 19.4K engagements


"@jon_charb @pythianism This discussion is being wildly misinterpreted: 1) EIP4844 is only the first step. 2) Volition/zkPorter L2s with decentralized DA remain uncapped on Ethereum. They will be more secure than monolithic alt-L1s. 3) ZK rollups have compression schemes down to [--] bytes/tx"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1694814044903891189)  2023-08-24T20:48Z 30.4K followers, [----] engagements


"We are looking for a Head of Product Marketing at @the_matter_labs. Help us tell the story of @zksync and hyperscale Ethereum ➡ This is not your typical marketing role. Were searching for an ethos-aligned and technically-savvy master communicator"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1696528409852285298)  2023-08-29T14:21Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@bkiepuszewski Irrespective of the problem everyone is puzzled about the proposed solution. How can forkability of a new chain help if it's supposed to affect something located over a bridge A bridge always negates any benefits of the forkability making it strictly worse than a rollup"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697925090535464961)  2023-09-02T10:51Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@bkiepuszewski Then the governance of the bridge completely overrides the governance of the chain. What's the function of the chain then How can it serve as an emergency resolution mechanism Why not simply use whatever the bridge governance is to upgrade Maker L1 smart contract"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697937450981568864)  2023-09-02T11:40Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@bkiepuszewski My reading is: this simply means that governance chain is irrelevant bridge guardians *are the governance*. What am I missing"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697941116375482471)  2023-09-02T11:54Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@bkiepuszewski Or put in a different way: having an external chain here has exactly zero advantage over a smart contract because whatever mechanism the bridge guardians use to choose the canonical fork the same mechanism can be used to choose a patched governance smart contract"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697942565117362364)  2023-09-02T12:00Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@bkiepuszewski We have thought about this problem a lot. The only solution I see is delegating the emergency upgrades to Ethereum L1 via a hard or a soft fork. That's the only way you actually take any advantage of forkability. Elaborate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697943850491297894)  2023-09-02T12:05Z 30.6K followers, [---] engagements


"@bkiepuszewski But my point is: what full node users choose is irrelevant. Bridge guardians can always pick a malicious fork and override users and that's all that matters"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697945190718165351)  2023-09-02T12:10Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@0xmillie_eth @bkiepuszewski Yes but here I'm worried only about the native crypto collateral. Without it something like MakerDAO wouldn't make any sense at all compared to USDC/USDT"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697946669843652764)  2023-09-02T12:16Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@levs57 Let's chat. The main idea of the post: no human-driven court should be able to say the last word. The final appeal must always be an L1 fork"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697966736878764139)  2023-09-02T13:36Z 49.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@SCBuergel I don't think I fully understand your proposal. Can you elaborate"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697967304183627790)  2023-09-02T13:38Z 49.3K followers, [----] engagements


"Can something like this be built on @Kleros_io"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697967613106589933)  2023-09-02T13:40Z 50.2K followers, [----] engagements


"1) Nothing stops the system from existing but it requires a broad discussion awareness acceptance and implementation. This is what I'm calling for. 2) It's not a panacea and won't solve all problems. But it provides an important deterrent against malicious governance actors which is currently missing due to the lack of culture and implementation. 3) Since the courts should only be able to revert an emergency decision there is less room for abuse. Ultimately appeals must be expensive but if a decision is not worth the attention of the L0 nothing will happen"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697971006877360540)  2023-09-02T13:53Z 30.4K followers, [--] engagements


"@SCBuergel I can't yet understand what is different in your proposal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697971649625108581)  2023-09-02T13:56Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@parseb Shoutout to @LidoFinance @Lomashuk 🫡"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697971857046098054)  2023-09-02T13:56Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@levs57 devs believe that emergency powers are better in their hands Believe it or not I really really don't want the emergency powers to be in my hands. And I'm not alone"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697976444733804874)  2023-09-02T14:15Z 30.4K followers, [--] engagements


"@GandalfGandolfi @bkiepuszewski Gold"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697986942879547863)  2023-09-02T14:56Z 30.5K followers, [--] engagements


"But is this the best solution to threats caused by implementation risks (it can't compete with centralized decision making in term of UX) Is it Idk you tell me :) What are better decentralized alternatives Centralized systems already exist with their pros and cons"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697992705781932380)  2023-09-02T15:19Z 30.4K followers, [----] engagements


"@ivangbi_ @Kleros_io @apeir99n @s0xn1ck I don't quite understand your example. Problem statement: we want to prevent a malicious governance from abusing the emergency upgrade mechanism. What can go wrong here"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1697993411582701814)  2023-09-02T15:22Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@bkiepuszewski @MakerDAO 1) While emergency shutdown is not ideal it serves as a nuclear deterrence from the malicious MKR gov it will punish them hard and won't allow to profit. Maybe it's ok to just accept it 2) If you're concerned about SC bugs ungovern"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1698019181336179116)  2023-09-02T17:04Z [--] followers, [----] engagements


"@clesaege @Kleros_io Thank you will watch"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698040778696593539)  2023-09-02T18:30Z 28K followers, [---] engagements


"@real_philogy @Kleros_io Agreed. We would love to get involved or support this research"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698102662984524081)  2023-09-02T22:36Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"But I dont think we should really be relying on that type off functionality to secure a rollup bridge. Why not And how else you see solving the fundamental smart contract risk of these complex systems in a decentralized way"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698291170038652989)  2023-09-03T11:05Z 30.4K followers, [----] engagements


"Yes I mentioned @VitalikButerin's post about overloading L1 consensus in my write-up and I am openly challenging it. BTW my proposal is inspired by another of his ideas about the concave vs. convex worldviews: Taking a 100% distanced approach to governance is convex. I plead for a concave policy of minimal necessary intervention: pre-agreeing on soft-fork as a non-intrusive veto mechanism for governance decisions; only in extreme emergency cases and only for protocols with systematic significance. Without it we're doomed to choose between two extremes: 1) Code is law bug = death. 2) Code"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698302382386344176)  2023-09-03T11:50Z 30.5K followers, 11.1K engagements


"@MicahZoltu @LajkoKalman PoS validators and full node operators (let's call them guardians) have different objectives and incentives. Validators: operate the network efficiently to maximize rewards. Guardians: enforce networks' implicit social contract. Example: recover from "51% attack""  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698304745809625554)  2023-09-03T11:59Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@MicahZoltu @LajkoKalman Maybe. But L2s and Defi protocols are incredibly unpredictible because most have multisigs with unchallenged instant upgradability. What this really means: the core protocol is only good for building centralized systems. Was that the master plan ;)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698308027546255807)  2023-09-03T12:12Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@MicahZoltu @LajkoKalman Some systems are too complex to accept this risk. You can of course disagree but I see a broad consensus on this view regarding L2s and MakerDAO for example"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698315083858968931)  2023-09-03T12:40Z 30.6K followers, [---] engagements


"@MicahZoltu @LajkoKalman Good point about small protocols and barriers of entry. This is why some hierarchical court system could be interesting. You can't directly go to the supreme court but only if there is a glaring injustice. I admit that it's a pretty far stretch though. Just brainstorming"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698316534517498068)  2023-09-03T12:46Z 30.4K followers, [--] engagements


"@MicahZoltu @LajkoKalman fork based governance is that majority rules to me fork-based governance is what protects the minority because it can always go away with its own fork"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698317011934232733)  2023-09-03T12:48Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@MicahZoltu @LajkoKalman Yes apologies🫡"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698319037506130370)  2023-09-03T12:56Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@0xmillie_eth Will appreciate elaborated feedback. Here's a more precise problem statement:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698331476259905696)  2023-09-03T13:45Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@0xmillie_eth How can state actors capture a fork choice"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698334989446795702)  2023-09-03T13:59Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@lex_node @ChrisBlec @delphi_labs Here's a more concise problem statement. This is what triggered the recent @MakerDAO discussion"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698347746980208857)  2023-09-03T14:50Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@0xmillie_eth The whole point of a UASF is to defy stakers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698354375939199113)  2023-09-03T15:16Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@MIC_btc @Cointelegraph Please elaborate the attack vector. An example maybe"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698683688190345294)  2023-09-04T13:05Z 30.6K followers, [---] engagements


"@rav3n_pl It looks like I didn't manage to properly explain the idea. It's not a proposal to bypass the governance of a protocol or (God forbid) retro-actively govern anything. Only to prevent the governance from going mad. Maybe this will help:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698726362658242978)  2023-09-04T15:55Z 30.5K followers, [--] engagements


"We are looking for a VP of Product at @the_matter_labs. Help us build @zksync and bring mass adoption to Ethereum Were searching for an visionary technical product leader who will drive our product strategy. Here are some interesting facts about the role: 👇 1) Mission comes first: advancing personal freedom for all. What were building is neither a company nor a commercial product it's a credibly neutral tech and network owned and governed by the community. Our goal is to create a protocol that turns Ethereum into the limitless Internet of Value. Your alignment with our mission and culture is"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1698731402265604115)  2023-09-04T16:15Z 29.6K followers, 195.2K engagements


"💯 and it's already obvious if you understand the tech. As long as the majority of decision makers believes the opposite it's your lucky chance. [--] years ago @the_matter_labs had the same thesis about ZK cryptography permeating everything in the blockchain world"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699026412059943009)  2023-09-05T11:47Z 30.5K followers, 12.4K engagements


"@TheOCcryptobro @Cointelegraph Which part you find ridiculous The proposal is to address the limitations of the on-chain governance"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699107012796182892)  2023-09-05T17:07Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"This scheme is genuis. Since the compliance is voluntary it works for any jurisdiction"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699439954336649250)  2023-09-06T15:10Z 30.5K followers, 28.6K engagements


"Yes Tornado: clean + dirty money = dirty money. Therefore DOJ blacklisted the entire TC contract as "dirty". Here clean money is separated from the dirty money. It's very close to "clean" and "dirty" addresses on Ethereum itself. TC's compliance tool could not do that because you were only able to reveal the immediate source address not prove the clean provenance of the incoming funds"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699477893766693184)  2023-09-06T17:41Z 30.5K followers, 43.7K engagements


"What problem does this privacy protocol solve Building an ethos-compatible privacy protocol that actually works because it's politically much harder to ban. What does ethos-compatible mean 1) Compliance is voluntary. Every user decides for themselves what they want to comply with. 2) No transaction data is revealed even if a user decides to comply with their local authorities. How to accomplish this By understanding legit concerns of the regulators (fighting crime) and actually addressing them in a way that is strongly legally defensible. How not to accomplish this 1) By completely ignoring"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699562578341425300)  2023-09-06T23:17Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@BlockEnthusiast"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699562735569080624)  2023-09-06T23:18Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@hosseeb It depends on the actual implementation"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699562906306613441)  2023-09-06T23:19Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@ChrisBlec First seek to understand. Then judge"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699563857562259795)  2023-09-06T23:22Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@imrane I agree with you and stand 100% pro-privacy. I was merely explaining the logic of the regulators. Consider this:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699695112370917515)  2023-09-07T08:04Z 30.5K followers, [--] engagements


"@MicahZoltu I remember similar conversations about the magic internet money which "the state would never accept". Some people did nothing but lament. Others worked hard to create legit use-cases educate and convince regulators or build up a strong legal defense"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699698150691283185)  2023-09-07T08:16Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@0xCheap @MicahZoltu"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699699073077367021)  2023-09-07T08:20Z 30.6K followers, [---] engagements


"@nero_eth It depends on the implementation or may require another iteration of design but the point is: it's fundamentally possible to construct a scheme that enables nothing for bad actors what they don't already have with TC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699701602825699805)  2023-09-07T08:30Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"@levs57 @ameensol @stellarmagnet @hdevalence @twobitidiot @hosseeb Turning the network governance into a global ASP would politicize the network. We want to keep it as neutral as we possibly can. In contrast decentralized web-of-trust with exchanges as ASPs is a very interesting idea I'd be very happy to help work on it let me know how"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699750252893413384)  2023-09-07T11:43Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"I am 100% pro freedom and pro privacy and generally agree with most of your arguments. It's not gonna be an easy fight. What I see differently: "the state" is not a monolithic entity. There are different states and different parties within them. Try diplomacy and incentives before you die a martyr for a great cause. Read Asimov's "Foundation". I remember a similar conversation about the magic internet money. "The state will never accept Bitcoin because it's too great a competition for fiat" they said. Look where we are today"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1699837077586686092)  2023-09-07T17:28Z 30.4K followers, [--] engagements


"What an amazing speech The success or failure of @zksync's mission and indeed of my own life's mission is whether or not we live up to the spirit of @ErikVoorhees' words with [--] billion users on-chain"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1704874943631012069)  2023-09-21T15:07Z 30.5K followers, 49.9K engagements


"Imagine Ukraine banning civilians from the East to evacuate to the rest of the country or Armenia banning people in Karaback from moving inland after they lost to Azerbaijan. That's what Arab nations are doing. Their position is what keeps the war going for [--] yrs. Israel completely withdrew its settlements from there in [----]. There was full freedom full liberation no siege. What did it get in return Peace talks What is it supposed to do now Just sit and wait for the next massacre If you can't win a war don't fucking start it using your civilians as human shields. If you do you and you alone"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1713237261704204492)  2023-10-14T16:56Z 30.5K followers, [---] engagements


"Because Palestinians were consistently encouraged by their "supporters" to chose violent extremism over healthy pragmatism. Every time they'd initiate and lose a war their conditions would worsen. Ask [--] random Palestinians if their vision of freedom includes co-existence with Israel. You'll be in a for a surprise"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1713290432577142984)  2023-10-14T20:27Z 30.5K followers, [--] engagements


"@Scroll_ZKP Congrats"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1714281423702773925)  2023-10-17T14:05Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"One big additional use-case is trustless reading *from* a validium. Examples: 1) Oracle updates 2) Voting in L2 3) General off-chain computation over large input data"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1719287835377705144)  2023-10-31T09:38Z 27.8K followers, 17.3K engagements


"Fasten your seats for an EPIC year"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1728479954822738207)  2023-11-25T18:25Z 28.9K followers, 49.1K engagements


"@DeanEigenmann Doesn't "wealth tax" explanation pass Occam's razor better"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1728756865461371269)  2023-11-26T12:45Z 28K followers, [----] engagements


"This is why @zksync uses state diffs. State diffs = no overhead for AA"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1731417834712973786)  2023-12-03T20:59Z 29.2K followers, 80.3K engagements


"This willful determination is in my experience the scarest and most underrated mindset trait setting people up for success"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1733095235369029761)  2023-12-08T12:04Z 29.1K followers, 16.7K engagements


"Because any serious finance on-chain requires trustlessness (1/2)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1736531040858997230)  2023-12-17T23:37Z 29.5K followers, 15.7K engagements


"The superpower of blockchain communities is their ability to drive collective actionmotivated not by mere altrusim but by individual incentive alignment which makes this movement a lot more headwind-resilient"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1736769036606742569)  2023-12-18T15:23Z 29.6K followers, 11.7K engagements


"@StrategicHash Think of SMTP. It's infinitely scalable even if latency is in minutes: you can add as many servers as you need to accomodate more user demand and yet an email sent from any domain to any other one can be fully trustless signed by a cryptographic key"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1736830814568984794)  2023-12-18T19:28Z 29.6K followers, [----] engagements


"@sgmmrinkeby Everything will be fully decentralized both sequening and proving"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1736885322204479737)  2023-12-18T23:05Z 29.6K followers, [---] engagements


"That's why trustless rollup ecosystems like @zksync's hyperchain network will flourish: * Anyone will be able to deploy a rollup there permissionlessly and flexibly customize it. * Security of all rollups in the network will be enforced stricly by validity proof and Ethereum. The easier it gets to launch a rollup the more we will see rollups of very poor quality or with outright malicious intents. Small systems will get less scrutiny than big ones it's unavoidable. Be aware aping into them dyor ask questions. The easier it gets to launch a rollup the more we will see rollups of very poor"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1738546567584350330)  2023-12-23T13:06Z 30.4K followers, 38.5K engagements


"Love this ❤ A much appreciated reminder on why we are here. Make Ethereum cypherpunk again https://t.co/qEiOcZLEeg Make Ethereum cypherpunk again https://t.co/qEiOcZLEeg"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1740527034655261124)  2023-12-29T00:15Z 30.5K followers, 43K engagements


"@sgoldfed Why are risig gas fees critical to realize its vision"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1740706317252050997)  2023-12-29T12:08Z 30.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@sgoldfed @0xSEC69420 At @zksync we believe the same and would love to cooperate 🤝 The technical limitation I see though is: in the lack of validity proofs the only way to achieve interoperability is giving up decentralization and sovereignty of individual chains"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1740707549685690583)  2023-12-29T12:13Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"VIVA LA LIBERTAD CARAJO Argentinos de bien estamos por el buen camino. No dejemos que se nos interpongan la casta delincuente que busca coimas y/o perpetuar el statu quo decadente. VIVA LA LIBERTAD CARAJO Argentinos de bien estamos por el buen camino. No dejemos que se nos interpongan la casta delincuente que busca coimas y/o perpetuar el statu quo decadente. VIVA LA LIBERTAD CARAJO"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1741065213779095680)  2023-12-30T11:54Z 31.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@PhABCD @CelestiaOrg Not the power users though and they matter. Look at the TVL difference between Arbitrum One and Nova. The problem is that alt DA layers add no more security *for data* than sidechains because a malicious quorum is all it takes to sign an unavailable block"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1743938470349791570)  2024-01-07T10:11Z 31.1K followers, [----] engagements


"Optimium Sidechain. There's this big misconception that Plasma = Fraud-Proofs + external DA (similarly to Validiums = Validity Proofs + external DA). The misconception stems from the fact that Plasma is using fraud proofs *and* does not use Ethereum as DA. But it does not work as Validiums 👇🧵 There's this big misconception that Plasma = Fraud-Proofs + external DA (similarly to Validiums = Validity Proofs + external DA). The misconception stems from the fact that Plasma is using fraud proofs *and* does not use Ethereum as DA. But it does not work as Validiums 👇🧵"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1744455376538325162)  2024-01-08T20:25Z 30.4K followers, 18.3K engagements


"@PlasmaPower0 A user wakes up and sees hundreds of thousands of unavailble blocks having been sequenced. How on earth step-by-step are they supposed to force withdraw If and only if you solve this (🍿 🍿) I will solemnly agree that Optimium Plasma (hello mass exit problem)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1744474904186003666)  2024-01-08T21:43Z 30.4K followers, [---] engagements


"The UX revolution is coming. 1/ Batch Transactions (AA) and State Diffs are more powerful than you think. With Clave's batchcaller Contract users can perform batch transactions while reducing data availability fees tanks to state diffs How Let us explain: https://t.co/wdCM3psEXI 1/ Batch Transactions (AA) and State Diffs are more powerful than you think. With Clave's batchcaller Contract users can perform batch transactions while reducing data availability fees tanks to state diffs How Let us explain: https://t.co/wdCM3psEXI"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1751729612550287434)  2024-01-28T22:10Z 31.4K followers, 19.3K engagements


"@0xMert_ The main difference today is technical maturity. See daily TPS record: Second main difference is DA architecture: state diffs (zkSync Starknet) vs. calldata (everyone else). State s = superlinear compression = much lower fees:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1752624065070674200)  2024-01-31T09:25Z 31.7K followers, 71.6K engagements


"Comparing ZK rollups: @0xMert_ The main difference today is technical maturity. See daily TPS record: https://t.co/vnXnUe92a0 Second main difference is DA architecture: state diffs (zkSync Starknet) vs. calldata (everyone else). State s = superlinear compression = much lower fees: https://t.co/IBmsHqEJ7t @0xMert_ The main difference today is technical maturity. See daily TPS record: https://t.co/vnXnUe92a0 Second main difference is DA architecture: state diffs (zkSync Starknet) vs. calldata (everyone else). State s = superlinear compression = much lower fees: https://t.co/IBmsHqEJ7t"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1752625130935660740)  2024-01-31T09:29Z 31.4K followers, 66.7K engagements


"I have deep respect for the remarkable progress the Polygon Labs' team has achieved in our highly complex field. If you are affected by this layoff we'd love to talk to you. Please shoot an email with your CV to recruiting+polygon@matterlabs.com Our mission at @the_matter_labs is to accelerate the mass adoption of crypto for personal sovereignty. We agree that scaling Ethereum with recursive ZK proofs is the only way to get there. ZK is the Endgame. Following Ethereum's philosophy of subtraction we have always strived to remain a lean and focused organization. Despite possessing a massive"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753079816855666900)  2024-02-01T15:36Z 31.3K followers, 48.2K engagements


"@sgoldfed If you dont design your architecture with the end-state in mind it will be very hard to fix it later. Better start early. @EdFelten co-founder of @arbitrum"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753452152083689896)  2024-02-02T16:15Z 31.3K followers, 21K engagements


"@Muhamma86216407 After EIP4844. We need to see the effects of it first on tx prices"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753468763947618402)  2024-02-02T17:21Z 31.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@StrategicHash @zksync Era a single ZK Stack hyperchain instance sustained [--] TPS over [--] hours during the inscriptions craze.More than any other L2 ever: At peak it measured [---] TPS. You can get to [----] TPS today by simply deploying [--] more ZK Stack hyperchains"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753472816928743827)  2024-02-02T17:37Z 31.4K followers, [----] engagements


"@EdFelten 🥈🙃"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753478654703612239)  2024-02-02T18:01Z 31.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@Cryptomireris @EdFelten I love Arbitrum ❤ One of the best L2 communities"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753481753073774597)  2024-02-02T18:13Z 31.4K followers, [----] engagements


"@Justin_Bons @aeyakovenko what do you say Tribalism aside let's steelman each other's arguments. I admire Solana's steady committment to its thesis: pushing the boundries of what a single synchronous blockchain engine can process. It's innovations are awesome especially around parallel execution and localize fee markets. That's what all L2s must embrace. There is some truth in the statement that disparate L2s can lead to UX and liquidity fragmentation. We will start with separate infinitely scalable ZK L2 ecosystems. At first @zksync hyperchains will be infinitely scalable and seamlessly"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753487150153084934)  2024-02-02T18:34Z 31.4K followers, 65.7K engagements


"@aeyakovenko @fede_intern @Justin_Bons You're not steelmanig my argument. Yes you can build an efficient database state sync engine that can handle [-------] TPS. How are users of this system supposed to verify it With ZKPs it's infeasible to process 1M TPS synchronously. Async no problem. Verification: 1s"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753495372578664655)  2024-02-02T19:07Z 31.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@HardhatChad @fede_intern You would not want to do this if you want verifiable computation and ownership instead of trusting big tech"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753499865575731256)  2024-02-02T19:25Z 31.2K followers, [---] engagements


"LOL @zksync's record usage is [---] TPS @solana's is 1k TPS Both of us will say we're far from optimium. However we can launch hundreds of independent zkSync validium instances on Ethereum today but I don't that Solana's throughput go can go even 100x from where it is now. Let's do our best. [----] is going to be fun 🍿"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753554308275044713)  2024-02-02T23:01Z 31.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@melquiades_19 Proving times are already negligible. @zksync is not only the cheapest ZK rollup it's the cheapest one across all rollup types: Hyperchain bridging is coming very soon"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1753704136963395740)  2024-02-03T08:57Z 31.4K followers, 26.4K engagements


"Powered by @zksync Woah. @HYCO_Official just passed [--] million NFT mints with nearly 450k accounts. Barely been a week https://t.co/WtKDx48X8C Woah. @HYCO_Official just passed [--] million NFT mints with nearly 450k accounts. Barely been a week https://t.co/WtKDx48X8C"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1754461364003754474)  2024-02-05T11:06Z 31.4K followers, 42.8K engagements


"Lol someone just did this almost literally 🙈 It's perfectly fine to launch early to learn experiment and iterate on design. It's extremely disappointing to see misleading naming in communicationbecause it devalues the hard work honest builders put in to actually make systems secure and decentralized. It's our moral responsibility as a community to absolutely insist on calling things by their true names: [--]. "ZK rollup" without ZK proofs PoA [--]. "Optimistic rollup" without fraud proofs PoA [--]. "OR" with permissioned fraud proofs Anytrust [--]. "Rollup" without code Multisig How has it become normal"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1754832818092249448)  2024-02-06T11:42Z 32K followers, 63.8K engagements


"@binadam61 @zksync I'm right here"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1756774135168995492)  2024-02-11T20:16Z 31.7K followers, [---] engagements


"@nic__carter There are strong forces beyond financial motivation that a small number of highly centralized actors can find themselves under"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1757126810398011722)  2024-02-12T19:37Z 31.6K followers, [---] engagements


"Exactly. Which effectively would turn all those rollups into a single giant L2. If you want that it's much easier and more ergonomical to add optimistic parallelism to a rollup VM. The reason we need many L2s is to decentralize control to different communities. This only works if they keep their sovereignty. Can we stop saying that shared sequencing enables synchronous composability by default The only current way for one to "synchronously compose" between the L2s sequenced together is to operate the full nodes for all of those L2s. Can we stop saying that shared sequencing enables"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1757130289736765905)  2024-02-12T19:51Z 32.1K followers, 46.9K engagements


"Viva la libertad carajo Crypto is a global movement to shift ownership from authorities to individuals. Were working with the city of Buenos Aires and @Extrimian to build @Quark_ID an open source protocol to issue decentralized identifiers (#DIDs) for millions of Argentinian citizens to reclaim https://t.co/co6nuIOVXu Crypto is a global movement to shift ownership from authorities to individuals. Were working with the city of Buenos Aires and @Extrimian to build @Quark_ID an open source protocol to issue decentralized identifiers (#DIDs) for millions of Argentinian citizens to reclaim"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1757458201245560947)  2024-02-13T17:34Z 31.8K followers, 12.6K engagements


"It's official. @ramonIsTweeting Can we just call those Brollups @ramonIsTweeting Can we just call those Brollups"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1757859221922578624)  2024-02-14T20:07Z 32K followers, 19.2K engagements


"Great job @zerolendxyz 🚀 Big news from ZeroLend We've cracked the top [--] in lending protocols and are currently sitting pretty at #19 by market size. A massive shoutout to our ZeroLend community 🖐 Find us at https://t.co/VLIRNYyQyC https://t.co/bfVVXr3fVL 🚀 Big news from ZeroLend We've cracked the top [--] in lending protocols and are currently sitting pretty at #19 by market size. A massive shoutout to our ZeroLend community 🖐 Find us at https://t.co/VLIRNYyQyC https://t.co/bfVVXr3fVL"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1758807362918297964)  2024-02-17T10:55Z 32.2K followers, 19.2K engagements


"@alexhooketh @haydenzadams @boredGenius @zksync From other nodes. No state - distrust that block"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1758924454539764084)  2024-02-17T18:40Z 32K followers, [---] engagements


"Gm Gm @zksync @syncswap @mute_io @derivio_xyz @grvt_io @Zyfi_org @zerolendxyz @Lighter_xyz @mavprotocol @gravitaprotocol @FulcromFinance @cronos_chain @getclave @pudgypenguins @zeekcoin @zkzorro https://t.co/J5dkgk1DvV Gm @zksync @syncswap @mute_io @derivio_xyz @grvt_io @Zyfi_org @zerolendxyz @Lighter_xyz @mavprotocol @gravitaprotocol @FulcromFinance @cronos_chain @getclave @pudgypenguins @zeekcoin @zkzorro https://t.co/J5dkgk1DvV"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1760232882520367313)  2024-02-21T09:19Z 32.9K followers, 56.2K engagements


"@Karim90373673 @hue_nfts Gm"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1761004642442317917)  2024-02-23T12:26Z 32.2K followers, [--] engagements


"If EVM = HTTP ZK = HTTPS. HTTPS (SSL) provided integrity of communication paving the path for online banking SaaS remote work. ZK provides integrity of computation enabling interoperability at infinite scale. HTTPS moved our lives online. ZK will move our lives onchain. ZK = HTTPS of blockchain 🔒 Dont trust verify ZK = HTTPS of blockchain 🔒 Dont trust verify"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1763277761982947560)  2024-02-29T18:59Z 32.9K followers, 14.2K engagements


"Specialized circuits are still important. After [--] months in the lab our team is ready to announce ZkLighter Our mission has been to build infrastructure for trading that's secure fair and as efficient as a centralized exchange. With several breakthroughs using ZK-SNARKs we have finished development of ZkLighter After [--] months in the lab our team is ready to announce ZkLighter Our mission has been to build infrastructure for trading that's secure fair and as efficient as a centralized exchange. With several breakthroughs using ZK-SNARKs we have finished development of ZkLighter"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1763939278793408644)  2024-03-02T14:47Z 34.8K followers, 22.8K engagements


"Catch me at @Permissionless in October. I'll be the one in a Zeek hat ZK-pilling everyone on why ZK is the Endgame. INTRODUCING: Permissionless III The event for crypto natives. October 9-11 Salt Lake City Utah 🏜🌵 https://t.co/aWTVwNykyN INTRODUCING: Permissionless III The event for crypto natives. October 9-11 Salt Lake City Utah 🏜🌵 https://t.co/aWTVwNykyN"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1766224657316016511)  2024-03-08T22:09Z 49.5K followers, 39.3K engagements


"@dimahledba @dmihal it's a question for you 🙏 Our PR is pending we're much looking forward to it because on the swap side it's even better"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1767992152406011935)  2024-03-13T19:12Z 35.2K followers, [----] engagements


"Really well said. [--] years ago the Cypherpunk manifesto was published. I wrote this manifesto with great concern that we are losing the principles that brought us here. This is an attempt to reunite. To refocus on what is really important. Let's get back to the roots. https://t.co/RTQ0Ch16Fn https://t.co/JdlkNuq0Sg [--] years ago the Cypherpunk manifesto was published. I wrote this manifesto with great concern that we are losing the principles that brought us here. This is an attempt to reunite. To refocus on what is really important. Let's get back to the roots. https://t.co/RTQ0Ch16Fn"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1768999647798780288)  2024-03-16T13:55Z 42.3K followers, 21.9K engagements


"If you're building an onchain order book on @zksync please share a link in comments. Would love to talk. DeFi A.D. (After Dencun) Filling up huge block spaces with on-chain transactions will arise as one of the biggest challenges that L2s will face as Ethereum scales even further. Meanwhile existing DeFi protocols will not bring enough demands for that. This is obvious because DeFi A.D. (After Dencun) Filling up huge block spaces with on-chain transactions will arise as one of the biggest challenges that L2s will face as Ethereum scales even further. Meanwhile existing DeFi protocols will not"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1769001454214205593)  2024-03-16T14:03Z 42.7K followers, 49.1K engagements


"@dennissanche @zksync There are teams actually building this on @zksync"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1771244322307924251)  2024-03-22T18:35Z 47.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@MicahZoltu @zksync @l2beat Yes. Permissionless immutable (close to the degree to which an L1 is immutable) censorship-resistant. Decentralizing both sequencer and prover in the fullness of time"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1772278674462495036)  2024-03-25T15:05Z 42.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@ptrwtts @zksync"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1772754218052440368)  2024-03-26T22:35Z 42.6K followers, [---] engagements


""rollups will launch faster than the UX and security can be abstracted" That's the central premise of his thesis. Where @0xMert_ sees a problem I see an opportunity. ZK will fix this. Save screenshots. a prediction - Base is making a ton of money from their L2 (2M compared to 1k to Ethereum and this is only on [--] TPS) - companies will use these figures to justify launching their own L2s (this is already happening) - however they will forget that they are not indeed https://t.co/FSQAUmXS0N a prediction - Base is making a ton of money from their L2 (2M compared to 1k to Ethereum and this is"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1773459613054091421)  2024-03-28T21:18Z 46.2K followers, 47.1K engagements


"@0xMert_ Before the rest of the prediction can materialize. It will be a gradual transition starting with trustless zero-cost hyperbridging on ZK. Integrated wallet UX will follow"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1773464530078617667)  2024-03-28T21:37Z 43K followers, [----] engagements


"True feel extremely lucky that we got @1kxnetwork to lead our last round have seen some extremely unseemly behavior from funds in some projects i angeled in recently and will just say every founder should do what they can to have 1kx behind them feel extremely lucky that we got @1kxnetwork to lead our last round have seen some extremely unseemly behavior from funds in some projects i angeled in recently and will just say every founder should do what they can to have 1kx behind them"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1778691120811176356)  2024-04-12T07:46Z 47.5K followers, 51.7K engagements


"@tevaera @zksync @HashKey_Capital @fenbushi @DWFLabs @Cryptocom_Cap @Morningstar_vc @gbvofficial @Faculty__Group @SeliniCapital @castrumistanbul @GD10Capital Congrats"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1783167560076169480)  2024-04-24T16:14Z 48.3K followers, 16.1K engagements


"It's fast AF Freedom always wins Announcing Venice Today we launch private permissionless AI for the purpose of unfettered civilizational advancement: https://t.co/m2jsJuDuXS Full announcement: https://t.co/lPIDpgI9K1 @TryVenice A thread. 1/17 Announcing Venice Today we launch private permissionless AI for the purpose of unfettered civilizational advancement: https://t.co/m2jsJuDuXS Full announcement: https://t.co/lPIDpgI9K1 @TryVenice A thread. 1/17"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1789024585876164790)  2024-05-10T20:07Z 49.2K followers, 58.1K engagements


"@divine_economy what if it was branded as a classic liberal (aka libertarian) movement"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1789959734201622780)  2024-05-13T10:03Z 49.2K followers, 12.1K engagements


"Extremely excited to be working with @StaniKulechov and Lens' brilliant team on this long journey"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1790473280089956723)  2024-05-14T20:04Z 49.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@zksync is not just another L2. zkSync firmly stands by its commitment to decentralize. Since rolling out support for EIP4844 in March this has been the sole focus. The upcoming release of v24 is the final planned protocol upgrade needed before handing over network governance to the community. The remaining zkSync firmly stands by its commitment to decentralize. Since rolling out support for EIP4844 in March this has been the sole focus. The upcoming release of v24 is the final planned protocol upgrade needed before handing over network governance to the community. The remaining"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1791495435636416995)  2024-05-17T15:46Z 50.6K followers, 67.5K engagements


"2021-era Ethereum thought became too comfortable with a small number of large-scale actors as long as some kind of mechanism existed to force them to behave honestly. Such systems often work well in the average case but fail catastrophically in the worst case. 👏👏👏 Grats @dankrad @peter_szilagyi you got me to interrupt my work on EIPs and make a twitter response that turned into an unscheduled poast 😀 https://t.co/mmVaiEV68K Grats @dankrad @peter_szilagyi you got me to interrupt my work on EIPs and make a twitter response that turned into an unscheduled poast 😀 https://t.co/mmVaiEV68K"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1791745859127771230)  2024-05-18T08:21Z 49.4K followers, 31.1K engagements


"@eawosikaa @VitalikButerin @zengjiajun_eth ORUs are inherently incompatible with cross-chain interoperability. They must rearchitect their systems from scratch. Or more likely most users will naturally migrate into ZK-first ecosystems. DVDs dominated the market share too. Then streaming arrived. Many such cases"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1792890753636544827)  2024-05-21T12:10Z 49.4K followers, 24K engagements


"🤨 https://t.co/HdefVV3Jo2 https://t.co/HdefVV3Jo2"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1794817826894623040)  2024-05-26T19:48Z 51K followers, 49K engagements


"@WuBlockchain https://x.com/gluk64/status/1796166773139440053 @StarkWareLtd @zksync https://t.co/XyNpsGQPQq https://x.com/gluk64/status/1796166773139440053 @StarkWareLtd @zksync https://t.co/XyNpsGQPQq"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1796167464994148802)  2024-05-30T13:11Z 50.4K followers, 26.2K engagements


"@EliBenSasson This is a misconception. Trademarks is the only form of IP that even hardcore libertarians recognize specifically because they were designed to protect consumers not the owners. Read this excellent book: http://cdn.mises.org/15_2_1.pdf http://cdn.mises.org/15_2_1.pdf"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1796202385703878709)  2024-05-30T15:29Z 50.7K followers, 25.3K engagements


"@fede_intern Get well soon brother"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1796517519307489679)  2024-05-31T12:22Z 50.7K followers, [----] engagements


"Thats exactly the problem we were warned about. And squatting is easier in certain jurisdictions. From [----] to [----] Gmail was forced to use in Germany instead of because some random dude trademarked Gmail and sued Google. http://gmail.com http://googlemail.com @hdevalence I'm confused about how a common term like zk can even be trademarked. But now that it has been is there a possibility that if this proposed "neutral entity" does not snap up the trademarks a "trademark troll" will and cause even more headaches for zk teams http://gmail.com http://googlemail.com @hdevalence I'm confused about"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1796676100753330381)  2024-05-31T22:52Z 50.9K followers, 55K engagements


"Based take Leaving cultural aspects aside technically you have to choose whether you want to be sovereign or interoperable. You cannot get both: your chains sovereignty is capriciousness from another chains point of view. If you want interoperability for your chain you ***have*** to Leaving cultural aspects aside technically you have to choose whether you want to be sovereign or interoperable. You cannot get both: your chains sovereignty is capriciousness from another chains point of view. If you want interoperability for your chain you ***have*** to"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1796747117534339434)  2024-06-01T03:34Z 50.7K followers, 45.9K engagements


"Bookmark this. In [--] years from now worlds politicians and statist economists will be like: It has nothing to do with Milei Here are [--] reasons why Argentina was destined to succeed: . One more: I want to make a commitment to all of you and tell you that I will not fail you. I will lead by example and show the world that a government with our ideas can succeed. And the feats that our government accomplishes in Argentina will be a testimony and a proclaim One more: I want to make a commitment to all of you and tell you that I will not fail you. I will lead by example and show the world that a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1796765456852037992)  2024-06-01T04:47Z 50.7K followers, 55.6K engagements


"@eawosikaa EF holds trademarks for Ethereum. Patents are evil"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1797265717546377373)  2024-06-02T13:55Z 50.8K followers, 36.3K engagements


"@obvs___ @eawosikaa You will be very surprised when you look up blockchain in the TM registry. I hate this shit too: a massive waste of time and energy for everyone. Trademarks should be replaced with simple fair and objective onchain mechanisms like @ensdomains"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1797275139605692830)  2024-06-02T14:32Z 51.5K followers, [----] engagements


"His name was Satoshi Nakamoto @gluk64 @obvs___ @eawosikaa @ensdomains https://t.co/aHYyXWLw4Z holds patent for Blockchain @gluk64 @obvs___ @eawosikaa @ensdomains https://t.co/aHYyXWLw4Z holds patent for Blockchain"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1797278028403266007)  2024-06-02T14:44Z 50.9K followers, 53.2K engagements


"@Rahul__Ghangas No we want much higher throughput and lower latency. Awesome UX is not negotiable. Also L2 have checkpoints which opens many directions for optimization"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1797302652746834182)  2024-06-02T16:21Z 50.8K followers, [----] engagements


"@KGJRTG @zksync All good this is a planned upgrade. https://x.com/zkSyncDevs/status/1798273203887804800 🗣Update on v24 Release Weve concluded our review and are moving forward with the Mainnet deployment on June 6th. Reminder: withdrawals and deposits from the native zkSync bridge will be disabled for [--] hours. You can still use third-party bridges. More information below 👇 https://x.com/zkSyncDevs/status/1798273203887804800 🗣Update on v24 Release Weve concluded our review and are moving forward with the Mainnet deployment on June 6th. Reminder: withdrawals and deposits from the native"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1798750559585120462)  2024-06-06T16:15Z 51K followers, 37.2K engagements


"@bneiluj get well soon"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1801190173562065124)  2024-06-13T09:49Z 51.1K followers, 34.2K engagements


"@RiscZero Congrats great job"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1803441798620098622)  2024-06-19T14:56Z 50.2K followers, 22.2K engagements


"@Vandal213832781 1) Anti-thetical to crypto. 2) Not very effective. There are KYC farms with hundreds of thousands of fake identities"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1803857663479910544)  2024-06-20T18:29Z 50.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@0xceesar @CC2Ventures This can work But: 1) Requires biometric passports. Will exclude most ppl anyway. 2) How do you know that the app that is scanning your passport is not compromised Requires deterministic apk builds etc and people will still feel its dodgy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1803860409427828854)  2024-06-20T18:40Z 50.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@Siku461 Sybils dont do any work they run servers. Tx fees and deposits are both just cost factors for them. Thats why the model only works if unexpected. Now sybils know so it wont fly again"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1803862102446358820)  2024-06-20T18:46Z 50.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@zenerbabax I have absolutely no idea. Matter Labs sponsored the LO last summer to encourage people to experiment more with NFTs on ZKsync and have fun onchain. Once we realized that its being wildly misinterpreted we cancelled the project. This is why nothing ever came out of the capsule"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1803866157071634621)  2024-06-20T19:03Z 49.5K followers, 13.4K engagements


"@0x_degengod I agree with you. If it was up to me Id immediately go on a live AMA. But @TheZKNation is young and making her first baby steps. Please be kind. Let her grow learn from mistakes and improve"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1803875254487433692)  2024-06-20T19:39Z 50.2K followers, [----] engagements


"@_theOnlygrey @0x_degengod @TheZKNation I think the problem of @TheZKNation was not the transparency (the docs are very comprehensive) but the checker UI. It should have shown exactly why someone was eligible or not eligible (e.g. low TWAB) and what multipliers applied"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1803893705872490724)  2024-06-20T20:52Z 50.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@AnonmasterAnon @y_soo9 I agree. This is absolutely insane"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804074075620323657)  2024-06-21T08:49Z 50.6K followers, [----] engagements


"@Crypto_clock @y_soo9 @TheZKNation already commented: https://docs.zknation.io/zk-token/faqs/zk-token-faqs#id-14.-why-was-i-not-eligible-despite-performing-well-in-the-various-airdrop-checkers https://docs.zknation.io/zk-token/faqs/zk-token-faqs#id-14.-why-was-i-not-eligible-despite-performing-well-in-the-various-airdrop-checkers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804075022379528469)  2024-06-21T08:52Z 51K followers, [----] engagements


"@ennamence_roll @divinesix9 @y_soo9 @TheZKNation The FUD campaign was real in addition to many people being upset. Bots were deployed to exacerbate emotions of real people. But I agree that this post was a mistake"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804081250329575530)  2024-06-21T09:17Z 50.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@7ec0n @y_soo9 In a few weeks accurate data will be available to compare how ZKsync did vs LZ. Then lets judge"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804084881024041056)  2024-06-21T09:32Z 49.5K followers, [----] engagements


"@Degen_Meowster @y_soo9 I never said that one of them is more valuable than the other. Both are valuable in different ways. The problem is: for every real user who spent a lot of fees but had done little LP there were [--] bots with the similar behavior. How do you tell which one is human"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804086850086220280)  2024-06-21T09:39Z 50.1K followers, [---] engagements


"We've been saying this for [--] years. Latency caused by the proof generation time will keep rapidly decreasing until the UX boundaries are blurred (at around [--] seconds is my guess). The future of Web3 is async with eventual consistency. @jon_charb Synchronous atomic composability is very overrated imo. Like think about what are some specific cross-L2 things *you* are already doing or envision yourself doing that could be more seamless. For me the top two are: [--]. I have coins on Optimism I want to pay Bob but Bob is @jon_charb Synchronous atomic composability is very overrated imo. Like think"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804123671818072079)  2024-06-21T12:06Z 49.8K followers, 177.4K engagements


"@SasuRobert Will integrate Tiktok directly into the wallet confirmation window"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804128173367390542)  2024-06-21T12:24Z 50.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@marcov_91 Very interesting thank you So as a % of the total drop: ZK: [----] % ARB: [----] % Correct"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804133445683065194)  2024-06-21T12:45Z 50.3K followers, 12.1K engagements


"@Real_alex5 @Gautamguptagg @zksync RTed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804143801868468299)  2024-06-21T13:26Z 49.5K followers, 25.3K engagements


"@ntsntg1 @Gautamguptagg @zksync @TheZKNation @TheZKNation clearly stated that the airdrop is over. All decisions about the network will from now on be made by the governance. Whoever is grateful and committed to the missionwill be part of it. Whoever is jumping ship is making the ZK Nation a great favor right now"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804188871963427233)  2024-06-21T16:25Z 49.7K followers, 16.7K engagements


"@Mahesh_hodler @zksync @CryptoRank_io @MaransCrypto @CryptoTeluguO @wiseadvicesumit All of team and investors allocations unlock strictly after [--] year. Full details: https://docs.zknation.io/zk-token/zk-token https://docs.zknation.io/zk-token/zk-token"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804249728445506026)  2024-06-21T20:27Z 50.4K followers, [---] engagements


"1/2 Idk if true or fake but it's very plausible. That's how sophisticated sybils fucked community airdrops 😡 What he's not telling you: for each one of his [---] wallets that received allocation there were hundreds smaller ones that ZK excluded (and ZRO awarded). Ok this escalated quickly let's clear some things up 1) The infrastructure I had for farming [---] wallets on @zksync is more sophisticated than most of l2 chains which we have today. Ok this escalated quickly let's clear some things up 1) The infrastructure I had for farming [---] wallets on @zksync is more sophisticated than most of l2"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804833750674473274)  2024-06-23T11:07Z 50.8K followers, 186.1K engagements


"2/2 You will all soon realize in retrospect how well @TheZKNation did for building a resilient communityby using the multipliers based on external signals such as HODLing the previous airdrops"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804833752717123841)  2024-06-23T11:07Z 50.1K followers, 195.1K engagements


"@Borisateli What allegations"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804834241928171679)  2024-06-23T11:09Z 50.3K followers, [----] engagements


"In fact I predict that HODLing STRK ZK ZRO will become the most reliable signal of who's airdrop-worthy in the observable future. Jeets will regret it big deal. 2/2 You will all soon realize in retrospect how well @TheZKNation did for building a resilient communityby using the multipliers based on external signals such as HODLing the previous airdrops. 2/2 You will all soon realize in retrospect how well @TheZKNation did for building a resilient communityby using the multipliers based on external signals such as HODLing the previous airdrops"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804838919726366982)  2024-06-23T11:28Z 50.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@altbender0x Is "jeet" a swear word I thought it's just a term for whoever leaves immediately"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804840608067957140)  2024-06-23T11:35Z 50.4K followers, [---] engagements


"In fact I predict that HODLing STRK ZK ZRO will become the most reliable signal of who's airdrop-worthy in the observable future. Instant dumpers will regret it big deal. 2/2 You will all soon realize in retrospect how well @TheZKNation did for building a resilient communityby using the multipliers based on external signals such as HODLing the previous airdrops. 2/2 You will all soon realize in retrospect how well @TheZKNation did for building a resilient communityby using the multipliers based on external signals such as HODLing the previous airdrops"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804841730585329797)  2024-06-23T11:39Z 50.2K followers, 147.1K engagements


"@jarrrax20 That too for sure"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804850039044407467)  2024-06-23T12:12Z 50.4K followers, [----] engagements


"@NubsCrypto Yeah I agree that would be a smarter design"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804850597637620099)  2024-06-23T12:14Z 50.4K followers, [----] engagements


"What kind of ZK proofs do they use and for what exactly Didn't manage to find it in the docs. 1/ Today we launch the next generation of Light. Together with @heliuslabs At its core a new primitive: Tokens and accounts: orders of magnitude cheaper while enabling native ZK compute on Solana. We call it: ZK Compression. https://t.co/nx3m99bwvy 1/ Today we launch the next generation of Light. Together with @heliuslabs At its core a new primitive: Tokens and accounts: orders of magnitude cheaper while enabling native ZK compute on Solana. We call it: ZK Compression. https://t.co/nx3m99bwvy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804851995712372985)  2024-06-23T12:20Z 50.3K followers, 152.5K engagements


"Ok looks like a stateless client for Solana validators with a simple ZK for Merkle proofs. Not bad for a start Endgame progress: 0.01% ;) . What kind of ZK proofs do they use and for what exactly Didn't manage to find it in the docs. What kind of ZK proofs do they use and for what exactly Didn't manage to find it in the docs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804859997647478871)  2024-06-23T12:52Z 50.3K followers, 79.4K engagements


"Disclaimer: to clarify this is just my guess about other projects. I dont imply anything about ZKsync obviously where the airdrop is over and all decisions are subject to public governance"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804869956829372819)  2024-06-23T13:31Z 50.2K followers, 11.1K engagements


"@mpmaduka15 @HoldstationW The exact signal I'd look for is: who bridged out from the ecosystem completely. In any case I'd not expect much from any future airdrops. Sybils destoryed this meta. But there will be many more opportunities for all"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804895956741017990)  2024-06-23T15:15Z 50.2K followers, [---] engagements


"@0xMert_ @donnoh_eth @0xCygaar @LightProtocol @heliuslabs Yes I read these docs and still can't find the answer: what data do the full nodes observe for each state transition Which page explains this"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804927925957099825)  2024-06-23T17:22Z 50.4K followers, [---] engagements


"@aeyakovenko @zksync I vividly remember tweets about atomic composability being the only thing the world cares about"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1804959969944510527)  2024-06-23T19:29Z 50.3K followers, 14.1K engagements


"@_bfarmer Shared validity sequencing is not interop its a single (sharded) chain. You can have low latency with economic finality but you still need ZKP to keep the chains independent (autonomous). Thats our goal but I understand that youre optimizing for a different one"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1805019801338679591)  2024-06-23T23:27Z 50.4K followers, 11.2K engagements


"While everyone's end-state UX pitch might sound similar it's not easy to achieve in practice. The technological maturity (in particular fast ZK proofs and shared L1 infrastructure for native asset transfers) will be the deciding factor in the race to materialize this vision"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1808138698418008530)  2024-07-02T14:00Z 49.9K followers, [----] engagements


"More on the benchmarks: https://x.com/ivanbogatyy/status/1808126380179141057 If you're a founder picking an L2 stack to launch your chain performance matters. I ran the AMM TPS test on ZKsync Era Polygon zkEVM and OP Mainnet. For zk rollups @zksync ZK Stack can handle 30x more TPS https://t.co/L1rvTNSrLr https://x.com/ivanbogatyy/status/1808126380179141057 If you're a founder picking an L2 stack to launch your chain performance matters. I ran the AMM TPS test on ZKsync Era Polygon zkEVM and OP Mainnet. For zk rollups @zksync ZK Stack can handle 30x more TPS https://t.co/L1rvTNSrLr"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1808138700259205574)  2024-07-02T14:00Z 49.9K followers, [----] engagements


"@franciscrypto0 @zksync Good idea. For now ask anything"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1808142445969809519)  2024-07-02T14:15Z 50.1K followers, [----] engagements


"@fede_intern @zksync 💯"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1808145690435957159)  2024-07-02T14:28Z 50.1K followers, [----] engagements


"can equally fork any of these crank up gas get higher TPS That's exactly what has been done and alas it wasn't possible to get higher TPS for Polygon zkEVM the only chain live today on the AggLayer. This demonstrates real maturity of each stack. What better measure would you suggest"  
[X Link](https://x.com/gluk64/status/1808168952654401656)  2024-07-02T16:00Z 50.1K followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing