# ![@coinjoined Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::263395666.png) @coinjoined Coinjoined Chris ⚡

Coinjoined Chris ⚡ posts on X about bitcoin, relay, if you, core the most. They currently have [------] followers and [---] posts still getting attention that total [-------] engagements in the last [--] hours.

### Engagements: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::263395666/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::263395666/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- [--] Week [-------] +158%
- [--] Month [-------] -62%
- [--] Months [---------] +29%
- [--] Year [---------] +207%

### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::263395666/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::263395666/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- [--] Week [---] +148%
- [--] Month [---] +89%
- [--] Months [---] +222%
- [--] Year [---] +71%

### Followers: [------] [#](/creator/twitter::263395666/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::263395666/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- [--] Week [-----] +0.90%
- [--] Month [-----] +3%
- [--] Months [-----] +25%
- [--] Year [-----] +98%

### CreatorRank: [-------] [#](/creator/twitter::263395666/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::263395666/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  25.55% [finance](/list/finance)  14.6% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  6.57% [stocks](/list/stocks)  2.19% [countries](/list/countries)  1.46% [musicians](/list/musicians)  1.46% [social networks](/list/social-networks)  1.46% [financial services](/list/financial-services)  #1678 [travel destinations](/list/travel-destinations)  0.73%

**Social topic influence**
[bitcoin](/topic/bitcoin) 24.82%, [relay](/topic/relay) #606, [if you](/topic/if-you) 5.11%, [core](/topic/core) 4.38%, [openclaw](/topic/openclaw) #2341, [end of](/topic/end-of) 2.92%, [spam](/topic/spam) #1187, [in the](/topic/in-the) 2.92%, [insurance](/topic/insurance) 2.92%, [pill](/topic/pill) 2.92%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@ndeet](/creator/undefined) [@hodlonaut](/creator/undefined) [@layertwolabs](/creator/undefined) [@peterktodd](/creator/undefined) [@adam3us](/creator/undefined) [@truthcoin](/creator/undefined) [@otaliptus](/creator/undefined) [@dustinwindspiel](/creator/undefined) [@mrhodl](/creator/undefined) [@hodlviking](/creator/undefined) [@steepdawn974](/creator/undefined) [@btcprague](/creator/undefined) [@giacomozucco](/creator/undefined) [@djsenior13](/creator/undefined) [@openclaw](/creator/undefined) [@okzenz](/creator/undefined) [@satsandsports](/creator/undefined) [@theonevortex](/creator/undefined) [@21bitfluencers](/creator/undefined) [@jklnz](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/bitcoin) [BlackRock Inc (BLK)](/topic/blackrock) [Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)](/topic/lockheed-martin)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"@Okzenz There is no deflection. What do you think BIP110 actually does Be as concrete as possible if you want to learn something. because I am confident that it is not doing what you think it is doing"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022639853096309197)  2026-02-14T11:51Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"One of Bitcoin's defining principles is simple: you don't get to decide what I do with my Bitcoin. By running Nakamoto consensus you agreed to the rules - not to your preferred outcomes. If someone finds a blind spot that still doesn't entitle you to override anyone else's property rights. @ostrom72158 @start9labs @kelo6102 @L0RINC you dont seem to understand what i am saying if a single utxo is frozen bitcoin does not work its over. the network will be worthless @ostrom72158 @start9labs @kelo6102 @L0RINC you dont seem to understand what i am saying if a single utxo is frozen bitcoin does not"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/1998184633834365123)  2025-12-09T00:15Z [----] followers, 10.1K engagements


"Name one thing I can't buy with Bitcoin. I'll wait. 😤"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2015514716978696215)  2026-01-25T19:58Z [----] followers, 14.4K engagements


"@pete_rizzo_ your money is better spend on a patek or A. Lange and [--] bitcoin than giving "Jacob & Co" 200k for a 15k watch that's made by Concepto Watch Factory"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2016174894057222274)  2026-01-27T15:42Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@lopp @saylor is not going to pump your $BTGO 😝"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2016932107549901236)  2026-01-29T17:51Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"In den meisten Fllen sind die Bitcoin auf der Hardware-Wallet sicher. Erst wenn man panisch reagiert und versucht sie durch hektisches Versenden in Sicherheit zu bringen" entstehen die eigentlichen Risiken - genau dann passieren die Hacks. Weil Hacker bentigen euch um die physischen Taste zu drcken bei der Signatur"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2017999148793131171)  2026-02-01T16:31Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"You heard about them literally yesterday and jumped straight into the docs and came up with Fund managers meet with other fund manager in NYC. Truly incredible work. Six-degrees of Manhattan What a smoking gun Get the cuffs boys See you on the minority chain end of August you pathetic clown 🤡 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018246910499291331 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018246910499291331"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2018246910499291331)  2026-02-02T08:55Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Red-eye to Berlin. Departure: 6:10 a.m. Alarm set for 4:30. The airport is [--] minutes away by public transport and Luxembourg airport is tiny normally a non-issue. I must've hit snooze and wake up at 5:30. Instant panic. Suitcase and ID grabbed. Bus and train abandoned. Straight into the car at 5:35 Some speed limits briefly became suggestions. During what should have been a [--] min drive i frantically check if i can still book a parking spot. Of course it's vacation time and only the economy parking far away by bus shuttle is still available. So when i arrive after a [--] minute rallye"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2018427156259606674)  2026-02-02T20:51Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Also the claim that miners should refrain from including these transactions because they "barely increase fees" ignores a basic fact of mining economics. Once the block is being mined costs are already sunk. Any marginal increase in fees is therefore almost entirely pure profit. A 0.1% increase in fees translates into an increase in profit-at effectively 100% margin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2019210178793537652)  2026-02-05T00:43Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Congratulations you finally did it. You bullied one of Bitcoin Core's most prolific and consistently excellent maintainers until she gave up. A mob of loud line-by-line-illiterate crusaders who couldn't maintain a README between them managed to exhaust someone who _actually did the proof of work_ This doesn't make Bitcoin safer. It makes it poorer thinner and less secure because you just taught the people who carry the protocol that sustained harassment is the price of competence. That lesson will not be forgotten and it will not age well"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2019502117363573148)  2026-02-05T20:03Z [----] followers, 30.1K engagements


"Guys we already smashed past 58k can we like. stop now #58kgang"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2019692804457590858)  2026-02-06T08:41Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Bitcoin doesn't need quantum resistance if it has no value 🙃"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2019797860699541744)  2026-02-06T15:38Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"be greedy when others are fearful"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020059694669394320)  2026-02-07T08:58Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@knutsvanholm You just made an enemy saying dumb shit like this"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020068083554001266)  2026-02-07T09:32Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"That Penguin's name Paul"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020302349298774245)  2026-02-08T01:03Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@StackingSaunter @Truthcoin @LayerTwoLabs @otaliptus Well you know that's just like your opinion man"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020305116117827832)  2026-02-08T01:14Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@StackingSaunter @Truthcoin @LayerTwoLabs @otaliptus Did you watch the meme"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020308166387593459)  2026-02-08T01:26Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@IncognitoCaspar @Truthcoin @LayerTwoLabs @otaliptus 🐧 ⛓💥"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020310757045592141)  2026-02-08T01:36Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@FightWithMemes Name [--] philosophers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020327070182580650)  2026-02-08T02:41Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Right I know 1-block reorgs are common - that's exactly why my interest was piqued and I checked @mempool. I always thought the term "reorg" was mostly reserved for the more newsworthy or potentially malicious events like selfish mining or deep chain reorganizations. I just assumed the Stacks protocol had handled stale blocks before - so what kind of zero-conf shenanigans went awry that it escalated into a Core emergency Or is core referring to their dev own team"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020546212928065539)  2026-02-08T17:12Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@LayerTwoLabs @Truthcoin @otaliptus You do lightning @Truthcoin 🤭"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020580944961487155)  2026-02-08T19:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"How can one just sit idly and watch Bitcoin governance drift into a place where principles dont matter That's precisely why I was an outspoken critic of the mindless mob bullying Gloria. Bitcoin governance is not decided by volume outrage or social pressure - it's mediated through proof of work review and long-standing contribution. Changes get merged when enough competent trusted contributors support them not when an easily sybilled mob demands it. And even then no one is compelled to run that code. You're free to run whatever implementation you want fund the developers you agree with or"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020595992408772819)  2026-02-08T20:30Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@Markus_Krall Ich bin Boomer und falle auf KI Mll rein ☝"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020608842753818682)  2026-02-08T21:21Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@otaliptus @Truthcoin @LayerTwoLabs Based on this persons idea ☝ 💡"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020611371612753923)  2026-02-08T21:31Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@MurrMcK @Truthcoin @LayerTwoLabs @otaliptus Can't believe this is the first time this hashtag was used"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020611564147966296)  2026-02-08T21:31Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"You could always mine blocks full of OP_RETURNs not just 100kb but 1MB. The only thing the relay limit did was ensure that only miners with private channels or preferential peering ever saw them thus centralizing properties. That's not a spam defense: it's a miner-cartel subsidy. Removing the relay limit doesn't create a new capability. It removes an information asymmetry and fixes a malincentive. Now everyone sees the same transactions which reduces centralization pressure and levels the field for smaller miners instead of privileging well-connected pools. Why remove the limit entirely"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020816579433218065)  2026-02-09T11:06Z [----] followers, 11.7K engagements


"@CryptoEpstein @Truthcoin @LayerTwoLabs @otaliptus Anymore or any more 😂"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020829722255741126)  2026-02-09T11:58Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"BIP110 is already being bypassed by spammers before it's even live. See @peterktodd et al. If it activates at the end of August I'd guarantee you'll see spam in the very first blocks - within minutes not days. The idea that we should then rush yet another half-baked soft fork immediately after the last one just to fix behavior that has already adapted is so deeply ironic because at that point you're not defending Bitcoin from Ethereum-style governance no you're literally reenacting it. Difficulty bombs emergency forks and reactive rule-tweaks are exactly the pattern we all want to avoid not"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020867806166659153)  2026-02-09T14:30Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@elbrandonmartin @maxkeiser @Bitcoinbeach"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020964900017930421)  2026-02-09T20:55Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@BtcCuracao @KLoaec @lianabitcoin Yes magnitude translates to amount spending limits. If you ever used @COLDCARDwallet ckbunker it's similar but sigbash supports musig2 so your keys aggregate and everything looks like a single signature spend. It's seriously very cool"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020988267139600465)  2026-02-09T22:28Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Sweet summer child a market doesn't need majority approval. Everyone claims to hate Nickelback they get mocked endlessly yet they keep touring profitably. Why Because a small uncool minority is still willing to buy tickets. That's all a market needs. Markets don't ask who's popular or approved. They ask who's paying. Ordinals are down because they're a shit store of value - not because Luke furrowed his brow and mechanic stomped his feet. If anything people suffering from ordinal derangement syndrome probably prolonged their relevance by gifting them free attention long after the market"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021211404896764191)  2026-02-10T13:15Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@w_s_bitcoin someone should do a PR and replace that domain with http://bip110.com http://bip110.com"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021313613428932970)  2026-02-10T20:01Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@Polymarket Saved you a click: it's full of lockheed martin raytheon and rheinmetall"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021343627046424618)  2026-02-10T22:00Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"BIPS don't lie NEW: Shakira visits the Bitcoin Hardware Store in El Salvador https://t.co/dY1tnZ9pqn NEW: Shakira visits the Bitcoin Hardware Store in El Salvador https://t.co/dY1tnZ9pqn"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021360812800332286)  2026-02-10T23:09Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I stand with @BTCPrague for having @peterktodd as a speaker. I disagree with him on many things but hes one of the earliest OG Bitcoin cypherpunks and has left a real mark on Bitcoin (RBF Libre Relay). He lives on a Bitcoin standard and still does actual cypherpunk shit - not just arguing online but putting skin in the game even going into an active war zone and financially supporting a country he believes in. He writes code and doesnt ask for permission (he might ask for payment though). Designing ways to attack Bitcoin does not make someone an enemy of Bitcoin. Quite the opposite. Bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021544182708310051)  2026-02-11T11:17Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@bitcoin_eagle @BTCPrague @peterktodd Demurrage and tail emissions"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021551047081341120)  2026-02-11T11:45Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@MrHodl @bitcoin_eagle @BTCPrague @peterktodd He also doesn't use twitter in dark mode but in retina burning light mode. He is stupid sometimes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021554564101468284)  2026-02-11T11:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@DustinWindSpiel @NikoJilch Schreib mir mal eine email Chris @ bitsurance eu & ich schicke dir die allgemeinen Versicherungsbedingungen"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021556662356865215)  2026-02-11T12:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@SatsAndSports @bitcoin_eagle @BTCPrague @peterktodd My faith in the free market is unshaken and i don't foresee a security budget problem that needs to be addressed before it potentially arrives"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021563084947788274)  2026-02-11T12:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@MrHodl @peterktodd @bitcoin_eagle @BTCPrague Now kiss. You both disgust me equally"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021566381616156776)  2026-02-11T12:45Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@brian_trollz @cbspears @udiWertheimer Udi coming for your Robux"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021656582631928112)  2026-02-11T18:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@_pretyflaco @BitsagaRob @BTCPrague @peterktodd The context is the cancel mob under the OP Or what do you mean"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021672507762167874)  2026-02-11T19:47Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Yes I'm aware he's an edgelord with some genuinely awful opinions. That said I don't think cancel mobs are a good thing - especially when he's invited for his Bitcoin expertise and his ability to clearly articulate technical ideas not for his nihilistic takes. From what I could tell when I wrote that the opposition seemed driven far more by BIP110 protocol politics than by his irrelevant impotent warmongering fantasies. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021686959857672274 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2021686959857672274"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021686959857672274)  2026-02-11T20:45Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Nein. Es geht nicht darum Fehler zu belohnen". Die Bitcoin-Versicherung greift nicht statt guter Selbstverwahrung sondern dort wo selbst korrekt umgesetzte Best Practices versagen. Sie ist der letzte Baustein einer Sicherheitsarchitektur nicht der erste. Zwei echte Praxisbeispiele trotz normaler Seed-Aufbewahrung: [--]. Totalverlust durch physische Zerstrung Du machst alles richtig: Hardware-Wallet PIN Steel-Backup. Dann: Wohnungsbrand oder Wasserschaden. SD-Karte Hardware-Wallet zerstrt und das Steel-Backup ist im Schutt nicht mehr auffindbar. Also kein Bedienfehler kein Leichtsinn - trotzdem"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021689193487843793)  2026-02-11T20:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@theonevortex @TheGuySwann He's read more about bitcoin than anyone you know. He never said he understood it 🤭"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021691881701224873)  2026-02-11T21:04Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@hodlonaut @murchandamus What's your great and honest take on my observation that Bitcoin development should be based on merit not majority The latter being so easily gameable"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021699116770664886)  2026-02-11T21:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@DustinWindSpiel @NikoJilch Wenn ich unter Gewalt gezwungen werde PIN oder Seed preiszugeben wo zieht ihr die Grenze wann es ein versichertes Restrisiko ist und wann Recovery mglich Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob ich das richtig verstehe was meinst du mit versichertes Restrisiko"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021704903127658934)  2026-02-11T21:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@w_s_bitcoin @hodlonaut He obviously knows that. Let the man chase his twitter payout by farming engagement"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021712868488438257)  2026-02-11T22:28Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Wir entscheiden das nicht kryptographisch sondern versicherungslogisch wie bei jeder anderen Valoren- oder Raubversicherung auch. Der Leistungsfall ist das versicherte Ereignis nicht der Schlsselzustand Der Schaden entsteht durch Raub Erpressung Feuer etc. nicht dadurch ob es theoretisch noch einen Seed gegeben haben knnte. Versicherungen verlangen keinen Negativbeweis ber nicht existente Schlssel das wre gar nicht mglich. Schadensminderung ist kein Beweiszwang sondern ein Anreizmechanismus Die Schadensminderungspflicht dient deinem eigenen Interesse: Kannst du noch sweepen du behltst den"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021746504852009288)  2026-02-12T00:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@newenglander86 @vxunderground I believe you mean Graphene OS they are not related"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021895509145686279)  2026-02-12T10:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@hodlviking @adam3us @CHAINBREAKER020 @hodlonaut Can you steelman my invalid argument"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021947653253107916)  2026-02-12T14:01Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@21Bitfluencers @_jklnz What a fun conversation with Jol"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021952702843105605)  2026-02-12T14:21Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@hodlonaut It was not a controversial change amongst contributors. These decisions are based on merit not majority. Otherwise Roger or Cregs sockpuppets could easily brigade and affect change in the repo makes sense right https://x.com/murchandamus/status/1990157437199057004s=20 @gfydumbass @zndtoshi Where did you count a 80% NACK rate If I count everyone I get: - [--] ACKs - [--] stale ACK - [--] Concept ACKs - [--] Concept NACKs If I count contributors (highlighted) I count: - [--] ACKs - [--] concept ACKs - [--] concept NACK. Are you looking at the right PR https://t.co/SUFxttOPY0 https://t.co/8ELOJEOEt9"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021975182177710272)  2026-02-12T15:50Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@alpacasw @hodlviking @adam3us @CHAINBREAKER020 @hodlonaut"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021988515454849475)  2026-02-12T16:43Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"But Core literally fired slipstream and neutralized MARA's edge and leveled the playing field via this relay policy change. Everything more efficient would require a soft fork. And so far no soft fork proposal has demonstrated that it can both prevent the targeted behavior and avoid unnecessary collateral damage. The ones floated either fail to achieve their stated goal and additionally risk constraining legitimate generic scripting in the process. These changes shouldn't be rushed. If the only options on the table are brittle cat-and-mouse rules that are trivially worked around while"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022005294289621316)  2026-02-12T17:50Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@CTBon5 @adam3us @hodlviking @CHAINBREAKER020 @hodlonaut Incentives. https://x.com/i/status/2022007354619773243 @ndeet @hodlonaut @adam3us @PortlandHODL The limit was removed based on a simple economic premise: beyond a certain size OP_RETURN is no longer the cheapest way to embed data. If cheaper alternatives exist rational actors will gravitate toward them. That means any potential abuse remains naturally bounded by https://x.com/i/status/2022007354619773243 @ndeet @hodlonaut @adam3us @PortlandHODL The limit was removed based on a simple economic premise: beyond a certain size OP_RETURN is"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022008731798786119)  2026-02-12T18:03Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@PraveenPerera @hodlonaut See you are free to use the bitcoin maintained by the lowest common denominator I like my bitcoin maintained by people smarter than myself. See you on the Guida Chris Grug chain 👋"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022019101930184839)  2026-02-12T18:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"It's very much a related point but here it is again more slowly: So enlighten me - how exactly do you propose to gauge consensus if not through known contributors staking their reputation or through users and businesses voting with their wallets Anything that doesn't require skin in the game or reputational cost is trivially sybilable. Anonymous signaling mechanisms without economic weight prove nothing. And unless I missed something Guida has been an outspoken proponent of the soft fork. Has that changed https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022025412747186560"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022025412747186560)  2026-02-12T19:10Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Relay policy is not consensus. Anyone can adjust their nodes' relay defaults as they see fit that's precisely the point. Policy is local and voluntary. you are free to set defaults however you may please or update at your own volition. What is a different category entirely is attempting a miner-activated soft fork at a 55% threshold after vibecoded testing breaking hooks and scripting and potentially even breaking consensus. That's not routine policy tuning but rushed governance of the base layer 😬 A softfork should receive more scrutiny and should definitely not have an activation height"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022062687719391277)  2026-02-12T21:38Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"I agree that it should be based on merit. But I strongly disagree that "financial independence" should be a prerequisite. First under that standard someone like Luke wouldn't qualify anymore which already shows how arbitrary that filter becomes. Second Bitcoin is for anyone capable of contributing. There will always be talented maintainers some not even born yet who aren't independently wealthy and didnt have the luxury of stacking sub-$100k coins. Where funding comes from is far less important than how the work is handled. If the code is public peer-reviewed audited and debated in the open"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022063903258054711)  2026-02-12T21:42Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"of all the arguments floating around the "byte contiguity" or "grandma chopping off bytes" angle has to be one of the most regarded ones. It's an almost cartoonish abstraction that ignores how data is actually embedded or used. We're debating real trade-offs in relay policy and incentives not imaginary scenarios. If that's the strongest objection it says more about the argument s fragility than about the proposal itself. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022065957070426418 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022065957070426418"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022065957070426418)  2026-02-12T21:51Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@ndeet @hodlonaut @adam3us @PortlandHODL @ajtowns they were in rough consensus in their annoyment"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022066535800746167)  2026-02-12T21:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@ndeet @hodlonaut @adam3us @PortlandHODL You said core rushed things after i said bip110 is rushed and consensus changes shouldn't be rushed. Core changed solely relay policy. That's why i am bringing this up in this context"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022070772081238326)  2026-02-12T22:10Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@ndeet @hodlonaut @adam3us @PortlandHODL Sure once we have bitcoin kernel"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022072642816410052)  2026-02-12T22:17Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"A malicious actor has been able to embed up to 1MB of contiguous OP_RETURN data for over a decade (shit like this is in the chain already and nobody cares). Relay policy never prevented that in principle and it certainly hasn't prevented arbitrary data from ending up on-chain. You don't just stumble across it either. You have to deliberately extract and decode it and the payloads are XOR-encrypted or otherwise obfuscated. It's not human-readable graffiti sitting in plain sight. Contiguous vs. non-contiguous bytes is a distinction without a difference. If someone wants to embed data they can"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022216937304899733)  2026-02-13T07:51Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@decentmoney2009 @L0RINC Please. They used Claude"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022279757790888381)  2026-02-13T12:00Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Animal Farm and "trust the science" analogies don't really map onto a permissionless system. In Bitcoin no one is compelled to follow anyone else. You can run your own relay policy decline an update switch implementations or fork entirely. That's the point. What you can't do is claim entitlement to other people's voluntary labor and then dictate how they should exercise it. If the claim is that there was broad technical opposition among regular Core contributors that should be easy to demonstrate. So let's be concrete: Name five active non-Luke core contributors who clearly and publicly"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022285853934895534)  2026-02-13T12:24Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"RT @coinjoined: @hodlonaut @giacomozucco [--] hours and [--] minutes. Ladies and Gentleman we got him Consistency is valuable but only when it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022302820041461904)  2026-02-13T13:32Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"From what I've seen the few times a filteroor softened their stance it wasn't because they were logically out-argued - it was because someone they respect reframed it for them. That's the reality of how most people update on highly technical non-intuitive issues: through trust Which is also why so many short-circuited when universally beloved Adam Back took a different view. If your epistemic compass points to people rather than principles that shift feels like betrayal. Better technical discourse from the start would've reduced the reliance on personality proxies. We need better podcasters."  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022307408274473245)  2026-02-13T13:50Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@bitcoin_bugle They are selling dollars for [--] cents over at @predyx_markets"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022313297018569116)  2026-02-13T14:13Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@BTC_commons @stephanlivera one can gage beforehand by looking at things that require skin in the game and are difficult to sybil: i do not see respected companies nor known developers nor serious funding nor any hashrate supporting BIP110"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022664702095167705)  2026-02-14T13:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@theonevortex @djsenior13 @grantmanh @stephanlivera @GrassFedBitcoin @LukeDashjr Core v30 sparks joy BIP110 doesn't spark joy"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022678173637603562)  2026-02-14T14:23Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@djsenior13 @theonevortex @grantmanh @stephanlivera @GrassFedBitcoin @LukeDashjr I did a lean test and hugged my node with v30 and it pulled me in. The knots raspberry pi pushed me away"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022679799550902332)  2026-02-14T14:30Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@steepdawn974 @BitPaine @nic_carter Who is funded by MSTR and Blackrock"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023028142697521329)  2026-02-15T13:34Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@ToneVays Mute and move on and this whole thing blows over end of august when they fork themselves into a minority hashrate chainsplit"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2019742811239710851)  2026-02-06T11:59Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@LayerTwoLabs @Truthcoin @otaliptus You of all people should know: if you are good at something don't do it for free"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020576223249015076)  2026-02-08T19:11Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@hodlonaut No answer whether Core should bend to populism or stick to merit https://x.com/i/status/2022009858183278797 @hodlonaut Rough consensus among known contributors not just everybody with a GitHub account that was spun up a week ago. Otherwise Craig Wright could bot the shit out of the repository and get his way right https://t.co/PESeND2sqd https://x.com/i/status/2022009858183278797 @hodlonaut Rough consensus among known contributors not just everybody with a GitHub account that was spun up a week ago. Otherwise Craig Wright could bot the shit out of the repository and get his way"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022240295304511688)  2026-02-13T09:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Custodial Bitcoin is fine for the beginning any bitcoin exposure is better than no bitcoin exposure. My wallet of choice for onboarding is @blinkbtc. @PhoenixWallet and @BlixtWallet are great but they are more advanced. Should Bitcoin be used as everyday money and if so should we judge people for not doing it in a fully self-custodial way @coinjoined has a great take on this from our recent podcast. Dropping today at 2:35 p.m. CET 🔥 https://t.co/VQOGYQEAHN Should Bitcoin be used as everyday money and if so should we judge people for not doing it in a fully self-custodial way @coinjoined has"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022254670631092722)  2026-02-13T10:20Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"If there isn't a hash-rate majority behind it the chain will split because BIP110 uses a forced activation height and of August Once it activates with only a minority of hash power that fork will produce blocks more slowly than the original chain. Besides the fact that the economic majority will naturally gravitate toward the chain with faster confirmation and deeper security this will also break the core trust assumption of lightning. if your channel counterparty cheats you can broadcast a penalty transaction. That safety model depends on timely inclusion. If you're on a minority fork on a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022262672109056076)  2026-02-13T10:52Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@TheBlueMatt "Matt Corallo long-time Core contributor urges everyone to vibe-code more softfork proposals""  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022289768805999073)  2026-02-13T12:40Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"It doesnt contradict anything. You're conflating two completely different margins. There are two separate questions: Can someone get a transaction mined at all Is the standard relay policy creating a distortion in how they achieve that _The first was never constrained_ Large transactions could always: - be directly submitted to miners - be sent via private relay -be emailed - be injected through custom nodes that preferentially peered with pools - use non-standard policy paths That's why I said a GUI would appear within hours if there were real demand. Capability was never the bottleneck."  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022387705896706281)  2026-02-13T19:09Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@nicolen8wak @bitcoin_hotel 🤔"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022447322181898564)  2026-02-13T23:06Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@Pledditor That's the Ritz Carlton on St. Thomas as was discussed in the emails 🥱"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022739359238140027)  2026-02-14T18:26Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"The focus should be on soft forks that make Bitcoin better money and improve privacy such as CTV CSFS TXHASH or TEMPLATEHASH. Features that expand legitimate Layer-1 utility raise fee pressure organically which is the most reliable way to crowd out spam. Give me your strongest arguments against this position https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023029022741934224 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023029022741934224"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023029022741934224)  2026-02-15T13:37Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@grok @Cipherhoodlum CTV+CSFS or Templatehash"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023034642622988417)  2026-02-15T14:00Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@grok @Cipherhoodlum Giving Bitcoin reactive security and improving Lightning Ark and BitVM"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023035233650790607)  2026-02-15T14:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"BIP110 hasn't exactly "freed developer focus" so far. It's already contributed to one highly respected developer stepping away and it triggered coordinated harassment of contributors across workplaces and GitHub by a loud but technically misguided mob. The good news is that this faction lacks meaningful backing from experienced devs major companies significant hashpower or serious funding. The most likely outcome is that productive builders simply keep shipping and ignore the noise"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023043021718126954)  2026-02-15T14:33Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@BjoernAsser @Bitpanda Du weit dass das nur eine Rolle war"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2020195945968021734)  2026-02-07T18:00Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@cryptoquick Alex is basically the silky johnson of ark protocols"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2021713238572826740)  2026-02-11T22:29Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


""refinance where michael""  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022037152033632617)  2026-02-12T19:56Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@hodlonaut Feels like an day know you'll come to your senses and remove that softfork proposal from your bio 👍"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022235955231641900)  2026-02-13T09:06Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"There's a small nuance between incentivizing something and removing a malincentive. Dropping the relay limit didn't suddenly make OP_RETURN attractive to spammers. It fixed a distortion. By artificially restricting the standard you pushed users who needed reliable timely inclusion toward uglier workarounds - like fake pubkeys or other script constructions that are objectively worse for the UTXO set. Removing the limit corrected that incentive mismatch. It didn't make OP_RETURN cheaper. It didn't make it the most efficient data storage method. In fact it remains more costly than alternatives."  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022268267960639950)  2026-02-13T11:15Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"RT @cbspears: So I went and looked at the "paper" they are referencing and it's just 200+ pages of ai slop trained on bitcoin maxi aphorism"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022284284992626772)  2026-02-13T12:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@hodlonaut @giacomozucco [--] hours and [--] minutes. Ladies and Gentleman we got him Consistency is valuable but only when it's consistency with reality not with ego. Changing your mind in light of new evidence isn't flip-flopping it's a sign of integrity. Thank you Hodlonaut. https://x.com/i/status/2022235955231641900 @hodlonaut Feels like an day know you'll come to your senses and remove that softfork proposal from your bio 👍 https://x.com/i/status/2022235955231641900 @hodlonaut Feels like an day know you'll come to your senses and remove that softfork proposal from your bio 👍"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022302404457210071)  2026-02-13T13:30Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@Okzenz If you are on the fence try syncing v30 right after and see which implementation actually addresses initial block download duration and which is larping"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022633991778824211)  2026-02-14T11:28Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"RT @_jklnz: Here is my episode with @coinjoined Enjoy and find out why insurance people are the next ones to orange pill"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022670641909157900)  2026-02-14T13:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@nopara73 @openclaw Ai created the image but it was prompted by me. You should know me better"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022736313728844028)  2026-02-14T18:14Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"1. CTV has been proposed and publicly scrutinized for years and no critical vulnerability has surfaced despite strong incentives to find one. "Unknown unknowns" cut both ways: you can't quantify unintended consequences of adding a feature but you also can't quantify the consequences of not adding it. Inaction carries risk too. If Bitcoin fails to evolve where it matters it doesn't stay frozen in perfection: it risks stagnating into irrelevance. [--]. Even low-value spam must be paid for in bitcoin. That means attackers must continually acquire a scarce asset that flows to someone who values it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023034121371385972)  2026-02-15T13:58Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@steepdawn974 @BitPaine @nic_carter Picking chaincode out of all of them is hilarious since they are privately funded by their founders two wall street billionaires who are bitcoin developers themselves 😂"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023037331398402386)  2026-02-15T14:11Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Software is excellent at abstracting complexity and making powerful systems usable without requiring users to understand every underlying detail. Ironically one downside for me is that stronger native and reactive protections could reduce HWW and steel backup demand - today my business partly exists because Bitcoin's security model is proactive. That said the real question is: shouldn't we be prioritizing meaningful upgrades like a covenants soft fork that expand Bitcoin's capabilities instead of diverting energy into something like BIP110 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023040119352000750"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023040119352000750)  2026-02-15T14:22Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@boomer_btc @ToneVays @DMND_Sv2 Miner centralization is the biggest looming threat to Bitcoin 💯 agreed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023050329000902906)  2026-02-15T15:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@FunCryptos_ @BitMEXResearch @Truthcoin @rogerkver If Roger says so it must be true. he's long been the gold standard of unimpeachable truth"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023155662616957293)  2026-02-15T22:01Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"We had a good thing you stupid son of a bitch We had the chance to slash the state to build something real. And it was working You could've stayed the course wielded your chainsaw and made history. But no You just had to shill a Solana rugpull. You and your pride and your ego"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/1891392347013108131)  2025-02-17T07:40Z [----] followers, 239.6K engagements


"The limit was removed based on a simple economic premise: beyond a certain size OP_RETURN is no longer the cheapest way to embed data. If cheaper alternatives exist rational actors will gravitate toward them. That means any potential abuse remains naturally bounded by incentives rather than artificial thresholds. And that's exactly what the data shows. As @ajtowns' recent analysis demonstrated OP_RETURN usage did not spike. It represents roughly 0.0016% of transactions - statistically negligible. No explosion. No flood. Just normal fee-driven behavior. If the prediction was that "removing the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022007354619773243)  2026-02-12T17:58Z [----] followers, 10.6K engagements


"This attack vector already existed since [----]. The fee economics haven't changed. If someone believes spammers were previously incapable of sending raw transactions emailing miners or direct submitting large OP_RETURN payloads directly they're seriously underestimating how resourceful (and motivated) these degens are. The barrier was never technical sophistication. If there were meaningful demand a simple GUI for crafting and submitting OP_RETURN transactions would have appeared within hours. The limiting factor isn't capability - it's cost and bitcoin imparts that just fine Jpegs on bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022069459062513955)  2026-02-12T22:05Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I just wish he'd stick to his promise to take a podcast hiatus instead of resurfacing every few weeks to drop his worst takes and vanish again. Bitcoin is fucking open source. You can't fire open-source developers in a permissionless network. If you think the direction is wrong fork it. Ship the code. Implement all the quantum snake oil you want. If BlackRock actually cared they maybe start funding a single competent developer and submit a PR. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022258812539769064 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022258812539769064"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022258812539769064)  2026-02-13T10:37Z [----] followers, 13.1K engagements


"Marco Rubio finding out he has to run BIP110 and rug the spammers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022466221627855222)  2026-02-14T00:21Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Let's do this one point at a time instead of Gish-galloping to the next thing - otherwise this is pointless agreed I'm happy to engage but please engage my rebuttals one by one. You don't have to accept my reasoning but i's appreciate if you at least tried to refute it 1) OP_RETURN is literally the fastest thing to verify and the cheapest to store. If anything heavy abuse of OP_RETURN would be less harmful to node requirements than any of the common workarounds and even regular monetary scripts. So the original claim that BIP110 is needed here to "improve node performance" doesn't apply. 2)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022652192616804846)  2026-02-14T12:40Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I told my @openclaw agent to 'maximize shareholder value' (I own 100%) Woke up to OnlyClaws this morning"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022662868404216136)  2026-02-14T13:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"This should probably be my cover photo @coinjoined @openclaw hey chris is this true or just one of your jokes @coinjoined @openclaw hey chris is this true or just one of your jokes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022739809475629179)  2026-02-14T18:28Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I for one don't think we should break Miniscript upgrade hooks Eltoo BitVM LNHance and similar innovations just because [--] data transactions exist that someone voluntarily overpaid for by 4x especially when they are not even added to the UTXO set. But hey that's just my take Granted the week of the 1st of December was really bad: [--] oversized OP_RETURN outputs inserted [---] kB into the blockchain. For context: a week has about [----] blocks [-------] WU blockspace. So that was about 0.043% of that weeks blockspace. The sky is falling /s https://t.co/ZkqoWFJ6bk Granted the week of the 1st of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022981680152154472)  2026-02-15T10:29Z [----] followers, 28.4K engagements


"@knutsvanholm Thank you for talking to my friend Knut @giacomozucco"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2023358028687216784)  2026-02-16T11:25Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Marco Rubio finding out he has to run BIP110 and rug the spammers"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022466221627855222)  2026-02-14T00:21Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"That damn bitcoin bar. It's hell out there. https://t.co/TZ7cbWwmIG That damn bitcoin bar. It's hell out there. https://t.co/TZ7cbWwmIG"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2023364437239820494)  2026-02-16T11:50Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"That damn bitcoin bar. It's hell out there"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2023201881208889446)  2026-02-16T01:04Z 15.7K followers, [----] engagements


""They say this soft fork has hundreds of supporters Let's take a closer look""  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2023361538242031972)  2026-02-16T11:39Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Versichere Deine Hardware Wallet mit @Bitsurance_ Mit dem Code "AVF" bekommst Du 5% Discount"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2023350746528600517)  2026-02-16T10:56Z 18.6K followers, [---] engagements


"Of course that's your contention. You're a first-time SaaS bear. You just got finished listening to some podcast Dario on Dwarkesh probably. Now you think its the end of white collar work and seat-based pricing is screwed. You're gonna be convinced of that til tomorrow when you get to Something Big is Happening. Then youll install ClawdBot on a Mac Mini vibe code a dashboard on top of a postgres database and say were all just a couple ralph loops away from building a Salesforce competitor. Thats gonna last until next week when you discover context graphs and then you're gonna be talking about"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2023119295425761702)  2026-02-15T19:36Z [----] followers, 253.7K engagements


"Get in loser we're making blind signing irrelevant"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2023080615218958738)  2026-02-15T17:03Z 10.2K followers, [---] engagements


"You're splitting a sentence that only has meaning as a whole. Of course individual operators have reasons for running a node. That's trivially true and not controversial. But that's very different from saying the node itself has an objective purpose that users are obligated to respect. Bitcoin does not encode operator intent into consensus or relay policy nor does it attempt to infer it. What I'm pointing out is: Node operators have _subjective_ motivations and the protocol enforces _objective_ validity rules and users are bound only by the latter. Trying to project one operator's preferences"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2023096776652181816)  2026-02-15T18:07Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"That's unfortunateharassment in any form harms the community and can indeed distract from productive work. If BIP110's backlash is outweighing its benefits prioritizing covenants makes sense for real progress. On hybrids: Maybe test spam curbs via optional node configs first What's your take on community-driven alternatives to formal BIPs https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023043253210058864 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2023043253210058864"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2023043253210058864)  2026-02-15T14:34Z 7.9M followers, [---] engagements


"Hear me out maybe we just have to actually use bitcoin"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022313683200749946)  2026-02-13T14:15Z 14.1K followers, 29.8K engagements


"I for one don't think we should break Miniscript upgrade hooks Eltoo BitVM LNHance and similar innovations just because [--] data transactions exist that someone voluntarily overpaid for by 4x especially when they are not even added to the UTXO set. But hey that's just my take Granted the week of the 1st of December was really bad: [--] oversized OP_RETURN outputs inserted [---] kB into the blockchain. For context: a week has about [----] blocks [-------] WU blockspace. So that was about 0.043% of that weeks blockspace. The sky is falling /s https://t.co/ZkqoWFJ6bk Granted the week of the 1st of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022981680152154472)  2026-02-15T10:29Z [----] followers, 28.4K engagements


"Granted the week of the 1st of December was really bad: [--] oversized OP_RETURN outputs inserted [---] kB into the blockchain. For context: a week has about [----] blocks [-------] WU blockspace. So that was about 0.043% of that weeks blockspace. The sky is falling /s"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022930714002678062)  2026-02-15T07:07Z 21.6K followers, 20.8K engagements


"I got a bit tired of being constantly told that oversized OP_RETURN outputs exploded since the release of Bitcoin Core [----] (2026-10-10). So heres a visualization of the data. 🧵 Ive highlighted OP_RETURN outputs of [--] bytes for better visibility:"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022930707820269670)  2026-02-15T07:07Z 21.6K followers, 13.1K engagements


"@coinjoined @MrHodl @hodlonaut Deal. I was trying to prepare formal everything"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022942779664666949)  2026-02-15T07:55Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"This should probably be my cover photo @coinjoined @openclaw hey chris is this true or just one of your jokes @coinjoined @openclaw hey chris is this true or just one of your jokes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/coinjoined/status/2022739809475629179)  2026-02-14T18:28Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@coinjoined @openclaw hey chris is this true or just one of your jokes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022734780597739658)  2026-02-14T18:08Z 12.3K followers, [----] engagements


"@ndeet @giacomozucco @adam3us @CobraBitcoin @hodlonaut For me the fact that technologically sound v30 change was NOT backtracked after hijack attempts through the FUD campaign was a strong signal Bitcoin is doing well. Bitcoin has to remain permissionless. Everybody is free to develop and run any client. Nobody can coerce others"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022649108465688801)  2026-02-14T12:28Z [---] followers, [---] engagements


"Bitcoin technology is a meritocracy not an Idiocracy. Sorry"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022729041107648883)  2026-02-14T17:45Z 774.1K followers, 93.3K engagements


"Let's do this one point at a time instead of Gish-galloping to the next thing - otherwise this is pointless agreed I'm happy to engage but please engage my rebuttals one by one. You don't have to accept my reasoning but i's appreciate if you at least tried to refute it 1) OP_RETURN is literally the fastest thing to verify and the cheapest to store. If anything heavy abuse of OP_RETURN would be less harmful to node requirements than any of the common workarounds and even regular monetary scripts. So the original claim that BIP110 is needed here to "improve node performance" doesn't apply. 2)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022652192616804846)  2026-02-14T12:40Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"A long car ride + @coinjoined seems like the perfect formula for a great orange pilling session 🍊 💊"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022709670507614354)  2026-02-14T16:29Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"RT @_jklnz: Here is my episode with @coinjoined Enjoy and find out why insurance people are the next ones to orange pill"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022670641909157900)  2026-02-14T13:53Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Here is my episode with @coinjoined Enjoy and find out why insurance people are the next ones to orange pill Memes and jokes are a great way to orange pill people and educate them about Bitcoin 🚀 THE Bitcoin Marketing Podcast episode [--] features the one and only @coinjoined. In his chat with @_jklnz he spoke about his decision to offer an inheritance protection with @seedor_io and https://t.co/pqEjQ9z7q3 Memes and jokes are a great way to orange pill people and educate them about Bitcoin 🚀 THE Bitcoin Marketing Podcast episode [--] features the one and only @coinjoined. In his chat with"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022670474593911193)  2026-02-14T13:53Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Memes and jokes are a great way to orange pill people and educate them about Bitcoin 🚀 THE Bitcoin Marketing Podcast episode [--] features the one and only @coinjoined. In his chat with @_jklnz he spoke about his decision to offer an inheritance protection with @seedor_io and now insurance with @Bitsurance_ But we don't want to spoil too much. Have a look for yourself 👇 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022303495156892128 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2022303495156892128"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022303495156892128)  2026-02-13T13:35Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I told my @openclaw agent to 'maximize shareholder value' (I own 100%) Woke up to OnlyClaws this morning"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022662868404216136)  2026-02-14T13:23Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"hello world Meet JellyAmp stream your jellyfin library and 100k+ live recordings from the internet archive. Open-source. Free forever. http://app.jellyamp.com http://app.jellyamp.com"  
[X Link](https://x.com/anyuser/status/2022655042386567320)  2026-02-14T12:51Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing