# ![@TheCryptoEscape Avatar](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:26/cr:twitter::270917683.png) @TheCryptoEscape Steve McQueen

The creator of Qubic, cfb, is generating significant interest and discussion in the crypto community with his ambitious plans and statements. Cfb's intentions to use Qubic to mine other cryptocurrencies, such as Dogecoin, and potentially gain significant control over their networks, have sparked debate and curiosity. The community is also speculating about cfb's identity and potential connection to Satoshi Nakamoto, the creator of Bitcoin.

### Engagements: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::270917683/interactions)
![Engagements Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::270917683/c:line/m:interactions.svg)

- [--] Week [------] -17%
- [--] Month [-------] +13%
- [--] Months [-------] +6.70%
- [--] Year [---------] -61%

### Mentions: [--] [#](/creator/twitter::270917683/posts_active)
![Mentions Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::270917683/c:line/m:posts_active.svg)

- [--] Week [--] -49%
- [--] Month [---] +22%
- [--] Months [---] +67%
- [--] Year [---] -55%

### Followers: [-----] [#](/creator/twitter::270917683/followers)
![Followers Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::270917683/c:line/m:followers.svg)

- [--] Week [-----] -0.09%
- [--] Month [-----] +0.13%
- [--] Months [-----] +6.30%
- [--] Year [-----] +21%

### CreatorRank: [---------] [#](/creator/twitter::270917683/influencer_rank)
![CreatorRank Line Chart](https://lunarcrush.com/gi/w:600/cr:twitter::270917683/c:line/m:influencer_rank.svg)

### Social Influence

**Social category influence**
[cryptocurrencies](/list/cryptocurrencies)  82% [finance](/list/finance)  22% [technology brands](/list/technology-brands)  8% [stocks](/list/stocks)  4% [fashion brands](/list/fashion-brands)  2%

**Social topic influence**
[$qubic](/topic/$qubic) #113, [in the](/topic/in-the) 20%, [the project](/topic/the-project) 12%, [ai](/topic/ai) 11%, [certik](/topic/certik) 11%, [$doge](/topic/$doge) 10%, [posts](/topic/posts) 10%, [crypto](/topic/crypto) 8%, [if you](/topic/if-you) 8%, [the first](/topic/the-first) 7%

**Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by**
[@cfb](/creator/undefined) [@retrodrive1](/creator/undefined) [@0xkovuh](/creator/undefined) [@samsonofla](/creator/undefined) [@cptjeanfleury](/creator/undefined) [@rokstraus](/creator/undefined) [@qubic](/creator/undefined) [@eincrypt](/creator/undefined) [@theone1whosees](/creator/undefined) [@airdrop85042313](/creator/undefined) [@markcrypto8](/creator/undefined) [@losaahead](/creator/undefined) [@vivancosdavid](/creator/undefined) [@traderlonewolf](/creator/undefined) [@elitebreedss](/creator/undefined) [@my20022cents](/creator/undefined) [@june_22](/creator/undefined) [@cryptotwi1](/creator/undefined) [@15ubicbaby](/creator/undefined) [@ervinbeg1](/creator/undefined)

**Top assets mentioned**
[Qubic (QUBIC)](/topic/$qubic) [Dogecoin (DOGE)](/topic/$doge) [Bitcoin (BTC)](/topic/$btc) [Monero (XMR)](/topic/$xmr) [XRP (XRP)](/topic/xrp) [Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL)](/topic/$googl) [Ethereum (ETH)](/topic/$eth) [Midnight (NIGHT)](/topic/midnight)
### Top Social Posts
Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"$QUBIC Amazing that the story of $BTC began with the "Genesis" block Genesis is the beginning in the bible And Revelation is the end What a coincidence that the first #Bitcoin address begins with the characters 1A1z The number [--] accompanied by the beginning of the alphabet and the end So the first Bitcoin block begins with the beginning and end of the alphabet Is it just me or is that a crazy coincidence So what comes next @c___f___b Will we get the end of the story with revelation https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014683376444178538 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014683376444178538"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014683376444178538)  2026-01-23T12:55Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"A mindblowing $QUBIC revelation that @c___f___b revealed a few days ago. $QUBIC can give higher rewards for $DOGE mining Meaning that ASICs machines that had become obsolete and unprofitable could be brought back into use to mine $DOGE through $QUBIC On the surface doesn't seem like the biggest revelation ever But when you dig into it this is a really big deal With current competition ASICs miners become obsolete very fast because they can't be upgraded They are still working and capable of mining but unfortunately they cost more to run than the amount they can mine So this results in ASIC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2016134273346986288)  2026-01-27T13:00Z [----] followers, 14.4K engagements


"It is an exciting time in the $QUBIC world Basically very little excitement has happened for the average $QUBIC investor since early Autumn last year During that time $QUBIC's name was on everyone's lips and it looked like it was time for it to take off and become a top crypto project But then it seemed like CfB took his foot off the peddle (intentionally) and since then we have hit a price death spiral Now we are very close to the completion of oracle machines and $DOGE mining Why am I excited by this Because this is endgame time No more waiting around No typical crypto investor behaviour"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018674824944468400)  2026-02-03T13:15Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"As some of you may know @rok_straus got a lot of his $QUBIC stolen I really feel for anyone that has this happen to them There is an address in the below post that you can donate and help him recover some of his $QUBIC funds Rolling with the punches Godspeed @rok_straus and cheers to @ervinbeg1 leading the charge to help recover some value for his comrade If you want to pitch in here is the donation wallet: QXOWYEFZWRFHXCJTQLJWRRTJKDZADETLWRZCABJHUECTCOLAACGSPJVCFMGB every bit counts 👊 The Rolling with the punches Godspeed @rok_straus and cheers to @ervinbeg1 leading the charge to help"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018678660060889326)  2026-02-03T13:31Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Centralized AGI might be this close But Qubic is as far as I'm aware the leader in decentralized AGI That is a big difference Money existed for long time before $BTC But Bitcoin was massive because it was the first decentralised currency In the same manner $QUBIC doesn't have to be first in terms of AI it just needs to be the first in decentralized AGI And as far as I'm aware it is the only crypto project built for this https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018735235190370498 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018735235190370498"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018735235190370498)  2026-02-03T17:16Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Yes I did but basically we are still in that $XMR situation that I discussed back then I said then that $XMR mining would need to be the catalyst that gets $QUBIC moving And it worked beautifully but then for some reason they didn't really push it (most likely because other project elements like OM were not ready) I thought they would move straight from $XMR to $DOGE and gradually grow but things stalled Basically it is still the same situation from $XMR time but there was a long stretch period Now I believe that $DOGE mining and [----] is the last hurdle. If it doesn't happen with $DOGE I find"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018736954922184797)  2026-02-03T17:22Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"That isn't true for $XRP completely because transactions happen so fast that liquidity can maintain Still probably if most of the world is underpinned by $XRP it could happen In terms of $QUBIC it is more realistic what I'm saying It is just maths the more miners that come to the network the more the mining rewards are diluted between them meaning they will receive less and less $QUBIC So to attract new miners the price of each $QUBIC needs to be higher It doesn't mean it definitely will be higher It just means that it definitely has to be higher to have more miners Also worth noting that"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018738225322377227)  2026-02-03T17:27Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@Eincrypt @c___f___b If $QUBIC price goes up Miners will come To attract miners it needs to be more profitable to mine $QUBIC than $DOGE"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018738401915047979)  2026-02-03T17:28Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@theone1whosees @c___f___b More mining power means more dollars for anyone holding $QUBIC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018738532689264675)  2026-02-03T17:29Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Oh yeah market performance matters But if $QUBIC is still coupled with $BTC price action completely all through [----] then it means it isn't working It would need to out perform $BTC and most other alts I don't have set dates but basically I'm thinking I'll judge it by Autumn [----] It needs to be at the very least breaking into the top [---] or top [--] and showing clear progress week-by-week Hard to 100% say how I will judge it but I guess the main thing is seeing that it is growing in market cap on a week by week basis https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2018739589477814752"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018739589477814752)  2026-02-03T17:33Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@Airdrop85042313 Yes overall success would depend on this I suppose But still we would need to see the market cap of $QUBIC decouple from typical cryptos even during a bear"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018983821585064288)  2026-02-04T09:43Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"The issue is that Google Anthropic OpenAI and xAI appear to be very far ahead on the wrong path And when it comes to decentralized AI they aren't even on a path So even if they achieved AI before $QUBIC they still would only be centralized AI Similar to how money existed for a long long time before Bitcoin But still Bitcoin was a revolutionary development https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019075938512744820 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019075938512744820"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2019075938512744820)  2026-02-04T15:49Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@markcrypto8 @c___f___b Interestingly for something like $QUBIC's AI models I don't think there is any data/knowledge provided foundationally"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2019365618647200150)  2026-02-05T11:00Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"As I said at the end the current issue is that users end up holding the bag And yes burning doesn't impact price but it prevents excessive inflation And yes demand needs to grow It is very possible we see it with many projects or many companies (any sustainable inflationary project like $ETH or $XRP and any stock issuance company) I know it is possible and the economic model can work and it is a very clever model if it can be made work correctly But I agree currently the main issue is that holders have been exit liquidity https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019417442951332051"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2019417442951332051)  2026-02-05T14:26Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"As I said at the end the current issue is that users end up holding the bag And yes burning doesn't impact price but it prevents excessive inflation And yes demand needs to grow It is very possible we see it with many projects or many companies (any sustainable inflationary project like $ETH or $XRP and any stock issuance company) I know it is possible and the economic model can work and it is a very clever model if it can be made work correctly But I agree currently the main issue is that holders have been exit liquidity https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2019417592662786126"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2019417592662786126)  2026-02-05T14:27Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"A lot of interesting people are now pointing to the bottom being hit and a run coming for crypto over the next couple of weeks But also seem to be indicating that there will be a massive black swan event soon after that will wipe markets out (cyber attack possibly) I have no idea how true it is But I'm stacking as much as I can now and I will definitely be selling some crypto if there is a lift off"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2019676149559738756)  2026-02-06T07:34Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"What a wild day for $QUBIC yesterday This news went mostly under the radar For basically [--] hours straight $QUBIC controlled over 51% of the $XMR hashrate For large parts of the day they were controlling 80% to 90% of the total hashrate $QUBIC was at a market cap of around [--] million at the time while $XMR was at a market cap of around [---] billion Think about that a 65m market cap project basically controlled a [---] billion market cap project for [--] hours If they wanted to $QUBIC could have completed double-spends revealed who was behind private transactions and a range of other security"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2019737956961976785)  2026-02-06T11:40Z [----] followers, 20K engagements


"I know $QUBIC is at a scary price right now But the underlying tech hasn't changed and it still holds that potential No financial advice But in my opinion $QUBIC is at an insane price right now Able to pick up a billion for under $600 If $QUBIC works even close to as planned that billion could be worth a lot The downside is that $QUBIC could fail and death spiral from here. anything is possible But if only losing $600 is your downside that isn't bad considering the potential upside https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001935544129831090 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2001935544129831090"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2001935544129831090)  2025-12-19T08:40Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I finally see how $QUBIC could potentially hit 51% hashrate on $DOGE Or at least hit a significant hashrate If possible it is incredible and a work of genius 👇 A mindblowing $QUBIC revelation that @c___f___b revealed a few days ago. $QUBIC can give higher rewards for $DOGE mining Meaning that ASICs machines that had become obsolete and unprofitable could be brought back into use to mine $DOGE through $QUBIC On the surface doesn't https://t.co/NI0Oqu0pHr A mindblowing $QUBIC revelation that @c___f___b revealed a few days ago. $QUBIC can give higher rewards for $DOGE mining Meaning that ASICs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2016164543337201971)  2026-01-27T15:01Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"$QUBIC: I'm far from a skilled trader I'm a basic hodler But the more I stay in these markets the more I think I understand the sort of psy-ops that happen The question on everyone's lips is "will we get an alt-season" In some respects it is untrue to say we haven't had an altseason. there were definitely times that alts were performing very well but it has been very poor for over a year now You can see the posters drying up on social media You can see the negativity in project communities And we are seeing some projects collapse and fail While $GOLD and Silver pump in there biggest bull runs"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2016979841262961040)  2026-01-29T21:00Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I've seen quite a few people quote the below @c___f___b post about $QUBIC and say it is very bearish Basically their logic is that CfB doesn't know if AGI is possible so he doesn't really know if $QUBIC will work out I don't think those people have quite thought this through Yes it is an admission from CfB that AGI might not be possible currently and Aigarth/Qubic might fail on its path in the short term But the big picture of what he is saying here is: "We are going to get all the mining power we possibly can and direct it towards Aigarth to see if AGI can be created" That means that CfB"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018706543274020936)  2026-02-03T15:22Z [----] followers, 10.3K engagements


"Wise words related to $QUBIC and big corporations AI development What many don't realize is most of those companies are losing a lot of money with their LLMs (Chat GPT etc) But they are propping themselves up by getting investment from chip manufacturers (Nvidia Amazon etc) The AI bubble that exists currently because it is mind blowing and it surely will collapse at some point LLM creators are losing money but they get huge investments from chip manufacturers The investment includes an agreement that the LLM creator will purchase a set amount of chips from the chip manufacturer So you end up"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2019365317462434204)  2026-02-05T10:59Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"People have since corrected me that $QUBIC did not achieve the super high hashrate results on $XMR mining that I shared in the below post My only question about this is if the hashrate was just a glitch why is that glitch also reflected on the Monero Mining stats websites If you go to this website for example: You can clearly see that on Thursday $QUBIC was dominating $XMR hashrate So was this Monero website and others reporting incorrectly Seems unlikely Forgive my ignorance here looking for some education on how this was possible. https://miningpoolstats.stream/monero What a wild day for"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2020198776254697656)  2026-02-07T18:11Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Really interesting to read about $QUBIC's evolving governance model Many look at some of the disruption in the $QUBIC community and ask "why doesn't @c___f___b step in and fix these issues" They see funds that appear to be misspent They see community fallouts They see many governance issues Personally I think CfB's lack of intervention issues isn't a flaw it is a feature of his plan for $QUBIC I find it hard to believe that a guy who was clever enough to build a project like $QUBIC doesn't understand the intricacies of governance etc. I think it is much more likely that he is very much aware"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2020851361705795947)  2026-02-09T13:24Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@MantisMiner They have created some sort of middleware (or not sure how you would term it) that makes listing the native token far easier"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2012200558933704954)  2026-01-16T16:29Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"There are no guarantees with what $QUBIC is building in terms of AI It is an experimental path and that means there are no guaranteed results But I think these posts and developments by @VivancosDavid are being overlooked and in some sections even mocked and ridiculed From my (admittedly not very knowledgeable) perspective I'm seeing groundwork being laid for AI to be tested and inhabited in a way that can be presented to the scientific community We will have to see how it plays out because right now we are only seeing some visuals and theoretical papers But CfB was eager to get the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2012430317974331495)  2026-01-17T07:42Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"2026 needs to be THE year for $QUBIC and it all begins with $DOGE mining If $DOGE mining goes the way of $XMR mining with a initial pump and then a collapse. I don't see what the plan is from there This needs to be the thing that sets the project off If it isn't. I'm not sure where we go next CfB always laid out the plan and it ended with Oracle Machines Outsourced Computations and finally Aigarth [----] is the year where we will see Oracle Machines and Outsourced Computations so it also has to be the time that we see $QUBIC climb to a high rank as a cryptocurrency ranked by market cap If it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2012994960161730732)  2026-01-18T21:06Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@isamu3l Whatever you think about them I challenge you to read through those blog posts from over a year ago with an open mind And in most cases I think you will read the words of people trying to improve $QUBIC and not being listened to"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013002864059191646)  2026-01-18T21:37Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I guess that is why they are angry now But I don't really care about that What I care about is those posts and the facts are that they discussed some important key topics that were never addressed at the time by SteCo We didn't know if they were right at the time but with the power of hindsight we can see they were https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013003265672155469 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013003265672155469"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013003265672155469)  2026-01-18T21:39Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Key points in the $QUBIC post below I'm still super positive on $QUBIC but [----] is the year where the project either makes it or doesn't and $DOGE mining is the first part of that And love or hate Valis we only have to use the power of hindsight to see that they were correct about many things Admitting they were right about things doesn't mean you have to like them or agree with them on everything but you have to give credit where it is due It just means you are viewing things with an open mind Over a year ago when I first became interested in crypto and discovered $QUBIC I understood very"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013004655509319696)  2026-01-18T21:44Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"The posts I shared above are from a time when Valis was the main builder on the $Qubic network If you read them you will see they were mostly concentrated on improving the network They weren't allowed make those changes and since then $QUBIC teams didn't work on core progress The details that they share in the posts above about $QUBIC TPS stands true today It has insane TPS potential on a one-to-one basis but that hasn't been realized Valis turned bitter after most of these blog posts were made Love them or hate them I don't care I'm not particularly fond of them since they branded me a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013190511016767708)  2026-01-19T10:03Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"I don't believe for a second that CfB is a scammer I believe he has built something that can succeed and be massive I believe in CfB and $QUBIC But I think some people who worked on $QUBIC were more interested in short term gain than actually making $QUBIC work It probably won't matter in the long run and CfB will do his thing But definitely appears many who worked in SteCo and were full of it and didn't care about the longterm progress of the project And it appears Valis were genuine and correct about many things https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013197305529188491"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013197305529188491)  2026-01-19T10:30Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"A thoughtful and honest post on $QUBIC 👇 I believe in @c___f___b and what he has built with $QUBIC I don't believe for one second that his intention is to "scam" people. he is building the tech of the future But some of the people who were involved in SteCo were focussed on short term goals and weren't very honest (Talent Nodes is a prime example) I don't particularly like Valis but there is no denying that they were right about many things thinking different is just burying your head in the sand I don't think it will matter in the longterm anyway But I'm not going to be dishonest and hide"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013198277294907879)  2026-01-19T10:34Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@rok_straus The point I'm making here isn't a discussion on Valis But it is pointing out that many of the points they made in these old blog posts were true and never addressed"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013228546261397682)  2026-01-19T12:34Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I believe it can run the one-to-one TPS The only issue that I have is with the marketing suggesting that it has achieved [----] million TPS in one-to-one when that is untrue Currently it is probably under [----] TPS in this scenario I believe in $QUBIC and CfB and I always share the good news and potential. But I'm not going to be dishonest when I see an area that I think isn't quite right. https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013229152007065674 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013229152007065674"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013229152007065674)  2026-01-19T12:36Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@0xKovuh @c___f___b This is the thing with all POW and POS though They have to create price action to secure the network (exit liquidity for miners incentives to stake) So I don't think it is particularly bad for $QUBIC I think it is just how a network works"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013232448276934687)  2026-01-19T12:49Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I don't mean to promote any company What I'm saying is that I read through their blog posts and with hindsight and improved knowledge I can see that they had a lot of good points at the time And they were (in my opinion) correct at that time about some mismanagement of $QUBIC's progress and marketing"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013235683427574263)  2026-01-19T13:02Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"I learned that they did get that score but the result was not close to being in line with the Certik score and that is why it was never shared I'm not saying that for FUD it just appears to be the truth $QUBIC is capable of [--] million+ TPS even Valis admitted that so it can achieve something exceptional that hasn't been seen before The part that doesn't sit right with me is lying or misrepresenting the [--] million TPS result to make it appear that it is the same as the one-to-one results achieved by a chain like $KAS It is unfair to other chains and to investors to misrepresent that score"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013239281167315168)  2026-01-19T13:17Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I agree $QUBIC is fantastic and I have belief in @c___f___b The problem is that $QUBIC can't hit [----] million transactions per second It is probably around [----] to [----] transactions per second right now So it is completely misleading marketing to say it is at [----] million TPS I believe in $QUBIC and I agree that it can do great things I'm not bitching or complaining about $QUBIC here I'm positive about $QUBIC I'm sharing the truth about something that has been misrepresented If you don't believe me put the Certik test into Chat GPT and ask it some questions yourself"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013254817703936355)  2026-01-19T14:18Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@moonordust8 If you want to know the truth Ask $QUBIC for the result of the Chainspect score It is fine the project is in good hands any way But don't expect me to not point out something like this when I see it"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013255802568511790)  2026-01-19T14:22Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Yes it is true I didn't understand initially But after talking to people involved I learned more about it and queried ChatGPT to understand the paper I also read the comments of the marketing person who worked on it where they confirmed that it didn't measure payment TPS you can see it below So I believe I have a good understanding of it now Two questions for you: [--]. Do you understand it [--]. Why do you think they never released the Chainspect score https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013260076207808901 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013260076207808901"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013260076207808901)  2026-01-19T14:39Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I 100% trust in CfB and I believe he will make $QUBIC a huge success That's not what I'm discussing here I have no issues with CfB or what he is doing My only issue is with misleading marketing and I've called it out and said my piece and I'm moving on to focus on the things $QUBIC is doing well I won't mention TPS again until $QUBIC does a proper test on it https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013260580602143134 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013260580602143134"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013260580602143134)  2026-01-19T14:41Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"If you aren't questioning things and being honest then how can anyone believe anything that you say I believe 99% that CfB is involved in the creation of $BTC and is the ancient whale selling $BTC because I did the research and saw the clear fingerprints At the same time I have done the research on the 15.5m TPS and I believe 100% that it is being misrepresented and for that reason it makes me question the ethics of some team members who know that is untrue https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013267310677537071 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013267310677537071"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013267310677537071)  2026-01-19T15:08Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@Trader_LoneWolf @elitebreedss @retrodrive1 I don't agree and just resort to baby goes out with the bath water mindset I still think $QUBIC will succeed but there has been some negligent actors in there undoubtedly [----] will be a telling year"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013267797095117226)  2026-01-19T15:10Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I have been informed that $DOGE mining isn't coming to $QUBIC this Wednesday This Wednesday will be a change to the Aigarth mining algorithm So please disregard the comment in the below post about $DOGE mining beginning on Wed But the comments on the effect of mining are still relevant and worth reading $QUBIC founder CfB says they will be super busy in [--] days. why Because that is the day $DOGE mining begins. And I believe this is THE catalyst for $QUBIC If $DOGE mining isn't the catalyst I don't know what else will be $DOGE mining (IMHO) is the making or breaking of $QUBIC founder CfB says"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013269113892737361)  2026-01-19T15:15Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@Trader_LoneWolf @elitebreedss @retrodrive1 The good part is that we will find out for sure this year If [----] isn't a big year for $QUBIC then we can basically guess that the mission won't go to plan"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013269295266922664)  2026-01-19T15:16Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@Lie_Lada Do you think this post is misleading to new investors Or how about this blog post https://qubic.org/blog-detail/qubic-sets-a-new-world-record-15-52-million-tps-on-mainnet-certified-by-certik https://x.com/_Qubic_/status/2010699013666795875 CertiK verified [-----] million transactions per second on Qubics live mainnet. This was not a testnet benchmark. Not a simulation. Not a theoretical ceiling. It was measured performance on the production network: [-----] billion transfers processed in [--] minutes. No rollups. No https://t.co/7sa6d021if"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013274861246820840)  2026-01-19T15:38Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Yeah I have no time for Valis they aren't a group I respect But I do respect some of those old articles because they were full of good information at at time when they were more genuine The representation of the Certik audit is very misleading. All marketing makes appear like $QUBIC is the top crypto in terms of one-to-one transactions The truth is that if the Chainspect audit was released we would all have seen that $QUBIC wasn't in the top [---] cryptos (coming in sub [----] tps) But to reiterate a key point is that with development $QUBIC can go to a very high TPS My issue is with"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013276287670927517)  2026-01-19T15:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@samsonofLA And the main issue is that people weren't left to make their own interpretations of the data They were told what to think: https://qubic.org/blog-detail/qubic-sets-a-new-world-record-15-52-million-tps-on-mainnet-certified-by-certik https://qubic.org/blog-detail/qubic-sets-a-new-world-record-15-52-million-tps-on-mainnet-certified-by-certik"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013276540432224763)  2026-01-19T15:45Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@my20022cents @retrodrive1 They achieved this through batched transactions as far as I understand Not using the correct one-to-one standard The chainspect audit tested using the correct standard and the results apparently were poor that is why they weren't released"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013277271382016183)  2026-01-19T15:48Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@my20022cents @retrodrive1 That is fine But still Certik did not test for one-to-one transactions the proof is in the screenshot below which was released by the person who was working with Certik and Chainspect Chainspect was going to test the actual TPS"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013279978540924940)  2026-01-19T15:58Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@DewaPutuGunawa1 Yes I'm still holding $QUBIC and only $QUBIC But I think some areas of the project were mishandled and I think it is illuminating to read back on those old Valis posts"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013548149348933987)  2026-01-20T09:44Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Look if you don't find it misleading to say that $QUBIC has hit [----] million transactions then that is your prerogative But personally I'm not cool with saying something has hit [----] million transactions per second until it has hit that metric in a way that is universally recognized by the industry And the issue I have is that $QUBIC is representing apples as oranges (not me comparing them) Most people reading the [----] million TPS phrase will believe that $QUBIC is outperforming $XRP or Visa by that number which is categorically untrue I don't think it is morally correct and I think it is a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013551002452889722)  2026-01-20T09:55Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"They already applied to Chainspect and underperformed in the test sub [----] and chose not to share that information with the public. The reason I posted is because I found out about this from the source. I'm sure $QUBIC can do great in terms of actual one-to-one TPS performance with some work but right now it isn't performing well. The reason I shouted out Valis is because I read their articles discussing exactly this issue over a year ago and how to fix it. I'm not a fan of Valis but I'm also honest enough to pick out the good and bad in what people say and I can see that they make plenty of"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013552046763319385)  2026-01-20T09:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"😅I'm not dying on a hill I've been on this hill all along I share the truth about projects on my page I'm a $QUBIC investor and someone who believes in the project But I'm not a fan or football supporter who just blindly accepts everything I do my best to tell the truth and inform people even if it isn't the popular opinion That has been the way I have been on my page since day one and will continue to be I'll continue posting the positives about $QUBIC and people can believe me when I post the positives because I will also share the negatives"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013552755957227686)  2026-01-20T10:02Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@samsonofLA By the way I love all the work you do so we can disagree on something and still be cool We both fundamentally believe the same things about $QUBIC and we are both confident on the future of the project So lets agree to focus on that :)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013633085758120179)  2026-01-20T15:21Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"There are quite a few decentralized AI projects in existence as mentioned in the post But none (as far as I'm aware) are focused on providing all that is needed for an AI (i.e. oracles smart contracts computational power from UPOW etc.) I agree it remains to be seen if Qubic is the best chain for an AI but from what I can see it appears to be the first mover and first movers generally win In terms of a centralized entity copying Qubic's code and releasing a decentralized AI network. that would be an insane thing to do. they would give all there power away. no sane centralized AI network would"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013661437671956604)  2026-01-20T17:14Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Yes what I mean is CfB or someone within $QUBIC can copy it onto the $QUBIC network or create something similar would be a more accurate way to put it. They would just need to figure out how it was created and then launch on $QUBIC and voil first decentralized AI It wouldn't work on almost any other chain because they don't have the UPOW element to power the AI (along with many other important elements like feeless oracles and outsourced computations) https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013667169633030393 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013667169633030393"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013667169633030393)  2026-01-20T17:37Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Possibly true But also no matter what centralized AI creations happen they can be copied onto the $QUBIC network And I don't think CfB will be able to deny when an intelligent AI that actually is proven to think is created Right now there is no sign of an intelligent AI as far as I'm aware (although LLMs are great tools) https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013667777890931064 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013667777890931064"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013667777890931064)  2026-01-20T17:39Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@0xKovuh Then he will be able to say look I have created the first decentralized AI mine is the best"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013678247175712786)  2026-01-20T18:21Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@I_Dus They didn't release the report But I know what the result was (secret sources 😉) Pretty much the same as Valis prediction"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014336617398391167)  2026-01-22T13:57Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@alkulana2 @c___f___b I have no concerns to address I believe in the project and I understand the rest of the situation"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014399496273191100)  2026-01-22T18:07Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@retrodrive1 Thanks for the share man I know I'm a pain But I like to have these debates out in the open here so I can learn and other people can learn a bit too I've learned a lot from this and I'm happy with the answers Thanks for your help I'll be making a video on this soon :)"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014683732758651300)  2026-01-23T12:56Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Great to see progress on the $Qubic dApp Quottery Interesting we are only on version 0.2.0 Meaning the first full version still isnt developed This is the beta minimum viable product stage If you don't know what Quottery is. it is a decentralised Betting application built on $Qubic This could be an incredible App if done correctly Oracles pulling real world data on events Smart contracts auto executing when a result happens All full decentralised I'm looking forward to seeing this one progress And I think it could progress very well. Why am I confident that it will progress well Because there"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/1841743348362531114)  2024-10-03T07:33Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Here's [--] reasons why $QUBIC should be absolutely massive and should run well over the next year 👇 #QUBIC @_Qubic_"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/1855218025999290602)  2024-11-09T11:57Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"The result of my ChatGPT experiment today on the probabilities of $QUBIC creator @c___f___b being $BTC creator Satoshi were mindblowing The result of the study: The odds of the address 1CFBdvaiZgZPTZERqnezAtDQJuGHKoHSzg being randomly created on the 13th of January [----] is effectively zeroso small that its astronomically unlikely (about [--] in 10) And ChatGPT confirmed that the odds are extremely high that it was created by Satoshi Nakamoto or someone in his immediate circle You can see the full experiment here: https://chatgpt.com/share/67ab7115-2f8c-800c-86d6-8657d36c876a I just performed a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/1889344870181208380)  2025-02-11T16:04Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Pretty wild to see @IOHK_Charles discussing $QUBIC Interestingly CFB created the first proof of stake with $NXT and he has eluded before that there is a weakness in POS that could be exploited Could $ADA and other POS coins also be attacked by $QUBIC in the future This is another reason we built minotaur for Midnight. Multi-resource consensus ensures checks and balances for the consensus providers using different resources from work to stake. Thus no one attack can take over the network This is another reason we built minotaur for Midnight. Multi-resource consensus ensures checks and balances"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/1955317009287147599)  2025-08-12T17:14Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Big news for $QUBIC it is now far easier for exchanges to list $QUBIC from a technical standpoint Not a time to get overexcited because this doesn't mean that we have any new exchange listings yet But one of the major roadblocks $QUBIC was experiencing in relation to tier [--] listings was the difficulty of integration Basically Qubic's architecture was so unique that it was too much effort for some exchanges to list Now with this update it is very easy for them to integrate Qubic Of course we still need to see some price action for the exchanges take note But when they do They won't be met with"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2011818411823677671)  2026-01-15T15:11Z [----] followers, 12K engagements


"Over a year ago when I first became interested in crypto and discovered $QUBIC I understood very little. Around that time I saw many posts by these guys called Valis and in hindsight I understood very little of what is written in these posts Now over a year on looking back on some of those posts is sobering reading and a cause for eating some humble pie Credit has to be given to Valis there are some excellently written posts with some great ideas to improve $QUBIC and some clear business plans Much of Valis's writings at the time have proved to be prophetic At the time they discussed how"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2012992405503377644)  2026-01-18T20:56Z [----] followers, 17.3K engagements


"I'm afraid you are wrong buddy I have looked into this and I wouldn't make it up That test was a one-to-many test Not a one-to-one test $QUBIC isn't a leader in one-to-one true TPS testing As outlined in that article it could be pushed to number one with proper development But $QUBIC team hasn't done that development from what I see and has instead been dishonest about the metric I'm all about $QUBIC and I believe in it. I'm also not a fan of Valis and they have said some messed up things about me. But there points back then and there points recently about $QUBIC TPS are true from the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013191370136031464)  2026-01-19T10:06Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"@QubicLoyal I don't hold anything but $QUBIC and I still have faith in the project But I don't cherry pick information and bury my head in the sand when I see something isn't being done correctly"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013191658272161986)  2026-01-19T10:07Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I believe that @DeFiMomma might not be aware of some of the issues with the Certik But the score isn't a true reflection of $QUBIC's current tps It was a one-to-many transfer not one-to-one transaction The below clip is from the Certik audit The head of marketing at the time confirmed the same And said that Chainspect score would show the true TPS And I know that the $QUBIC team received the Chainspect score but they never shared it Why Most likely because it showed that $QUBIC's current TPS is below [----] As was originally outlined by Valis The good news is that Valis also noted at the time"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013200184168026423)  2026-01-19T10:41Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I'm not trying to create a toxic vibe I believe in $QUBIC and I think there are many good people killing it on the project but I also think some milked it for all it is worth and built competitors I'm just interested in the truth I don't believe the Certik assessment was fake But I do believe the result is misleading Happy to be proven wrong But the result is presented as one-to-one transactions and is instead one-to-many transfers Am I wrong in this assumption And what was the Chainspect score in that case https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013230736107557005"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013230736107557005)  2026-01-19T12:43Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Yes I trust the Certik audit but I think its presentation is misleading It is presented as a one-to-one transactions score But as far as I'm aware it is actually a one-to-many transfers score You can see this in the snippet from the certification While the marketing manager at the time admitted it The Chainspect review apparently did come but the results weren't anywhere near this [--] million so they weren't shared I believe in $QUBIC and I think it will do fine But if I discover something like this I will share it https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013232122434031836"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013232122434031836)  2026-01-19T12:48Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Just to be clear to people I'm not trying to FUD $QUBIC by asking questions about it or pointing out some things that I believe were untrue The truth is rarely black or white From the day I started this page I said I will always be honest about things as I learn them I'm sure that there are many people doing great jobs with $QUBIC and killing it But I took some time to read some old Valis articles from back in the day and they had some great points I believe that some situations were mishandled maybe it was incompetence but in some scenarios I question this I believe the Certik score is a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013237151039721733)  2026-01-19T13:08Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"People question why I would share a post questioning $QUBIC's TPS or actions of some team members over time (it has nothing to do with PA) I can see it pisses people off that I would say anything regarded as negative about the project But look at this from my POV I have shared all the positives I can about $QUBIC And I believed that it had achieved [--] million TPS in a way comparable to $XRP or Visa So I shared that information publicly with a lot of people But since then I have realized that the information isn't entirely accurate Which means I misled people because I was given wrong"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013248048768352314)  2026-01-19T13:51Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"$QUBIC founder CfB says they will be super busy in [--] days. why Because that is the day $DOGE mining begins. And I believe this is THE catalyst for $QUBIC If $DOGE mining isn't the catalyst I don't know what else will be $DOGE mining (IMHO) is the making or breaking of $QUBIC Why They will mine $DOGE 24/7 and use the CPU power to train ANNA and Aigarth The goal here is to suck up as much mining power as possible The goal is for $QUBIC to become a black hole for miners I guess this will mean that CfB will become very active on X He will do everything he can to incentivize miners over to $QUBIC"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013259274089124334)  2026-01-19T14:36Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"$QUBIC If you aren't honest about the not so good news how can people trust you on the good news I'm 99% confident that CfB was at least involved in $BTC creation and he is enacting a plan that has been in the making for a very long time I'm 100% sure that Certik TPS results were misrepresented I'm super confident on $QUBIC I know it can achieve necessary TPS when required and I think it is capable of doing something epic But I'll still call out the BS when I see it because I am giving honest insights https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2013268511502610569"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013268511502610569)  2026-01-19T15:13Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"TPS is regarded in the industry as Transactions per second So when XRP says [----] TPS or Visa says [----] TPS they are discussing one-to-one transactions by second That is the industry standard they are measuring by Certik did not measure this with $QUBIC They measured the smart contract transfers per second And they didn't do it on a one-to-one basis They did it on a one to many basis Chainspect was then due to run the test on actual TPS and gave $QUBIC their score but the team didn't release it because it was poor You can see this breakdown from the guy who was interacting with Certik and"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013280758568255903)  2026-01-19T16:01Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"I agree that it is a great performance But they haven't been clear about this in marketing This is a recent post by them: And the blog post released at the time: Both state transactions per second and imply that the industry standard one-to-one was used $QUBIC achieved [--] million smart contract transfers per second in a one to many exchange These are very different things But they were represented as the same The 15.5m is an incredible result anyway But the Chainspect score came in at under [----] TPS in one-to-one scenarios That is why it was never released"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013281678664269845)  2026-01-19T16:05Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@rageagainstm No I don't believe it is close to over for $QUBIC I think [----] will be a big year for the project Let's assess in late 2026"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013615864617017422)  2026-01-20T14:13Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@CptJeanFleury @anna_aigarth @VivancosDavid Be patient The mining algo is being updated and when the $DOGE mining starts they will direct the CPU to Anna Let's see how it progresses then [----] is the year we need to see movement"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014274992570040642)  2026-01-22T09:52Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"The below post about $QUBIC ended up being quite an unpopular one 😅 When I write on X it is generally just a random stream of consciousness I usually don't even proof read what I write When I review the below post in hindsight I could definitely have worded some things better I have massive respect for the all the people working hard and developing $QUBIC and for the Qubic community and I don't think I expressed that clearly in the below post. So here is a clearer hopefully better worded explanation of what I was communicating in this post It still isn't for the faint-hearted and it will"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014326613719109967)  2026-01-22T13:17Z [----] followers, 10.9K engagements


"No I'm not basing it on Valis numbers being correct without other information I'm basing on information that I was given that showed the Chainspect score came in at sub [----] TPS I'm not saying $QUBIC marketing are lying but I'm saying that they are misrepresenting the number because it is a one-to-many transaction rather than a one-to-one transaction which is the standard that is used to measure chains They didn't use the correct metric If you don't believe me query the Certik report using a LLM https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014401770840105461"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014401770840105461)  2026-01-22T18:16Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Ok here is a valuable point related to $QUBIC tps shared by CfB that alleviates a lot of the concerns that I had In it he states that the tick space could be expanded to include more transactions if needed This aligns with the statements from @retrodrive1 in this post: So I'll bow out of the conversation and accept that the tech pros know what they are doing and talking about and leave it there https://x.com/retrodrive1/status/1922254809450651821 The below post about $QUBIC ended up being quite an unpopular one 😅 When I write on X it is generally just a random stream of consciousness I"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014425405147509172)  2026-01-22T19:50Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Thanks for the debate I know I'm a pain 😅 When I can't figure something out myself I like to just debate it out in the open and see what comes out of so I can learn a bit and maybe some others can too Anyway I got a really good answer from CfB and learned a lot from this talk Seems $QUBIC could just up the one-to-one tps if needed but there is no reason to do it At this point I have to bow out and say I haven't a clue what I'm talking about but I trust CfB :) https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014684401141957076 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2014684401141957076"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014684401141957076)  2026-01-23T12:59Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"@GottaBeCookie @c___f___b Apparently CPU miners will be training Aigarth I'm not sure how it will work to be honest We will just have to wait and see"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2016461436369698979)  2026-01-28T10:40Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"Nobody has lost money because of me People are grown ups and can make their own decisions I have always shared Qubic as a high potential high risk project I still feel the same about Qubic I think it can be very successful over the next year but I also know it is risky Time will tell"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2017501914125017475)  2026-01-31T07:35Z [----] followers, [--] engagements


"I think $QUBIC's project focus is pretty clear It is transactions smart contracts and AI Everything within blockchain and crypto tech falls under the transaction and smart contract area and the AI is something outside of crypto that $QUBIC is working on $QUBIC appears to have its finger in many pies basically because it is super scalable and efficient beyond any other crypto project So yes DeSci might sound like another area they are focusing on. but the general idea is that the whole world and internet can be built on $QUBIC The goal of $QUBIC is to be what Ethereum was supposed to be (and"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/1859390689907245141)  2024-11-21T00:17Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Wouldn't it be cool if we had some major $QUBIC contributors get their own unique characters in My Last Match Just a thought that could be cool. (definitely not angling to get my own custom made MLM character here 😅) @c___f___b @MyLastMatch"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/1985331723618726124)  2025-11-03T13:02Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I didn't have a lot of spare money over Christmas but I'm happy to have picked up some $QUBIC and some ecosystem projects at great discounts Of course it is risky with a volatile asset like this and it isn't guaranteed But I can't believe you can pick up a project with this much potential for such low prices https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2008228914972254276 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2008228914972254276"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2008228914972254276)  2026-01-05T17:27Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"Something I feel is overlooked about $QUBIC Many people say "Qubic won't achieve AI definitely not before some centralized corporation like Google or Amazon" The part I think people are missing is that $QUBIC doesn't have to be first If a centralized AI is created it won't be long before many replicas are created from many industry leaders That means that this centralized AI could be replicated onto a decentralized network $QUBIC is by far the first mover in terms of decentralized AI it is years ahead of any other competitor as far as I'm aware $QUBIC is designed completely for a"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2013637618018156678)  2026-01-20T15:39Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"$QUBIC it is funny when you look at early Bitcoin addresses and the statement by Satoshi "just by chance I have my initials" Basically they were stating to Hal Finney that they had just thought of an idea that some day in the future that people could brute force create custom addresses They then said that they had their initials at the start of a very early Bitcoin address by complete luck 😅 It always felt to me like this was Satoshi low key trolling Finney He was pretending that he couldn't custom create an address but just coincidentally had his initials in an address Only a few hours"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2014682432109191554)  2026-01-23T12:51Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"I agree it is unlikely they will hit the 51% But until recently I didn't even think they could hit 1% Now I see that they can gather a lot of hash rate And they can pay existing Doge miners more than they currently get paid (so a rational actor should switch) Then if they can get to 34% hash rate they can begin the selfish mining strategy that worked with $XMR A huge hill to climb But I now see there is a path that makes it possible https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2016446029843902713 https://twitter.com/i/web/status/2016446029843902713"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2016446029843902713)  2026-01-28T09:39Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@Lansky_crypto @c___f___b Yeah I don't like that AGI for [----] message. it is just marketing I don't believe it I don't believe any where will get that by 2027"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2018737191850238290)  2026-02-03T17:23Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"Interested in doing your own probability experiment on whether $QUBIC creator @c___f___b is also $BTC creator Satoshi Nakamoto Put each of these questions into ChatGPT: [--]. What is the probability of a Bitcoin address with 1CFB appearing randomly by the 13th of January [----] (within first [--] days of Bitcoin creation) where CFB appears in sequence in the 2nd 3rd and 4th position [--]. What is the probability of this address appearing randomly by the 13th of January [----] when Satoshi emailed Hal Finney mentioning brute forcing Bitcoin addresses and mentioning they had their initials in an address 3."  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/1890139745239310589)  2025-02-13T20:43Z [----] followers, 10.4K engagements


"When $QMINE launched on the $QUBIC network I didn't get a chance to grab some Over the holidays with dollar values dipping I finally picked up a bag A lot of the $QUBIC community has a point of view that you either hold $QMINE or $QCAP I hold both 😁😁 I think they are both strong projects and I think it is great to see strong projects develop on the $QUBIC network It was clear from day one that $QCAP was a great idea and now it is fully decentralized $QMINE is a little riskier I guess because it isn't as decentralized And a lot of people appear to not like the $QMINE creator called Eko"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2007183808320229629)  2026-01-02T20:14Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"There is a small war in the $QUBIC ecosystem between $QCAP and $QMINE People seem to be on one side of the fence and completely against the other project I've looked into both of them. And personally I think they are both strong projects $QCAP has been around quite some time and it has a really solid business plan that will be very successful if the $QUBIC ecosystem is successful. It is also completely decentralized now. $QMINE is at an earlier phase but there is a very solid project in place here. I'm especially attracted by the project creator Eko because I believe they have what it takes"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2009296286886084688)  2026-01-08T16:09Z [----] followers, [----] engagements


"So much noise around $QUBIC And I get it people are worried about price action For me this is a time to chill and take stock You can bet on many people with unproven track records But I look at $QUBIC and @c___f___b and I see a project that provably is outstanding and a developer that has a proven track record for innovation I can see CfB posting online about Artificial Intelligence over [--] years ago (screenshot below) I see clear evidence that CfB was one of the very first Bitcoin miners I see the name Qubic in the 4th Bitcoin address I see the the initials CfB at the start of one of the"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2009587606023983362)  2026-01-09T11:26Z [----] followers, [---] engagements


"@A967623278O @CryptoVikng @GtownDiamond You might be right on $QMINE But you undersell $QCAP $QCAP might not earn major returns right now but if $QUBIC gets adoption all those smart contracts will start earning money So the earnings per $QCAP should skyrocket in that case"  
[X Link](https://x.com/TheCryptoEscape/status/2009618579197469041)  2026-01-09T13:29Z [----] followers, [--] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing