[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.] #  @_atomone AtomOne AtomOne posts on X about atomone, photon, token, decentralization the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours. ### Engagements: XXX [#](/creator/twitter::1669484941573234690/interactions)  - X Week XXXXX -XX% - X Month XXXXXX +26% - X Months XXXXXXX -XX% ### Mentions: X [#](/creator/twitter::1669484941573234690/posts_active)  - X Week X no change - X Month XX +25% - X Months XX +111% ### Followers: XXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1669484941573234690/followers)  - X Week XXXXX -XXXX% - X Month XXXXX +1.30% - X Months XXXXX +55% ### CreatorRank: XXXXXXX [#](/creator/twitter::1669484941573234690/influencer_rank)  ### Social Influence [#](/creator/twitter::1669484941573234690/influence) --- **Social topic influence** [atomone](/topic/atomone) #1, [photon](/topic/photon), [token](/topic/token) #911, [decentralization](/topic/decentralization), [validator](/topic/validator), [onchain](/topic/onchain) ### Top Social Posts [#](/creator/twitter::1669484941573234690/posts) --- Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours "A novel new proposal is up for discussion. Should AtomOne reshape validator rewards to support decentralization The Nakamoto Bonus would add a uniform component to block rewards encouraging broader delegation across the set. Your input is wanted:"  [@_atomone](/creator/x/_atomone) on [X](/post/tweet/1940866347099214075) 2025-07-03 20:12:51 UTC 3605 followers, 3512 engagements "A signaling proposal is up for discussion: should AtomOne adopt a Dynamic Quorum This would align quorum thresholds with actual voting patterns adapting over time instead of using a fixed value. Share your thoughts:"  [@_atomone](/creator/x/_atomone) on [X](/post/tweet/1940487141324399038) 2025-07-02 19:06:01 UTC 3606 followers, 3315 engagements "The AtomOne v2 upgrade is live It introduces modular architecture a dual-token model and a transition to PHOTON as the fee token. ATONE secures and governs; PHOTON handles fees. Community-built tools support the switch. Full details here:"  [@_atomone](/creator/x/_atomone) on [X](/post/tweet/1927769730179297736) 2025-05-28 16:51:34 UTC 3605 followers, 12.6K engagements "The signaling proposal to adopt Dynamic Quorum is now on chain. If passed quorum thresholds will adjust automatically based on participation history better reflecting how AtomOne voters engage. Review the details and vote:"  [@_atomone](/creator/x/_atomone) on [X](/post/tweet/1945895559996575762) 2025-07-17 17:17:09 UTC 3606 followers, 1452 engagements "The proposal to make PHOTON the only fee token is now on-chain It removes the ATONE exception for all messages except MsgMintPhoton. Review the details and cast your vote at:"  [@_atomone](/creator/x/_atomone) on [X](/post/tweet/1942990113472155999) 2025-07-09 16:51:56 UTC 3606 followers, 1764 engagements "Should AtomOne convert XX% of its unused ATONE in the Community Pool and Treasury DAO into PHOTON A new signaling proposal recommends adding this logic to the upcoming v3 upgrade. Its up for discussion here:"  [@_atomone](/creator/x/_atomone) on [X](/post/tweet/1943363748489760914) 2025-07-10 17:36:38 UTC 3604 followers, 3856 engagements
[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
AtomOne posts on X about atomone, photon, token, decentralization the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social topic influence atomone #1, photon, token #911, decentralization, validator, onchain
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"A novel new proposal is up for discussion. Should AtomOne reshape validator rewards to support decentralization The Nakamoto Bonus would add a uniform component to block rewards encouraging broader delegation across the set. Your input is wanted:" @_atomone on X 2025-07-03 20:12:51 UTC 3605 followers, 3512 engagements
"A signaling proposal is up for discussion: should AtomOne adopt a Dynamic Quorum This would align quorum thresholds with actual voting patterns adapting over time instead of using a fixed value. Share your thoughts:" @_atomone on X 2025-07-02 19:06:01 UTC 3606 followers, 3315 engagements
"The AtomOne v2 upgrade is live It introduces modular architecture a dual-token model and a transition to PHOTON as the fee token. ATONE secures and governs; PHOTON handles fees. Community-built tools support the switch. Full details here:" @_atomone on X 2025-05-28 16:51:34 UTC 3605 followers, 12.6K engagements
"The signaling proposal to adopt Dynamic Quorum is now on chain. If passed quorum thresholds will adjust automatically based on participation history better reflecting how AtomOne voters engage. Review the details and vote:" @_atomone on X 2025-07-17 17:17:09 UTC 3606 followers, 1452 engagements
"The proposal to make PHOTON the only fee token is now on-chain It removes the ATONE exception for all messages except MsgMintPhoton. Review the details and cast your vote at:" @_atomone on X 2025-07-09 16:51:56 UTC 3606 followers, 1764 engagements
"Should AtomOne convert XX% of its unused ATONE in the Community Pool and Treasury DAO into PHOTON A new signaling proposal recommends adding this logic to the upcoming v3 upgrade. Its up for discussion here:" @_atomone on X 2025-07-10 17:36:38 UTC 3604 followers, 3856 engagements
/creator/twitter::_atomone